Instrumental Delivery

Instrumental delivery uses forceps or vacuum (ventouse) to assist vaginal delivery in the second stage of labour when there is delay, fetal compromise, or maternal indication.

DRCOGPLAB 1UKMLA0 questions

Key Facts

Instrumental delivery rate in the UK: approximately 12-15% of all deliveries Ventouse (vacuum) and forceps are the two methods; choice depends on clinical situation and operator experience Prerequisites (FORCEPS mnemonic): Full dilatation, OA/OP position known, Ruptured membranes, Catheter in situ, Epidural/analgesia, Presenting part at or below spines, Sphincter (bladder) empty, Sagittal suture position identified Ventouse is associated with more failures but fewer maternal injuries than forceps Forceps have higher success rate but increased risk of perineal trauma (3rd/4th degree tears) Maximum 3 pulls with ventouse and 3 cup detachments before abandoning (RCOG GTG 26) Kielland's forceps for rotational delivery; Neville Barnes/Simpson's for non-rotational All instrumental deliveries should have a paired cord blood gas taken

Overview

Key Facts

Instrumental delivery refers to the use of forceps or vacuum extractor to assist vaginal delivery during the second stage of labour. It is a core obstetric skill required when spontaneous delivery is not progressing or when expedited delivery is needed.

Epidemiology

  • Instrumental delivery rate in the UK: 12-15% of all births
  • Ventouse accounts for approximately 60% and forceps 40% of instrumental deliveries
  • Higher rates in nulliparous women, epidural use, and occipitoposterior position
  • Declining slightly with increasing caesarean section rates

Aetiology (Indications)

  • Prolonged second stage: nulliparous >2 hours active pushing, multiparous >1 hour
  • Fetal compromise: pathological CTG in second stage
  • Maternal exhaustion
  • Maternal medical conditions: avoid Valsalva (cardiac disease, intracranial pathology, hypertensive crisis)
  • Aftercoming head of breech (forceps only)

Pathophysiology

  • Ventouse creates a chignon (artificial caput) on the fetal scalp; traction assists descent and delivery
  • Forceps cradle the fetal head; traction and (if rotational) rotation aid delivery
  • Force is applied along the pelvic curve to follow the axis of the birth canal

Clinical Presentation

Assessment Before Instrumental Delivery

  • Confirm full dilatation
  • Assess fetal position (OA, OP, OT - clinical and/or ultrasound)
  • Station: at or below ischial spines
  • Adequate contractions
  • Adequate analgesia (pudendal block for ventouse, regional/spinal for mid-cavity/rotational)
  • Empty bladder (catheterise)
  • Informed consent

Classification of Instrumental Delivery

  • Outlet: fetal scalp visible, minimal rotation needed
  • Low-cavity: station at +2cm or more, ≤45° rotation
  • Mid-cavity: station above +2cm but head engaged, may need >45° rotation

Red Flags

  • Head not engaged (above ischial spines) - contraindication
  • Unknown fetal position
  • Prematurity (<34 weeks for ventouse due to risk of subgaleal haemorrhage)
  • Suspected fetal bleeding disorder
  • Failure to deliver with 3 pulls or 3 cup detachments

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Normal second stageProgressing, no indication for interventionPartogram review
Obstructed labourNo descent despite good contractions, caput/mouldingVaginal examination
Cephalopelvic disproportionHead not engaging, significant mouldingClinical assessment
MalpresentationBrow/face presentationVaginal examination, USS
Fetal compromisePathological CTG, meconiumCTG, fetal blood sampling

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Abdominal palpation (fifths palpable - must be 0/5 or 1/5)
  • Vaginal examination (position, station, moulding, caput, dilatation)
  • CTG assessment
  • Ultrasound for fetal position if uncertain
  • Catheterise bladder

Bloods

  • Group and save (should already be available)
  • Paired cord blood gases after delivery (arterial and venous)

Imaging

  • Intrapartum ultrasound increasingly used to confirm fetal position before instrumental delivery

Special Tests

  • Fetal blood sampling may have been performed if CTG concerns preceded decision for instrumental delivery

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Informed consent (including discussion of risks, alternative of CS)
  • Appropriate birth setting (theatre for mid-cavity or rotational, may be room for outlet)
  • Neonatal team present or on standby
  • Paediatrician present for all mid-cavity and rotational deliveries

Pharmacological

  • Analgesia: pudendal block + perineal infiltration (outlet ventouse), spinal/epidural (mid-cavity/rotational forceps)
  • Oxytocin: may be started/continued for uterine contractions
  • Active management of third stage: oxytocin 10 IU IM

Surgical/Interventional

  • Ventouse (vacuum): Kiwi cup, metal cup (Malmström), or silicone cup applied to flexion point
  • Forceps: Neville Barnes or Simpson's (non-rotational), Kielland's (rotational), Wrigley's (outlet/at CS)
  • Episiotomy: mediolateral episiotomy recommended for forceps delivery
  • Sequential instrumentation: ventouse followed by forceps is associated with increased neonatal morbidity - should only be performed by senior obstetrician
  • Trial of instrumental in theatre: mid-cavity or uncertain deliveries with immediate access to CS if unsuccessful

Referral Criteria

  • Failed instrumental delivery: immediate caesarean section
  • Third/fourth degree tear: repaired by experienced operator in theatre
  • Neonatal assessment after all instrumental deliveries
  • Follow-up at 6-12 weeks for perineal clinic if significant tear

Prognosis

  • Overall success rate: ventouse 80-85%, forceps 90-95%
  • 3rd/4th degree perineal tear: 8-12% with forceps, 4-6% with ventouse
  • Neonatal cephalhaematoma: 6-12% with ventouse
  • Neonatal subgaleal haemorrhage: 0.6% with ventouse (potentially life-threatening)
  • Neonatal facial nerve palsy: 0.5-1% with forceps (usually temporary)
  • Maternal urinary incontinence: increased risk with forceps
  • Subsequent delivery: 70-80% achieve spontaneous vaginal delivery

Other Relevant Information

Ventouse vs Forceps Comparison

FeatureVentouseForceps
Success rate80-85%90-95%
Maternal perineal traumaLowerHigher
CephalhaematomaHigherLower
Subgaleal haemorrhageHigher (rare)Minimal
Facial nerve injuryNoPossible
Retinal haemorrhageMore commonLess common
Analgesia requirementPudendal block may sufficeRegional/spinal preferred

RCOG Classification of Instrumental Delivery

TypeStationRotation
OutletScalp visible≤45°
LowAt +2cm or below≤45°
Mid-cavityAbove +2cm but engagedMay be >45°