TextbookSurgeryIncisional Hernia

Incisional Hernia

Incisional hernia occurs through a previous surgical incision site. It affects approximately 10-15% of laparotomy wounds and is a common late surgical complication.

MRCSPLAB 1UKMLA0 questions

Key Facts

Occurs in 10-15% of laparotomy wounds; up to 23% in emergency laparotomies Risk factors: Wound infection (strongest modifiable factor), obesity, emergency surgery, vertical midline incision, malnutrition, immunosuppression, chronic cough Usually presents as a bulge at the previous incision site, increasing with straining Can cause significant morbidity: Pain, cosmetic concern, bowel obstruction, strangulation Mesh repair (open or laparoscopic) is superior to primary suture repair — recurrence ~10-15% vs ~30-50% Laparoscopic repair: Lower wound infection rate and shorter recovery; recommended by NICE (IPG134) Incarceration and strangulation can occur — same principles as other hernias Prevention: Mass closure of laparotomy (Jenkins rule — suture length:wound length ≥4:1), avoid wound infection

Overview

Key Facts

Incisional hernias are a common and significant complication of abdominal surgery. Prevention through optimal wound closure technique and post-operative care is paramount.

Epidemiology

Affects ~10-15% of all laparotomy wounds. Incidence is higher after emergency surgery (~23%), wound infection (~30%), and obesity. Most develop within 1-3 years of surgery but can present decades later.

Aetiology

Risk factors:

  • Surgical: Wound infection (strongest modifiable factor), vertical midline incision, emergency surgery, re-operation, drain sites
  • Patient: Obesity, malnutrition, diabetes, smoking, chronic cough/COPD, immunosuppression, connective tissue disorders, age >60
  • Technical: Inadequate closure technique, inappropriate suture material

Pathophysiology

  • Failure of fascial healing at the surgical incision site
  • Increased intra-abdominal pressure (obesity, chronic cough, ascites) exacerbates defect
  • Progressive enlargement over time as abdominal contents herniate through the defect
  • Loss of domain: Large hernias → abdominal contents permanently outside abdomen → respiratory compromise, loss of abdominal domain

Clinical Presentation

Typical Presentation

  • Bulge at previous surgical incision, increasing with standing/straining
  • Reducible in most cases
  • May be asymptomatic or cause pain, dragging sensation
  • Cosmetic concern, especially with large hernias

Complications

  • Incarceration → obstruction → strangulation (same spectrum as other hernias)
  • Skin complications over large hernias (ulceration, dermatitis)
  • Respiratory compromise with very large hernias (loss of domain)

Red Flags

  • Tender, irreducible incisional hernia — strangulation
  • Signs of bowel obstruction
  • Overlying skin changes — compromise of contents

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
SeromaFluctuant, non-reducible, post-operative, no cough impulseUS
Wound abscessTender, warm, erythematous, may dischargeUS, blood cultures
Rectus diastasisMidline bulge on sitting up, no fascial defectClinical, CT
Malignant depositHard, non-reducible, growingCT, biopsy
Subcutaneous lipomaSoft, non-tender, no cough impulseClinical

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Clinical examination: Usually diagnostic; examine lying and standing

Imaging

  • CT abdomen: Defines defect size, contents, complications, loss of domain
  • Ultrasound: If clinical uncertainty
  • CT is essential for surgical planning in large or complex hernias

Management

Conservative

  • Watchful waiting: For asymptomatic small hernias in high-risk surgical patients
  • Abdominal binder: Symptomatic relief; does not prevent enlargement or complications
  • Optimise risk factors: Weight loss, smoking cessation, glycaemic control, treat chronic cough

Surgical

  • Mesh repair is superior to primary suture repair
    • Open mesh repair: Onlay, sublay (retromuscular — Rives-Stoppa), or underlay (intraperitoneal)
    • Sublay (retromuscular) placement has lowest recurrence rate
    • Laparoscopic repair (IPOM — intraperitoneal onlay mesh): Lower wound infection, faster recovery; NICE IPG134
  • Component separation: For large hernias with loss of domain — allows tension-free closure
  • Botulinum toxin A: Pre-operative injection to relax lateral abdominal wall muscles → aids closure of large defects (progressive pneumoperitoneum is an alternative)

Emergency

  • Strangulated incisional hernia → emergency surgery, possible bowel resection

Referral Criteria

  • Symptomatic incisional hernia — surgical referral
  • Enlarging hernia — surgical referral
  • Complicated hernia — emergency surgery

Prognosis

  • Mesh repair recurrence: ~10-15% (vs ~30-50% for primary suture repair)
  • Surgical site infection: ~5-10% (mesh-related)
  • Chronic pain: ~5-10% post-repair
  • Loss of domain: Complex surgical challenge; higher morbidity
  • Prevention: Optimal primary wound closure technique is the most effective strategy

Other Relevant Information

Jenkins Rule for Laparotomy Closure

PrincipleDetail
Suture:wound length ratio≥4:1
Suture typeSlowly absorbable (e.g., PDS/looped PDS) or non-absorbable
Bite size≥1cm from wound edge
Stitch interval≤1cm apart
TechniqueMass closure (all layers except skin and peritoneum)
GoalSmall bites technique — reduces incisional hernia rate by ~30% (STITCH trial)