Safeguarding and Child Protection
Safeguarding in paediatrics involves recognising and responding to child abuse and neglect, with all healthcare professionals having a statutory duty to protect children under the Children Acts 1989 and 2004.
Key Facts
Approximately 50,000 children in England are on a child protection plan at any given time Four categories of abuse: Physical, emotional, sexual abuse, and neglect — neglect is the most common reason for a child protection plan (~50%) All healthcare professionals have a statutory duty to safeguard children under the Children Act 2004 and Working Together to Safeguard Children 2018 NICE CG89 provides clinical guidance on when to suspect child maltreatment Bruising in non-mobile infants ('those who are not yet cruising') should always raise suspicion of non-accidental injury Information sharing is permitted without consent when a child is at risk of significant harm — overrides confidentiality (GMC guidance) The named doctor/nurse for safeguarding must be in place in all NHS organisations Serious case reviews (now Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews) are conducted when a child dies or is seriously harmed and abuse/neglect is suspected
Overview
Key Facts
Safeguarding children is everyone's responsibility. Healthcare professionals are uniquely placed to identify children who may be at risk of abuse or neglect through their contact with families. Early recognition and appropriate action can prevent significant harm and save lives.
Epidemiology
In England, approximately 400,000 children are assessed as 'children in need' annually. Approximately 50,000 are subject to a child protection plan. An estimated 1 in 5 children in the UK experience abuse or neglect during childhood. Approximately 50-70 children per year die as a result of abuse or neglect in England. Infants under 1 year have the highest rate of serious case reviews.
Aetiology
Risk factors for child maltreatment:
- Parental: Mental illness, substance misuse, domestic abuse, history of being abused themselves, learning disability, young parenthood
- Child: Prematurity, disability, chronic illness, behavioural difficulties
- Environmental: Poverty, social isolation, housing instability, large family, chaotic household
- Relationship: Poor attachment, domestic violence, separation/divorce
Pathophysiology
Types of abuse:
- Physical abuse: Inflicting physical harm (hitting, shaking, burning, poisoning, suffocating)
- Emotional abuse: Persistent emotional maltreatment causing severe adverse effects on emotional development
- Sexual abuse: Forcing or enticing a child to take part in sexual activities (contact or non-contact)
- Neglect: Persistent failure to meet a child's basic physical and/or psychological needs
- Fabricated or induced illness (FII): Previously Munchausen syndrome by proxy — parent fabricates or induces symptoms in a child
Clinical Presentation
Physical Abuse Indicators
- Bruising in non-mobile infants or in unusual locations (ears, neck, buttocks, trunk)
- Multiple bruises of different ages
- Burns: cigarette burns, immersion scalds (glove/stocking pattern, clear tide marks)
- Fractures in non-mobile children, multiple fractures, rib fractures in infants
- Subdural haematoma in infants (non-accidental head injury/shaken baby syndrome)
- Oral injuries: torn frenulum in non-mobile child
Neglect Indicators
- Persistent poor hygiene, inappropriate clothing
- Failure to thrive with no organic cause
- Missed medical/dental appointments
- Developmental delay with adequate biological potential
- Untreated medical conditions
Emotional Abuse Indicators
- Withdrawn, anxious, overly compliant behaviour
- Low self-esteem, self-harm in older children
- Developmental regression
Sexual Abuse Indicators
- Sexualised behaviour inappropriate for age
- Genital/anal injuries without adequate explanation
- STIs in pre-pubertal children
- Disclosure by the child
Red Flags
- ANY injury in a non-mobile infant
- Injury inconsistent with developmental stage or explanation given
- Delay in presentation
- Changing or inconsistent history
- Multiple presentations to different departments/hospitals
- Parent's affect inappropriate to the child's condition
Differential Diagnosis
| Diagnosis | Key Features | Investigation |
|---|---|---|
| Non-accidental injury | Inconsistent history, unusual pattern, delay in presentation | Skeletal survey, CT head, ophthalmology |
| Accidental injury | Consistent mechanism, developmentally appropriate | History, examination |
| Osteogenesis imperfecta | Multiple fractures, blue sclerae, family history | Collagen studies, genetics |
| Bleeding disorder | Easy bruising, mucosal bleeding, family history | FBC, coagulation screen, vWF |
| ITP | Petechiae/purpura, well child, thrombocytopenia | FBC (low platelets, normal otherwise) |
| Henoch-Schönlein purpura | Palpable purpura over buttocks/legs, arthralgia | Clinical, urinalysis |
| Mongolian blue spots | Blue-grey patches on sacrum/buttocks, present from birth | Documentation at birth |
| Haemophilia | Joint bleeds, large haematomas, male, family history | Factor VIII/IX levels |
Diagnosis / Investigation
Bedside
- Full physical examination: Document ALL injuries meticulously — size, shape, colour, location, pattern
- Body map documentation: Use standardised body map to record injuries
- Photography: Clinical photography of injuries with consent (or best interest if consent not possible)
- Growth and development assessment: Plot growth, assess developmental milestones
- History: Detailed and documented — mechanism, timing, witnesses, who was present, developmental abilities of child
Bloods
- FBC and coagulation screen: Exclude bleeding disorder (PT, APTT, fibrinogen, vWF screen)
- Bone profile: Calcium, phosphate, ALP — exclude metabolic bone disease
- Vitamin D: Rickets can predispose to fractures
- LFTs and amylase: Abdominal injuries (hepatic/pancreatic trauma)
- Urine toxicology: If poisoning suspected
Imaging
- Skeletal survey: Mandatory in all children <2 years with suspected physical abuse (AP and lateral skull, AP spine, AP chest including oblique ribs, AP pelvis, AP long bones, AP hands and feet); repeat at 11-14 days for healing fractures
- CT head (non-contrast): If subdural haematoma or head injury suspected — urgent
- MRI brain: More sensitive than CT for diffuse axonal injury and dating of subdural collections
- Abdominal CT: If abdominal trauma suspected
Special Tests
- Ophthalmology review: Retinal haemorrhages in suspected abusive head trauma (performed by paediatric ophthalmologist under dilated examination)
- STI screening: In suspected sexual abuse (refer to sexual assault referral centre — SARC)
- Forensic medical examination: Performed by trained forensic/paediatric physician in cases of suspected sexual abuse
Management
Non-pharmacological
- Ensure immediate safety of the child: If at immediate risk, do not discharge — paediatric admission for safety
- Document thoroughly: Contemporaneous, factual, objective notes; record verbatim quotes from history
- Refer to children's social care: If concerned about significant harm — telephone referral followed by written referral within 24 hours
- Contact police: If immediate risk of harm or criminal offence suspected
- Inform the named/designated doctor for safeguarding in the organisation
- Multi-agency working: Strategy meeting/discussion within 24 hours; Section 47 enquiry if threshold met
Pharmacological
- Treat any identified injuries appropriately (analgesia, wound care, etc.)
- STI prophylaxis/treatment if indicated following sexual abuse assessment
- Emergency contraception if indicated in adolescents
Surgical/Interventional
- Surgical management of significant injuries as clinically indicated
Referral Criteria
- Any concern about child maltreatment — refer to children's social care
- Suspected physical or sexual abuse — immediate referral; involve police
- Neglect concerns — referral to social care; may be less acute but equally important
- FII (fabricated or induced illness) — specialist referral and multi-agency investigation
- Staff uncertainty — seek advice from named/designated safeguarding professional
Prognosis
- Early intervention significantly improves outcomes for maltreated children
- Abusive head trauma: Mortality 20-25%; ~50% of survivors have significant neurological disability
- Long-term effects of abuse: Increased risk of mental health disorders, substance misuse, self-harm, relationship difficulties, reduced educational attainment
- ACEs (Adverse Childhood Experiences): Dose-response relationship — 4+ ACEs associated with significantly increased risk of chronic disease, mental illness, and early death
- Neglect: The most common form of maltreatment; chronic neglect has profound effects on brain development, particularly in the first 3 years
- Re-abuse rates: Without intervention, ~30% of maltreated children are re-referred to child protection services within 5 years
Other Relevant Information
Key Legislation and Guidance
| Document | Key Provisions |
|---|---|
| Children Act 1989 | Defines 'significant harm'; Section 47 duty to investigate |
| Children Act 2004 | Section 11 duty on organisations to safeguard; established LSCBs |
| Working Together 2018 | Multi-agency guidance; replaced LSCBs with safeguarding partners |
| NICE CG89 | Clinical guidance on when to suspect child maltreatment |
| GMC 0-18 years guidance | Doctors' duties to safeguard children; information sharing |
Fractures with High Specificity for Abuse
| Fracture Type | Notes |
|---|---|
| Rib fractures in infants | Especially posterior — highly specific for abuse |
| Classic metaphyseal lesions (CML) | 'Bucket handle' or 'corner' fractures |
| Scapula fractures | Very rare accidental |
| Spinous process fractures | Highly suspicious |
| Multiple fractures of different ages | Strongly suggestive |
Information Sharing Principles
| Principle | Detail |
|---|---|
| Consent preferred | Seek consent where possible |
| Override confidentiality | Permitted if child at risk of significant harm |
| Share proportionately | Only relevant information |
| Document decisions | Record what was shared, with whom, and why |