TextbookSurgeryFemoral Hernia

Femoral Hernia

Femoral hernia passes through the femoral canal below and lateral to the pubic tubercle. It has a high strangulation risk (~30%) and requires urgent surgical repair.

MRCSPLAB 1UKMLA0 questions

Key Facts

Accounts for ~5% of all hernias but ~30-40% of emergency hernia repairs due to high strangulation rate More common in women (F:M ~4:1), but inguinal hernias are still more common overall in women Lump below and lateral to pubic tubercle (vs inguinal hernia which is above and medial) High strangulation risk (~30%) — all femoral hernias should be repaired urgently, even if asymptomatic Femoral canal boundaries: Anterior (inguinal ligament), posterior (pectineal ligament/Cooper's), medial (lacunar ligament), lateral (femoral vein) Richter's hernia: Partial circumference of bowel wall trapped — can strangulate without complete obstruction; may lack classic obstruction features Repair: Low (Lockwood), high (McEvedy), or laparoscopic approach; mesh recommended where possible Never attempt to reduce a tender, irreducible femoral hernia — strangulated bowel may be pushed back into the abdomen

Overview

Key Facts

Femoral hernias are less common than inguinal hernias but carry a much higher risk of strangulation. All femoral hernias should be repaired without delay.

Epidemiology

Femoral hernias account for ~5% of all groin hernias. More common in women (F:M ~4:1), elderly, multiparous women. However, inguinal hernias remain the commonest groin hernia in both sexes.

Aetiology

  • Weakness at the femoral ring — below the inguinal ligament, medial to the femoral vein
  • Risk factors: Female sex, multiparity, increased intra-abdominal pressure, previous inguinal hernia repair

Pathophysiology

  • Abdominal contents (usually omentum or bowel) protrude through the femoral ring into the femoral canal
  • Narrow, rigid boundaries of femoral canal (lacunar ligament medially) → high risk of incarceration and strangulation
  • Richter's hernia: Only the antimesenteric border of bowel herniates → can strangulate and perforate without causing classic bowel obstruction

Clinical Presentation

Typical Presentation

  • Small, firm lump in the groin — below and lateral to the pubic tubercle
  • May be difficult to detect clinically, especially in obese patients
  • Often presents as an emergency with incarceration or strangulation

Examination

  • Lump in femoral triangle below the inguinal ligament
  • Non-reducible in many cases
  • No cough impulse (if incarcerated)
  • Distinguish from inguinal hernia by relationship to pubic tubercle

Red Flags

  • Tender, irreducible femoral hernia — strangulation until proven otherwise
  • Signs of bowel obstruction — colicky pain, vomiting, constipation
  • Overlying skin changes (erythema, warmth) — bowel necrosis
  • Richter's hernia — may present with localised peritonitis without frank obstruction

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Inguinal herniaAbove and medial to pubic tubercle, cough impulseClinical
Lymph nodeNon-reducible, rubbery, may be tender if reactiveUS, biopsy
Saphena varixBelow inguinal ligament, compressible, disappears on lyingUS Doppler
Femoral artery aneurysmPulsatile, expandableUS Doppler
Abscess (psoas/groin)Fluctuant, tender, may have feverUS, CT
LipomaSoft, non-tender, subcutaneousClinical

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Clinical examination: Position relative to pubic tubercle is key
  • Examine patient standing and lying

Bloods

  • FBC, CRP, U&Es, lactate: If strangulation/obstruction suspected
  • G&S: Pre-operative

Imaging

  • CT abdomen/pelvis: If diagnostic uncertainty or suspected complication (obstruction, strangulation)
  • Ultrasound: May identify hernia contents and vascularity

Management

Surgical (All Femoral Hernias Should Be Repaired)

Elective:

  • Low (Lockwood/crural) approach: Below inguinal ligament; simple, can be done under local
  • High (McEvedy/preperitoneal) approach: Preferred for emergency; better access for bowel assessment and resection
  • Laparoscopic (TEP/TAPP): Can be performed; offers advantage of bilateral repair
  • Mesh repair where feasible (reduces recurrence)

Emergency:

  • Strangulated femoral hernia = emergency surgery
  • McEvedy approach preferred — allows assessment of bowel viability and resection if needed
  • Do NOT attempt blind reduction — necrotic bowel may be returned to abdomen
  • IV fluids, NG tube if obstructed, IV antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 1.2g)

Referral Criteria

  • All femoral hernias — urgent surgical referral for repair (even if asymptomatic due to high strangulation risk)
  • Suspected strangulation — emergency surgery

Prognosis

  • Strangulation rate: ~30% — significantly higher than inguinal hernias (~1-3%)
  • Emergency repair mortality: ~5-10% (much higher than elective <1%)
  • Recurrence: ~2-5% after mesh repair
  • Bowel resection required: In ~30-40% of emergency femoral hernia repairs
  • Outcomes significantly better with elective repair → all femoral hernias should be repaired promptly

Other Relevant Information

Inguinal vs Femoral Hernia

FeatureInguinalFemoral
Position relative to pubic tubercleAbove and medialBelow and lateral
Sex predominanceMales (12:1)Females (4:1)
Strangulation riskLow (~1-3%)High (~30%)
Enters scrotumIndirect canNever
ManagementElective or watchful waitingAlways repair urgently