Capacity Assessment
Mental capacity assessment under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is a legal and clinical skill requiring assessment of whether a patient can understand, retain, weigh, and communicate a specific decision at a specific time.
Key Facts
- Mental Capacity Act 2005 (England and Wales): legal framework for capacity assessment and best interests decisions
- Capacity is decision-specific and time-specific: a person may have capacity for one decision but not another
- Two-stage test: (1) Does the person have an impairment of, or disturbance in, the functioning of the mind or brain? (2) Does this impairment mean they cannot make the specific decision?
- Four functional criteria: the person must be able to understand, retain, weigh/use, and communicate the information relevant to the decision
- Principle 1: Assume capacity until established otherwise
- Principle 3: An unwise decision does not equal lack of capacity
- If a person lacks capacity, decisions must be made in their best interests (Section 4 MCA 2005)
- IMCA (Independent Mental Capacity Advocate): must be instructed for serious medical treatment decisions or accommodation changes for unbefriended patients
Overview
Key Facts
Capacity assessment is a core clinical skill. All clinicians are responsible for assessing capacity for decisions within their scope of practice. It is a legal requirement under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Epidemiology
- Approximately 2 million adults in England and Wales may lack capacity for some decisions
- Commonly encountered in: dementia, delirium, brain injury, learning disability, severe mental illness, intoxication
- Capacity assessments are performed daily in hospitals, GP practices, and social care settings
Aetiology
Impairment or disturbance of the mind or brain may be caused by:
- Dementia
- Delirium
- Brain injury (stroke, traumatic)
- Learning disability
- Severe mental illness (psychosis, severe depression)
- Intoxication (alcohol, drugs)
- Loss of consciousness
Pathophysiology
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 does not define capacity in pathological terms but in functional terms - it assesses what a person can do with the information relevant to a specific decision, not their diagnosis.
Clinical Presentation
When to Assess Capacity
- When there is reason to doubt capacity for a specific decision
- Before any medical treatment or intervention
- When a patient refuses treatment
- When a patient is making a decision with significant consequences
- When advance care planning
- When considering discharge destination
Five Principles of the MCA 2005
- Assume capacity unless established otherwise
- Support decision-making: take all practicable steps to help the person make their own decision (e.g. timing, location, communication aids, interpreter)
- Unwise decisions are allowed: a person is not to be treated as lacking capacity merely because they make a decision others consider unwise
- Best interests: any act done for a person who lacks capacity must be in their best interests
- Least restrictive option: anything done must be the least restrictive of the person's rights and freedoms
Red Flags
- Clinician assuming lack of capacity based on diagnosis alone (unlawful)
- No documented capacity assessment before proceeding with treatment
- Best interests decision made without consulting relevant people
- Lack of capacity assumed because patient makes an unwise decision
- Restraint used without proper legal framework (DoLS/LPS)
Differential Diagnosis
| Scenario | Capacity Status | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Patient with capacity refuses treatment | Has capacity | Respect decision (even if clinicians disagree) |
| Patient lacks capacity, treatment in best interests | Lacks capacity | Proceed under best interests (MCA Section 4) |
| Patient lacks capacity, valid ADRT exists | Lacks capacity | Respect ADRT (if valid and applicable) |
| Patient lacks capacity, LPA exists | Lacks capacity | Consult attorney (who acts in best interests) |
| Unbefriended patient lacks capacity for serious decision | Lacks capacity | Instruct IMCA |
Diagnosis / Investigation
Bedside
- Stage 1: Is there an impairment of, or disturbance in, the functioning of the mind or brain? (e.g. dementia, delirium, brain injury, intoxication)
- Stage 2 (if yes to Stage 1): Can the person:
- Understand the information relevant to the decision? (presented in simple terms, including risks and benefits)
- Retain the information long enough to make the decision? (even briefly is sufficient)
- Weigh/use the information as part of the decision-making process? (balance pros and cons)
- Communicate the decision? (by any means - speech, writing, signing, blinking)
- Failure in any one of these four = lacks capacity for that decision
Bloods
- May be needed to identify/treat reversible causes of impaired capacity (e.g. delirium workup)
Imaging
- Not required for capacity assessment itself
- May be relevant if investigating underlying cause
Special Tests
- Cognitive assessment (AMT, MoCA, ACE-III) may inform but does not replace formal capacity assessment
- Neuropsychological assessment: for complex cases
Management
Non-pharmacological
- If person HAS capacity: respect their decision, even if it seems unwise; document assessment
- If person LACKS capacity: make a best interests decision (Section 4 MCA)
Best Interests Decision (Section 4 MCA)
- Consider all relevant circumstances
- Consider whether the person will regain capacity
- Involve the person as much as possible
- Consider past and present wishes, feelings, beliefs, and values
- Consult: carers, family, LPA, IMCA (if unbefriended)
- Choose the least restrictive option
- Document the decision-making process
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) / Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS)
- If a person lacks capacity and is deprived of their liberty (e.g. kept in hospital/care home), DoLS/LPS authorisation is required
- Six qualifying requirements: age (≥18), mental disorder, lack of capacity, best interests, eligibility, no refusals
Pharmacological
- Not applicable to capacity assessment itself
- Treat reversible causes of impaired capacity (e.g. treat delirium, correct metabolic disturbance)
Surgical/Interventional
- Not applicable
Referral Criteria
- Complex capacity assessments: psychiatry or neuropsychology
- Disputed capacity: seek second opinion, consider Court of Protection
- Serious medical treatment for unbefriended patient: instruct IMCA
- Potential DoLS: supervisory body (local authority)
Prognosis
- Capacity may fluctuate: reassess when there is reason to believe it may have changed
- Capacity may be regained: e.g. after delirium resolves, intoxication clears, depression treated
- Timely capacity assessment ensures patients' rights are protected
- Failure to assess capacity appropriately may have legal consequences
- Good documentation protects patients and clinicians
Other Relevant Information
Mental Capacity Act 2005 - Two-Stage Test
| Stage | Question |
|---|---|
| 1. Diagnostic | Is there an impairment of, or disturbance in, the mind or brain? |
| 2. Functional | Can the person understand, retain, weigh/use, and communicate the decision? |
Best Interests Checklist (Section 4 MCA)
| Factor |
|---|
| Will the person regain capacity? Can the decision wait? |
| Involve the person as much as possible |
| Consider past and present wishes, feelings, beliefs, values |
| Consult family, carers, LPA, IMCA |
| Do not make assumptions based on age, appearance, condition, or behaviour |
| Least restrictive option |
| Document the decision and reasoning |