Capacity Assessment
Mental capacity assessment under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is a legal and clinical skill requiring assessment of whether a patient can understand, retain, weigh, and communicate a specific decision at a specific time.
Key Facts
Mental Capacity Act 2005 (England and Wales): legal framework for capacity assessment and best interests decisions Capacity is decision-specific and time-specific: a person may have capacity for one decision but not another Two-stage test: (1) Does the person have an impairment of, or disturbance in, the functioning of the mind or brain? (2) Does this impairment mean they cannot make the specific decision? Four functional criteria: the person must be able to understand, retain, weigh/use, and communicate the information relevant to the decision Principle 1: Assume capacity until established otherwise Principle 3: An unwise decision does not equal lack of capacity If a person lacks capacity, decisions must be made in their best interests (Section 4 MCA 2005) IMCA (Independent Mental Capacity Advocate): must be instructed for serious medical treatment decisions or accommodation changes for unbefriended patients
Overview
Key Facts
Capacity assessment is a core clinical skill. All clinicians are responsible for assessing capacity for decisions within their scope of practice. It is a legal requirement under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Epidemiology
- Approximately 2 million adults in England and Wales may lack capacity for some decisions
- Commonly encountered in: dementia, delirium, brain injury, learning disability, severe mental illness, intoxication
- Capacity assessments are performed daily in hospitals, GP practices, and social care settings
Aetiology
Impairment or disturbance of the mind or brain may be caused by:
- Dementia
- Delirium
- Brain injury (stroke, traumatic)
- Learning disability
- Severe mental illness (psychosis, severe depression)
- Intoxication (alcohol, drugs)
- Loss of consciousness
Pathophysiology
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 does not define capacity in pathological terms but in functional terms — it assesses what a person can do with the information relevant to a specific decision, not their diagnosis.
Clinical Presentation
When to Assess Capacity
- When there is reason to doubt capacity for a specific decision
- Before any medical treatment or intervention
- When a patient refuses treatment
- When a patient is making a decision with significant consequences
- When advance care planning
- When considering discharge destination
Five Principles of the MCA 2005
- Assume capacity unless established otherwise
- Support decision-making: take all practicable steps to help the person make their own decision (e.g. timing, location, communication aids, interpreter)
- Unwise decisions are allowed: a person is not to be treated as lacking capacity merely because they make a decision others consider unwise
- Best interests: any act done for a person who lacks capacity must be in their best interests
- Least restrictive option: anything done must be the least restrictive of the person's rights and freedoms
Red Flags
- Clinician assuming lack of capacity based on diagnosis alone (unlawful)
- No documented capacity assessment before proceeding with treatment
- Best interests decision made without consulting relevant people
- Lack of capacity assumed because patient makes an unwise decision
- Restraint used without proper legal framework (DoLS/LPS)
Differential Diagnosis
| Scenario | Capacity Status | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Patient with capacity refuses treatment | Has capacity | Respect decision (even if clinicians disagree) |
| Patient lacks capacity, treatment in best interests | Lacks capacity | Proceed under best interests (MCA Section 4) |
| Patient lacks capacity, valid ADRT exists | Lacks capacity | Respect ADRT (if valid and applicable) |
| Patient lacks capacity, LPA exists | Lacks capacity | Consult attorney (who acts in best interests) |
| Unbefriended patient lacks capacity for serious decision | Lacks capacity | Instruct IMCA |
Diagnosis / Investigation
Bedside
- Stage 1: Is there an impairment of, or disturbance in, the functioning of the mind or brain? (e.g. dementia, delirium, brain injury, intoxication)
- Stage 2 (if yes to Stage 1): Can the person:
- Understand the information relevant to the decision? (presented in simple terms, including risks and benefits)
- Retain the information long enough to make the decision? (even briefly is sufficient)
- Weigh/use the information as part of the decision-making process? (balance pros and cons)
- Communicate the decision? (by any means — speech, writing, signing, blinking)
- Failure in any one of these four = lacks capacity for that decision
Bloods
- May be needed to identify/treat reversible causes of impaired capacity (e.g. delirium workup)
Imaging
- Not required for capacity assessment itself
- May be relevant if investigating underlying cause
Special Tests
- Cognitive assessment (AMT, MoCA, ACE-III) may inform but does not replace formal capacity assessment
- Neuropsychological assessment: for complex cases
Management
Non-pharmacological
- If person HAS capacity: respect their decision, even if it seems unwise; document assessment
- If person LACKS capacity: make a best interests decision (Section 4 MCA)
Best Interests Decision (Section 4 MCA)
- Consider all relevant circumstances
- Consider whether the person will regain capacity
- Involve the person as much as possible
- Consider past and present wishes, feelings, beliefs, and values
- Consult: carers, family, LPA, IMCA (if unbefriended)
- Choose the least restrictive option
- Document the decision-making process
Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) / Liberty Protection Safeguards (LPS)
- If a person lacks capacity and is deprived of their liberty (e.g. kept in hospital/care home), DoLS/LPS authorisation is required
- Six qualifying requirements: age (≥18), mental disorder, lack of capacity, best interests, eligibility, no refusals
Pharmacological
- Not applicable to capacity assessment itself
- Treat reversible causes of impaired capacity (e.g. treat delirium, correct metabolic disturbance)
Surgical/Interventional
- Not applicable
Referral Criteria
- Complex capacity assessments: psychiatry or neuropsychology
- Disputed capacity: seek second opinion, consider Court of Protection
- Serious medical treatment for unbefriended patient: instruct IMCA
- Potential DoLS: supervisory body (local authority)
Prognosis
- Capacity may fluctuate: reassess when there is reason to believe it may have changed
- Capacity may be regained: e.g. after delirium resolves, intoxication clears, depression treated
- Timely capacity assessment ensures patients' rights are protected
- Failure to assess capacity appropriately may have legal consequences
- Good documentation protects patients and clinicians
Other Relevant Information
Mental Capacity Act 2005 — Two-Stage Test
| Stage | Question |
|---|---|
| 1. Diagnostic | Is there an impairment of, or disturbance in, the mind or brain? |
| 2. Functional | Can the person understand, retain, weigh/use, and communicate the decision? |
Best Interests Checklist (Section 4 MCA)
| Factor |
|---|
| Will the person regain capacity? Can the decision wait? |
| Involve the person as much as possible |
| Consider past and present wishes, feelings, beliefs, values |
| Consult family, carers, LPA, IMCA |
| Do not make assumptions based on age, appearance, condition, or behaviour |
| Least restrictive option |
| Document the decision and reasoning |