Back to Palliative Care

MedPrep · High-Yield Revision Notes

Palliative Care

Symptom control, end-of-life care, communication skills, syringe drivers, and ethical frameworks in terminal illness.

15 topics · 378 linked questions

Principles of Palliative Care

Palliative care is an approach that improves quality of life for patients and families facing life-threatening illness, through prevention and relief of suffering across physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • WHO definition: palliative care improves quality of life of patients and families facing life-threatening illness, through prevention and relief of suffering
  • Total pain concept (Dame Cicely Saunders): suffering has physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions - all must be addressed
  • Palliative care is not just end of life care: it should be integrated early alongside disease-modifying treatment (Temel et al. 2010 - NEJM; early palliative care improved QoL and survival in NSCLC)
  • Generalist palliative care: provided by all healthcare professionals; specialist palliative care: provided by trained palliative care teams for complex needs
  • Key principles: symptom management, patient-centred care, holistic assessment, shared decision-making, advance care planning, coordination of care
  • Approximately 500,000 people die each year in England; an estimated 75% would benefit from palliative care
  • NICE NG31: individualised care of the dying adult in the last days of life
  • Palliative care applies to all life-limiting illnesses - not just cancer (heart failure, COPD, dementia, renal failure, neurological disease)

Overview

Key Facts

Palliative care is one of the most rapidly growing specialties, reflecting the increasing recognition that good symptom management and quality of life are as important as disease-modifying treatment.

Epidemiology

  • ~500,000 deaths/year in England; ~75% would benefit from palliative care
  • Only ~50% of those who would benefit currently access specialist palliative care
  • Cancer patients: most likely to receive specialist palliative care
  • Non-cancer patients (HF, COPD, dementia): significant unmet palliative care needs

Aetiology

Palliative care is needed for any life-limiting condition, including:

  • Cancer (all types)
  • Organ failure: heart failure, COPD, CKD, liver failure
  • Neurological disease: MND, MS, Parkinson's, stroke
  • Dementia (all types)
  • Frailty and multiple comorbidities
  • HIV/AIDS

Pathophysiology

  • Total pain (Cicely Saunders): an integrated concept recognising that suffering is not purely physical
    • Physical: pain, nausea, dyspnoea, fatigue
    • Psychological: anxiety, depression, fear, anger
    • Social: isolation, financial worries, family strain, role loss
    • Spiritual: existential distress, loss of meaning, religious concerns

Clinical Presentation

Assessment

  • Holistic needs assessment: physical symptoms, psychological wellbeing, social situation, spiritual needs, functional status
  • Symptom burden: use validated tools (ESAS - Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale; IPOS - Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale)
  • Prognosis discussion: honest, compassionate; use Surprise Question
  • Goals of care: what matters most to the patient?

Illness Trajectories

  • Cancer: relatively predictable decline with clear terminal phase
  • Organ failure: unpredictable trajectory with acute exacerbations and partial recovery
  • Frailty/dementia: gradual decline over months to years

Red Flags

  • Uncontrolled symptoms despite appropriate management
  • Patient/family distress
  • Conflict about goals of care
  • Complex ethical dilemmas
  • Need for specialist symptom management

Differential Diagnosis

TrajectoryPatternExample
CancerProgressive decline with clear terminal phaseLung, pancreatic, advanced breast
Organ failureFluctuating with acute exacerbationsHeart failure, COPD, CKD
Frailty/dementiaGradual decline, prolonged dwindlingAdvanced dementia, frailty

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Holistic assessment: physical, psychological, social, spiritual
  • Symptom assessment tools: ESAS, IPOS, numerical rating scales
  • Functional assessment: ECOG PS, PPS (Palliative Performance Scale), Karnofsky
  • Prognostic tools: Surprise Question, PPI (Palliative Prognostic Index), PaP score
  • Advance care planning discussion

Bloods

  • Generally guided by clinical need; avoid unnecessary investigations
  • May check: calcium (hypercalcaemia), renal function (opioid dosing), FBC (anaemia)

Imaging

  • Only if result will change management (e.g. SCC screen → MRI spine)

Special Tests

  • Bereavement risk assessment for family
  • Carer needs assessment
  • Spiritual assessment (FICA tool)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Patient-centred care: listen to patient's priorities and preferences
  • MDT approach: palliative medicine consultant, CNS, SALT, OT, physiotherapy, psychology, social worker, chaplain
  • Communication: honest, empathic; avoid false reassurance; explore understanding
  • Advance care planning: early, ongoing
  • Psychological support: counselling, CBT, mindfulness
  • Social support: benefits advice, carers' support, respite
  • Spiritual care: chaplaincy, existential support
  • Coordination of care: single point of contact; shared care plan; EPaCCS/coordinate my care

Pharmacological

  • Symptom management (see specific topics: pain, nausea, breathlessness, constipation, agitation)
  • Anticipatory prescribing: for last days of life
  • Medication review: stop non-essential medications

Surgical/Interventional

  • Palliative procedures: stenting, drainage (ascites, pleural effusion), nerve blocks
  • Palliative radiotherapy: bone pain, haemorrhage, SVC obstruction

Referral Criteria

  • Complex symptoms not responding to generalist management
  • Complex psychological/spiritual needs
  • Difficult prognostic conversations
  • Complex ethical issues
  • End of life care coordination
  • Specialist palliative care team (hospital, community, hospice)

Prognosis

  • Early palliative care improves quality of life and may extend survival (Temel et al. 2010: metastatic NSCLC patients receiving early palliative care had improved QoL AND median survival of 11.6 vs 8.9 months)
  • Palliative care reduces hospital admissions and healthcare costs
  • Improves patient and family satisfaction
  • Reduces bereavement-related depression and complicated grief in families
  • WHO estimates that globally only 14% of those needing palliative care receive it

Other Relevant Information

WHO Definition of Palliative Care

Element
Improves quality of life
For patients and families facing life-threatening illness
Through prevention and relief of suffering
By early identification, assessment, and treatment of pain and other problems
Physical, psychosocial, and spiritual
Applicable early in the illness alongside disease-modifying treatments

Levels of Palliative Care

LevelProviderScope
GeneralistAll healthcare professionalsBasic symptom management, communication, ACP
SpecialistPalliative care teams (hospital, community, hospice)Complex symptoms, psychosocial support, end of life
AcademicSpecialist centresResearch, education, complex cases

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Pain Management in Palliative Care

Pain affects 70-80% of patients with advanced cancer and requires systematic assessment and management using the WHO analgesic ladder alongside adjuvant therapies and interventional techniques for refractory cases.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Pain affects approximately 70-80% of patients with advanced cancer; adequate control achievable in >80% with WHO ladder approach
WHO analgesic ladder
Step 1 (paracetamol ± NSAID)
Step 2 (weak opioid ± Step 1)
Step 3 (strong opioid ± Step 1 ± adjuvants)
  • Oral morphine first-line strong opioid: start 5-10mg IR 4-hourly (opioid-naive); breakthrough = 1/6th of total 24-hour dose
  • NICE NG193: titrate strong opioids to effect; use modified-release for background + immediate-release for breakthrough
  • Adjuvants for neuropathic pain: amitriptyline 10-75mg ON, gabapentin 300-1,800mg/day, pregabalin 75-300mg BD
  • Bone pain: NSAID + opioid + palliative RT (8Gy single fraction); bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid 4mg IV monthly) or denosumab
  • Always co-prescribe laxatives with opioids (senna + docusate or macrogol); constipation does NOT develop tolerance
  • Opioid rotation: switch if intolerable side effects (use equianalgesic tables; reduce new dose by 25-50% for incomplete cross-tolerance)

Overview

Key Facts

Pain management in palliative care requires regular assessment, individualised treatment, and attention to all dimensions of suffering.

Epidemiology

  • Pain affects 50% at diagnosis and 70-80% with advanced cancer
  • 10-20% have refractory pain requiring specialist intervention
  • Non-cancer conditions also cause significant pain: heart failure, COPD, renal failure, neurological disease

Aetiology

  • Cancer-related (60-70%): direct tumour involvement (bone, nerve, visceral, soft tissue)
  • Treatment-related (20%): post-surgical, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, radiation fibrosis
  • Concurrent (10-20%): musculoskeletal, neuropathic, non-related conditions

Pathophysiology

  • Nociceptive (somatic): well-localised, aching; bone, soft tissue
  • Nociceptive (visceral): poorly localised, cramping, referred; organ involvement
  • Neuropathic: burning, shooting, allodynia; nerve compression/invasion
  • Mixed: combination of mechanisms (very common in cancer pain)
Bone pain
osteoclast activation
bone destruction
nociceptor stimulation; prostaglandin-mediated

Clinical Presentation

Pain Assessment

  • Location, character, severity (0-10 NRS)
  • Temporal pattern: constant, intermittent, incident, breakthrough
  • Radiation and referral patterns
  • Aggravating and relieving factors
  • Impact on function, sleep, mood
  • Current analgesic use and effectiveness
  • Side effects of treatment

Pain Types in Palliative Care

  • Background pain: constant, present most of the time
  • Breakthrough pain: transient flare on controlled background (spontaneous or incident-related)
  • Incident pain: predictable, related to specific activity (movement, dressing change)
  • End-of-dose pain: pain returning before next scheduled dose

Red Flags

  • Back pain with neurological signs (spinal cord compression - emergency)
  • Severe uncontrolled pain despite escalating opioids
  • Opioid toxicity: myoclonus, confusion, hallucinations, respiratory depression
  • Pain crisis (severe uncontrolled pain requiring emergency management)

Differential Diagnosis

Pain TypeFeaturesTreatment Approach
Nociceptive somaticWell-localised, aching, tenderOpioid + NSAID
Nociceptive visceralDiffuse, cramping, referredOpioid ± antispasmodic
NeuropathicBurning, shooting, allodyniaOpioid + amitriptyline/gabapentin
BoneLocalised, worse on movementOpioid + NSAID + RT + bisphosphonate
IncidentPredictable with activityPre-emptive breakthrough dose

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Pain assessment (NRS, body map, Brief Pain Inventory)
  • Neurological examination if neuropathic component
  • Medication chart review

Bloods

  • U&Es (renal function for opioid dosing)
  • Calcium (hypercalcaemia causing pain)
  • LFTs (hepatic metabolism)

Imaging

  • Targeted imaging of pain site (X-ray, CT, MRI)
  • MRI spine: if cord compression suspected (emergency)

Special Tests

  • Specialist pain assessment if refractory
  • Psychological assessment (pain catastrophising, depression)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Patient education about pain management goals
  • Psychological support (CBT, relaxation, mindfulness)
  • Physiotherapy (gentle exercise, positioning)
  • TENS (adjunct for localised pain)
  • Heat/cold therapy
  • Complementary therapies (massage, acupuncture)

Pharmacological

  • Step 1: paracetamol 1g QDS ± NSAID (ibuprofen 400mg TDS or naproxen 250-500mg BD - with PPI cover)
  • Step 2: codeine 30-60mg QDS or tramadol 50-100mg QDS (increasingly bypassed in favour of low-dose strong opioid)
  • Step 3:
    • Oral morphine: 5-10mg IR 4-hourly; titrate by 30-50% every 24-48 hours until pain controlled
    • Convert to MR: total 24h IR dose → divide by 2 for BD MR dosing (MST Continus, Zomorph)
    • Breakthrough: 1/6th of 24-hour morphine dose, IR, PRN up to hourly
    • Oxycodone: alternative; start 5mg IR 4-6 hourly or 10mg MR BD (equianalgesic: oral morphine:oxycodone = 1.5-2:1)
    • Fentanyl patch: 12-25mcg/h every 72 hours (stable pain, swallowing difficulty)
    • Buprenorphine patch: 5-70mcg/h every 7 days
  • Adjuvants:
    • Neuropathic: amitriptyline 10-75mg ON; gabapentin 300-1,800mg/day; pregabalin 75-300mg BD
    • Bone: NSAID ± dexamethasone 4-8mg OM; zoledronic acid 4mg IV monthly or denosumab 120mg SC monthly
    • Muscle spasm: baclofen 5-20mg TDS; diazepam 2-5mg TDS
    • Visceral colic: hyoscine butylbromide 20mg QDS
  • Always co-prescribe: laxatives (senna 15mg ON + docusate 100mg BD); antiemetic PRN (metoclopramide 10mg TDS or haloperidol 1.5mg ON)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Palliative radiotherapy: bone mets (8Gy single fraction - 60-80% response)
  • Nerve blocks: coeliac plexus (pancreatic), paravertebral, intercostal
  • Intrathecal drug delivery: refractory pain (morphine ± bupivacaine ± ziconotide)
  • Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty: painful vertebral fractures
  • Cordotomy: unilateral cancer pain (specialist centres)

Referral Criteria

  • Pain not controlled with Step 3 opioids + adjuvants: specialist palliative care
  • Neuropathic pain not responding to first-line: pain specialist
  • Interventional procedures needed: pain team
  • Opioid toxicity or difficulty with rotation: specialist input

Prognosis

  • >80% of cancer pain can be controlled with WHO ladder + adjuvants
  • 10-20% have refractory pain requiring specialist intervention
  • Palliative RT for bone pain: response in 60-80%; complete response in 30%
  • Good pain management significantly improves quality of life, function, and mood
  • Untreated pain is associated with depression, anxiety, and reduced survival

Other Relevant Information

WHO Analgesic Ladder

StepSeverityAgents
1MildParacetamol ± NSAID
2ModerateWeak opioid (codeine/tramadol) ± Step 1
3SevereStrong opioid (morphine/oxycodone/fentanyl) ± Step 1 ± adjuvants

Opioid Equianalgesic Doses

OpioidOral Dose ≈ 10mg Oral Morphine
Codeine60-100mg
Tramadol100mg
Oxycodone (oral)5mg
Hydromorphone (oral)2mg
Fentanyl patch12mcg/h ≈ 30-60mg/24h oral morphine

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Opioid Conversion

Opioid conversion (rotation) involves switching between opioid formulations or agents, requiring knowledge of equianalgesic ratios and dose reduction for incomplete cross-tolerance to ensure safe and effective pain management.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Opioid conversion is needed when: changing route (oral → SC/IV), switching opioid (rotation for side effects), or converting between preparations
  • Oral morphine to SC morphine: divide by 2 (e.g. 60mg oral/24h = 30mg SC/24h)
  • Oral morphine to oral oxycodone: divide by 1.5-2 (e.g. 30mg morphine = 15-20mg oxycodone)
  • Oral morphine to fentanyl patch: 60mg oral morphine/24h ≈ 25mcg/h fentanyl patch (72-hourly)
  • Oral morphine to SC diamorphine: divide by 3 (e.g. 60mg oral morphine = 20mg SC diamorphine)
  • Incomplete cross-tolerance: when switching opioids, reduce calculated equianalgesic dose by 25-50% (except fentanyl patches - manufacturer conversion used)
  • Always calculate and document: show working; use local guidelines/conversion charts
  • Breakthrough dose: always 1/6th of total 24-hour opioid dose in morphine equivalent, given as immediate-release preparation

Overview

Key Facts

Opioid conversion is a high-risk prescribing activity. Errors in conversion cause significant harm. Always use conversion tables, show calculations, and seek advice if unsure.

Epidemiology

  • Opioid rotation is needed in approximately 20-30% of patients on long-term opioids
  • Common reasons: side effects (nausea, confusion, myoclonus), renal impairment (accumulation of metabolites), route change (inability to swallow)

Aetiology

Indications for opioid conversion:

  • Route change: oral to subcutaneous/transdermal (swallowing difficulty, bowel obstruction, dying patient)
  • Opioid rotation: intolerable side effects despite dose titration, poor analgesia despite dose escalation, renal impairment (morphine → oxycodone or fentanyl), development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia
  • Formulation change: immediate-release to modified-release

Pathophysiology

  • Incomplete cross-tolerance: different opioids act on different μ-receptor subtypes and have different receptor binding profiles; tolerance to one opioid does not fully transfer to another
  • This is why dose reduction (25-50%) is needed when switching opioids
  • Renal impairment: morphine-6-glucuronide (active metabolite) accumulates → toxicity; switch to oxycodone, fentanyl, or buprenorphine (hepatically metabolised)
  • Fentanyl: highly lipophilic; onset and offset depend on tissue distribution; requires stable pain (not for titration)

Clinical Presentation

When to Convert

  • Patient unable to swallow (convert oral → SC or transdermal)
  • Intolerable opioid side effects (rotate to different opioid)
  • Renal impairment (switch from morphine to safer alternative)
  • Starting syringe driver (convert oral to CSCI)
  • Stepping up from weak to strong opioid

Assessment Before Conversion

  • Current opioid, dose, route, frequency
  • Total 24-hour opioid consumption (including breakthrough doses used)
  • Pain control (adequate or inadequate?)
  • Side effects
  • Renal and hepatic function
  • Reason for conversion

Red Flags

  • Prescriber unsure of conversion ratios (seek specialist advice)
  • Large dose conversions (high risk of error)
  • Renal impairment + morphine (accumulation risk)
  • Patient on mixed opioid agonists/partial agonists (buprenorphine + morphine - interactions)

Differential Diagnosis

ScenarioAction
Pain controlled, switching routeConvert using equianalgesic table; no dose change
Pain controlled, switching opioidConvert then reduce by 25-50% for cross-tolerance
Pain NOT controlled, switching opioidConvert but do NOT reduce (or reduce less); titrate
Renal impairment on morphineSwitch to oxycodone, fentanyl, or buprenorphine
Starting syringe driverConvert total 24h oral dose to SC equivalent

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Current pain score
  • Current opioid dose (include all breakthrough doses used in last 24-48h)
  • Calculate total 24-hour morphine equivalent dose
  • Check renal function and hepatic function

Bloods

  • U&Es (essential - renal function affects opioid choice)
  • LFTs (hepatic function affects metabolism)

Imaging

  • Not applicable to conversion itself

Special Tests

  • Conversion calculation (show working, document clearly)
  • Double-check with pharmacist or palliative care team

Management

Key Conversion Ratios

  • Oral morphine → SC/IV morphine: ÷ 2 (e.g. 60mg PO = 30mg SC)
  • Oral morphine → SC/IV diamorphine: ÷ 3 (e.g. 60mg PO = 20mg SC diamorphine)
  • Oral morphine → oral oxycodone: ÷ 1.5-2 (e.g. 30mg morphine ≈ 15-20mg oxycodone)
  • Oral oxycodone → SC oxycodone: ÷ 1.5-2 (e.g. 20mg PO = 10-13mg SC)
  • Oral morphine → fentanyl patch: use conversion table (60-90mg/24h oral morphine = 25mcg/h patch)
  • Oral morphine → oral hydromorphone: ÷ 5 (e.g. 50mg morphine ≈ 10mg hydromorphone)

Conversion Steps

  1. Calculate total 24-hour oral morphine equivalent (include MR + IR + breakthrough doses used)
  2. Apply conversion ratio to target opioid
  3. If rotating opioids: reduce by 25-50% for incomplete cross-tolerance
  4. Calculate new breakthrough dose (1/6th of new 24h total)
  5. Document calculation clearly in notes and prescription
  6. Monitor closely after conversion (pain, sedation, respiratory rate)

Pharmacological

  • Fentanyl patch: apply when starting; takes 12-24 hours to reach therapeutic levels; continue oral opioid for first 12 hours
  • Syringe driver (CSCI): convert oral dose to SC diamorphine (÷3) or SC morphine (÷2); run over 24 hours
  • Renal impairment: avoid morphine; use oxycodone (÷1.5-2 from morphine), fentanyl, or alfentanil in CSCI

Surgical/Interventional

  • Not applicable

Referral Criteria

  • Complex conversions: palliative care pharmacist or specialist
  • High-dose opioid conversions (>300mg oral morphine equivalent/day): specialist mandatory
  • Methadone conversion: specialist only (complex, variable half-life)
  • Mixed agonist/antagonist issues: specialist advice

Prognosis

  • Safe opioid conversion maintains pain control while reducing side effects
  • Errors in conversion can cause significant harm (overdose or under-dosing)
  • Most conversions are straightforward with appropriate use of conversion tables
  • Close monitoring in first 24-48 hours after conversion is essential

Other Relevant Information

Opioid Equianalgesic Conversion Table

OpioidOral DoseSC/IV DoseRelative to 10mg Oral Morphine
Morphine10mg5mgReference
Oxycodone5-7mg3-5mg1.5-2× more potent
DiamorphineN/A3.3mg3× more potent SC
Hydromorphone2mg1mg5× more potent
Codeine60-100mgN/A10× less potent
Fentanyl patch12mcg/h ≈ 30-60mg/24h oral morphine

Opioid Safety in Renal Impairment

OpioidSafety in CKD
MorphineAVOID (M6G accumulates)
CodeineAVOID (unpredictable metabolism)
OxycodoneUse with caution (reduced dose)
FentanylPreferred (hepatic metabolism)
BuprenorphinePreferred (hepatic, no active metabolites)
AlfentanilPreferred for CSCI in renal failure

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Nausea and Vomiting in Palliative Care

Nausea and vomiting affect 40-70% of patients with advanced cancer, requiring identification of the underlying mechanism to guide rational antiemetic selection based on receptor pharmacology.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Nausea and vomiting affect 40-70% of patients with advanced cancer
  • Mechanism-based approach: identify the cause → choose antiemetic based on receptor pharmacology and vomiting centre pathways
  • Chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) mediated (drugs, metabolic): haloperidol 1.5mg ON or ondansetron 4-8mg TDS
  • Gastric stasis/functional obstruction: metoclopramide 10mg TDS (prokinetic; avoid in complete bowel obstruction)
  • Raised intracranial pressure: dexamethasone 8-16mg daily (with cyclizine 50mg TDS)
  • Vestibular: cyclizine 50mg TDS (antihistamine/antimuscarinic)
  • Bowel obstruction (inoperable): cyclizine + hyoscine butylbromide 60-120mg/24h CSCI + consider octreotide 300-600mcg/24h CSCI; avoid prokinetics
  • Levomepromazine 6.25mg ON is a broad-spectrum antiemetic (blocks D2, 5HT2, H1, mACh) - useful when cause unclear or multiple causes

Overview

Key Facts

Rational antiemetic prescribing in palliative care is based on understanding the neuropharmacology of nausea and matching the antiemetic to the underlying cause.

Epidemiology

  • Nausea: 40-70% of advanced cancer patients
  • Vomiting: 30% of advanced cancer patients
  • Often multifactorial
  • Significantly impacts quality of life and oral medication absorption

Aetiology

  • Chemical/metabolic (CTZ): drugs (opioids, chemotherapy), renal failure (uraemia), hypercalcaemia, infection
  • Gastric stasis: opioids, autonomic neuropathy, hepatomegaly, ascites, gastroparesis
  • Bowel obstruction: tumour, adhesions, constipation
  • Raised ICP: brain metastases, leptomeningeal disease
  • Vestibular: opioids (early), motion, labyrinthine disease
  • Psychogenic: anxiety, anticipatory nausea
  • Serosal/peritoneal: peritoneal metastases, liver capsule stretch

Pathophysiology

  • Vomiting centre (medulla): final common pathway; receives input from CTZ, GI tract, vestibular system, higher cortical centres
  • CTZ (area postrema): outside blood-brain barrier; responds to circulating toxins; D2 and 5HT3 receptors
  • GI tract: vagal afferents from gut (5HT3, 5HT4 receptors); stretch and chemo receptors
  • Vestibular: H1 and mACh receptors
  • Higher centres: cortical input (anticipatory, anxiety)

Clinical Presentation

Assessment

  • Timing (constant, intermittent, related to food/medication/movement)
  • Volume and content of vomitus
  • Associated symptoms (pain, constipation, headache, vertigo)
  • Medication review (opioids started recently?)
  • Abdominal examination (distension, bowel sounds, hepatomegaly)
  • Neurological examination if raised ICP suspected

Red Flags

  • Faeculent vomiting (bowel obstruction)
  • Projectile vomiting with headache (raised ICP)
  • Haematemesis (GI bleeding)
  • Signs of dehydration
  • Complete bowel obstruction (absolute constipation + vomiting + distension)

Differential Diagnosis

CauseKey FeaturesFirst-line Antiemetic
Opioid-induced (CTZ)Onset with opioid start/escalationHaloperidol 1.5mg ON
Gastric stasisEarly satiety, large-volume vomitingMetoclopramide 10mg TDS
Bowel obstructionColicky pain, distension, absolute constipationCyclizine + hyoscine butylbromide
Raised ICPHeadache worse AM, papilloedemaDexamethasone + cyclizine
HypercalcaemiaConfusion, polyuria, constipationRehydrate + haloperidol
VestibularVertigo, worse with movementCyclizine 50mg TDS

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Abdominal examination (distension, bowel sounds, tenderness)
  • Medication chart review
  • Constipation assessment (DRE if appropriate)
  • Neurological examination (if raised ICP suspected)

Bloods

  • U&Es (renal failure, dehydration)
  • Calcium (hypercalcaemia - common cause)
  • LFTs (hepatic causes)
  • FBC (infection)

Imaging

  • AXR: if bowel obstruction suspected
  • CT abdomen: bowel obstruction assessment, level of obstruction
  • CT head: if raised ICP suspected

Special Tests

  • Not usually needed beyond clinical assessment and targeted investigations

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Identify and treat reversible causes (constipation, hypercalcaemia, medications)
  • Small, frequent meals; avoid strong smells
  • Cool, fresh air
  • Psychological support (anticipatory nausea: relaxation, CBT)

Pharmacological

  • Opioid-induced (CTZ):
    • Haloperidol 0.5-1.5mg PO/SC ON (D2 antagonist at CTZ)
    • Usually settles within 5-7 days (tolerance develops)
    • If persists: consider opioid rotation
  • Gastric stasis:
    • Metoclopramide 10mg TDS PO/SC (prokinetic + D2 antagonist)
    • AVOID in complete bowel obstruction
  • Bowel obstruction (inoperable):
    • Cyclizine 150mg/24h CSCI (H1 antagonist)
    • Hyoscine butylbromide 60-120mg/24h CSCI (reduces secretions and colic)
    • Octreotide 300-600mcg/24h CSCI (reduces GI secretions)
    • Dexamethasone 6-8mg IV/SC (reduces peri-tumoral oedema; may resolve partial obstruction)
    • Venting gastrostomy: for intractable vomiting
  • Raised ICP:
    • Dexamethasone 8-16mg daily (reduces oedema)
    • Cyclizine 50mg TDS
  • Vestibular: cyclizine 50mg TDS or prochlorperazine 5mg TDS (NOT in Parkinson's)
  • Broad-spectrum (cause unclear/multiple causes):
    • Levomepromazine 6.25-25mg ON PO/SC (blocks D2, 5HT2, H1, mACh)
    • Olanzapine 2.5-5mg ON (emerging evidence as broad-spectrum antiemetic)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Venting PEG/gastrostomy: for inoperable bowel obstruction with intractable vomiting
  • Stenting: for gastric outlet or duodenal obstruction
  • Surgical bypass: palliative, in selected patients with good PS

Referral Criteria

  • Refractory nausea/vomiting: specialist palliative care
  • Bowel obstruction: surgical review for operability; palliative care if inoperable
  • Raised ICP: oncology/neurosurgery

Prognosis

  • Opioid-induced nausea usually self-limiting (5-7 days; tolerance develops)
  • Most nausea can be controlled with appropriate mechanism-based antiemetics
  • Bowel obstruction-related nausea: can usually be managed medically if surgery not appropriate
  • Refractory nausea significantly impacts quality of life and oral medication absorption

Other Relevant Information

Antiemetic Selection by Mechanism

CausePathwayReceptorsFirst-line Antiemetic
Drugs/metabolicCTZD2, 5HT3Haloperidol, ondansetron
Gastric stasisVagal (GI)D2, 5HT4Metoclopramide
Bowel obstructionVagal + CTZH1, mAChCyclizine + hyoscine
Raised ICPVomiting centreH1, mAChCyclizine + dexamethasone
VestibularVestibular nucleiH1, mAChCyclizine
Unclear/multipleMultipleMultipleLevomepromazine

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Breathlessness in Palliative Care

Breathlessness is a distressing subjective experience affecting 50-70% of patients with advanced disease, managed through non-pharmacological interventions and low-dose opioids as the pharmacological mainstay.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Breathlessness affects 50-70% of patients with advanced cancer and >90% with advanced COPD or heart failure
  • Breathlessness is a subjective experience - severity does not always correlate with objective measures (O2 sats, respiratory rate)
  • Non-pharmacological interventions are first-line: fan directed at face, breathing techniques, positioning, pacing, anxiety management
  • Low-dose oral morphine (2.5-5mg PO 4-hourly or 10-20mg MR OD) is the pharmacological mainstay; reduces the sensation of breathlessness without significant respiratory depression at these doses
  • Oxygen is only beneficial if hypoxic (SpO2 <92%); handheld fan is equivalent for non-hypoxic breathlessness (Abernethy 2010)
  • Benzodiazepines (lorazepam 0.5-1mg SL) for anxiety-related breathlessness; limited evidence for breathlessness itself but useful adjunct
  • Dexamethasone 4-8mg daily: for breathlessness related to tumour obstruction, lymphangitis carcinomatosa, SVC obstruction
  • Anticipatory medications: morphine 2.5-5mg SC PRN + midazolam 2.5-5mg SC PRN for terminal breathlessness

Overview

Key Facts

Breathlessness in palliative care is often irreversible and multifactorial. The focus is on reducing the distressing sensation rather than treating the underlying cause.

Epidemiology

  • Affects 50-70% of advanced cancer patients; >90% with advanced COPD/HF
  • Most common symptom in last weeks of life (apart from fatigue)
  • Strongly associated with anxiety, panic, and reduced quality of life

Aetiology

  • Cancer-related: lung cancer, pleural effusion, lymphangitis carcinomatosa, SVC obstruction, pericardial effusion, ascites (diaphragm splinting), tumour in airway
  • Treatment-related: pneumonitis (RT, immunotherapy), pulmonary fibrosis (bleomycin), cardiomyopathy (doxorubicin)
  • Comorbid: COPD, heart failure, anaemia, pulmonary embolism, infection
  • General: anxiety, deconditioning, cachexia

Pathophysiology

  • Breathlessness perception involves afferent signals from chemoreceptors (CO2, O2), mechanoreceptors (lung stretch, chest wall), and cortical processing (anxiety amplifies perception)
  • Opioids reduce central perception of breathlessness via μ-receptors in brainstem and cortex
  • Fan/cool air stimulates V2 branch of trigeminal nerve → reduces breathlessness perception ("open window" effect)

Clinical Presentation

Assessment

  • Subjective severity (0-10 NRS or modified Borg scale)
  • Temporal pattern (constant, exertional, paroxysmal, nocturnal)
  • Associated symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest pain, anxiety, panic)
  • Functional impact (what can/cannot do because of breathlessness)
  • Psychological impact (fear, anxiety, depression)
  • Current interventions and their effectiveness

Red Flags

  • Acute deterioration: PE, pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, SVC obstruction
  • Stridor (airway obstruction - emergency)
  • Massive haemoptysis
  • Severe anxiety/panic attacks
  • Terminal breathlessness in last days of life

Differential Diagnosis

CauseFeaturesTreatment
Pleural effusionDull percussion, absent breath soundsDrainage/pleurodesis
PESudden onset, pleuritic pain, tachycardiaAnticoagulation
PneumoniaFever, productive cough, consolidationAntibiotics (if appropriate)
SVC obstructionFacial oedema, distended neck veins, dyspnoeaDexamethasone + stent/RT
AnxietyHyperventilation, tingling, panicReassurance, lorazepam
AnaemiaFatigue, pallor, exertional dyspnoeaTransfusion (if appropriate)

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • SpO2, respiratory rate, heart rate
  • Breathlessness assessment (NRS, mMRC scale)
  • Chest examination
  • Anxiety screening

Bloods

  • FBC (anaemia)
  • BNP (heart failure)
  • D-dimer (if PE suspected and would change management)

Imaging

  • CXR: pleural effusion, pneumonia, lung mass, collapse
  • CTPA: PE (if would change management)
  • CT thorax: tumour assessment

Special Tests

  • ABG: type 1 or 2 respiratory failure (if would change management)
  • Echocardiography: pericardial effusion, cardiac function
  • Lung function tests: COPD assessment (if new diagnosis)

Management

Non-pharmacological (FIRST-LINE)

  • Handheld fan directed at face (trigeminal nerve stimulation; as effective as oxygen for non-hypoxic breathlessness)
  • Breathing techniques: pursed-lip breathing, diaphragmatic breathing
  • Positioning: upright, leaning forward (tripod position)
  • Pacing and energy conservation: plan activities, rest between tasks
  • Anxiety management: relaxation techniques, CBT, mindfulness
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation: where appropriate (COPD, deconditioning)
  • Cool, well-ventilated room: open window

Pharmacological

  • Low-dose opioids:
    • Opioid-naive: morphine 1-2.5mg PO 4-hourly PRN or 5-10mg MR OD
    • Already on opioids: increase by 25% if breathlessness is a significant symptom
    • SC morphine 1-2.5mg PRN if unable to swallow
  • Benzodiazepines:
    • Lorazepam 0.5-1mg SL PRN (anxiety-related breathlessness)
    • Midazolam 2.5-5mg SC PRN (terminal breathlessness)
  • Corticosteroids:
    • Dexamethasone 4-8mg daily: lymphangitis carcinomatosa, SVC obstruction, tumour-related airway narrowing
  • Oxygen: only if hypoxic (SpO2 <92%); short-burst oxygen for exertional desaturation
  • Nebulised saline (0.9%): may help with sputum clearance
  • Bronchodilators: if reversible airway obstruction (salbutamol, ipratropium)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Pleural aspiration/drainage: for symptomatic pleural effusion
  • Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC): for recurrent effusions
  • Pleurodesis: talc (for recurrent malignant pleural effusion)
  • SVC stent: for SVC obstruction
  • Airway stenting: for endobronchial obstruction
  • Pericardiocentesis: for cardiac tamponade

Referral Criteria

  • Refractory breathlessness: specialist palliative care
  • Pleural effusion: respiratory/interventional service
  • SVC obstruction: oncology emergency
  • Complex anxiety: psychology/psychiatry

Prognosis

  • Non-pharmacological interventions (fan, breathing techniques): effective in 30-50% of patients
  • Low-dose opioids: reduce breathlessness perception safely; do NOT cause respiratory depression at appropriate palliative doses
  • Oxygen: no benefit over fan in non-hypoxic breathlessness
  • Breathlessness in last days of life: usually manageable with SC morphine + midazolam
  • Breathlessness is a strong predictor of mortality in advanced cancer and COPD

Other Relevant Information

Breathlessness Management Algorithm

StepIntervention
1Identify and treat reversible causes
2Non-pharmacological: fan, positioning, breathing techniques
3Low-dose opioid (morphine 1-2.5mg QDS PRN)
4Oxygen (only if hypoxic)
5Benzodiazepine (if anxiety component)
6Specialist palliative care referral for refractory cases

Key Evidence

StudyFinding
Abernethy 2010Fan equivalent to oxygen for non-hypoxic breathlessness
Jennings 2002Systematic review: oral/parenteral opioids reduce breathlessness
Currow 2011Low-dose morphine for chronic breathlessness in non-cancer

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Constipation in Palliative Care

Constipation affects up to 90% of palliative care patients on opioids, requiring prophylactic laxatives with all opioid prescriptions and a proactive approach to assessment and management.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Constipation affects 50-90% of palliative care patients; almost universal with opioid use
  • Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) does NOT develop tolerance - unlike nausea; requires ongoing laxative treatment
  • Prophylactic laxatives MUST be prescribed with all opioid prescriptions: senna 15mg ON + docusate 100mg BD (stimulant + softener)
  • Macrogol (Movicol): effective first-line; adjust dose to effect (1-3 sachets daily)
  • Naloxegol 25mg OD: peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) for OIC refractory to standard laxatives
  • Faecal impaction can cause overflow diarrhoea, urinary retention, delirium, and bowel obstruction in palliative patients
  • Assess regularly: ask about bowels at every review; Bristol Stool Chart; DRE if appropriate
  • Spinal cord compression can present with constipation - always consider in cancer patients with new bowel dysfunction

Overview

Key Facts

Constipation is one of the most common and distressing symptoms in palliative care. Prevention is key, particularly with opioid use.

Epidemiology

  • 50-90% of palliative care patients experience constipation
  • Almost universal with opioid therapy
  • Often undertreated despite being predictable and preventable

Aetiology

  • Medications: opioids (most common cause), anticholinergics, 5HT3 antagonists (ondansetron), iron, calcium
  • Disease-related: intra-abdominal tumour, spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia, autonomic neuropathy
  • General: reduced oral intake, dehydration, immobility, weakness, confusion

Pathophysiology

  • Opioid-induced: μ-receptor activation in myenteric and submucosal plexus → reduced peristalsis, increased segmental contractions, increased water absorption, increased anal sphincter tone
  • Tolerance to constipation does NOT develop (unlike nausea, sedation)
  • Reduced mobility and oral intake compound the problem
  • Dehydration increases colonic water absorption further

Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

  • Infrequent bowel movements
  • Hard stools (Bristol 1-2)
  • Straining
  • Abdominal bloating, discomfort, pain
  • Nausea and anorexia (from faecal loading)
  • Overflow diarrhoea (faecal impaction)

Complications in Palliative Care

  • Faecal impaction with overflow
  • Nausea and vomiting (impairs oral medication absorption)
  • Urinary retention
  • Delirium
  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Rectal pain and haemorrhoids

Red Flags

  • Absolute constipation with vomiting/distension (bowel obstruction)
  • New constipation in cancer patient (spinal cord compression, bowel obstruction)
  • Faecal impaction causing delirium
  • Overflow diarrhoea being treated with anti-diarrhoeals (dangerous mistake)

Differential Diagnosis

CauseFeaturesManagement
Opioid-inducedTemporal relationship with opioidLaxatives ± naloxegol
Bowel obstructionColicky pain, vomiting, distensionMedical/surgical management
HypercalcaemiaConfusion, polyuria, nauseaRehydration, bisphosphonate
Spinal cord compressionBack pain, leg weakness, urinary retentionMRI, dexamethasone, RT/surgery
Faecal impactionOverflow diarrhoea, palpable faeces on DREDisimpaction

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Abdominal palpation (faecal loading)
  • DRE (impaction, rectal mass)
  • Bowel chart (frequency, Bristol Stool type)
  • Medication review

Bloods

  • Calcium (hypercalcaemia)
  • U&Es (dehydration)
  • TFTs (hypothyroidism, if new presentation)

Imaging

  • AXR: if significant faecal loading or obstruction suspected
  • CT abdomen: if bowel obstruction suspected

Special Tests

  • Generally clinical assessment is sufficient in palliative care

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Maintain oral fluid intake where possible
  • Encourage mobility (as tolerated)
  • Privacy and comfort for toileting
  • Footstool (optimal defaecation position)

Pharmacological

  • Prevention with all opioids:
    • Senna 15mg ON (stimulant) + docusate 100mg BD (softener)
    • Or macrogol (Movicol) 1-2 sachets daily
  • Treatment escalation:
    • Step 1: Senna + docusate → increase doses (senna up to 30mg BD; docusate up to 200mg TDS)
    • Step 2: Add/switch to macrogol 1-3 sachets daily
    • Step 3: Add bisacodyl 10mg ON (stimulant)
    • Step 4: Rectal measures - glycerine suppositories, bisacodyl suppositories, phosphate enema, arachis oil enema (soften hard impaction overnight then phosphate enema)
  • Faecal impaction:
    • Soft: high-dose macrogol (8 sachets/day for up to 3 days)
    • Hard: arachis oil enema overnight → phosphate enema; digital manual evacuation (under sedation with midazolam if needed)
  • Refractory OIC:
    • Naloxegol 25mg OD (oral PAMORA; blocks peripheral μ-receptors without affecting central analgesia)
    • Methylnaltrexone 12mg SC (alternative PAMORA; for patients who cannot swallow)
  • Bowel obstruction: see specific management (avoid stimulant laxatives; medical management with hyoscine + cyclizine ± octreotide)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Manual evacuation (for hard impaction in rectum)
  • Stoma formation (rarely; for intractable obstruction)

Referral Criteria

  • Refractory constipation despite optimised laxatives: specialist palliative care
  • Suspected bowel obstruction: surgical/oncological review
  • Significant faecal impaction causing complications: urgent assessment

Prognosis

  • Prophylactic laxatives prevent OIC in most patients
  • Constipation in palliative care is treatable but requires proactive management
  • Untreated constipation causes significant distress, nausea, and impairs oral medication absorption
  • Naloxegol/methylnaltrexone effective in 40-50% of refractory OIC cases
  • Bowel function should be assessed at every palliative care review

Other Relevant Information

Stepwise Approach to Constipation in Palliative Care

StepIntervention
PreventionSenna + docusate with all opioids
Step 1Increase laxative doses
Step 2Add macrogol (Movicol)
Step 3Add bisacodyl
Step 4Rectal measures (suppositories, enemas)
Step 5Naloxegol or methylnaltrexone (OIC)

Rectal Measures for Faecal Impaction

Stool TypeTreatment
Soft impactionHigh-dose macrogol (8 sachets/day)
Hard impactionArachis oil enema overnight → phosphate enema
Very hard/resistantManual evacuation (with sedation)

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Terminal Agitation and Delirium

Terminal agitation affects 25-85% of dying patients and manifests as restlessness, distress, and confusion in the last days of life, requiring identification of reversible causes and judicious use of sedative medications.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Terminal agitation (terminal restlessness) affects 25-85% of dying patients in the last hours to days of life
  • Always exclude reversible causes: urinary retention, faecal impaction, pain, medication toxicity (opioids), full bladder, hypercalcaemia
  • Midazolam 2.5-5mg SC PRN (hourly) is first-line pharmacological treatment for terminal agitation
  • Levomepromazine 12.5-25mg SC (or 6.25mg if frail): alternative/addition if midazolam insufficient (antipsychotic + sedative)
  • Haloperidol 0.5-2mg SC: if delirium with hallucinations/paranoia (avoid in Lewy body/Parkinson's)
  • Syringe driver (CSCI): midazolam 10-30mg/24h ± levomepromazine 12.5-50mg/24h for continuous sedation
  • Palliative sedation: proportionate sedation to relieve intractable suffering; NOT euthanasia; governed by ethical principles of beneficence and double effect
  • Communication with family: explain that agitation/restlessness is common in dying; that medications aim to relieve distress not hasten death

Overview

Key Facts

Terminal agitation is one of the most distressing symptoms for families witnessing the dying process. Prompt identification of reversible causes and compassionate use of sedation are essential.

Epidemiology

  • Affects 25-85% of dying patients (depending on definition and setting)
  • More common in younger patients, those with brain metastases, and those on high-dose opioids
  • May be the most distressing symptom for families

Aetiology

Reversible causes (check first):

  • Urinary retention (catheterise)
  • Faecal impaction (rectal examination)
  • Pain (uncontrolled; adjust analgesia)
  • Opioid toxicity (myoclonus, confusion; reduce/rotate opioid)
  • Medication side effects (anticholinergics, steroids)
  • Hypercalcaemia
  • Hypoxia
  • Anxiety, fear, spiritual distress

Irreversible causes:

  • Multi-organ failure
  • Cerebral hypoxia
  • Metabolic encephalopathy
  • Brain metastases

Pathophysiology

  • Terminal delirium: multifactorial neurotransmitter imbalance in the context of dying
  • Hepatic/renal failure → accumulation of metabolites and toxins
  • Cerebral hypoperfusion → cortical dysfunction
  • Drug metabolite accumulation (morphine-6-glucuronide, etc.)
  • May represent existential/spiritual distress in some patients

Clinical Presentation

Features

  • Restlessness, fidgeting, picking at bedclothes
  • Agitation, moaning, calling out
  • Confusion, disorientation
  • Hallucinations (visual or auditory)
  • Attempting to get out of bed
  • Facial grimacing (may indicate pain)
  • Fluctuating consciousness
  • Myoclonus (may indicate opioid toxicity)

Assessment

  • Is the patient in pain? (facial grimacing, groaning on movement)
  • Is there urinary retention? (palpate bladder or bladder scan)
  • Is there faecal impaction? (DRE if appropriate)
  • Review medication chart (opioid toxicity? recently stopped medications?)
  • Is this expected dying process or acute deterioration with treatable cause?

Red Flags

  • Myoclonus with agitation (opioid toxicity - reduce/rotate)
  • Palpable bladder (urinary retention - catheterise)
  • Seizures (consider midazolam, review anticonvulsants)
  • Severe uncontrolled distress despite medication (consider palliative sedation)

Differential Diagnosis

CauseFeaturesIntervention
PainGrimacing on movement, groaningAdjust analgesia
Urinary retentionPalpable bladder, restlessnessCatheterise
Faecal impactionAbdominal distension, rectal loadingRectal measures
Opioid toxicityMyoclonus, hallucinations, pinpoint pupilsReduce/rotate opioid
Spiritual distressExistential anguish, fear of dyingChaplaincy, psychological support
Seizure activityTonic-clonic movements or subtle motor activityMidazolam

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Reversible cause check: urinary retention (bladder scan), faecal impaction (DRE), pain assessment, medication review
  • Clinical assessment of dying
  • Family discussion about what is happening

Bloods

  • Generally not appropriate in last days of life unless result would change management
  • May check calcium if hypercalcaemia treatable and appropriate

Imaging

  • Generally not appropriate in terminal phase

Special Tests

  • None required in most cases; clinical assessment guides management

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Check and treat reversible causes (retention, impaction, pain, medication toxicity)
  • Calm, quiet environment
  • Familiar people present
  • Gentle reassurance (even if patient appears unconscious; hearing may be preserved)
  • Minimise unnecessary interventions
  • Communicate with family: explain agitation is common in dying; reassure medications are for comfort

Pharmacological

  • First-line: midazolam 2.5-5mg SC PRN (up to hourly)
    • If frequent doses needed: CSCI midazolam 10-30mg/24h
  • If agitation with delirium features (hallucinations, paranoia):
    • Haloperidol 0.5-2mg SC PRN 2-hourly (max 10mg/24h)
    • Avoid in Parkinson's/Lewy body → use midazolam or levomepromazine
  • If midazolam insufficient:
    • Levomepromazine 12.5-25mg SC PRN (or CSCI 25-100mg/24h)
    • Very sedating; broad-spectrum (D2, H1, mACh, 5HT2 blockade)
  • Opioid toxicity (myoclonus, confusion):
    • Reduce opioid by 30-50%
    • Consider opioid rotation
    • Add midazolam for myoclonus
  • Seizures: midazolam 5-10mg SC/buccal; CSCI midazolam 20-40mg/24h
  • Palliative sedation (for intractable refractory agitation):
    • Continuous deep sedation: midazolam CSCI 30-60mg/24h ± levomepromazine
    • Ethical: principle of double effect; proportionate to suffering; intention is symptom relief
    • Requires senior decision, team consensus, family discussion, documentation

Surgical/Interventional

  • Urinary catheterisation (for retention)
  • Rectal interventions (for impaction)

Referral Criteria

  • Refractory terminal agitation: specialist palliative care (urgent)
  • Ethical concerns about palliative sedation: senior clinical and ethical discussion
  • Family unable to cope: additional support, bereavement counselling

Prognosis

  • Terminal agitation is a marker of the dying process; median survival once present is typically hours to 2-3 days
  • Most cases can be managed effectively with midazolam ± levomepromazine
  • Uncontrolled terminal agitation is distressing for families and staff; prompt management is essential
  • Palliative sedation is appropriate and ethical for intractable suffering

Other Relevant Information

Terminal Agitation Management Algorithm

StepIntervention
1Exclude reversible causes (retention, impaction, pain, medication)
2Non-pharmacological measures (calm environment, reassurance)
3Midazolam 2.5-5mg SC PRN (hourly)
4If hallucinations/paranoia: add haloperidol 0.5-2mg SC
5If midazolam insufficient: levomepromazine 12.5-25mg SC
6CSCI if frequent doses needed
7Palliative sedation for intractable suffering (senior decision)

Principle of Double Effect

ElementApplication
Good intentionRelief of suffering
Bad effect (foreseen but unintended)Possible hastening of death
ProportionalityMedication dose proportionate to distress
The bad effect must not be the meansSedation for comfort, not to cause death

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Syringe Driver Prescribing

A syringe driver delivers continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) of medications over 24 hours, used when patients can no longer take oral medications, enabling effective symptom management in the last days of life.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Syringe driver (CSCI) delivers medications continuously via subcutaneous infusion over 24 hours
  • Indications: inability to swallow, persistent vomiting, bowel obstruction, poor oral absorption, last days of life
  • Common medications in CSCI: morphine/diamorphine/oxycodone (pain), midazolam (agitation/seizures), haloperidol (nausea/delirium), hyoscine butylbromide (secretions), levomepromazine (nausea/agitation), cyclizine (nausea)
  • Diamorphine is preferred for CSCI due to high solubility (large doses in small volume); alternatives: morphine, oxycodone, alfentanil
  • Drug compatibility: check local compatibility charts before mixing; generally 2-3 drugs can be mixed; some combinations are incompatible (e.g. cyclizine may crystallise at higher concentrations)
  • Dilute with water for injection (NOT normal saline for most mixtures)
  • Convert oral doses to SC equivalent before starting CSCI: oral morphine ÷ 2 = SC morphine; oral morphine ÷ 3 = SC diamorphine
  • Continue PRN SC breakthrough doses alongside CSCI (1/6th of 24h dose)

Overview

Key Facts

Syringe drivers are an essential tool in palliative care, enabling symptom management when the oral route is unavailable. Safe prescribing requires knowledge of drug conversions, compatibility, and local protocols.

Epidemiology

  • Used in approximately 30-50% of dying patients in the UK
  • Most commonly used in the last days of life
  • Also used earlier for bowel obstruction, persistent vomiting, or severe dysphagia

Aetiology

Indications for CSCI:

  • Patient unable to swallow (dying, dysphagia, drowsy)
  • Persistent nausea/vomiting (oral route unreliable)
  • Bowel obstruction (oral absorption impaired)
  • Need for multiple parenteral medications
  • Patient preference (avoids repeated SC injections)

Pathophysiology

  • Subcutaneous absorption: continuous, steady-state delivery → avoids peaks and troughs of intermittent injections
  • SC bioavailability approaches IV for most palliative drugs
  • Insertion sites: upper arm (deltoid area), anterior chest wall, thigh, abdomen
  • Change site every 48-72 hours (or sooner if inflammation/hardening)

Clinical Presentation

When to Start a Syringe Driver

  • Patient recognised as dying and unable to take oral medications
  • Persistent vomiting despite antiemetics
  • Bowel obstruction preventing oral absorption
  • Dysphagia (progressive neurological disease, head and neck cancer)
  • Two or more symptoms requiring regular SC medication

Assessment Before Starting

  • Current symptoms and medications
  • Total 24-hour opioid requirement (including breakthrough doses used)
  • Other medications needed (antiemetic, anxiolytic, antisecretory)
  • Renal function (affects opioid choice)
  • Allergy status

Red Flags

  • Syringe driver NOT started as a "comfort measure" in isolation - must be accompanied by clinical assessment and communication
  • Starting a syringe driver should NOT be seen as "giving up" - it is a route change, not a treatment change
  • Drug incompatibility causing crystallisation or precipitation (check charts)
  • Site reactions (inflammation, erythema - change site)

Differential Diagnosis

ScenarioApproach
Dying patient, unable to swallowConvert oral meds to CSCI
Persistent vomitingCSCI antiemetic + opioid if needed
Bowel obstructionCSCI (cyclizine + hyoscine ± opioid ± octreotide)
Patient able to swallow occasionallyCSCI for background; oral PRN for breakthrough
Opioid rotation neededCalculate equivalent SC dose using conversion tables

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Review all current medications
  • Calculate 24-hour opioid requirement
  • Check drug compatibility (local chart)
  • Identify insertion site
  • Check renal function (from recent bloods)

Bloods

  • U&Es (renal function - guides opioid choice)
  • Generally not needed to initiate CSCI in dying patient

Imaging

  • Not applicable

Special Tests

  • Drug compatibility check (essential)
  • Calculation check (second clinician verification recommended)

Management

Prescribing a Syringe Driver

  1. Calculate 24-hour opioid requirement:
    • Total oral morphine in 24h (MR + IR doses used) → convert to SC
    • Oral morphine ÷ 2 = SC morphine; oral morphine ÷ 3 = SC diamorphine
  2. Add other medications as needed:
    • Pain: diamorphine, morphine, or oxycodone (or alfentanil if renal failure)
    • Nausea: haloperidol 1.5-5mg/24h or levomepromazine 6.25-25mg/24h
    • Agitation: midazolam 10-30mg/24h
    • Secretions: hyoscine butylbromide 60-120mg/24h or glycopyrronium 0.6-1.2mg/24h
  3. Check compatibility: use local chart; Water for Injection as diluent
  4. Prescribe PRN SC breakthrough doses (1/6th of 24h opioid dose)
  5. Review daily: adjust doses based on symptom control and PRN use

Common CSCI Combinations

  • Pain + nausea: diamorphine + haloperidol (compatible)
  • Pain + agitation: diamorphine + midazolam (compatible)
  • Pain + agitation + secretions: diamorphine + midazolam + hyoscine butylbromide (compatible)
  • Pain + nausea + agitation: diamorphine + haloperidol + midazolam (check concentration)

Practical Points

  • Use McKinley T34 syringe driver (rate in mm/hour; 24-hour infusion)
  • Site: anterior chest wall, upper arm, abdomen, thigh
  • Change site: every 48-72 hours or if inflammation
  • Protect from light: if light-sensitive drugs used
  • When starting: continue oral medications until CSCI has had 30-60 minutes to reach steady state

Referral Criteria

  • Uncertain about drug compatibility or conversion: specialist palliative care pharmacist
  • High-dose opioid conversions: specialist input
  • Refractory symptoms despite CSCI: specialist palliative care review

Prognosis

  • CSCI effectively manages symptoms in the majority of dying patients
  • Starting a syringe driver does not hasten death - it changes the route of medication delivery
  • Clear communication with families about the purpose of CSCI is essential
  • Breakthrough doses should always be available alongside CSCI

Other Relevant Information

Common CSCI Drug Doses

DrugIndicationTypical 24h CSCI Dose
DiamorphinePainVariable (convert from oral)
MorphinePainVariable (oral dose ÷ 2)
MidazolamAgitation, seizures10-30mg
HaloperidolNausea, delirium1.5-5mg
LevomepromazineNausea, agitation6.25-25mg
Hyoscine butylbromideSecretions, colic60-120mg
GlycopyrroniumSecretions0.6-1.2mg
CyclizineNausea150mg (may crystallise >20mg/ml)
OctreotideBowel obstruction300-600mcg

Opioid Conversion for CSCI

ConversionRatio
Oral morphine → SC morphine÷ 2
Oral morphine → SC diamorphine÷ 3
Oral oxycodone → SC oxycodone÷ 1.5-2
Oral morphine → SC alfentanil÷ 30

NICE Guidelines / CKS

End of Life Care Pathway

The end of life care pathway provides a structured framework for delivering individualised care in the last days and hours of life, replacing the Liverpool Care Pathway with personalised care planning as recommended by NICE NG31.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) was withdrawn in 2014 following the Neuberger Review (More Care, Less Pathway) due to concerns about poor implementation
  • NICE NG31 (2015) replaced LCP with recommendations for individualised care of the dying adult
  • Five Priorities of Care for the dying person (Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People): recognise, communicate, involve, address needs of those important to them, create an individualised plan
  • Recognising dying is a clinical decision; should be made by the senior responsible clinician and communicated to patient, family, and team
  • Anticipatory prescribing should be in place for: pain, agitation, secretions, nausea/vomiting
  • Regular review: at least daily reassessment; consider whether the person is improving (may need to de-escalate dying pathway)
  • Hydration and nutrition: assess individually; not routinely started or withdrawn; based on patient benefit and wishes
  • After death: sensitive care of the body; verification and certification of death; family support; bereavement services

Overview

Key Facts

The end of life care pathway is a framework, not a checklist. It must be delivered with compassion, individualised to each patient, and regularly reviewed.

Epidemiology

  • ~500,000 deaths/year in England
  • Approximately 30% of hospital deaths are expected
  • Most dying patients spend their last days in hospital (~46%), home (~25%), or care home (~22%)

Aetiology

The pathway applies to patients recognised as dying from any cause.

Pathophysiology

Not a pathological process. The pathway addresses the care needs of people in the last days of life.

Clinical Presentation

Recognising Dying

  • Progressive deterioration not responding to treatment
  • Reduced consciousness, bedbound
  • Taking only sips of fluid or nil by mouth
  • Reduced urine output
  • Peripheral cyanosis, mottling
  • Changes in breathing (Cheyne-Stokes, irregular)
  • Cold peripheries

NICE NG31 - What to Do

  1. Recognise that the person may be dying
  2. Communicate sensitively with the dying person and those important to them
  3. Involve the dying person and those close to them in decisions about their care
  4. Address the needs of families and carers
  5. Develop an individualised plan of care

Red Flags

  • Uncertainty about whether patient is dying (seek senior opinion)
  • Reversible cause of deterioration not excluded
  • Family disagreement about care goals
  • Patient distress not controlled
  • Staff distress or moral injury

Differential Diagnosis

ScenarioAction
Dying confirmedIndividualised care plan; anticipatory medications
Uncertain if dyingContinue active treatment AND prepare for possible dying; reassess daily
Improving after being considered dyingDe-escalate; restart appropriate oral medications and hydration

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Clinical assessment (as above)
  • Review all medications: stop non-essential; ensure anticipatory medications prescribed
  • Assess symptom burden
  • Assess patient's wishes and preferences
  • Spiritual/religious needs

Bloods

  • Generally NOT appropriate if patient is dying
  • Only if result would change management (e.g. correctable hypercalcaemia)

Imaging

  • NOT appropriate in dying phase

Special Tests

  • Review advance directives, ADRT, ReSPECT form
  • Verify DNACPR status

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Individualised care plan: documented within hours of recognising dying
  • Communication: honest, compassionate conversations with patient and family
  • Comfort care: mouth care (every 2 hours), eye care, skin care, repositioning
  • Environment: quiet, private, comfortable; unrestricted visiting; personal belongings
  • Stop non-essential: monitoring, routine observations, blood tests, inappropriate medications
  • Spiritual care: chaplaincy, religious observances as wished
  • Family support: keep informed, involve in care, prepare for death
  • After death: verification of death, care of the body, death certification, family support, bereavement services

Pharmacological

  • Anticipatory prescribing (PRN medications available):
    • Pain: morphine 2.5-5mg SC PRN 1-hourly
    • Agitation: midazolam 2.5-5mg SC PRN 1-hourly
    • Secretions: hyoscine butylbromide 20mg SC PRN 1-hourly (or glycopyrronium 200mcg)
    • Nausea: haloperidol 0.5-1mg SC PRN or levomepromazine 6.25mg SC PRN
  • Syringe driver: if regular SC doses needed
  • Review hydration: clinically assisted hydration (IV/SC) assessed individually; not routinely started or stopped
  • Stop non-essential medications: antihypertensives, statins, anticoagulants (unless for symptom control), PPIs, supplements

Surgical/Interventional

  • Not appropriate in dying phase
  • Palliative procedures (urinary catheter for retention) may be appropriate for comfort

Referral Criteria

  • Complex symptoms: specialist palliative care
  • Family unable to cope: additional support, social services
  • Staff distress: debrief, peer support
  • After death: bereavement services

Prognosis

  • Median survival after recognition of dying: 1-3 days
  • Prognostication in last days is difficult but important for planning
  • Good end of life care improves quality of death for patient and bereavement outcomes for family
  • Approximately 70% of patients prefer to die at home; achieving this requires forward planning

Other Relevant Information

Neuberger Review Findings (2013)

Issue with LCPLesson
Tick-box mentalityIndividualise care
Poor communicationCommunicate honestly and sensitively
Inappropriate withdrawal of food/fluidAssess individually
Premature diagnosis of dyingRegularly reassess; accept uncertainty
Lack of senior oversightSenior clinician makes dying diagnosis

NICE NG31 - Priorities for Care of the Dying Person

Priority
1. Recognise that the person may be dying
2. Communicate sensitively with the dying person and those important to them
3. Involve them in decisions
4. Address the needs of families
5. Create an individualised plan

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Breaking Bad News

Breaking bad news is a complex communication skill requiring a structured approach such as SPIKES, to deliver distressing information honestly and compassionately while supporting the patient's emotional response.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Breaking bad news is any information that adversely and seriously affects a patient's view of their future
  • SPIKES framework (Baile et al. 2000): Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotions, Strategy/Summary
  • Preparation is essential: review facts, ensure privacy, allow adequate time, have appropriate people present
  • "Warning shot" prepares the patient: 'I'm afraid the results show something serious...'
  • Check understanding first: 'What do you understand about your condition so far?' (Perception step)
  • Ask permission: 'Would it be OK if I shared some of the test results with you?' (Invitation step)
  • Respond to emotions: use empathic statements; allow silence; acknowledge distress; 'I can see this is very difficult news...'
  • Patient-centred: information delivery should match the patient's pace and preferences; some want details, others prefer minimal information initially

Overview

Key Facts

Breaking bad news is one of the most challenging but important clinical skills. It affects the patient's trust, understanding, psychological adjustment, and decision-making.

Epidemiology

  • Doctors break bad news thousands of times during their career
  • Studies show significant variation in skill level
  • Training improves performance and patient satisfaction
  • Poor communication is the most common complaint in healthcare

Aetiology

Situations requiring breaking bad news:

  • Cancer diagnosis
  • Recurrence or progression of disease
  • Transition to palliative care
  • Poor prognosis
  • Serious diagnosis (dementia, MND, progressive condition)
  • Death of a patient (informing family)
  • Unexpected complications

Pathophysiology

Not a pathological process. Breaking bad news is a communication skill grounded in psychological principles of adjustment, grief, and coping.

Clinical Presentation

SPIKES Framework

  1. S - Setting: private room, adequate time, tissues, switch off phone, sit down, invite relevant others
  2. P - Perception: 'What have you been told so far about your condition?' (assess understanding)
  3. I - Invitation: 'Would you like me to explain what the tests showed?' (check readiness; some patients do not want detailed information)
  4. K - Knowledge: deliver information in simple language; use warning shot; avoid jargon; give information in small chunks; check understanding
  5. E - Emotions: acknowledge and validate emotions; use empathic statements ('I can see this is very upsetting...'); allow silence; normalise reactions
  6. S - Strategy/Summary: discuss next steps; outline plan; offer support; written information; arrange follow-up

Patient Responses

  • Shock, disbelief, denial
  • Anger, frustration
  • Sadness, crying
  • Anxiety, fear
  • Acceptance
  • Questions (may come later)

Red Flags

  • Severe emotional distress (risk of self-harm)
  • Denial interfering with essential treatment decisions
  • Family conflict about disclosure
  • Cultural considerations requiring interpreter or different approach
  • Patient alone with no support network

Differential Diagnosis

Communication ScenarioApproach
Diagnosis of cancerSPIKES; allow time; outline next steps
Recurrence/progressionAcknowledge previous experience; reframe goals
Transition to palliativeHonest discussion of prognosis; explore patient's priorities
Informing family of deathPrivate setting; use clear language ('has died'); support grief
Unexpected complicationHonest disclosure; apologise appropriately (Duty of Candour)

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Not applicable in the traditional sense
  • Preparation: review all results, imaging, MDT outcome before the conversation
  • Ensure you have correct and complete information before speaking to the patient

Bloods/Imaging

  • All relevant results should be reviewed and understood before the conversation

Special Tests

  • Not applicable

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Before the conversation: review results, plan what to say, ensure privacy and time, invite patient to bring someone
  • During the conversation: follow SPIKES framework; sit at patient's level; maintain eye contact; speak slowly and clearly; use pauses; check understanding; respond to emotions empathically
  • After the conversation: summarise; offer written information; arrange follow-up appointment; ensure patient knows who to contact; document conversation in notes
  • Self-care: recognise emotional impact on clinician; debrief with colleagues

Key Communication Skills

  • Active listening: reflect back what patient says
  • Empathy: 'I can see this has been really shocking for you'
  • Warning shot: 'I'm afraid the news is not what we had hoped for'
  • Avoid euphemisms: use clear language ('cancer', 'has died' - not 'passed away' or 'growth')
  • Silence: allow pauses after delivering information; resist urge to fill silence
  • Chunk and check: give small pieces of information, then check understanding
  • Open questions: 'What questions do you have?' (not 'Do you have any questions?' which invites 'no')

Pharmacological

  • Not directly applicable
  • Anxiolytics or sedatives may rarely be needed for severe acute distress

Referral Criteria

  • Severe psychological distress: psychology, psychiatry
  • CNS (clinical nurse specialist) support: often present during bad news conversations
  • Palliative care: for ongoing support after life-limiting diagnosis
  • Bereavement support: after informing family of death

Prognosis

  • Effective communication improves patient satisfaction, trust, and psychological adjustment
  • Poor communication increases anxiety, depression, and complaints
  • Training in breaking bad news improves clinician confidence and patient outcomes
  • Patients remember how they were told bad news for the rest of their lives

Other Relevant Information

SPIKES Framework Summary

StepAction
S - SettingPrivate, quiet, adequate time, sit down
P - Perception'What do you understand so far?'
I - Invitation'Would you like me to explain the results?'
K - KnowledgeWarning shot; clear language; small chunks
E - EmotionsEmpathic response; acknowledge feelings; allow silence
S - StrategyNext steps; plan; written information; follow-up

Common Pitfalls

PitfallBetter Approach
Delivering too much information at onceChunk and check
Using medical jargonSimple, clear language
Filling silenceAllow pauses for processing
False reassurance ('everything will be fine')Honest but compassionate
Not checking understanding'What have you taken from what I've said?'

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Advance Care Planning and DNACPR

Advance care planning in palliative care encompasses discussion of future care preferences, advance decisions to refuse treatment, and DNACPR/ReSPECT decisions, ensuring care aligns with patient values and wishes.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Advance care planning (ACP) is a voluntary, ongoing process of discussion about future care, values, and preferences
  • DNACPR is a clinical decision that CPR would not be successful or not in the patient's best interests; should involve patient/family discussion
  • ReSPECT process: nationally adopted summary plan for emergency treatment; replaces standalone DNACPR in most areas
  • ADRT (Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment): legally binding under MCA 2005; must be written, signed, and witnessed if refusing life-sustaining treatment
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in advanced cancer: success rate <5% to hospital discharge; much lower in metastatic disease
  • Tracey v Cambridge (2014): landmark case - patients/families must be consulted about DNACPR unless discussion would cause physical or psychological harm
  • ACP should be initiated early in the palliative care trajectory - not left until crisis or last days
  • Preferred priorities of care: document preferred place of care, preferred place of death, treatment escalation limits

Overview

Key Facts

Advance care planning in palliative care ensures that patients receive care that aligns with their wishes and values, even when they can no longer communicate their preferences.

Epidemiology

  • CPR survival to discharge in advanced cancer: <5% (often <1%)
  • Only ~4% of UK adults have an ADRT
  • ReSPECT forms now used in most of England and Wales
  • Approximately 70% of people say they prefer to die at home

Aetiology

ACP is important in palliative care because:

  • Many patients lose capacity to make decisions as illness progresses
  • Without ACP, default care may include unwanted interventions (CPR, ICU admission)
  • Discussing ACP improves concordance between patient wishes and actual care received

Pathophysiology

Not a pathological process. ACP is an ethical and legal framework within palliative care.

Clinical Presentation

When to Discuss ACP in Palliative Care

  • At diagnosis of life-limiting illness
  • When Surprise Question answer is 'No'
  • After significant deterioration or hospital admission
  • When moving from curative to palliative intent
  • At regular palliative care reviews
  • At patient's request

Components

  • Values, beliefs, what matters most
  • Understanding of illness and prognosis
  • Treatment preferences (hospital admission, ICU, ventilation)
  • DNACPR/ReSPECT
  • Preferred place of care and death
  • Naming a spokesperson/proxy
  • ADRT (specific treatments to refuse)

Red Flags

  • DNACPR decision made without patient/family awareness (Tracey v Cambridge ruling)
  • ACP documented but not accessible to emergency services
  • Patient lacks understanding of their prognosis
  • Family requests concealment of diagnosis from patient (cultural sensitivity needed but patient autonomy paramount)

Differential Diagnosis

DocumentLegal StatusPurpose
Advance statementNot bindingGeneral wishes and values
ADRTLegally bindingRefuses specific treatment
LPA (health)Legally bindingProxy decision-maker
ReSPECTClinical recommendationEmergency care preferences + CPR decision
DNACPRClinical decisionCPR decision only

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Capacity assessment (does patient have capacity for ACP discussion?)
  • Review existing documents (ADRT, LPA, ReSPECT)
  • Explore patient's understanding of illness
  • Discuss values, wishes, and preferences

Bloods/Imaging

  • Not applicable

Special Tests

  • Not applicable

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Initiate discussion: open, honest conversation about future care
  • DNACPR decision:
    • Clinical decision based on likelihood of CPR success and patient's best interests
    • Discuss with patient and/or family (Tracey v Cambridge 2014)
    • Document clearly; complete ReSPECT form
    • Review regularly (not permanent unless patient has clear ADRT)
  • ReSPECT form: complete with patient; includes CPR decision, clinical recommendations, patient preferences
  • ADRT: support patient to complete if they wish; ensure valid (written, signed, witnessed for life-sustaining treatment refusal)
  • LPA: advise patient to consider health and welfare LPA while they have capacity
  • Communicate plan: ensure accessible to all teams (GP, ambulance, hospital, care home)
  • EPaCCS/Coordinate My Care: electronic systems for sharing palliative care preferences
  • Review regularly: preferences may change over time

Pharmacological

  • Not applicable

Surgical/Interventional

  • Not applicable

Referral Criteria

  • Complex ACP decisions: specialist palliative care
  • Capacity concerns: formal capacity assessment
  • Legal queries: trust legal department
  • Family conflict: mediation, clinical ethics committee

Prognosis

  • ACP increases the likelihood of dying in preferred place
  • Reduces unwanted hospital admissions and interventions
  • Improves family satisfaction and reduces complicated grief
  • DNACPR discussions do not increase patient anxiety when handled sensitively
  • ReSPECT process is now standard of care in most UK settings

Other Relevant Information

CPR Survival Rates

SettingSurvival to Discharge
In-hospital cardiac arrest (all)~20%
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest~8-10%
Advanced cancer<5%
Metastatic cancer<1%
Frail elderly with multiple comorbidities<5%

Tracey v Cambridge (2014)

Key Point
DNACPR decisions engage Article 8 (right to private life)
Patient/family must be consulted unless discussion would cause harm
Decision must be clinically justified
Must be documented and communicated
Failure to consult is a breach of human rights

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Bereavement and Grief

Bereavement and grief are natural responses to loss, with most people adjusting over time without professional intervention, though approximately 10% develop prolonged grief disorder requiring specialist support.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Bereavement is the state of having lost someone; grief is the emotional response to bereavement
  • Normal grief involves waves of sadness, yearning, anger, guilt, and disbelief; typically improves over 6-12 months
  • Prolonged grief disorder (PGD/complicated grief): affects approximately 10% of bereaved; intense grief persisting >6 months with functional impairment
  • Kübler-Ross model (5 stages): denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance - NOT a linear process; not all stages are experienced
  • Dual Process Model (Stroebe & Schut): oscillation between loss-oriented (grief) and restoration-oriented (rebuilding life) coping
  • Risk factors for complicated grief: sudden/unexpected death, death of a child, pre-existing mental illness, social isolation, difficult relationship with deceased, lack of social support
Bereavement support
most people need social support, not professional intervention; stepped care approach (self-help
voluntary sector
specialist)
  • Children's grief: differs from adults; needs age-appropriate information and support

Overview

Key Facts

Grief is a natural process. Healthcare professionals should be able to recognise normal grief, identify complicated grief, and signpost appropriate support.

Epidemiology

  • Approximately 600,000 deaths/year in the UK → millions affected by bereavement
  • 10% develop prolonged grief disorder
  • Bereaved people have increased mortality (widowhood effect) - 40% higher in first 6 months
  • Increased risk of depression, anxiety, cardiovascular disease, and suicide

Aetiology

Grief occurs after any significant loss:

  • Death of loved one (most common context)
  • Loss of health, function, independence
  • Loss of role (retirement, parenthood)
  • Anticipatory grief (before death in terminal illness)

Pathophysiology

  • Neurobiologically, grief activates pain pathways, attachment circuits (separation distress), and reward systems (yearning)
  • Cortisol dysregulation and immune suppression in acute bereavement
  • Complicated grief may involve persistent activation of attachment/separation distress circuitry without resolution

Clinical Presentation

Normal Grief

  • Waves of intense sadness, crying
  • Yearning and searching for the deceased
  • Disbelief and shock (especially if sudden death)
  • Anger (at deceased, healthcare, God, themselves)
  • Guilt ('If only...')
  • Anxiety about the future
  • Sleep disturbance, appetite changes
  • Physical symptoms (fatigue, chest tightness, breathlessness)
  • Preoccupation with memories of the deceased
  • Gradual improvement over 6-12 months

Prolonged Grief Disorder (ICD-11)

  • Intense longing/yearning persisting >6 months (>12 months ICD-11)
  • Preoccupation with or rumination about the deceased
  • Significant functional impairment
  • Difficulty accepting the death
  • Emotional numbness or inability to experience positive emotions
  • Difficulty engaging in social activities or planning for the future

Red Flags

  • Suicidal ideation or intent
  • Prolonged inability to function (work, self-care, relationships)
  • Significant weight loss or self-neglect
  • Substance misuse
  • Grief persisting >12 months with worsening trajectory
  • Pre-existing mental illness exacerbated by bereavement

Differential Diagnosis

ConditionKey FeaturesIntervention
Normal griefWaves of sadness, gradual improvementSocial support, time
Prolonged grief disorderPersistent intense grief >6-12 monthsSpecialist grief therapy (CGT)
DepressionPervasive low mood, anhedonia, worthlessnessAntidepressant, CBT
PTSDIntrusive memories of death, avoidance, hyperarousalTrauma-focused CBT, EMDR
Adjustment disorderDistress beyond expected, occurs within 3 monthsCounselling, support

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Sensitive assessment of grief experience
  • Screening for complicated grief (PG-13 scale, ICG - Inventory of Complicated Grief)
  • Assess for depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7)
  • Assess for suicidal ideation
  • Social support assessment
  • Assess for risk factors for complicated grief

Bloods

  • Not routinely needed
  • Consider TFTs, FBC if physical symptoms suggest underlying cause

Imaging

  • Not applicable

Special Tests

  • Bereavement risk assessment (ideally before death - identifies high-risk individuals)
  • Standardised grief measures (ICG, PG-13) for research or specialist assessment

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Majority need social support, not professional intervention
  • Level 1: information, self-help, social support (family, friends, community)
  • Level 2: trained bereavement volunteers, peer support groups (Cruse Bereavement Support, hospice bereavement services)
  • Level 3: professional counselling (for complicated grief, depression, PTSD)
  • Level 4: specialist mental health services (psychiatry, clinical psychology)
  • Cognitive grief therapy (CGT): evidence-based for prolonged grief disorder (Shear et al. 2005)
  • Trauma-focused CBT or EMDR: for PTSD-related grief
  • Children: age-appropriate information, reassurance, routine, specialist support if needed (Winston's Wish, Child Bereavement UK)

Pharmacological

  • Grief itself should NOT be treated with medication (it is a normal process)
  • If complicated by depression: SSRIs (sertraline 50-200mg, fluoxetine 20-60mg)
  • If complicated by insomnia: short-term zopiclone or melatonin (avoid long-term)
  • If complicated by anxiety: consider SSRI; short-term benzodiazepine only in extreme cases

Surgical/Interventional

  • Not applicable

Referral Criteria

  • Prolonged grief disorder: specialist grief therapy
  • Suicidal ideation: crisis team / psychiatric assessment
  • Depression or PTSD: psychological therapy service (IAPT/NHS Talking Therapies)
  • Children affected: Child Bereavement UK, Winston's Wish
  • Pre-bereavement support: palliative care team

Prognosis

  • Most people adjust to bereavement over 6-12 months without professional help
  • 10% develop prolonged grief disorder (responds to cognitive grief therapy)
  • Widowhood effect: 40% increased mortality in first 6 months of bereavement
  • Bereavement increases risk of depression (30%), anxiety, cardiovascular disease
  • Good pre-bereavement care (honest communication, being present at death, saying goodbye) reduces complicated grief

Other Relevant Information

Models of Grief

ModelKey Concept
Kübler-Ross (1969)5 stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance (not linear)
Worden (1991)4 tasks: accept reality, work through pain, adjust to world without, relocate the deceased
Dual Process (Stroebe & Schut 1999)Oscillation between loss-oriented and restoration-oriented coping
Continuing Bonds (Klass 1996)Maintaining connection with deceased is healthy and normal

Risk Factors for Complicated Grief

Risk Factor
Sudden/unexpected death
Death of a child
Traumatic death (suicide, homicide, accident)
Pre-existing mental illness
Insecure attachment style
Social isolation/poor support
Difficult relationship with deceased
Multiple losses

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Spiritual Care

Spiritual care addresses existential, meaning-making, and transcendent dimensions of suffering in serious illness, forming a core component of holistic palliative care alongside physical, psychological, and social support.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Spiritual care addresses questions of meaning, purpose, hope, and connection - not limited to religious beliefs
  • Total pain (Cicely Saunders): spiritual suffering is an integral component alongside physical, psychological, and social pain
  • Approximately 70-80% of patients with serious illness report spiritual needs; often unaddressed by healthcare teams
  • Spiritual distress may manifest as: existential anguish, loss of meaning, hopelessness, guilt, anger at God, fear of death, isolation
  • FICA assessment tool: Faith/beliefs, Importance/influence, Community, Address/Action - structured spiritual history
  • Not limited to religion: atheists and agnostics have spiritual needs (meaning, legacy, relationships, peace)
  • Chaplaincy services should be accessible to all patients regardless of faith or belief; chaplains are trained in spiritual assessment
  • Healthcare professionals should be able to recognise spiritual distress and offer basic spiritual care (presence, listening, acknowledging)

Overview

Key Facts

Spiritual care is a fundamental component of palliative care. Addressing spiritual needs improves quality of life, reduces suffering, and supports dignity at the end of life.

Epidemiology

  • 70-80% of patients with serious illness report spiritual needs
  • Spiritual wellbeing is associated with better quality of life and lower rates of depression
  • Only 20-30% of patients have their spiritual needs formally assessed
  • Spiritual distress is associated with desire for hastened death, increased symptom burden, and reduced quality of life

Aetiology

Spiritual needs arise from:

  • Confrontation with mortality
  • Loss of meaning and purpose
  • Questioning of faith or beliefs
  • Loss of identity and role
  • Guilt, regret, unfinished business
  • Fear of the unknown (after death)
  • Desire for legacy and being remembered
  • Need for reconciliation, forgiveness, love

Pathophysiology

Not a pathological process. Spiritual care operates within the bio-psycho-social-spiritual model of healthcare. Research demonstrates that spiritual wellbeing modulates the experience of physical symptoms and psychological distress.

Clinical Presentation

Spiritual Distress

  • 'Why is this happening to me?'
  • 'What's the point of going on?'
  • Loss of hope
  • Guilt and regret
  • Anger at God/life/fate
  • Fear of dying or what comes after
  • Feeling of being a burden
  • Desire for hastened death
  • Withdrawal and isolation
  • Existential loneliness

Spiritual Wellbeing

  • Sense of peace
  • Meaning and purpose
  • Connection with others
  • Hope (even if not for cure - hope for comfort, legacy, reconciliation)
  • Acceptance
  • Gratitude

Red Flags

  • Desire for hastened death (screen for depression AND spiritual distress)
  • Severe existential anguish not responding to basic support
  • Religious/spiritual crisis causing significant distress
  • Conflict between patient's beliefs and medical treatment

Differential Diagnosis

ConditionFeaturesIntervention
Spiritual distressExistential questioning, loss of meaningSpiritual care, chaplaincy
DepressionPersistent low mood, anhedonia, worthlessnessAntidepressant, CBT
AnxietyWorry, fear, physical tensionAnxiolytic, CBT
DemoralisationHopelessness, loss of meaning, preserved capacity for pleasureMeaning-centred therapy
Grief (anticipatory)Sadness about losses, future lossesGrief support

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • FICA spiritual history:
    • F: What gives your life meaning? Do you have spiritual or religious beliefs?
    • I: How important are these in your life? How do they influence your healthcare decisions?
    • C: Are you part of a spiritual or religious community? Is this helpful?
    • A: How would you like me to address these issues in your care?
  • Open questions: 'What gives you strength?', 'What are you most worried about?', 'Is there anything that is troubling you deeply?'
  • Observe for signs of spiritual distress

Bloods/Imaging

  • Not applicable

Special Tests

  • FACIT-Sp (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being): validated measure of spiritual wellbeing
  • Spiritual needs questionnaire (research settings)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • All clinicians: be present; listen actively; acknowledge spiritual concerns; sit with uncertainty
  • Basic spiritual care (all healthcare professionals):
    • Create safe space for patient to express concerns
    • Ask open questions about meaning, fears, hopes
    • Acknowledge distress without trying to 'fix' it
    • Respect patient's beliefs (or absence of belief)
  • Chaplaincy referral: for in-depth spiritual assessment and support
    • Multi-faith chaplains available in most NHS trusts
    • Available to patients of all faiths and none
  • Meaning-centred psychotherapy: evidence-based intervention for patients with advanced cancer (Breitbart et al.)
  • Dignity therapy: patient creates legacy document; improves spiritual wellbeing and sense of meaning (Chochinov et al.)
  • Life review: reflecting on life story, achievements, relationships
  • Religious rituals: facilitated by chaplaincy or faith leader (prayer, sacraments, communion, last rites)
  • Legacy work: letters, recordings, memory boxes (especially for parents of young children)

Pharmacological

  • Not applicable to spiritual care itself
  • Treat comorbid depression or anxiety if present

Surgical/Interventional

  • Not applicable

Referral Criteria

  • Spiritual distress not responding to basic care: chaplaincy
  • Severe existential anguish: chaplain + psychology/psychiatry
  • Specific religious needs: faith leader
  • Desire for hastened death: specialist palliative care assessment (exclude depression, undertreated symptoms)

Prognosis

  • Addressing spiritual needs improves quality of life and reduces psychological distress
  • Patients with higher spiritual wellbeing have lower rates of depression and desire for hastened death
  • Dignity therapy improves sense of meaning and purpose; valued by patients and families
  • Spiritual care is associated with more peaceful deaths and better bereavement outcomes for families
  • Unaddressed spiritual needs increase suffering and may lead to requests for euthanasia/hastened death

Other Relevant Information

FICA Spiritual Assessment Tool

DomainQuestions
F - Faith/beliefDo you have a faith or spiritual beliefs? What gives your life meaning?
I - ImportanceHow important is this in your life? Does it influence your healthcare decisions?
C - CommunityAre you part of a spiritual community? Is this a source of support?
A - AddressHow would you like healthcare providers to address spiritual issues?

Dignity Therapy (Chochinov)

Element
Patient is asked about important aspects of their life
Sessions are recorded, transcribed, and edited into a 'generativity document'
Document is given to patient and family as a legacy
Improves spiritual wellbeing, meaning, purpose, and will to live

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Carer Support

Carers of patients with life-limiting illness experience significant physical, emotional, and financial burden, requiring proactive assessment and support as a key component of holistic palliative care.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • There are approximately 6.5 million unpaid carers in the UK; carers save the NHS an estimated £132 billion/year
  • Carer burnout affects 40-70% of carers of patients with life-limiting illness; associated with depression, anxiety, and physical ill-health
  • Carer's assessment: carers have a legal right to an assessment of their own needs under the Care Act 2014
  • Carer's Allowance: £76.75/week (2024/25); available if caring ≥35 hours/week for someone receiving certain disability benefits
  • Respite care: essential for carer wellbeing; includes day care, sitting services, short-term residential care
  • Bereavement support: carers at high risk of complicated grief; pre-bereavement support improves outcomes
  • Healthcare professionals should proactively assess carer needs at every clinical encounter
  • Children as carers (young carers): approximately 800,000 in the UK; entitled to a young carer's assessment under Care Act 2014

Overview

Key Facts

Carers are the backbone of community-based palliative care. Supporting carers is essential for sustaining home-based care and improving outcomes for both patient and carer.

Epidemiology

  • ~6.5 million unpaid carers in the UK
  • 1 in 5 carers provides >50 hours of care per week
  • Carers are 2× more likely to be in poor health than non-carers
  • Depression affects 40-50% of carers of patients with advanced cancer
  • ~800,000 young carers in the UK (<18 years)

Aetiology

Carer burden arises from:

  • Physical demands of caring (lifting, personal care, medication management)
  • Emotional distress (witnessing suffering, anticipatory grief, fear of loss)
  • Social isolation (reduced social activities, loss of own identity/role)
  • Financial impact (reduced employment, care costs, benefits complexity)
  • Sleep deprivation (nocturnal care needs)
  • Lack of information and training

Pathophysiology

Chronic stress
HPA axis activation
cortisol dysregulation
immune suppression, cardiovascular risk
  • Caregiver burden is an independent risk factor for mortality (63% higher in stressed caregivers - Schulz & Beach 1999)
  • Anticipatory grief: grieving before death occurs; may be protective or may complicate post-bereavement adjustment

Clinical Presentation

Signs of Carer Strain

  • Physical exhaustion
  • Emotional distress (anxiety, depression, irritability)
  • Sleep disturbance
  • Social withdrawal
  • Neglecting own health (missed appointments, untreated conditions)
  • Relationship difficulties
  • Financial difficulties
  • Substance misuse
  • Expressing frustration, resentment, or guilt

Assessment

  • 'How are you coping?'
  • 'Are you getting enough rest?'
  • 'Do you have support from anyone else?'
  • 'Are you managing financially?'
  • 'Do you know what support is available to you?'

Red Flags

  • Carer expressing inability to continue caring
  • Evidence of carer self-neglect or health deterioration
  • Safeguarding concerns (abuse or neglect of patient by overwhelmed carer)
  • Suicidal ideation in carer
  • Young carer with educational/developmental impact
  • Patient being kept at home against their wishes due to carer's preferences

Differential Diagnosis

Carer NeedAssessmentIntervention
Physical exhaustionCarer health assessmentRespite, practical support
Depression/anxietyPHQ-9, GAD-7GP referral, counselling
Financial difficultyBenefits assessmentCitizens Advice, Carer's Allowance
Social isolationSocial assessmentCarer support groups, befriending
Bereavement riskBereavement risk assessmentPre-bereavement support, counselling

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Carer needs assessment (proactive; at every clinical encounter)
  • Carer strain index (CSI) or Zarit Burden Interview
  • Depression/anxiety screening (PHQ-9, GAD-7)
  • Financial assessment
  • Social support assessment

Bloods

  • Not applicable to carer assessment itself
  • Encourage carer to attend own GP for health review

Imaging/Special Tests

  • Not applicable

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Proactive carer assessment at every palliative care encounter
  • Information and education: illness trajectory, what to expect, medication management, when to call for help
  • Practical support: district nurses, personal care assistants, Marie Curie/Macmillan nurses, night sitting services
  • Respite care: day centres, short-term residential, hospice day care
  • Carer support groups: peer support (Carers UK, local carer centres)
  • Psychological support: counselling, CBT, mindfulness
  • Financial advice: Carer's Allowance, Attendance Allowance, PIP, Citizens Advice
  • Young carers: young carer's assessment; school support; Young Carers Network
  • After death: bereavement support (Cruse, hospice bereavement services)
  • Advance care planning: involve carer in discussions; prepare for death

Pharmacological

  • Not directly applicable
  • Treat carer depression/anxiety through own GP (SSRIs, counselling)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Not applicable

Referral Criteria

  • All carers: offer carer's assessment (Care Act 2014)
  • Significant carer strain: social services, carer support services
  • Depression/anxiety: GP, psychological therapy
  • Financial difficulties: benefits advice, social worker
  • Young carers: local authority young carer's assessment
  • Bereavement risk: palliative care team, bereavement services

Prognosis

  • Supporting carers enables patients to remain at home longer (preferred by most)
  • Carer support reduces unplanned hospital admissions
  • Pre-bereavement support reduces complicated grief by 30-40%
  • Unsupported carers have higher mortality, morbidity, and psychological distress
  • Investment in carer support is cost-effective for the health system

Other Relevant Information

Carer Support Available in the UK

Support TypeProvider
Practical/nursingDistrict nurses, Marie Curie, Macmillan
RespiteHospice day care, residential respite
FinancialCarer's Allowance, Attendance Allowance
EmotionalCounselling, support groups
InformationCarers UK helpline, Macmillan
Young carersYoung Carers Network, local authority
BereavementCruse, hospice bereavement services

Care Act 2014 - Carer's Rights

Right
Right to a carer's assessment
Right to have eligible needs met
Right to information and advice
Right to be involved in discharge planning
Right to advocacy if needed

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Palliative Care Emergencies

Palliative care emergencies include spinal cord compression, superior vena cava obstruction, hypercalcaemia of malignancy, massive haemorrhage, and seizures, requiring prompt recognition and treatment alongside goals-of-care discussions.

MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA

Key Facts

  • Spinal cord compression (SCC): back pain + neurological signs; MRI whole spine within 24 hours; dexamethasone 16mg IV immediately; emergency radiotherapy or surgery
  • SVC obstruction: facial oedema, dyspnoea, distended neck veins; dexamethasone 8-16mg + urgent stent or radiotherapy
  • Hypercalcaemia of malignancy: confusion, nausea, polyuria, constipation; IV normal saline + zoledronic acid 4mg IV (or denosumab if renal impairment)
  • Massive haemorrhage: prepare dark towels; midazolam 10mg IM/SC for sedation; hold patient's hand; do not attempt to stop catastrophic haemorrhage
  • Seizures: midazolam 10mg buccal/IM; consider CSCI midazolam 20-40mg/24h if recurrent; investigate cause (brain mets, metabolic)
  • All emergencies require simultaneous treatment AND goals of care discussion (is active treatment appropriate or should focus be comfort?)
  • Neutropenic sepsis: covered in oncology emergencies but palliative care patients may present; decision about antibiotic treatment depends on goals of care
  • Catastrophic haemorrhage protocol: anticipatory plan for patients at risk (head and neck cancer, large vessel erosion); ensure PRN midazolam available

Overview

Key Facts

Palliative care emergencies require urgent medical management alongside consideration of the patient's overall condition, prognosis, and goals of care. Not all emergencies require active treatment - comfort may be the priority.

Epidemiology

  • SCC: affects 3-5% of cancer patients; most common with breast, prostate, lung, myeloma
  • SVC obstruction: 2-4% of cancer patients; most common with lung cancer and lymphoma
  • Hypercalcaemia: 10-30% of advanced cancer patients (especially squamous cell, breast, myeloma)
  • Catastrophic haemorrhage: rare but occurs in head and neck cancer, eroded major vessels

Aetiology

Causes are cancer-related:

  • SCC: vertebral metastases compressing cord
  • SVCO: mediastinal tumour/lymphadenopathy compressing SVC
  • Hypercalcaemia: PTHrP (humoral), osteolytic metastases, vitamin D production
  • Haemorrhage: tumour erosion into major vessel (carotid, aorta), coagulopathy
  • Seizures: brain metastases, metabolic (hyponatraemia, uraemia), medications

Pathophysiology

SCC
tumour compresses spinal cord
oedema
ischaemia
irreversible neurological damage if not treated within 24-48 hours
  • SVCO: obstruction of venous return from head, neck, and upper limbs → facial/upper limb oedema, cerebral oedema
  • Hypercalcaemia: PTHrP (80%) → increased bone resorption + renal calcium reabsorption; dehydration worsens it
  • Massive haemorrhage: exsanguination within minutes if major vessel eroded

Clinical Presentation

Spinal Cord Compression

  • Back pain (90%) - often precedes neurological signs by weeks
  • Leg weakness (motor)
  • Sensory level
  • Bladder/bowel dysfunction (late; usually irreversible)
  • Band-like pain around thorax/abdomen

SVC Obstruction

  • Facial oedema (especially worse on waking)
  • Distended neck veins and chest wall veins (Pemberton's sign)
  • Dyspnoea
  • Headache (worse bending forward)
  • Arm oedema (unilateral or bilateral)

Hypercalcaemia

  • Confusion, drowsiness
  • Nausea, vomiting, constipation
  • Polyuria, polydipsia, dehydration
  • Abdominal pain
  • Cardiac: shortened QT, arrhythmias

Massive Haemorrhage

  • Sudden onset massive bleeding (oral, rectal, vaginal, from wound/tumour)
  • Rapid cardiovascular collapse
  • Usually from eroded major vessel

Red Flags

  • Any new back pain in a cancer patient → consider SCC until proven otherwise
  • Facial swelling in cancer patient → SVC obstruction
  • Confusion in cancer patient → check calcium urgently
  • Patient at risk of catastrophic haemorrhage: must have anticipatory plan

Differential Diagnosis

EmergencyKey FeatureImmediate Action
Spinal cord compressionBack pain + leg weaknessMRI + dexamethasone 16mg IV
SVC obstructionFacial oedema, dyspnoeaDexamethasone + urgent stent/RT
HypercalcaemiaConfusion, nausea, dehydrationIV fluids + zoledronic acid
Massive haemorrhageCatastrophic bleedingDark towels + midazolam sedation
SeizuresTonic-clonic or focalMidazolam 10mg buccal/IM
Neutropenic sepsisFever + neutropeniaAntibiotics (if goals-appropriate)

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Neurological examination (SCC)
  • Oxygen saturations, blood pressure
  • ECG (hypercalcaemia: shortened QT)

Bloods

  • Corrected calcium (urgent if hypercalcaemia suspected)
  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs
  • Clotting (haemorrhage)
  • Blood cultures (neutropenic sepsis)

Imaging

  • MRI whole spine (SCC - within 24 hours; emergency if progressive neurology)
  • CT thorax (SVCO - assess cause and suitability for stenting)
  • CT head (seizures - brain metastases)

Special Tests

  • As guided by emergency type

Management

Spinal Cord Compression

  • Dexamethasone 16mg IV immediately (then 16mg daily, taper over 2 weeks)
  • MRI whole spine within 24 hours (or same day if progressive deficit)
  • Refer to oncology + spinal surgery: radiotherapy or surgical decompression
  • Maintain flat bed rest until spinal stability confirmed
  • Bladder catheterisation if retention
  • VTE prophylaxis

SVC Obstruction

  • Dexamethasone 8-16mg IV (reduces peri-tumoral oedema)
  • Elevate head of bed
  • SVC stent (interventional radiology): rapid relief; preferred for most causes
  • Radiotherapy: if lymphoma or radiosensitive tumour
  • Chemotherapy: if chemo-sensitive (lymphoma, SCLC)

Hypercalcaemia

  • IV normal saline 1L over 4-6 hours (rehydrate aggressively; 3-4L/24h)
  • Zoledronic acid 4mg IV over 15 minutes (takes 2-4 days to work)
  • Or denosumab 120mg SC (if renal impairment or bisphosphonate failure)
  • Monitor calcium, U&Es daily
  • Treat underlying cancer if possible
  • May recur: repeat bisphosphonate as needed

Massive Haemorrhage

  • Anticipatory plan must be in place for at-risk patients
  • Dark towels (reduces visual distress of blood)
  • Stay with patient; hold their hand
  • Midazolam 10mg IM/SC (sedation to reduce distress)
  • Do NOT attempt to stop catastrophic haemorrhage (futile in major vessel erosion)
  • Call for help; support family
  • Morphine if pain

Seizures

  • Midazolam 10mg buccal/IM (first-line)
  • If recurrent: CSCI midazolam 20-40mg/24h
  • Levetiracetam 250-1,000mg BD if ongoing seizure risk
  • Dexamethasone 8-16mg (if brain metastases causing seizures)
  • Phenytoin/sodium valproate: alternatives for ongoing prophylaxis

Referral Criteria

  • SCC: emergency oncology and spinal surgery
  • SVCO: interventional radiology and oncology
  • Refractory hypercalcaemia: oncology
  • Complex emergencies: specialist palliative care

Prognosis

  • SCC: neurological outcome depends on speed of treatment; 50% who are walking at diagnosis remain ambulant; paraplegia at presentation is usually irreversible
  • SVCO: stenting provides rapid relief (90% response); median survival depends on underlying cancer
  • Hypercalcaemia: responds to rehydration + bisphosphonate in 80%; recurrence common; poor prognostic sign (median survival 3-4 months)
  • Massive haemorrhage: usually fatal within minutes; focus is on comfort and dignity
  • Seizures: most controlled with anticonvulsants; brain metastases have poor prognosis

Other Relevant Information

Palliative Care Emergency Summary

EmergencyKey InvestigationKey Treatment
Spinal cord compressionMRI whole spineDexamethasone 16mg + RT/surgery
SVC obstructionCT thoraxDexamethasone + stent/RT
HypercalcaemiaCorrected calciumIV fluids + zoledronic acid
Massive haemorrhageClinicalDark towels + midazolam
SeizuresCT headMidazolam 10mg buccal

Catastrophic Haemorrhage Protocol

Element
Identify at-risk patients (head and neck, large vessel proximity)
Discuss and document anticipatory plan
Ensure PRN midazolam prescribed and available
Dark towels accessible
Staff/family education
Stay with the patient

NICE Guidelines / CKS