Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting
PONV affects 30% of all surgical patients and up to 80% of high-risk patients. Risk stratification using the Apfel score guides prophylactic antiemetic therapy, which is most effective as combination treatment.
Key Facts
PONV affects approximately 30% of all surgical patients and up to 80% of high-risk patients Apfel score identifies risk factors: female sex, non-smoker, history of PONV/motion sickness, post-operative opioid use — each factor adds ~20% risk Ondansetron 4mg IV (5-HT3 antagonist) is the most commonly used rescue antiemetic Dexamethasone 6.6mg IV at induction is an effective prophylactic agent — cheap and well-tolerated (DREAMS trial) Combination antiemetic therapy (2-3 agents from different classes) is recommended for moderate-high risk patients PONV is the most common reason for unplanned admission after day case surgery TIVA (propofol-based) reduces PONV by approximately 30% compared with volatile-based anaesthesia Risk factors: Female sex (3× risk), non-smoker, history of PONV/motion sickness, post-operative opioids, inhalational anaesthesia, gynaecological/ENT/strabismus surgery
Overview
Key Facts
PONV is one of the most common complications of anaesthesia, causing patient distress, delayed discharge, and increased healthcare costs. A multimodal approach to prevention and treatment significantly improves outcomes.
Epidemiology
Overall PONV incidence is approximately 30% without prophylaxis. In high-risk patients (Apfel score 3-4), incidence reaches 60-80%. PONV costs the NHS millions annually through prolonged recovery, unplanned admissions, and additional treatments. Patient surveys consistently rank PONV as one of the most undesirable post-operative outcomes.
Aetiology
Patient risk factors:
- Female sex (strongest patient factor)
- Non-smoker
- History of PONV or motion sickness
- Young age
Anaesthetic risk factors:
- Volatile anaesthesia (vs TIVA)
- Nitrous oxide (modest effect)
- Post-operative opioids
- Duration of anaesthesia (each 30 min increases risk by ~60%)
Surgical risk factors:
- Gynaecological (laparoscopy), ENT (middle ear, tonsillectomy), strabismus surgery, laparoscopic surgery
Pathophysiology
Vomiting is controlled by the vomiting centre in the lateral reticular formation of the medulla. Input arrives from:
- Chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ): Area postrema (outside BBB) — dopamine (D2), serotonin (5-HT3), NK1 receptors
- Vestibular system: Histamine (H1), muscarinic (M1) receptors — motion sickness component
- GI tract: Vagal afferents — 5-HT3 receptors on enterochromaffin cells
- Higher cortical centres: Anxiety, pain, smell
Antiemetics target these different receptor pathways, which is why combination therapy from different classes is more effective than single-agent therapy.
Clinical Presentation
Risk Assessment (Apfel Score)
| Factor | Score |
|---|---|
| Female sex | +1 |
| Non-smoker | +1 |
| History of PONV/motion sickness | +1 |
| Post-operative opioid use | +1 |
| Total Score | Approximate Risk |
|---|---|
| 0 | 10% |
| 1 | 20% |
| 2 | 40% |
| 3 | 60% |
| 4 | 80% |
Clinical Presentation
- Nausea with or without vomiting in the first 24 hours post-operatively
- May be accompanied by retching, pallor, sweating
- Can lead to dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, aspiration risk
- Delayed discharge, unplanned overnight admission
Red Flags
- Persistent vomiting >24 hours — consider surgical complication (obstruction, ileus)
- Bilious vomiting — consider bowel obstruction
- Projectile vomiting — consider raised ICP (neurosurgical patients)
- Signs of aspiration — cough, wheeze, desaturation
Differential Diagnosis
| Cause of Post-Op Vomiting | Key Features | Management |
|---|---|---|
| PONV (anaesthetic-related) | Within 24h, risk factors present | Multimodal antiemetics |
| Opioid-induced | Dose-related, CTZ stimulation | Reduce opioid, add antiemetic |
| Ileus | Abdominal distension, absent bowel sounds | NGT, IV fluids, nil by mouth |
| Bowel obstruction | Bilious vomiting, abdominal pain, distension | CT, surgical review |
| Raised ICP | Headache, neurological signs, projectile | CT head, neurosurgical review |
| Hypotension (spinal) | Associated with neuraxial block | Treat hypotension (vasopressors, fluids) |
Diagnosis / Investigation
Bedside
- Apfel score: Pre-operative risk assessment
- Observations: HR, BP (hypotension can cause nausea), temperature
- Fluid balance: Assess hydration status
- Abdominal examination: If persistent vomiting — exclude surgical cause
Bloods
- U&Es: If prolonged vomiting — electrolyte derangement (hypokalaemia, metabolic alkalosis)
- FBC: If concerned about post-operative complication
Imaging
- AXR/CT abdomen: If surgical cause suspected (obstruction, ileus)
Special Tests
- Not routinely required for straightforward PONV
Management
Non-pharmacological
- Adequate hydration: IV fluids perioperatively
- Minimise opioids: Multimodal analgesia, regional anaesthesia
- TIVA: Propofol-based anaesthesia reduces PONV by ~30% vs volatile
- Avoid nitrous oxide: In high-risk patients
- Adequate analgesia: Pain itself is emetogenic
- Acupressure/acupuncture: P6 (Neiguan) point — some evidence of efficacy
Pharmacological
Prophylaxis (based on Apfel score):
- Low risk (0-1): No prophylaxis or single agent
- Moderate risk (2): Combination of 2 agents from different classes
- High risk (3-4): Combination of 2-3 agents + TIVA + minimise opioids
Antiemetic agents:
- Ondansetron 4mg IV (5-HT3 antagonist): At end of surgery — most commonly used
- Dexamethasone 6.6mg IV (steroid): At induction — cheap, effective, long-acting (DREAMS trial)
- Cyclizine 50mg IV (H1 antagonist): Effective for vestibular-mediated nausea
- Droperidol 0.625-1.25mg IV (D2 antagonist): Effective but risk of sedation, QT prolongation
- Prochlorperazine 12.5mg IM (D2 antagonist): Alternative
- Aprepitant 40mg PO (NK1 antagonist): For high-risk patients; expensive
Rescue antiemetic: Use agent from a DIFFERENT class to prophylaxis given
Surgical/Interventional
- Not applicable
Referral Criteria
- Persistent vomiting >24h — surgical review to exclude complication
- Severe PONV causing dehydration/electrolyte imbalance — IV fluids and electrolyte correction
- Recurrent PONV with subsequent anaesthetics — anaesthetic review for future planning
Prognosis
- Prophylaxis reduces PONV incidence by 40-60% compared with no treatment
- Combination therapy is more effective than single-agent prophylaxis (NNT 3-5 for combination vs 5-8 for single agent)
- TIVA + combination antiemetics can reduce high-risk PONV from 80% to <20%
- Day case impact: PONV is the most common cause of unplanned overnight admission (5-10% of day cases)
- Patient satisfaction: Effective PONV management significantly improves patient experience scores
Other Relevant Information
Antiemetic Receptor Targets
| Drug Class | Receptor | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 5-HT3 antagonist | Serotonin (CTZ + vagal) | Ondansetron, granisetron |
| D2 antagonist | Dopamine (CTZ) | Droperidol, prochlorperazine |
| H1 antagonist | Histamine (vestibular) | Cyclizine, promethazine |
| Muscarinic antagonist | Acetylcholine (vestibular) | Hyoscine (scopolamine) |
| NK1 antagonist | Substance P (vomiting centre) | Aprepitant |
| Corticosteroid | Multiple (anti-inflammatory) | Dexamethasone |
Prophylaxis Strategy by Risk
| Apfel Score | Risk | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Low (10-20%) | No prophylaxis or single agent |
| 2 | Moderate (40%) | 2 antiemetics from different classes |
| 3 | High (60%) | 2-3 antiemetics + TIVA + minimise opioids |
| 4 | Very high (80%) | 3 antiemetics + TIVA + regional + minimise opioids |
Key Trials
| Trial | Finding |
|---|---|
| DREAMS (2017) | Dexamethasone 6.6mg IV reduces PONV and improves recovery quality |
| Apfel et al (1999) | Simplified risk score (4 factors) predicts PONV risk |
| IMPACT (2004) | Combination antiemetics more effective than single agents; TIVA reduces PONV |