TextbookAnaestheticsPost-Operative Nausea and Vomiting

Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting

PONV affects 30% of all surgical patients and up to 80% of high-risk patients. Risk stratification using the Apfel score guides prophylactic antiemetic therapy, which is most effective as combination treatment.

FRCAPLAB 10 questions

Key Facts

PONV affects approximately 30% of all surgical patients and up to 80% of high-risk patients Apfel score identifies risk factors: female sex, non-smoker, history of PONV/motion sickness, post-operative opioid use — each factor adds ~20% risk Ondansetron 4mg IV (5-HT3 antagonist) is the most commonly used rescue antiemetic Dexamethasone 6.6mg IV at induction is an effective prophylactic agent — cheap and well-tolerated (DREAMS trial) Combination antiemetic therapy (2-3 agents from different classes) is recommended for moderate-high risk patients PONV is the most common reason for unplanned admission after day case surgery TIVA (propofol-based) reduces PONV by approximately 30% compared with volatile-based anaesthesia Risk factors: Female sex (3× risk), non-smoker, history of PONV/motion sickness, post-operative opioids, inhalational anaesthesia, gynaecological/ENT/strabismus surgery

Overview

Key Facts

PONV is one of the most common complications of anaesthesia, causing patient distress, delayed discharge, and increased healthcare costs. A multimodal approach to prevention and treatment significantly improves outcomes.

Epidemiology

Overall PONV incidence is approximately 30% without prophylaxis. In high-risk patients (Apfel score 3-4), incidence reaches 60-80%. PONV costs the NHS millions annually through prolonged recovery, unplanned admissions, and additional treatments. Patient surveys consistently rank PONV as one of the most undesirable post-operative outcomes.

Aetiology

Patient risk factors:

  • Female sex (strongest patient factor)
  • Non-smoker
  • History of PONV or motion sickness
  • Young age

Anaesthetic risk factors:

  • Volatile anaesthesia (vs TIVA)
  • Nitrous oxide (modest effect)
  • Post-operative opioids
  • Duration of anaesthesia (each 30 min increases risk by ~60%)

Surgical risk factors:

  • Gynaecological (laparoscopy), ENT (middle ear, tonsillectomy), strabismus surgery, laparoscopic surgery

Pathophysiology

Vomiting is controlled by the vomiting centre in the lateral reticular formation of the medulla. Input arrives from:

  • Chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ): Area postrema (outside BBB) — dopamine (D2), serotonin (5-HT3), NK1 receptors
  • Vestibular system: Histamine (H1), muscarinic (M1) receptors — motion sickness component
  • GI tract: Vagal afferents — 5-HT3 receptors on enterochromaffin cells
  • Higher cortical centres: Anxiety, pain, smell

Antiemetics target these different receptor pathways, which is why combination therapy from different classes is more effective than single-agent therapy.

Clinical Presentation

Risk Assessment (Apfel Score)

FactorScore
Female sex+1
Non-smoker+1
History of PONV/motion sickness+1
Post-operative opioid use+1
Total ScoreApproximate Risk
010%
120%
240%
360%
480%

Clinical Presentation

  • Nausea with or without vomiting in the first 24 hours post-operatively
  • May be accompanied by retching, pallor, sweating
  • Can lead to dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, aspiration risk
  • Delayed discharge, unplanned overnight admission

Red Flags

  • Persistent vomiting >24 hours — consider surgical complication (obstruction, ileus)
  • Bilious vomiting — consider bowel obstruction
  • Projectile vomiting — consider raised ICP (neurosurgical patients)
  • Signs of aspiration — cough, wheeze, desaturation

Differential Diagnosis

Cause of Post-Op VomitingKey FeaturesManagement
PONV (anaesthetic-related)Within 24h, risk factors presentMultimodal antiemetics
Opioid-inducedDose-related, CTZ stimulationReduce opioid, add antiemetic
IleusAbdominal distension, absent bowel soundsNGT, IV fluids, nil by mouth
Bowel obstructionBilious vomiting, abdominal pain, distensionCT, surgical review
Raised ICPHeadache, neurological signs, projectileCT head, neurosurgical review
Hypotension (spinal)Associated with neuraxial blockTreat hypotension (vasopressors, fluids)

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Apfel score: Pre-operative risk assessment
  • Observations: HR, BP (hypotension can cause nausea), temperature
  • Fluid balance: Assess hydration status
  • Abdominal examination: If persistent vomiting — exclude surgical cause

Bloods

  • U&Es: If prolonged vomiting — electrolyte derangement (hypokalaemia, metabolic alkalosis)
  • FBC: If concerned about post-operative complication

Imaging

  • AXR/CT abdomen: If surgical cause suspected (obstruction, ileus)

Special Tests

  • Not routinely required for straightforward PONV

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Adequate hydration: IV fluids perioperatively
  • Minimise opioids: Multimodal analgesia, regional anaesthesia
  • TIVA: Propofol-based anaesthesia reduces PONV by ~30% vs volatile
  • Avoid nitrous oxide: In high-risk patients
  • Adequate analgesia: Pain itself is emetogenic
  • Acupressure/acupuncture: P6 (Neiguan) point — some evidence of efficacy

Pharmacological

Prophylaxis (based on Apfel score):

  • Low risk (0-1): No prophylaxis or single agent
  • Moderate risk (2): Combination of 2 agents from different classes
  • High risk (3-4): Combination of 2-3 agents + TIVA + minimise opioids

Antiemetic agents:

  • Ondansetron 4mg IV (5-HT3 antagonist): At end of surgery — most commonly used
  • Dexamethasone 6.6mg IV (steroid): At induction — cheap, effective, long-acting (DREAMS trial)
  • Cyclizine 50mg IV (H1 antagonist): Effective for vestibular-mediated nausea
  • Droperidol 0.625-1.25mg IV (D2 antagonist): Effective but risk of sedation, QT prolongation
  • Prochlorperazine 12.5mg IM (D2 antagonist): Alternative
  • Aprepitant 40mg PO (NK1 antagonist): For high-risk patients; expensive

Rescue antiemetic: Use agent from a DIFFERENT class to prophylaxis given

Surgical/Interventional

  • Not applicable

Referral Criteria

  • Persistent vomiting >24h — surgical review to exclude complication
  • Severe PONV causing dehydration/electrolyte imbalance — IV fluids and electrolyte correction
  • Recurrent PONV with subsequent anaesthetics — anaesthetic review for future planning

Prognosis

  • Prophylaxis reduces PONV incidence by 40-60% compared with no treatment
  • Combination therapy is more effective than single-agent prophylaxis (NNT 3-5 for combination vs 5-8 for single agent)
  • TIVA + combination antiemetics can reduce high-risk PONV from 80% to <20%
  • Day case impact: PONV is the most common cause of unplanned overnight admission (5-10% of day cases)
  • Patient satisfaction: Effective PONV management significantly improves patient experience scores

Other Relevant Information

Antiemetic Receptor Targets

Drug ClassReceptorExamples
5-HT3 antagonistSerotonin (CTZ + vagal)Ondansetron, granisetron
D2 antagonistDopamine (CTZ)Droperidol, prochlorperazine
H1 antagonistHistamine (vestibular)Cyclizine, promethazine
Muscarinic antagonistAcetylcholine (vestibular)Hyoscine (scopolamine)
NK1 antagonistSubstance P (vomiting centre)Aprepitant
CorticosteroidMultiple (anti-inflammatory)Dexamethasone

Prophylaxis Strategy by Risk

Apfel ScoreRiskStrategy
0-1Low (10-20%)No prophylaxis or single agent
2Moderate (40%)2 antiemetics from different classes
3High (60%)2-3 antiemetics + TIVA + minimise opioids
4Very high (80%)3 antiemetics + TIVA + regional + minimise opioids

Key Trials

TrialFinding
DREAMS (2017)Dexamethasone 6.6mg IV reduces PONV and improves recovery quality
Apfel et al (1999)Simplified risk score (4 factors) predicts PONV risk
IMPACT (2004)Combination antiemetics more effective than single agents; TIVA reduces PONV