Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a chronic relapsing condition characterised by impaired control over alcohol use, with physical and psychological dependence, affecting approximately 600,000 dependent drinkers in England.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) is the WHO-validated screening tool; score ≥8 indicates hazardous drinking, ≥20 suggests possible dependence
NICE CG115 recommends brief interventions for hazardous/harmful drinking and specialist referral for moderate-severe dependence
SADQ (Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire): <16 mild, 16-30 moderate, >30 severe dependence
UK Chief Medical Officers' guideline: no more than 14 units/week, spread over ≥3 days with alcohol-free days
Acamprosate (333 mg TDS) and naltrexone (25-50 mg OD) are first-line relapse prevention pharmacotherapies
Alcohol-related deaths in England: approximately 10,000/year; liver disease is the 3rd leading cause of premature death in working-age adults
ICD-11 Dependence Syndrome: impaired control, physiological features (tolerance/withdrawal), persistent use despite harm
FRAMES model for brief intervention: Feedback, Responsibility, Advice, Menu of options, Empathy, Self-efficacy
Overview
Key Facts
Alcohol use disorder encompasses a spectrum from hazardous drinking to severe dependence. The UK has one of the highest rates of alcohol consumption in Europe. Alcohol misuse costs the NHS approximately £3.5 billion/year and is associated with over 200 disease and injury conditions.
Epidemiology
Approximately 600,000 dependent drinkers in England; only ~18% access treatment
Prevalence of hazardous drinking (AUDIT ≥8): approximately 25% of the adult population
Male:female ratio approximately 2:1 for dependence
Peak age of alcohol-related hospital admissions: 55-64 years
Alcohol-specific deaths rising: 9,641 in England and Wales (2021) - highest on record
Socioeconomic deprivation strongly associated with alcohol harm (the alcohol harm paradox)
Aetiology
Genetic factors: heritability ~50-60%; polymorphisms in ADH1B and ALDH2 genes influence risk
Neurobiological: alcohol enhances GABA (inhibitory) and inhibits glutamate (excitatory) neurotransmission; chronic use leads to neuroadaptation
Chlordiazepoxide: first-line for community/inpatient detoxification; typical reducing regimen over 7-10 days (e.g. 30 mg QDS reducing by 20% daily for moderate dependence)
Diazepam: alternative benzodiazepine; symptom-triggered regimens used in some units
Thiamine supplementation:
Oral thiamine 100 mg TDS for mild/moderate risk
IV Pabrinex (2 pairs TDS for 3-5 days) for high-risk patients or suspected Wernicke encephalopathy
Relapse prevention (NICE CG115):
Acamprosate 666 mg TDS (333 mg TDS if <60 kg): modulates glutamate; start after detoxification; continue for 6 months - COMBINE trial showed efficacy combined with behavioural therapy
Naltrexone 25 mg OD for 3 days then 50 mg OD: opioid antagonist; reduces reward from drinking - can cause hepatotoxicity; check LFTs
Nalmefene 18 mg PRN: licensed for reduction of alcohol consumption in adults with alcohol dependence without withdrawal symptoms (NICE TA325)
Surgical
Liver transplantation: considered for end-stage alcoholic liver disease with minimum 6 months abstinence (although increasingly flexible) - 5-year survival ~70%
TIPSS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt): for recurrent variceal haemorrhage or refractory ascites
Referral Criteria
Specialist alcohol services: moderate-severe dependence (SADQ ≥16), previous complicated withdrawal, co-morbid mental or physical health problems
Inpatient detoxification: severe dependence (SADQ >30), history of withdrawal seizures or delirium tremens, significant co-morbidity, unstable social situation
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition occurring 6-24 hours after cessation or significant reduction of chronic heavy alcohol use, ranging from mild tremor to seizures and delirium tremens.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Onset 6-24 hours after last drink; seizures at 12-48 hours; delirium tremens at 48-72 hours (peak 5 days)
CIWA-Ar (Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, revised) is the standard monitoring tool; score >20 indicates severe withdrawal
Chlordiazepoxide is first-line for managed withdrawal in the UK (NICE CG115); typical starting dose 20-40 mg QDS reducing over 7-10 days
Delirium tremens occurs in approximately 5% of withdrawals; mortality 5-15% if untreated, <1% with treatment
IV Pabrinex (vitamins B and C) must be given before any glucose to prevent Wernicke encephalopathy
Withdrawal seizures occur in ~10% of dependent drinkers; typically generalised tonic-clonic, self-limiting
Fixed-dose and symptom-triggered regimens both used; symptom-triggered regimens reduce total benzodiazepine dose and duration of treatment
Lorazepam preferred in severe liver disease due to absence of active metabolites and glucuronidation metabolism
Overview
Key Facts
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) results from neuroadaptive changes due to chronic alcohol exposure. Abrupt cessation leads to CNS hyperexcitability, autonomic dysfunction, and potentially fatal complications. It is a medical emergency requiring prompt recognition and treatment.
Epidemiology
5-10% of patients presenting to Emergency Departments have alcohol-related problems
~50% of alcohol-dependent individuals experience clinically significant withdrawal symptoms
Withdrawal seizures occur in approximately 10% of those with significant withdrawal
Delirium tremens develops in approximately 5% of those withdrawing; mortality 5-15% untreated
Thiamine depletion: impaired thiamine absorption and utilisation increases risk of Wernicke encephalopathy
Clinical Presentation
Mild Withdrawal (6-12 hours)
Tremor: fine bilateral hand tremor, often the earliest sign
Anxiety and agitation: restlessness, irritability
Insomnia: sleep disturbance, vivid dreams
Nausea and vomiting
Diaphoresis: sweating, particularly nocturnal
Mild tachycardia and hypertension
Moderate Withdrawal (12-48 hours)
Worsening tremor: coarse, visible at rest
Alcoholic hallucinosis: typically visual (insects, animals), but also auditory and tactile; patient retains intact sensorium (distinguishing from delirium tremens)
Withdrawal seizures: 12-48 hours post-cessation; generalised tonic-clonic; usually brief and self-limiting; may be recurrent (cluster seizures in ~60%)
Thromboprophylaxis: immobile patients at risk of VTE
Pharmacological
Benzodiazepines (first-line - NICE CG115):
Chlordiazepoxide: standard UK choice for managed withdrawal
Mild dependence: 10-20 mg QDS, reducing over 5-7 days
Moderate dependence: 20-30 mg QDS, reducing over 7-10 days
Severe dependence: 40-50 mg QDS, reducing over 7-10 days
Lorazepam 1-2 mg IV/IM: preferred in severe liver disease (no active metabolites, glucuronidation)
Diazepam: alternative; longer-acting; symptom-triggered regimens in some units
Thiamine (critical - must precede glucose):
IV Pabrinex: 2 pairs (IV ampoules) TDS for 3-5 days, then oral thiamine 100 mg TDS
Indications for IV Pabrinex: malnourished, unwell, vomiting, suspected Wernicke, previous withdrawal complications
Electrolyte replacement:
IV magnesium sulphate 20 mmol over 4 hours if hypomagnesaemic
IV potassium chloride per local protocol
Seizure management:
Lorazepam 4 mg IV for acute withdrawal seizure
Do NOT use phenytoin - ineffective for alcohol withdrawal seizures
Recurrent seizures: repeat lorazepam; consider ITU if status epilepticus
Delirium tremens:
High-dose benzodiazepines: lorazepam 2-4 mg IV repeated every 10-15 minutes as required
Consider ITU admission if refractory or significant organ dysfunction
Haloperidol 2.5-5 mg IM: adjunctive for severe agitation/hallucinations only after adequate benzodiazepine loading (risk of lowering seizure threshold)
Surgical
Not applicable to acute alcohol withdrawal management
Wernicke encephalopathy is an acute neuropsychiatric emergency caused by thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency, classically presenting with the triad of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, and confusion, requiring immediate parenteral thiamine replacement.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Classic triad (ophthalmoplegia, ataxia, confusion) present in only ~16% of cases - high index of suspicion required
Thiamine (B1) deficiency is the underlying cause; most commonly associated with chronic alcohol misuse but also occurs with malnutrition, hyperemesis, bariatric surgery
IV Pabrinex (2 pairs TDS for 3-5 days) is the treatment - must be given before IV glucose to prevent precipitation or worsening
Untreated Wernicke progresses to Korsakoff syndrome in approximately 80% of cases - an irreversible amnestic disorder
MRI brain: characteristic changes in mammillary bodies, periaqueductal grey matter, medial thalami, and tectal plate
Mortality: approximately 17-20% if untreated; complete recovery in only ~20% even with treatment
Clinical diagnosis: blood thiamine levels are unreliable and should not delay treatment
European guidelines (EFNS) recommend thiamine 500 mg IV TDS for 3-5 days in suspected Wernicke encephalopathy
Overview
Key Facts
Wernicke encephalopathy (WE) is a medical emergency resulting from acute thiamine deficiency. It is grossly under-diagnosed: post-mortem studies show that ~80% of cases are missed clinically. Prompt parenteral thiamine can prevent progression to the irreversible Korsakoff syndrome.
Epidemiology
Post-mortem prevalence: 1-3% of the general population; up to 12.5% of chronic alcohol misusers
Clinical diagnosis rate: only ~20% of cases identified ante-mortem
Alcohol misuse is the most common cause in developed countries, but non-alcoholic causes account for up to 20% of cases
No sex or ethnic predilection when adjusted for alcohol consumption
Korsakoff syndrome is a chronic irreversible neuropsychiatric condition characterised by profound anterograde amnesia and confabulation, typically resulting from untreated or inadequately treated Wernicke encephalopathy due to thiamine deficiency.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
~80% of untreated Wernicke encephalopathy cases progress to Korsakoff syndrome
Anterograde amnesia (inability to form new memories) is the hallmark feature; retrograde amnesia also present but less severe
Confabulation: fabrication of memories to fill gaps - considered a classic feature but not always present
Mammillary bodies and medial thalamic nuclei (especially anterior and dorsomedial) are the key lesion sites
Only ~20% of patients recover sufficiently to live independently; ~25% require long-term institutional care
Prevention is paramount: adequate thiamine replacement during alcohol withdrawal and in all at-risk patients
Thiamine replacement should continue long-term: oral thiamine 100 mg TDS indefinitely in those at ongoing risk
Cognitive rehabilitation may produce modest improvements over 12-24 months but full recovery is rare
Overview
Key Facts
Korsakoff syndrome (KS) is a chronic amnestic disorder most commonly seen as a sequel to Wernicke encephalopathy (together termed Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome). The condition is characterised by a disproportionate memory impairment relative to other cognitive functions. It represents one of the most devastating consequences of chronic alcohol misuse.
Epidemiology
Prevalence: approximately 1-2% of the general population at post-mortem; higher in chronic alcohol misusers
Male:female ratio approximately 1.7:1 (reflecting alcohol misuse patterns)
Mean age at presentation: 50-60 years
Under-diagnosed in life: many cases only confirmed at post-mortem
Non-alcoholic Korsakoff is rare but recognised (post-surgical, anorexia, hyperemesis)
Aetiology
Progression from acute Wernicke encephalopathy (untreated or inadequately treated)
Thiamine deficiency → irreversible damage to diencephalic structures
Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) encompasses a spectrum from simple steatosis through alcoholic hepatitis to cirrhosis, representing the leading cause of liver-related death in the UK and the commonest indication for liver transplantation.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Spectrum
steatosis (>90% heavy drinkers)
steatohepatitis
fibrosis
cirrhosis (~10-20% of heavy drinkers)
AST:ALT ratio >2 is characteristic of alcoholic liver disease (both typically <300 IU/L); ALT rarely >500
Maddrey Discriminant Function (DF) ≥32 identifies severe alcoholic hepatitis requiring consideration of corticosteroids
Prednisolone 40 mg OD for 28 days: standard treatment for severe alcoholic hepatitis (Maddrey DF ≥32) - STOPAH trial showed potential 28-day mortality benefit
NICE CG49: assessment and management of cirrhosis including screening for hepatocellular carcinoma with 6-monthly USS and AFP
Glasgow Alcoholic Hepatitis Score (GAHS) ≥9: identifies patients unlikely to respond to corticosteroids
Alcohol-related liver disease accounts for >60% of liver disease deaths in the UK
Overview
Key Facts
Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a major public health problem in the UK. It is the 3rd commonest cause of premature death in working-age adults. The rising trend in alcohol consumption has led to increasing rates of liver disease, in contrast to most other European countries.
Epidemiology
>60% of liver disease deaths in the UK are alcohol-related
Cirrhosis develops in approximately 10-20% of heavy drinkers after 10-20 years
Alcohol abstinence: single most important intervention; improves survival at all stages
Nutritional support: high-protein, high-calorie diet (35-40 kcal/kg/day, 1.2-1.5 g protein/kg/day); nasogastric feeding if unable to eat
Fluid and sodium restriction: for ascites management (sodium <2 g/day)
Weight management: address co-morbid obesity
Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: 6-monthly USS and AFP in cirrhosis (NICE CG49)
Pharmacological
Alcoholic hepatitis (Maddrey DF ≥32):
Prednisolone 40 mg OD for 28 days then taper - STOPAH trial (2015): showed trend towards reduced 28-day mortality (OR 0.72) but no benefit at 90 days or 1 year
Assess response with Lille score at day 7: score >0.45 = non-responder → stop steroids
Pentoxifylline: no longer recommended (STOPAH showed no benefit)
Contraindications to steroids: active GI bleeding, uncontrolled sepsis, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatitis B
Ascites management:
Spironolactone 100 mg OD (up to 400 mg) ± furosemide 40 mg OD (up to 160 mg) - aim weight loss 0.5-1 kg/day
Therapeutic paracentesis with albumin replacement (6-8 g/L drained) for tense/diuretic-resistant ascites
Variceal prophylaxis:
Primary: propranolol (titrate to HR 55-60) or carvedilol 6.25-12.5 mg OD
Variceal band ligation: for large varices or intolerance to beta-blockers
Opioid use disorder is a chronic relapsing condition characterised by compulsive opioid use despite harmful consequences, with approximately 260,000 high-risk opioid users in England and significant associated mortality from overdose and blood-borne viruses.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
~260,000 high-risk opioid users in England; ~140,000 in treatment at any one time
Opioid substitution therapy (OST) with methadone or buprenorphine is the cornerstone of treatment (NICE CG52, NICE TA114)
Drug-related deaths: opioids account for approximately 50% of all drug poisoning deaths in England and Wales (~2,300/year)
Needle and syringe programmes reduce hepatitis C and HIV transmission; NICE PH52
Naloxone (400 mcg IM/IV/SC) is the opioid antagonist for overdose reversal; take-home naloxone programmes reduce mortality
ICD-11 criteria: impaired control, increasing priority of use over other activities, physiological features (tolerance/withdrawal), persistent use despite harm
NICE CG52: recommends flexible dosing of methadone (60-120 mg/day optimal) with supervised consumption initially
Opioid withdrawal is extremely unpleasant but rarely life-threatening (unlike alcohol or benzodiazepine withdrawal)
Overview
Key Facts
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is one of the most significant substance misuse problems in the UK. Heroin (diamorphine) is the most commonly injected drug, but prescription opioid misuse is an increasing concern. Opioid-related deaths have risen to record levels in recent years.
Epidemiology
~260,000 high-risk opioid users in England; ~310,000 across the UK
Drug-related deaths in England and Wales: approximately 4,900/year (2021); opioids involved in ~50%
Mean age of opioid-dependent population is rising (ageing cohort): now ~40-45 years
Male:female ratio approximately 3:1
Hepatitis C: prevalence approximately 50% among people who inject drugs (PWID)
HIV: prevalence approximately 1-2% among PWID in England (higher in London)
Aetiology
Neurobiological
opioids activate μ (mu) opioid receptors in the mesolimbic reward pathway (VTA
nucleus accumbens)
dopamine release
reinforcement
Tolerance: receptor desensitisation and downregulation with chronic use
Opioid substitution therapy (OST) involves prescribing long-acting opioid agonists (methadone or buprenorphine) to reduce illicit opioid use, injecting behaviour, and associated harms, and is the most effective treatment for opioid dependence.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Methadone (full μ agonist) and buprenorphine (partial μ agonist) are first-line OST agents (NICE TA114)
Optimal methadone dose: 60-120 mg/day - doses below 60 mg associated with higher dropout and continued illicit use
Buprenorphine dose range: 8-24 mg/day sublingual; must be in withdrawal before first dose (COWS ≥12) to avoid precipitated withdrawal
Supervised consumption recommended for first 3 months minimum; longer if risk of diversion or instability
OST reduces all-cause mortality by ~50% and reduces criminal activity, injecting behaviour, and blood-borne virus transmission
QTc prolongation is a recognised risk with methadone - ECG monitoring recommended before and during treatment
The "Orange Book" (UK Guidelines on Clinical Management of Drug Misuse and Dependence, 2017) is the key UK clinical reference
Overview
Key Facts
Opioid substitution therapy is the gold standard treatment for opioid dependence. It replaces short-acting illicit opioids with longer-acting prescribed alternatives, stabilising the patient and enabling psychosocial recovery. It is one of the most evidence-based treatments in all of addiction medicine.
Epidemiology
Approximately 140,000 people in England receive OST at any one time
~50% prescribed methadone, ~30% buprenorphine, remainder mixed or other
Retention in OST at 12 months: approximately 60-70% for methadone, 50-60% for buprenorphine
Adequate-dose OST associated with ~50% reduction in all-cause mortality
Perinatal addiction service: pregnant women on OST
Pain management: patients with chronic pain on OST
Hepatology/BBV services: hepatitis C treatment, HIV co-management
Prognosis
Outcomes
OST retention at 1 year: 60-70% (methadone), 50-60% (buprenorphine)
Reduction in illicit opioid use: ~60-70% of patients significantly reduce or stop illicit heroin while on adequate-dose OST
All-cause mortality reduction: approximately 50% while on OST
Reduction in criminal activity: ~50% reduction in acquisitive crime
Duration of treatment: often years; no maximum recommended duration; many patients benefit from long-term or indefinite OST
Complications
Methadone-related: QTc prolongation and risk of torsades de pointes (especially doses >100 mg/day or with interacting drugs); constipation; weight gain; dental problems; hyperhidrosis
Buprenorphine-related: precipitated withdrawal if initiated too early; headache; nausea; constipation; hepatotoxicity (rare at therapeutic doses)
First 2 weeks of treatment: highest risk of overdose death (especially methadone titration phase)
Drop-out from treatment: associated with return to illicit use and increased mortality
Stigma: can affect engagement with healthcare and employment
Opioid overdose is a medical emergency characterised by respiratory depression, miosis, and reduced consciousness, requiring immediate naloxone administration and airway management, with approximately 2,300 opioid-related deaths annually in England and Wales.
Naloxone 400 mcg IV/IM/SC is the first-line antidote; repeat every 2-3 minutes as needed; larger doses may be required for synthetic opioids
Naloxone half-life (~60-90 minutes) is shorter than most opioids - risk of recurrent respiratory depression; observe for minimum 2 hours (longer for methadone/slow-release preparations)
Take-home naloxone programmes provide Prenoxad (pre-filled naloxone syringe, 5 × 400 mcg) or Nyxoid (naloxone nasal spray, 1.8 mg per dose)
Polysubstance overdose is the norm - ~70% of opioid-related deaths involve multiple substances (benzodiazepines, alcohol, gabapentinoids)
Non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: recognised complication of opioid overdose; may develop after naloxone administration
Resuscitation Council UK guidelines: ABC approach, rescue breaths, naloxone; bag-valve-mask ventilation is critical while awaiting naloxone effect
Risk factors for overdose death: loss of tolerance (prison release, post-detox), polysubstance use, injecting route, lone use, co-morbidities
Overview
Key Facts
Opioid overdose is the leading cause of drug-related death in the UK. Prompt recognition and treatment with naloxone can be life-saving. The majority of opioid-related deaths are preventable. Take-home naloxone programmes are a key public health intervention.
Epidemiology
~2,300 opioid-related deaths per year in England and Wales (2021 data); rising trend
Drug poisoning deaths overall: ~4,900/year - highest on record
Peak age: 40-49 years (reflecting ageing cohort of opioid users)
Male:female ratio: approximately 3:1
Risk period: first 4 weeks after prison release - 7-8× increased risk of drug-related death
Approximately 70% of opioid-related deaths involve multiple substances
Aetiology
Heroin (diamorphine): most common opioid in UK overdose deaths
Methadone: second most common; risk during initiation and if diverted
Airway: open airway (head tilt, chin lift, jaw thrust); suction if needed; recovery position if breathing
Breathing: if respiratory rate <8/min or SpO2 <92% - bag-valve-mask ventilation with high-flow oxygen
Rescue breaths: 5 initial rescue breaths if apnoeic (bystander or EMS)
Call 999: early activation of emergency services
Do not leave patient alone: monitor continuously
Pharmacological - Naloxone
Naloxone (opioid antagonist):
IV route: 400 mcg (0.4 mg) bolus; repeat every 2-3 minutes up to 10 mg total
IM/SC route: 400 mcg (0.4 mg); repeat every 2-3 minutes; slightly slower onset (~5 minutes)
Intranasal (Nyxoid): 1.8 mg per nostril; no needle required; increasingly used pre-hospital
Goal: restore adequate spontaneous respiration (RR >12) - do NOT aim to fully reverse opioid effect (precipitates severe withdrawal)
Naloxone infusion: if repeated boluses needed - 10 mg in 50 mL 0.9% NaCl at rate guided by clinical response (typically 2/3 of initial response dose per hour)
Observation period: minimum 2 hours after last naloxone dose for short-acting opioids; minimum 4-6 hours (or longer) for methadone, slow-release preparations, or fentanyl patches
Take-home naloxone:
Prenoxad: pre-filled syringe with 5 × 400 mcg doses for IM injection
Nyxoid: nasal spray, 1.8 mg per dose; available without prescription in some settings
Should be offered to all patients at risk of opioid overdose, their families, and carers (NICE NG225)
Additional Pharmacological Management
Atropine 0.5-1 mg IV: for symptomatic bradycardia
IV fluids: for hypotension and rhabdomyolysis
Sodium bicarbonate: for rhabdomyolysis-related acidosis
Antibiotics: if aspiration pneumonia suspected
Surgical
Intubation and mechanical ventilation: if airway compromise or persistent respiratory failure despite naloxone
Surgical removal of drug packets: body packing with suspected rupture - emergency laparotomy
Drug and alcohol services: all patients surviving opioid overdose - assess for OST
Mental health assessment: if intentional overdose
Take-home naloxone provision: before discharge from ED
Prison in-reach/release planning: if overdose relates to prison discharge
Prognosis
Outcomes
Prompt naloxone administration: near-complete reversal of respiratory depression in majority of cases
Survival to hospital discharge: >95% if naloxone given promptly
Hypoxic brain injury: if prolonged respiratory depression before treatment - variable outcome from mild cognitive impairment to persistent vegetative state
Recurrent overdose: approximately 20-30% of individuals who survive overdose will experience another within 12 months
Complications
Aspiration pneumonia: occurs in ~10-15% of patients with reduced consciousness
Non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: may develop up to 24 hours after overdose
Rhabdomyolysis: CK >5,000 IU/L; risk of acute kidney injury; requires aggressive IV fluid resuscitation
Benzodiazepine dependence is a common iatrogenic and recreational substance use disorder characterised by tolerance, physical and psychological dependence, and a potentially life-threatening withdrawal syndrome requiring gradual dose reduction.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
~1 million people in the UK may be dependent on benzodiazepines; majority are iatrogenic (prescribed) dependence
NICE CG113: benzodiazepines should not be prescribed for >4 weeks for anxiety; not first-line for insomnia
Withdrawal can be life-threatening: seizures, psychosis, and delirium can occur - unlike opioid withdrawal, benzodiazepine withdrawal can be fatal
Gradual dose reduction is the standard approach: convert to diazepam equivalent and reduce by approximately 10-12.5% of dose every 2-4 weeks
Diazepam is preferred for withdrawal management due to its long half-life (20-100 hours) and availability of multiple tablet strengths
Flumazenil is the benzodiazepine antagonist but is contraindicated in chronic benzodiazepine use (risk of precipitating seizures)
Z-drugs (zopiclone, zolpidem) have similar dependence potential and cross-tolerance with benzodiazepines
Illicit benzodiazepine use is a major contributor to drug-related deaths - frequently found alongside opioids in polydrug fatalities
Overview
Key Facts
Benzodiazepine dependence is one of the most common forms of substance dependence. It may be iatrogenic (from prescribing) or related to recreational/illicit use. Withdrawal is medically serious and potentially fatal, requiring careful managed reduction rather than abrupt cessation.
Epidemiology
Approximately ~11 million benzodiazepine prescriptions per year in England
Estimated ~1 million long-term users in the UK
Dependence can develop after as little as 4-6 weeks of regular use
Z-drugs (zopiclone, zolpidem): similar problem; often overlooked
Illicit benzodiazepine use: increasing problem; novel benzodiazepines (e.g. flualprazolam, etizolam) entering the illicit drug supply
Benzodiazepines implicated in approximately 40% of opioid-related deaths as co-ingestants
Cannabis use disorder involves problematic cannabis use leading to significant impairment, with increasing potency of modern cannabis strains associated with higher rates of dependence, psychosis, and cognitive impairment, particularly in young people.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug in the UK - approximately 7.4% of 16-59 year olds used in the past year
THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) is the main psychoactive component; modern strains ("skunk") contain ~15-20% THC versus ~3-5% in traditional herbal cannabis
Cannabis and psychosis: daily use of high-potency cannabis increases risk of first-episode psychosis by ~5-fold (Di Forti et al., Lancet Psychiatry 2019)
Cannabis dependence develops in approximately ~9% of ever-users and ~17% of those who start in adolescence
Cannabis withdrawal syndrome: irritability, anxiety, insomnia, decreased appetite, restlessness - peaks at ~3-4 days, resolves within 1-2 weeks
No approved pharmacotherapy for cannabis use disorder; psychosocial interventions (CBT, motivational enhancement) are first-line
Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: cyclical vomiting relieved by hot bathing in chronic heavy users
Cannabis is the most widely used controlled substance globally and in the UK. While often perceived as relatively harmless, increasing evidence demonstrates significant harms, particularly with high-potency products, early-onset use, and heavy/daily use. There is a strong association between cannabis use and psychotic disorders.
Epidemiology
~2.6 million adults in England and Wales used cannabis in the past year
Prevalence highest: 16-24 age group (~18% past-year use)
Dependence: ~9% of ever-users; ~17% of adolescent-onset users; ~25-50% of daily users
Cannabis-related hospital admissions are increasing
Treatment presentations: cannabis is the most common primary drug for under-18s entering treatment services
Aetiology
Pharmacology: THC acts on CB1 cannabinoid receptors (primarily in brain - hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, cerebellum) and CB2 receptors (periphery/immune)
Risk factors for dependence: early onset of use (<16 years), high-potency products, daily use, family history of addiction, co-morbid mental illness, social adversity
CBD (cannabidiol): non-intoxicating cannabinoid; may have anxiolytic and antipsychotic properties; attenuates some effects of THC
Chronic use: CB1 receptor downregulation and desensitisation → tolerance
Adolescent vulnerability: endocannabinoid system is critical for neurodevelopment; exogenous THC disrupts normal pruning and myelination of prefrontal cortex
Cannabis and psychosis: THC increases dopamine in mesolimbic pathway; gene-environment interaction (COMT Val158Met polymorphism moderates risk)
Clinical Presentation
Acute Cannabis Intoxication
Euphoria and relaxation: sense of wellbeing
Altered perception: time distortion, enhanced sensory experience
Impaired short-term memory and concentration
Increased appetite ("munchies")
Conjunctival injection (red eyes), dry mouth
Tachycardia: dose-related increase in heart rate
Anxiety or paranoia: particularly with high-THC products or in inexperienced users
Psychomotor impairment: slowed reaction time, impaired coordination
Cannabis Use Disorder
Impaired control over use
Continued use despite social, occupational, or health consequences
Cocaine and stimulant misuse encompasses the harmful use of cocaine (powder and crack), amphetamines, and methamphetamine, presenting with significant cardiovascular, neurological, and psychiatric complications and increasing drug-related deaths in the UK.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Cocaine is the second most commonly used illicit drug in the UK; ~2.6% of 16-59 year olds used in the past year
Cocaine-related deaths have increased >5-fold since 2011 in England and Wales; ~840 deaths/year
Chest pain: cocaine-associated ACS should be treated with benzodiazepines, GTN, and aspirin; avoid beta-blockers (risk of unopposed alpha-adrenergic stimulation)
Crack cocaine: freebase form smoked for rapid intense high; more addictive; associated with greater harm
Amphetamine/methamphetamine: release monoamines from presynaptic terminals; longer duration of action than cocaine
No approved pharmacotherapy for cocaine dependence; psychosocial interventions (CBT, contingency management) are first-line (NICE CG51)
Cocaine and other stimulants are among the most commonly misused substances in the UK. Cocaine-related harm has risen dramatically over the past decade, driven by increased purity and availability. Stimulant misuse carries significant cardiovascular, neurological, and psychiatric risks.
Epidemiology
Cocaine: ~875,000 users in past year (England and Wales); highest rates in 20-29 age group
Cocaine purity: average has increased from ~20% to >60% over the past decade
Cocaine deaths: approximately 840/year (England and Wales); increasing trend
Amphetamines: ~130,000 past-year users; declining trend but methamphetamine emerging
MDMA (ecstasy): ~500,000 past-year users; typically intermittent recreational use
Aetiology
Cocaine: derived from coca plant (Erythroxylum coca); two forms:
Powder cocaine (cocaine hydrochloride): snorted or injected
Crack cocaine (freebase): smoked; rapid onset, intense but brief high → highly reinforcing
Cocaine-associated acute coronary syndrome: chest pain within hours of use; coronary vasospasm ± thrombosis; may cause MI in young patients with normal coronary arteries
Novel psychoactive substances (NPS, formerly 'legal highs') are synthetic compounds designed to mimic effects of established drugs, posing significant clinical challenges due to unpredictable potency, unknown pharmacology, and frequent non-detection on standard drug screens.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Psychoactive Substances Act 2016: made it an offence to produce, supply, or possess with intent to supply any psychoactive substance (blanket ban replacing substance-by-substance scheduling)
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) (e.g. Spice, Black Mamba): most commonly associated with severe toxicity including seizures, psychosis, AKI, and death
Standard urine drug screens do NOT detect most NPS - specialist toxicology required
Homeless and prison populations: disproportionately affected by synthetic cannabinoid use
Clinical management is largely supportive - identify toxidrome (sympathomimetic, serotonergic, sedative, cannabinoid) and treat accordingly
NEPTUNE Clinical Guidance provides UK-specific recommendations for NPS-related harm management
Overview
Key Facts
Novel psychoactive substances represent a rapidly evolving challenge for healthcare. Hundreds of new compounds emerge each year, often with limited pharmacological data. Clinical presentations can be severe and unpredictable. Healthcare professionals must recognise common toxidromes and provide appropriate supportive care.
Epidemiology
>800 NPS identified by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) since 2005
Prevalence of past-year NPS use in UK: approximately 0.5-1% of 16-59 year olds
Synthetic cannabinoids: most commonly used NPS; concentrated in homeless and prison populations (prevalence up to ~90% in some prison surveys)
NPS-related deaths: increasing; ~200/year in England and Wales (often involving novel benzodiazepines)
Mephedrone: was most popular NPS before classification as Class B in 2010
Aetiology - Major NPS Categories
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs): Spice, Black Mamba, ADB-BUTINACA; full CB1 agonists (much more potent and dangerous than THC, which is a partial agonist)
Urine drug screen: standard immunoassay - often negative for NPS; still useful to identify co-ingestants
Bloods
ABG/VBG: acidosis, lactate, oxygenation
U&Es: AKI (SCRAs), hyponatraemia (cathinones/MDMA-like compounds)
CK: rhabdomyolysis (may be massively elevated)
LFTs: hepatotoxicity (some cathinones)
FBC: leucocytosis (stress response)
Coagulation: DIC in severe cases
Paracetamol and salicylate: routine in acute presentations
Imaging
CT head: if seizures, focal neurology, prolonged reduced consciousness
Chest X-ray: if aspiration, pulmonary oedema, or chest pain
Special Tests
Specialist toxicology screen: liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) - identifies specific NPS; send via National Poisons Information Service
TOXBASE/NPIS: contact for guidance on specific substances
Wedinos: Welsh substance testing service providing information on circulating NPS in UK
Management
Non-pharmacological
Toxidrome-based approach: identify the predominant clinical picture and manage accordingly
Calm, safe environment: reduce stimulation for agitated patients
Active cooling: for hyperthermia >39°C
IV fluid resuscitation: for dehydration, rhabdomyolysis, hypotension
Continuous monitoring: in high-dependency setting for severe presentations
Smoking is the leading preventable cause of death in the UK, responsible for approximately 76,000 deaths annually, with nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline, and behavioural support forming the evidence-based approach to cessation.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
~76,000 deaths/year in England attributable to smoking; leading preventable cause of death
Smoking prevalence in England: approximately 12-13% of adults (declining but persistent in deprived groups)
Varenicline (Champix): most effective single pharmacotherapy; NNT ~8 for 6-month abstinence - partial nicotinic receptor agonist (EAGLES trial confirmed cardiovascular and psychiatric safety)
NRT (nicotine replacement therapy): increases quit rates by 50-60%; combination therapy (patch + short-acting form) most effective
Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND): assesses severity; time to first cigarette most predictive item
Very Brief Advice (VBA): ASK about smoking, ADVISE to stop, ACT on response - takes 30 seconds; recommended for all healthcare contacts (NICE PH1)
E-cigarettes (vapes): evidence suggests they are ~twice as effective as NRT for cessation (Hajek et al., NEJM 2019); endorsed by PHE/OHID as harm reduction tool
NICE NG209: tobacco - preventing uptake, promoting quitting, and treating dependence; recommends offering stop smoking support to all smokers at every opportunity
Overview
Key Facts
Smoking remains the single largest preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the UK. Despite declining prevalence, it continues to cause enormous health and economic burden, with stark socioeconomic inequalities. Effective cessation treatments exist and are highly cost-effective.
Epidemiology
Smoking prevalence in England: ~12-13% (2022); down from ~46% in 1974
Socioeconomic gradient: prevalence ~25% in most deprived quintile vs ~6% in least deprived
~76,000 deaths/year in England; ~500,000 hospital admissions attributable to smoking
Smoking in pregnancy: ~9% at time of delivery; leading modifiable risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes
Smokeless tobacco: betel/paan use in South Asian communities - oral cancer risk
E-cigarette use: ~3.6 million adults in England use vapes; primarily current or ex-smokers
Aetiology
Nicotine: primary addictive component; binds nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), particularly α4β2 subtype in the ventral tegmental area
Neurobiological
nicotine
dopamine release in nucleus accumbens
reinforcement; tolerance develops rapidly
Behavioural: conditioning to environmental cues (after meals, with alcohol, stress); habitual behaviour deeply ingrained
Psychosocial: peer influence (particularly in adolescent initiation), stress coping, social identity
Industry: tobacco product design optimises nicotine delivery and addiction
Pathophysiology - Smoking-Related Disease
Cardiovascular: accelerated atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction, prothrombotic state
Cytisine (Desmoxan): partial nAChR agonist; emerging evidence of efficacy similar to varenicline; natural plant alkaloid; increasingly available
E-cigarettes/vapes: not licensed medicines but endorsed by OHID (Office for Health Improvement and Disparities) as cessation aid; ~twice as effective as NRT (Hajek et al., NEJM 2019); swap-to-stop schemes in NHS
Surgical
Not applicable to smoking cessation specifically
Referral Criteria
NHS Stop Smoking Service: all smokers motivated to quit; GPs can refer directly
Specialist services: pregnant smokers (specialist midwifery), mental health inpatients (higher smoking rates), secondary care inpatients (hospital smoking cessation teams)
Respiratory/oncology: for smoking-related disease management alongside cessation support
Prognosis
Benefits of Cessation
20 minutes: heart rate and blood pressure begin to normalise
48 hours: CO eliminated; taste and smell improving
1 year: CVD risk halved compared to continuing smoker
10 years: lung cancer risk halved compared to continuing smoker
15 years: CVD risk equivalent to never-smoker
Stopping at age 30: gain ~10 years life expectancy; stopping at age 60: gain ~3 years
Complications of Continued Smoking
Life expectancy reduction: smokers die on average 10 years earlier than non-smokers
COPD: progressive, irreversible airflow limitation; leading cause of respiratory disability
Lung cancer: ~47,000 cases/year in UK; 5-year survival ~15-20% overall
Cardiovascular disease: 2-4× risk of CAD; 2× risk of stroke
Economic cost: estimated £2.4 billion/year to the NHS
Quit Attempt Statistics
~60% of smokers want to quit; ~30% make a quit attempt each year
Unaided quit attempts: ~3-5% success at 12 months
Pharmacotherapy alone: ~10-15% at 12 months
Pharmacotherapy + behavioural support: ~15-25% at 12 months
Average smoker makes ~7 quit attempts before successfully stopping long-term
Other Relevant Information
Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy Comparison
Treatment
Mechanism
OR vs Placebo (6 months)
Key Side Effects
Varenicline
Partial α4β2 nAChR agonist
2.2-2.9
Nausea, vivid dreams
Combination NRT
Nicotine replacement
1.9-2.4
Skin irritation (patch), mouth/throat irritation
Single NRT
Nicotine replacement
1.5-1.7
As above
Bupropion
NA/DA reuptake inhibitor
1.6
Insomnia, dry mouth, seizure risk
E-cigarette
Nicotine delivery (non-combustion)
~1.7-2.0
Throat irritation, cough
Cytisine
Partial nAChR agonist
~1.6-2.0
GI upset, nausea
Fagerström Test Items
Question
Scoring
Time to first cigarette
≤5 min (3), 6-30 min (2), 31-60 min (1), >60 min (0)
Difficulty refraining in forbidden places
Yes (1), No (0)
Which cigarette hardest to give up
First in morning (1), Other (0)
Cigarettes per day
≤10 (0), 11-20 (1), 21-30 (2), ≥31 (3)
Smoke more in first hours after waking
Yes (1), No (0)
Smoke when ill in bed
Yes (1), No (0)
Key Landmark Studies
Trial
Year
Finding
EAGLES
2016
Varenicline: no increased neuropsychiatric risk vs NRT/placebo
Hajek et al.
2019
E-cigarettes twice as effective as NRT for cessation
Doll & Peto (British Doctors Study)
1954-2004
Definitive evidence: smoking causes lung cancer and CVD
Cahill et al. (Cochrane)
2016
Varenicline most effective single agent for cessation
Harm reduction is a pragmatic, evidence-based public health approach that aims to reduce the adverse health, social, and economic consequences of substance use without necessarily requiring abstinence, encompassing needle exchange, naloxone provision, opioid substitution, and supervised consumption.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Harm reduction aims to reduce drug-related harm without requiring abstinence as a precondition for engagement
Needle and syringe programmes (NSPs) reduce hepatitis C incidence by approximately 50% and HIV transmission significantly (NICE PH52)
Take-home naloxone: provision to opioid users and carers reduces opioid overdose deaths; Prenoxad (IM) and Nyxoid (intranasal) available
Opioid substitution therapy (OST) reduces all-cause mortality by ~50%, reduces injecting, and reduces acquisitive crime
Hepatitis C treatment: direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) achieve >95% cure rate; WHO elimination target by 2030; treatment as prevention
Drug consumption rooms (DCRs): not currently legal in England (Scotland piloting); evidence from international sites shows reduction in overdose deaths and public injecting
NICE PH52: recommends comprehensive NSPs, including provision of foil for smoking drugs as alternative to injecting
Managed alcohol programmes: controlled provision of alcohol to reduce harms from street drinking in severe alcohol dependence
Overview
Key Facts
Harm reduction is a cornerstone of UK drug policy and public health strategy. It recognises that some individuals cannot or do not wish to stop using substances, and focuses on minimising associated harms. The approach is endorsed by NICE, PHE/OHID, WHO, and UNAIDS.
Epidemiology and Context
Approximately 300,000 high-risk drug users in England; not all are in treatment
Needle and syringe programmes distribute approximately 30 million syringes per year in England
Hepatitis C prevalence among people who inject drugs (PWID): approximately 50%; declining with increased treatment
HIV prevalence among PWID in England: approximately 1% (low by international standards - attributed to early NSP implementation)
Drug-related deaths: record levels (~4,900/year); harm reduction measures are crucial to reducing this toll
Principles
Pragmatism: drug use is a reality; focus on reducing harm rather than eliminating use
Human rights: drug users deserve access to healthcare and respect
Evidence-based: interventions proven to reduce morbidity, mortality, and BBV transmission
Hierarchy of goals: death prevention > disease prevention > reducing injecting risk > reducing drug use
Non-judgemental engagement: meeting people where they are
Policy Framework
UK Drug Strategy 2021: "From Harm to Hope" - combines harm reduction with treatment and recovery
NICE PH52 (2014): Needle and syringe programmes - evidence-based recommendations
NICE NG225 (2022): Drug misuse prevention and harm reduction
Dame Carol Black Review (2021): highlighted urgent need for increased investment in drug treatment and harm reduction
Clinical Presentation
Target Populations for Harm Reduction
People who inject drugs (PWID): highest risk for BBV transmission, overdose, injection-related infections
People who smoke drugs: crack cocaine, heroin (chasing); lower BBV risk than injecting
Opioid users not in treatment: at risk of overdose, particularly after tolerance loss
Alcohol-dependent individuals: street drinkers, homeless populations
Chemsex populations: MSM using GHB/GBL, crystal meth, mephedrone during sexual activity - risk of BBV, overdose, sexual health consequences
People in criminal justice settings: prison, probation; high rates of substance use
Assessment for Harm Reduction Interventions
Injecting risk assessment: sites used, sharing of equipment, knowledge of safer injecting
BBV risk assessment: sharing history, sexual risk, vaccination status
Distribute approximately 30 million syringes/year in England
Take-Home Naloxone
Prenoxad: pre-filled syringe (5 × 400 mcg doses IM); provided to opioid users, families, and services
Nyxoid: intranasal spray (1.8 mg per dose); no needle required
Training: simple instruction on recognition of opioid overdose and naloxone administration
Target groups: all people using illicit opioids, OST patients, prison leavers, family/carers, hostel staff
Legal protection: no prosecution for administering naloxone in emergency
Blood-Borne Virus Prevention and Treatment
Hepatitis B vaccination: accelerated schedule for PWID (0, 7, 21 days + 12-month booster); check seroconversion
Hepatitis C treatment: direct-acting antivirals (e.g. sofosbuvir/velpatasvir - Epclusa - 12 weeks); >95% SVR; treat and prevent paradigm (NICE TA507)
HIV PrEP: emtricitabine/tenofovir (Truvada) for HIV-negative PWID and chemsex populations at high risk
HIV treatment: early ART initiation; undetectable = untransmissible (U=U)
Opioid Substitution Therapy
Methadone or buprenorphine: reduces overdose risk, injecting, BBV transmission, crime (detailed in OST topic)
Supervised Consumption Rooms
Legally sanctioned facilities where pre-obtained drugs can be consumed under medical supervision
Not currently legal in England; pilot approved in Glasgow (2023)
International evidence: reduces overdose death, BBV transmission, public injecting; does not increase drug use or crime
Managed Alcohol Programmes
Controlled provision of alcohol (e.g. beer/wine at set intervals) to severely dependent homeless individuals
Reduces consumption of non-beverage alcohol, emergency presentations, and alcohol-related harm
Referral Criteria
Community drug and alcohol services: all people using substances harmfully
Hepatology/BBV services: hepatitis C-positive individuals for DAA treatment
Sexual health services: chemsex populations, BBV-positive individuals
Housing and social services: homeless individuals using substances
Mental health services: co-morbid mental illness (dual diagnosis)
Prognosis
Effectiveness of Harm Reduction
NSPs: reduce hepatitis C incidence by approximately 50% among PWID; contributed to keeping UK HIV prevalence among PWID at ~1% (vs >30% in countries without NSPs)
Take-home naloxone: associated with ~36% reduction in opioid overdose mortality at community level
OST: reduces all-cause mortality by ~50%; reduces heroin use, injecting, and crime
Hepatitis C treatment: >95% SVR with DAAs; WHO elimination target (80% reduction by 2030) potentially achievable in UK
Hepatitis B vaccination: effective seroconversion in >80% of PWID completing accelerated schedule
Ongoing Challenges
Drug-related deaths: continuing to rise despite harm reduction efforts; need for expanded access
Treatment gaps: only ~50% of opioid users in treatment; significant unmet need
Homelessness: strong association with drug-related harm; housing-first approaches complement harm reduction
Stigma: barrier to accessing services; affects quality of healthcare received
Motivational interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based, patient-centred counselling approach designed to strengthen intrinsic motivation for behaviour change by exploring and resolving ambivalence, widely used in substance misuse, chronic disease management, and health promotion.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Developed by Miller and Rollnick (1991): defined as a collaborative, goal-oriented style of communication with particular attention to the language of change
NICE CG115 recommends motivational interviewing-based interventions for alcohol use disorders; NICE CG51 recommends for drug misuse
Four core processes: engaging, focusing, evoking, and planning (Miller & Rollnick, 3rd edition 2013)
OARS skills: Open questions, Affirmations, Reflective listening, and Summaries - the fundamental MI communication techniques
Change talk: patient statements favouring change (desire, ability, reasons, need, commitment) - the MI practitioner's goal is to evoke and reinforce these
Sustain talk: patient statements favouring the status quo - should be acknowledged but not reinforced
UKATT trial (2005): demonstrated that motivational enhancement therapy was as effective as more intensive social behaviour and network therapy for alcohol dependence in UK NHS
Spirit of MI: partnership (collaboration, not confrontation), acceptance (autonomy, affirmation), compassion, evocation (drawing out rather than imposing)
Overview
Key Facts
Motivational interviewing is one of the most widely studied and applied behavioural interventions in healthcare. It has a strong evidence base across multiple conditions including substance misuse, smoking cessation, medication adherence, weight management, and chronic disease self-management.
Epidemiology and Context
MI is recommended in over 20 NICE guidelines across different clinical areas
Brief motivational interventions (1-4 sessions) are the standard approach for hazardous/harmful alcohol use in primary care and Emergency Departments
MI training is a core competency in postgraduate training for GPs, psychiatrists, and addiction specialists
Stages of Change model (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1983): often used alongside MI - precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, relapse
Theoretical Basis
Self-determination theory: MI supports autonomy, competence, and relatedness - key psychological needs for sustained behaviour change
Cognitive dissonance: MI creates discrepancy between current behaviour and personal values/goals, motivating change
MI shares empathic style but is more directive and goal-oriented
12-step facilitation
Disease model, abstinence-oriented, peer support
MI is non-judgemental about goals; supports autonomous decision-making
Psychoeducation
Providing information about condition and treatment
Information-giving; does not explore ambivalence or evoke change talk
Confrontational approaches
Direct challenge of denial, historically used in addiction
MI avoids confrontation; evidence shows confrontation increases resistance
Solution-focused brief therapy
Focuses on solutions rather than problems
MI focuses specifically on resolving ambivalence about a target behaviour
Contingency management
Incentive-based behaviour modification
External motivation; MI focuses on internal motivation
Diagnosis / Investigation
Assessment Tools Used Alongside MI
Readiness to change rulers: 0-10 scale - "How ready are you to make this change?" followed by exploring responses
Importance and confidence rulers: "On a scale of 0-10, how important is it for you to change? How confident are you that you could change?"
Decisional balance: exploring pros and cons of change vs. status quo - structured exercise within MI framework
AUDIT/AUDIT-C: screening for alcohol use disorders (used to identify patients who may benefit from MI)
Stages of Change questionnaire: identifies current stage in the change cycle
Assessment of MI Fidelity
MITI (Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity): gold standard for coding MI quality in research and training
Measures: empathy, MI spirit (partnership, autonomy, evocation, compassion)
Counts: reflections, questions (ratio of reflections to questions), MI-adherent behaviours (affirmations, seeking permission) vs MI-non-adherent behaviours (advising without permission, confronting)
MISC (Motivational Interviewing Skill Code): more detailed coding system
Training standards: MI competence typically requires 2-3 days initial training plus ongoing supervision and practice
Monitoring Outcomes
Substance use measures: AUDIT, SADQ, urine drug screens, drinking diary
Behavioural outcome measures: specific to target behaviour (e.g. HbA1c for diabetes, weight for obesity)
Patient-reported outcomes: confidence in change, self-efficacy measures
Session recordings: reviewed in supervision for MI fidelity
Management
OARS - Core MI Skills
Open questions: encourage patient to explore their experience
"What concerns you about your drinking?"
"How would you like things to be different?"
Affirmations: recognise patient strengths, efforts, and values
"It took courage to come here today"
"You clearly care about your family's wellbeing"
Reflective listening: the most fundamental MI skill; demonstrates understanding and encourages deeper exploration
Simple reflection: repeating or rephrasing what the patient said
Complex reflection: adding meaning, reflecting feeling, or continuing the paragraph (anticipating what the patient might say next)
Aim for reflection:question ratio of at least 2:1
Summaries: collecting and linking what the patient has said; demonstrates careful listening and can strategically highlight change talk
Key MI Strategies
Developing discrepancy: helping the patient see the gap between current behaviour and personal values/goals
"On one hand you enjoy drinking with friends, and on the other you're worried about your liver. What do you make of that?"
Rolling with resistance (responding to sustain talk and discord):
Avoid arguing or confronting
Use reflections to acknowledge the patient's perspective
Emphasise personal autonomy: "It's entirely your decision"
Supporting self-efficacy: build confidence in the patient's ability to change
"You've managed to cut down before - what worked for you then?"
"What would be the best thing about making this change?"
"How might you go about it?"
Delivering MI in Practice
Brief MI (5-15 minutes): adapted for time-limited settings (GP consultations, ED attendances); retains core spirit and OARS
Extended MI (2-4 sessions, ~45 minutes each): motivational enhancement therapy (MET); used in specialist addiction services
Group MI: adapted for group settings; effective in some contexts
Telephone and digital MI: evidence for remote delivery; useful for accessibility
Training and Competence
Initial training: typically 2-3 day workshop with role-play and feedback
Ongoing supervision: essential for skill development and maintenance
Coding and feedback: using MITI to assess and improve practice
Integration with other approaches: MI is often combined with CBT, contingency management, or pharmacotherapy
Referral Criteria
MI is a skill used across healthcare settings rather than a standalone referral pathway
Brief MI: delivered by any trained healthcare professional (GP, nurse, pharmacist, ED doctor)
Specialist MI/MET: addiction services, mental health teams, health psychology
Training provision: Royal College of General Practitioners, various NHS trusts, Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT)
Prognosis
Evidence of Effectiveness
Alcohol use disorders: brief MI in primary care and ED reduces alcohol consumption; NNT ~8 for reduction to low-risk drinking (NICE CG115)
UKATT trial (2005): motivational enhancement therapy (3 sessions) as effective as social behaviour and network therapy (8 sessions) - more cost-effective
Project MATCH (1997): MET, CBT, and 12-step facilitation all effective; no significant matching effect
Smoking cessation: MI increases quit attempts and abstinence rates (Lindson et al., Cochrane 2019)
Drug misuse: modest but significant effects on reducing substance use (Smedslund et al., Cochrane 2011)
Chronic disease: effective for medication adherence (OR ~1.5), diabetes self-management, weight loss
Limitations
Effect sizes are modest: typically small to medium; MI is not a miracle cure
Practitioner skill variation: effectiveness highly dependent on quality of MI delivery
Less effective for: patients with no ambivalence (either strongly motivated or completely resistant), acute crises
Evidence strongest for: brief interventions for alcohol, as adjunct to other treatments for drug misuse, and for engagement in treatment
Complications of Poor MI Practice
"Righting reflex": telling the patient what to do → increases resistance
Premature focus: pushing towards change before exploring ambivalence → discord
Excessive use of closed questions: feels interrogative; reduces engagement
Labelling: e.g. "you're an alcoholic" → increases resistance and shame
Wrestling with resistance: arguing with the patient → entrenches status quo
Other Relevant Information
MI Spirit and Principles Summary
Component
Description
Partnership
Collaborative, not expert-driven
Acceptance
Autonomy support, accurate empathy, affirmation, absolute worth
Compassion
Prioritise the patient's welfare
Evocation
Draw out patient's own ideas, values, and motivations
Change Talk (DARN-CAT)
Category
Type
Example
D - Desire
Preparatory
"I want to cut down"
A - Ability
Preparatory
"I could probably manage one night without drinking"
R - Reasons
Preparatory
"If I stopped, my blood pressure would come down"
N - Need
Preparatory
"I have to do something about this"
C - Commitment
Mobilising
"I will make an appointment with the alcohol service"
A - Activation
Mobilising
"I'm ready to give it a go"
T - Taking steps
Mobilising
"I threw away the bottles last night"
Key Landmark Studies
Study
Year
Key Finding
Miller & Rollnick (1st edition)
1991
Defined motivational interviewing
Project MATCH
1997
MET as effective as longer treatments
UKATT
2005
MET equivalent to SBNT; more cost-effective
Lundahl et al. (meta-analysis)
2010
MI has significant, modest effect across behaviours
Dual diagnosis refers to the co-occurrence of substance misuse and mental health disorders, affecting approximately 30-50% of mental health service users and 50-70% of substance misuse service users, requiring integrated treatment approaches for optimal outcomes.
MRCPsych · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT
Key Facts
Prevalence: approximately 30-50% of people with severe mental illness also have a substance use disorder; 50-70% of people in substance misuse services have a co-morbid mental health condition
NICE CG120: recommends that mental health services take the lead when both conditions are present - "no wrong door" policy
Bidirectional relationship: substance use worsens mental illness, and mental illness increases vulnerability to substance use
Cannabis and psychosis: strong association; daily high-potency use increases psychosis risk 5-fold (Di Forti et al., 2019)
Alcohol and depression: co-occurrence in up to 40% of people presenting with either condition; alcohol is a CNS depressant and worsens mood
Suicide risk: dual diagnosis patients have significantly increased suicide risk - ~25-35% of completed suicides involve substance misuse
Integrated treatment (addressing both conditions simultaneously) produces better outcomes than sequential or parallel treatment
Self-medication hypothesis (Khantzian, 1985): individuals use substances to cope with distressing psychiatric symptoms
Overview
Key Facts
Dual diagnosis is the rule rather than the exception in both mental health and substance misuse services. The interaction between mental illness and substance use creates a cycle of mutual reinforcement that is challenging to treat. Integrated care models addressing both conditions simultaneously are recommended but inconsistently implemented.
Epidemiology
General population: ~30% of people with any mental disorder have a co-morbid substance use disorder
Severe mental illness (SMI): substance misuse prevalence:
Schizophrenia: ~40-50% lifetime substance use disorder
Bipolar disorder: ~40-60% lifetime substance use disorder
Homeless population: rates of dual diagnosis up to ~70-80%
Criminal justice: very high rates; dual diagnosis common among prison population
Aetiology
Self-medication hypothesis: individuals use substances to alleviate psychiatric symptoms (e.g. alcohol for anxiety, cannabis for negative symptoms of schizophrenia)
Shared vulnerability: common genetic, neurobiological, and environmental risk factors (e.g. dopamine system dysregulation, childhood adversity, social deprivation)
Avoid TCAs: risk of toxicity in overdose; lower seizure threshold
Mirtazapine 15-45 mg ON: useful for insomnia and appetite stimulation; low seizure risk
Anxiety + substance use:
SSRIs first-line for GAD, panic, social anxiety
Avoid benzodiazepines: high abuse potential, cross-tolerance with alcohol, respiratory depression risk with opioids
Pregabalin 150-600 mg/day: licensed for GAD but has abuse potential - prescribe cautiously in substance misusers
Propranolol 40 mg BD-TDS: for somatic anxiety symptoms without abuse potential
ADHD + substance use:
Treat ADHD - untreated ADHD is a risk factor for substance misuse
Lisdexamfetamine (Elvanse): preferred stimulant - pro-drug with lower abuse potential
Atomoxetine 40-100 mg OD: non-stimulant alternative; no abuse potential
Stabilise substance use before or concurrently with ADHD treatment initiation
Substance-specific treatment: OST for opioid dependence, managed withdrawal for alcohol, NRT/varenicline for smoking - should proceed alongside psychiatric treatment
Surgical
Not applicable
Referral Criteria
Community mental health team (CMHT): severe mental illness with substance misuse
Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): first-episode psychosis with substance use
Community drug and alcohol services: for substance-specific treatment alongside mental health care
Crisis team / home treatment team: acute psychiatric crisis with substance involvement
Inpatient psychiatric admission: acute psychosis, high suicide risk, severe self-neglect, failed community management
Specialist dual diagnosis team: where available - provides integrated assessment and care
Prognosis
Outcomes
Poorer outcomes than either condition alone: dual diagnosis associated with increased hospitalisation, homelessness, violence, victimisation, and mortality
Suicide risk: substance misuse present in ~25-35% of completed suicides; risk is multiplicative when combined with depression or psychosis
Treatment engagement: often lower than for single diagnosis; frequent loss to follow-up
Integrated treatment: produces better outcomes than parallel or sequential treatment for engagement, substance use reduction, and psychiatric symptom improvement
Recovery is possible: with sustained integrated support, many individuals achieve stability and improved quality of life
Complications
Increased relapse of both conditions: substance use precipitates psychiatric relapse and vice versa
Medication non-adherence: major contributor to psychiatric relapse; substance use disrupts routines and insight
Physical health: dual diagnosis associated with worse physical health outcomes; cardiovascular disease, infections, liver disease
Homelessness: both a cause and consequence of dual diagnosis; dramatically worsens prognosis
Criminal justice involvement: higher rates of offending and incarceration
Social exclusion: stigma from both mental illness and substance misuse; reduced employment, relationship breakdown
Premature mortality: life expectancy reduced by 15-20 years compared to general population in people with SMI and substance misuse
Other Relevant Information
Models of Care for Dual Diagnosis
Model
Description
Evidence
Integrated
Same team treats both conditions simultaneously
Best outcomes; NICE recommended
Parallel
Separate teams treat each condition at the same time