Symptom control, end-of-life care, communication skills, syringe drivers, and ethical frameworks in terminal illness.
15 topics · 378 linked questions
Principles of Palliative Care
Palliative care is an approach that improves quality of life for patients and families facing life-threatening illness, through prevention and relief of suffering across physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
WHO definition: palliative care improves quality of life of patients and families facing life-threatening illness, through prevention and relief of suffering
Total pain concept (Dame Cicely Saunders): suffering has physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions - all must be addressed
Palliative care is not just end of life care: it should be integrated early alongside disease-modifying treatment (Temel et al. 2010 - NEJM; early palliative care improved QoL and survival in NSCLC)
Generalist palliative care: provided by all healthcare professionals; specialist palliative care: provided by trained palliative care teams for complex needs
Key principles: symptom management, patient-centred care, holistic assessment, shared decision-making, advance care planning, coordination of care
Approximately 500,000 people die each year in England; an estimated 75% would benefit from palliative care
NICE NG31: individualised care of the dying adult in the last days of life
Palliative care applies to all life-limiting illnesses - not just cancer (heart failure, COPD, dementia, renal failure, neurological disease)
Overview
Key Facts
Palliative care is one of the most rapidly growing specialties, reflecting the increasing recognition that good symptom management and quality of life are as important as disease-modifying treatment.
Epidemiology
~500,000 deaths/year in England; ~75% would benefit from palliative care
Only ~50% of those who would benefit currently access specialist palliative care
Cancer patients: most likely to receive specialist palliative care
Non-cancer patients (HF, COPD, dementia): significant unmet palliative care needs
Aetiology
Palliative care is needed for any life-limiting condition, including:
Cancer (all types)
Organ failure: heart failure, COPD, CKD, liver failure
Palliative radiotherapy: bone pain, haemorrhage, SVC obstruction
Referral Criteria
Complex symptoms not responding to generalist management
Complex psychological/spiritual needs
Difficult prognostic conversations
Complex ethical issues
End of life care coordination
Specialist palliative care team (hospital, community, hospice)
Prognosis
Early palliative care improves quality of life and may extend survival (Temel et al. 2010: metastatic NSCLC patients receiving early palliative care had improved QoL AND median survival of 11.6 vs 8.9 months)
Palliative care reduces hospital admissions and healthcare costs
Improves patient and family satisfaction
Reduces bereavement-related depression and complicated grief in families
WHO estimates that globally only 14% of those needing palliative care receive it
Other Relevant Information
WHO Definition of Palliative Care
Element
Improves quality of life
For patients and families facing life-threatening illness
Through prevention and relief of suffering
By early identification, assessment, and treatment of pain and other problems
Physical, psychosocial, and spiritual
Applicable early in the illness alongside disease-modifying treatments
Levels of Palliative Care
Level
Provider
Scope
Generalist
All healthcare professionals
Basic symptom management, communication, ACP
Specialist
Palliative care teams (hospital, community, hospice)
Complex symptoms, psychosocial support, end of life
Pain affects 70-80% of patients with advanced cancer and requires systematic assessment and management using the WHO analgesic ladder alongside adjuvant therapies and interventional techniques for refractory cases.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Pain affects approximately 70-80% of patients with advanced cancer; adequate control achievable in >80% with WHO ladder approach
WHO analgesic ladder
Step 1 (paracetamol ± NSAID)
Step 2 (weak opioid ± Step 1)
Step 3 (strong opioid ± Step 1 ± adjuvants)
Oral morphine first-line strong opioid: start 5-10mg IR 4-hourly (opioid-naive); breakthrough = 1/6th of total 24-hour dose
NICE NG193: titrate strong opioids to effect; use modified-release for background + immediate-release for breakthrough
Adjuvants for neuropathic pain: amitriptyline 10-75mg ON, gabapentin 300-1,800mg/day, pregabalin 75-300mg BD
Bone pain: NSAID + opioid + palliative RT (8Gy single fraction); bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid 4mg IV monthly) or denosumab
Always co-prescribe laxatives with opioids (senna + docusate or macrogol); constipation does NOT develop tolerance
Opioid rotation: switch if intolerable side effects (use equianalgesic tables; reduce new dose by 25-50% for incomplete cross-tolerance)
Overview
Key Facts
Pain management in palliative care requires regular assessment, individualised treatment, and attention to all dimensions of suffering.
Epidemiology
Pain affects 50% at diagnosis and 70-80% with advanced cancer
10-20% have refractory pain requiring specialist intervention
Non-cancer conditions also cause significant pain: heart failure, COPD, renal failure, neurological disease
Aetiology
Cancer-related (60-70%): direct tumour involvement (bone, nerve, visceral, soft tissue)
Opioid conversion (rotation) involves switching between opioid formulations or agents, requiring knowledge of equianalgesic ratios and dose reduction for incomplete cross-tolerance to ensure safe and effective pain management.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Opioid conversion is needed when: changing route (oral → SC/IV), switching opioid (rotation for side effects), or converting between preparations
Oral morphine to SC morphine: divide by 2 (e.g. 60mg oral/24h = 30mg SC/24h)
Oral morphine to oral oxycodone: divide by 1.5-2 (e.g. 30mg morphine = 15-20mg oxycodone)
Oral morphine to SC diamorphine: divide by 3 (e.g. 60mg oral morphine = 20mg SC diamorphine)
Incomplete cross-tolerance: when switching opioids, reduce calculated equianalgesic dose by 25-50% (except fentanyl patches - manufacturer conversion used)
Always calculate and document: show working; use local guidelines/conversion charts
Breakthrough dose: always 1/6th of total 24-hour opioid dose in morphine equivalent, given as immediate-release preparation
Overview
Key Facts
Opioid conversion is a high-risk prescribing activity. Errors in conversion cause significant harm. Always use conversion tables, show calculations, and seek advice if unsure.
Epidemiology
Opioid rotation is needed in approximately 20-30% of patients on long-term opioids
Common reasons: side effects (nausea, confusion, myoclonus), renal impairment (accumulation of metabolites), route change (inability to swallow)
Opioid rotation: intolerable side effects despite dose titration, poor analgesia despite dose escalation, renal impairment (morphine → oxycodone or fentanyl), development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia
Formulation change: immediate-release to modified-release
Pathophysiology
Incomplete cross-tolerance: different opioids act on different μ-receptor subtypes and have different receptor binding profiles; tolerance to one opioid does not fully transfer to another
This is why dose reduction (25-50%) is needed when switching opioids
Renal impairment: morphine-6-glucuronide (active metabolite) accumulates → toxicity; switch to oxycodone, fentanyl, or buprenorphine (hepatically metabolised)
Fentanyl: highly lipophilic; onset and offset depend on tissue distribution; requires stable pain (not for titration)
Clinical Presentation
When to Convert
Patient unable to swallow (convert oral → SC or transdermal)
Intolerable opioid side effects (rotate to different opioid)
Renal impairment (switch from morphine to safer alternative)
Starting syringe driver (convert oral to CSCI)
Stepping up from weak to strong opioid
Assessment Before Conversion
Current opioid, dose, route, frequency
Total 24-hour opioid consumption (including breakthrough doses used)
Pain control (adequate or inadequate?)
Side effects
Renal and hepatic function
Reason for conversion
Red Flags
Prescriber unsure of conversion ratios (seek specialist advice)
Nausea and vomiting affect 40-70% of patients with advanced cancer, requiring identification of the underlying mechanism to guide rational antiemetic selection based on receptor pharmacology.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Nausea and vomiting affect 40-70% of patients with advanced cancer
Mechanism-based approach: identify the cause → choose antiemetic based on receptor pharmacology and vomiting centre pathways
Chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) mediated (drugs, metabolic): haloperidol 1.5mg ON or ondansetron 4-8mg TDS
Levomepromazine 6.25mg ON is a broad-spectrum antiemetic (blocks D2, 5HT2, H1, mACh) - useful when cause unclear or multiple causes
Overview
Key Facts
Rational antiemetic prescribing in palliative care is based on understanding the neuropharmacology of nausea and matching the antiemetic to the underlying cause.
Epidemiology
Nausea: 40-70% of advanced cancer patients
Vomiting: 30% of advanced cancer patients
Often multifactorial
Significantly impacts quality of life and oral medication absorption
Breathlessness is a distressing subjective experience affecting 50-70% of patients with advanced disease, managed through non-pharmacological interventions and low-dose opioids as the pharmacological mainstay.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Breathlessness affects 50-70% of patients with advanced cancer and >90% with advanced COPD or heart failure
Breathlessness is a subjective experience - severity does not always correlate with objective measures (O2 sats, respiratory rate)
Non-pharmacological interventions are first-line: fan directed at face, breathing techniques, positioning, pacing, anxiety management
Low-dose oral morphine (2.5-5mg PO 4-hourly or 10-20mg MR OD) is the pharmacological mainstay; reduces the sensation of breathlessness without significant respiratory depression at these doses
Oxygen is only beneficial if hypoxic (SpO2 <92%); handheld fan is equivalent for non-hypoxic breathlessness (Abernethy 2010)
Benzodiazepines (lorazepam 0.5-1mg SL) for anxiety-related breathlessness; limited evidence for breathlessness itself but useful adjunct
Dexamethasone 4-8mg daily: for breathlessness related to tumour obstruction, lymphangitis carcinomatosa, SVC obstruction
Breathlessness in palliative care is often irreversible and multifactorial. The focus is on reducing the distressing sensation rather than treating the underlying cause.
Epidemiology
Affects 50-70% of advanced cancer patients; >90% with advanced COPD/HF
Most common symptom in last weeks of life (apart from fatigue)
Strongly associated with anxiety, panic, and reduced quality of life
Constipation affects up to 90% of palliative care patients on opioids, requiring prophylactic laxatives with all opioid prescriptions and a proactive approach to assessment and management.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Constipation affects 50-90% of palliative care patients; almost universal with opioid use
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) does NOT develop tolerance - unlike nausea; requires ongoing laxative treatment
Prophylactic laxatives MUST be prescribed with all opioid prescriptions: senna 15mg ON + docusate 100mg BD (stimulant + softener)
Terminal agitation affects 25-85% of dying patients and manifests as restlessness, distress, and confusion in the last days of life, requiring identification of reversible causes and judicious use of sedative medications.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Terminal agitation (terminal restlessness) affects 25-85% of dying patients in the last hours to days of life
Palliative sedation: proportionate sedation to relieve intractable suffering; NOT euthanasia; governed by ethical principles of beneficence and double effect
Communication with family: explain that agitation/restlessness is common in dying; that medications aim to relieve distress not hasten death
Overview
Key Facts
Terminal agitation is one of the most distressing symptoms for families witnessing the dying process. Prompt identification of reversible causes and compassionate use of sedation are essential.
Epidemiology
Affects 25-85% of dying patients (depending on definition and setting)
More common in younger patients, those with brain metastases, and those on high-dose opioids
A syringe driver delivers continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) of medications over 24 hours, used when patients can no longer take oral medications, enabling effective symptom management in the last days of life.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Syringe driver (CSCI) delivers medications continuously via subcutaneous infusion over 24 hours
Indications: inability to swallow, persistent vomiting, bowel obstruction, poor oral absorption, last days of life
Common medications in CSCI: morphine/diamorphine/oxycodone (pain), midazolam (agitation/seizures), haloperidol (nausea/delirium), hyoscine butylbromide (secretions), levomepromazine (nausea/agitation), cyclizine (nausea)
Diamorphine is preferred for CSCI due to high solubility (large doses in small volume); alternatives: morphine, oxycodone, alfentanil
Drug compatibility: check local compatibility charts before mixing; generally 2-3 drugs can be mixed; some combinations are incompatible (e.g. cyclizine may crystallise at higher concentrations)
Dilute with water for injection (NOT normal saline for most mixtures)
Syringe drivers are an essential tool in palliative care, enabling symptom management when the oral route is unavailable. Safe prescribing requires knowledge of drug conversions, compatibility, and local protocols.
Epidemiology
Used in approximately 30-50% of dying patients in the UK
Most commonly used in the last days of life
Also used earlier for bowel obstruction, persistent vomiting, or severe dysphagia
Aetiology
Indications for CSCI:
Patient unable to swallow (dying, dysphagia, drowsy)
The end of life care pathway provides a structured framework for delivering individualised care in the last days and hours of life, replacing the Liverpool Care Pathway with personalised care planning as recommended by NICE NG31.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) was withdrawn in 2014 following the Neuberger Review (More Care, Less Pathway) due to concerns about poor implementation
NICE NG31 (2015) replaced LCP with recommendations for individualised care of the dying adult
Five Priorities of Care for the dying person (Leadership Alliance for the Care of Dying People): recognise, communicate, involve, address needs of those important to them, create an individualised plan
Recognising dying is a clinical decision; should be made by the senior responsible clinician and communicated to patient, family, and team
Anticipatory prescribing should be in place for: pain, agitation, secretions, nausea/vomiting
Regular review: at least daily reassessment; consider whether the person is improving (may need to de-escalate dying pathway)
Hydration and nutrition: assess individually; not routinely started or withdrawn; based on patient benefit and wishes
After death: sensitive care of the body; verification and certification of death; family support; bereavement services
Overview
Key Facts
The end of life care pathway is a framework, not a checklist. It must be delivered with compassion, individualised to each patient, and regularly reviewed.
Epidemiology
~500,000 deaths/year in England
Approximately 30% of hospital deaths are expected
Most dying patients spend their last days in hospital (~46%), home (~25%), or care home (~22%)
Aetiology
The pathway applies to patients recognised as dying from any cause.
Pathophysiology
Not a pathological process. The pathway addresses the care needs of people in the last days of life.
Clinical Presentation
Recognising Dying
Progressive deterioration not responding to treatment
Reduced consciousness, bedbound
Taking only sips of fluid or nil by mouth
Reduced urine output
Peripheral cyanosis, mottling
Changes in breathing (Cheyne-Stokes, irregular)
Cold peripheries
NICE NG31 - What to Do
Recognise that the person may be dying
Communicate sensitively with the dying person and those important to them
Involve the dying person and those close to them in decisions about their care
Address the needs of families and carers
Develop an individualised plan of care
Red Flags
Uncertainty about whether patient is dying (seek senior opinion)
Reversible cause of deterioration not excluded
Family disagreement about care goals
Patient distress not controlled
Staff distress or moral injury
Differential Diagnosis
Scenario
Action
Dying confirmed
Individualised care plan; anticipatory medications
Uncertain if dying
Continue active treatment AND prepare for possible dying; reassess daily
Improving after being considered dying
De-escalate; restart appropriate oral medications and hydration
Diagnosis / Investigation
Bedside
Clinical assessment (as above)
Review all medications: stop non-essential; ensure anticipatory medications prescribed
Assess symptom burden
Assess patient's wishes and preferences
Spiritual/religious needs
Bloods
Generally NOT appropriate if patient is dying
Only if result would change management (e.g. correctable hypercalcaemia)
Imaging
NOT appropriate in dying phase
Special Tests
Review advance directives, ADRT, ReSPECT form
Verify DNACPR status
Management
Non-pharmacological
Individualised care plan: documented within hours of recognising dying
Communication: honest, compassionate conversations with patient and family
Comfort care: mouth care (every 2 hours), eye care, skin care, repositioning
Environment: quiet, private, comfortable; unrestricted visiting; personal belongings
Breaking bad news is a complex communication skill requiring a structured approach such as SPIKES, to deliver distressing information honestly and compassionately while supporting the patient's emotional response.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Breaking bad news is any information that adversely and seriously affects a patient's view of their future
Preparation is essential: review facts, ensure privacy, allow adequate time, have appropriate people present
"Warning shot" prepares the patient: 'I'm afraid the results show something serious...'
Check understanding first: 'What do you understand about your condition so far?' (Perception step)
Ask permission: 'Would it be OK if I shared some of the test results with you?' (Invitation step)
Respond to emotions: use empathic statements; allow silence; acknowledge distress; 'I can see this is very difficult news...'
Patient-centred: information delivery should match the patient's pace and preferences; some want details, others prefer minimal information initially
Overview
Key Facts
Breaking bad news is one of the most challenging but important clinical skills. It affects the patient's trust, understanding, psychological adjustment, and decision-making.
Epidemiology
Doctors break bad news thousands of times during their career
Studies show significant variation in skill level
Training improves performance and patient satisfaction
Poor communication is the most common complaint in healthcare
Not a pathological process. Breaking bad news is a communication skill grounded in psychological principles of adjustment, grief, and coping.
Clinical Presentation
SPIKES Framework
S - Setting: private room, adequate time, tissues, switch off phone, sit down, invite relevant others
P - Perception: 'What have you been told so far about your condition?' (assess understanding)
I - Invitation: 'Would you like me to explain what the tests showed?' (check readiness; some patients do not want detailed information)
K - Knowledge: deliver information in simple language; use warning shot; avoid jargon; give information in small chunks; check understanding
E - Emotions: acknowledge and validate emotions; use empathic statements ('I can see this is very upsetting...'); allow silence; normalise reactions
S - Strategy/Summary: discuss next steps; outline plan; offer support; written information; arrange follow-up
Patient Responses
Shock, disbelief, denial
Anger, frustration
Sadness, crying
Anxiety, fear
Acceptance
Questions (may come later)
Red Flags
Severe emotional distress (risk of self-harm)
Denial interfering with essential treatment decisions
Family conflict about disclosure
Cultural considerations requiring interpreter or different approach
Patient alone with no support network
Differential Diagnosis
Communication Scenario
Approach
Diagnosis of cancer
SPIKES; allow time; outline next steps
Recurrence/progression
Acknowledge previous experience; reframe goals
Transition to palliative
Honest discussion of prognosis; explore patient's priorities
Informing family of death
Private setting; use clear language ('has died'); support grief
Unexpected complication
Honest disclosure; apologise appropriately (Duty of Candour)
Diagnosis / Investigation
Bedside
Not applicable in the traditional sense
Preparation: review all results, imaging, MDT outcome before the conversation
Ensure you have correct and complete information before speaking to the patient
Bloods/Imaging
All relevant results should be reviewed and understood before the conversation
Special Tests
Not applicable
Management
Non-pharmacological
Before the conversation: review results, plan what to say, ensure privacy and time, invite patient to bring someone
During the conversation: follow SPIKES framework; sit at patient's level; maintain eye contact; speak slowly and clearly; use pauses; check understanding; respond to emotions empathically
After the conversation: summarise; offer written information; arrange follow-up appointment; ensure patient knows who to contact; document conversation in notes
Self-care: recognise emotional impact on clinician; debrief with colleagues
Key Communication Skills
Active listening: reflect back what patient says
Empathy: 'I can see this has been really shocking for you'
Warning shot: 'I'm afraid the news is not what we had hoped for'
Avoid euphemisms: use clear language ('cancer', 'has died' - not 'passed away' or 'growth')
Silence: allow pauses after delivering information; resist urge to fill silence
Chunk and check: give small pieces of information, then check understanding
Open questions: 'What questions do you have?' (not 'Do you have any questions?' which invites 'no')
Pharmacological
Not directly applicable
Anxiolytics or sedatives may rarely be needed for severe acute distress
Referral Criteria
Severe psychological distress: psychology, psychiatry
CNS (clinical nurse specialist) support: often present during bad news conversations
Palliative care: for ongoing support after life-limiting diagnosis
Bereavement support: after informing family of death
Prognosis
Effective communication improves patient satisfaction, trust, and psychological adjustment
Poor communication increases anxiety, depression, and complaints
Training in breaking bad news improves clinician confidence and patient outcomes
Patients remember how they were told bad news for the rest of their lives
Advance care planning in palliative care encompasses discussion of future care preferences, advance decisions to refuse treatment, and DNACPR/ReSPECT decisions, ensuring care aligns with patient values and wishes.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Advance care planning (ACP) is a voluntary, ongoing process of discussion about future care, values, and preferences
DNACPR is a clinical decision that CPR would not be successful or not in the patient's best interests; should involve patient/family discussion
ReSPECT process: nationally adopted summary plan for emergency treatment; replaces standalone DNACPR in most areas
ADRT (Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment): legally binding under MCA 2005; must be written, signed, and witnessed if refusing life-sustaining treatment
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in advanced cancer: success rate <5% to hospital discharge; much lower in metastatic disease
Tracey v Cambridge (2014): landmark case - patients/families must be consulted about DNACPR unless discussion would cause physical or psychological harm
ACP should be initiated early in the palliative care trajectory - not left until crisis or last days
Preferred priorities of care: document preferred place of care, preferred place of death, treatment escalation limits
Overview
Key Facts
Advance care planning in palliative care ensures that patients receive care that aligns with their wishes and values, even when they can no longer communicate their preferences.
Epidemiology
CPR survival to discharge in advanced cancer: <5% (often <1%)
Only ~4% of UK adults have an ADRT
ReSPECT forms now used in most of England and Wales
Approximately 70% of people say they prefer to die at home
Aetiology
ACP is important in palliative care because:
Many patients lose capacity to make decisions as illness progresses
Without ACP, default care may include unwanted interventions (CPR, ICU admission)
Discussing ACP improves concordance between patient wishes and actual care received
Pathophysiology
Not a pathological process. ACP is an ethical and legal framework within palliative care.
Clinical Presentation
When to Discuss ACP in Palliative Care
At diagnosis of life-limiting illness
When Surprise Question answer is 'No'
After significant deterioration or hospital admission
Bereavement and grief are natural responses to loss, with most people adjusting over time without professional intervention, though approximately 10% develop prolonged grief disorder requiring specialist support.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Bereavement is the state of having lost someone; grief is the emotional response to bereavement
Normal grief involves waves of sadness, yearning, anger, guilt, and disbelief; typically improves over 6-12 months
Prolonged grief disorder (PGD/complicated grief): affects approximately 10% of bereaved; intense grief persisting >6 months with functional impairment
Kübler-Ross model (5 stages): denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance - NOT a linear process; not all stages are experienced
Dual Process Model (Stroebe & Schut): oscillation between loss-oriented (grief) and restoration-oriented (rebuilding life) coping
Risk factors for complicated grief: sudden/unexpected death, death of a child, pre-existing mental illness, social isolation, difficult relationship with deceased, lack of social support
Bereavement support
most people need social support, not professional intervention; stepped care approach (self-help
voluntary sector
specialist)
Children's grief: differs from adults; needs age-appropriate information and support
Overview
Key Facts
Grief is a natural process. Healthcare professionals should be able to recognise normal grief, identify complicated grief, and signpost appropriate support.
Epidemiology
Approximately 600,000 deaths/year in the UK → millions affected by bereavement
10% develop prolonged grief disorder
Bereaved people have increased mortality (widowhood effect) - 40% higher in first 6 months
Increased risk of depression, anxiety, cardiovascular disease, and suicide
Aetiology
Grief occurs after any significant loss:
Death of loved one (most common context)
Loss of health, function, independence
Loss of role (retirement, parenthood)
Anticipatory grief (before death in terminal illness)
Pathophysiology
Neurobiologically, grief activates pain pathways, attachment circuits (separation distress), and reward systems (yearning)
Cortisol dysregulation and immune suppression in acute bereavement
Complicated grief may involve persistent activation of attachment/separation distress circuitry without resolution
Spiritual care addresses existential, meaning-making, and transcendent dimensions of suffering in serious illness, forming a core component of holistic palliative care alongside physical, psychological, and social support.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Spiritual care addresses questions of meaning, purpose, hope, and connection - not limited to religious beliefs
Total pain (Cicely Saunders): spiritual suffering is an integral component alongside physical, psychological, and social pain
Approximately 70-80% of patients with serious illness report spiritual needs; often unaddressed by healthcare teams
Spiritual distress may manifest as: existential anguish, loss of meaning, hopelessness, guilt, anger at God, fear of death, isolation
FICA assessment tool: Faith/beliefs, Importance/influence, Community, Address/Action - structured spiritual history
Not limited to religion: atheists and agnostics have spiritual needs (meaning, legacy, relationships, peace)
Chaplaincy services should be accessible to all patients regardless of faith or belief; chaplains are trained in spiritual assessment
Healthcare professionals should be able to recognise spiritual distress and offer basic spiritual care (presence, listening, acknowledging)
Overview
Key Facts
Spiritual care is a fundamental component of palliative care. Addressing spiritual needs improves quality of life, reduces suffering, and supports dignity at the end of life.
Epidemiology
70-80% of patients with serious illness report spiritual needs
Spiritual wellbeing is associated with better quality of life and lower rates of depression
Only 20-30% of patients have their spiritual needs formally assessed
Spiritual distress is associated with desire for hastened death, increased symptom burden, and reduced quality of life
Aetiology
Spiritual needs arise from:
Confrontation with mortality
Loss of meaning and purpose
Questioning of faith or beliefs
Loss of identity and role
Guilt, regret, unfinished business
Fear of the unknown (after death)
Desire for legacy and being remembered
Need for reconciliation, forgiveness, love
Pathophysiology
Not a pathological process. Spiritual care operates within the bio-psycho-social-spiritual model of healthcare. Research demonstrates that spiritual wellbeing modulates the experience of physical symptoms and psychological distress.
Clinical Presentation
Spiritual Distress
'Why is this happening to me?'
'What's the point of going on?'
Loss of hope
Guilt and regret
Anger at God/life/fate
Fear of dying or what comes after
Feeling of being a burden
Desire for hastened death
Withdrawal and isolation
Existential loneliness
Spiritual Wellbeing
Sense of peace
Meaning and purpose
Connection with others
Hope (even if not for cure - hope for comfort, legacy, reconciliation)
Acceptance
Gratitude
Red Flags
Desire for hastened death (screen for depression AND spiritual distress)
Severe existential anguish not responding to basic support
Carers of patients with life-limiting illness experience significant physical, emotional, and financial burden, requiring proactive assessment and support as a key component of holistic palliative care.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
There are approximately 6.5 million unpaid carers in the UK; carers save the NHS an estimated £132 billion/year
Carer burnout affects 40-70% of carers of patients with life-limiting illness; associated with depression, anxiety, and physical ill-health
Carer's assessment: carers have a legal right to an assessment of their own needs under the Care Act 2014
Carer's Allowance: £76.75/week (2024/25); available if caring ≥35 hours/week for someone receiving certain disability benefits
Respite care: essential for carer wellbeing; includes day care, sitting services, short-term residential care
Bereavement support: carers at high risk of complicated grief; pre-bereavement support improves outcomes
Healthcare professionals should proactively assess carer needs at every clinical encounter
Children as carers (young carers): approximately 800,000 in the UK; entitled to a young carer's assessment under Care Act 2014
Overview
Key Facts
Carers are the backbone of community-based palliative care. Supporting carers is essential for sustaining home-based care and improving outcomes for both patient and carer.
Epidemiology
~6.5 million unpaid carers in the UK
1 in 5 carers provides >50 hours of care per week
Carers are 2× more likely to be in poor health than non-carers
Depression affects 40-50% of carers of patients with advanced cancer
~800,000 young carers in the UK (<18 years)
Aetiology
Carer burden arises from:
Physical demands of caring (lifting, personal care, medication management)
Emotional distress (witnessing suffering, anticipatory grief, fear of loss)
Social isolation (reduced social activities, loss of own identity/role)
Financial impact (reduced employment, care costs, benefits complexity)
Sleep deprivation (nocturnal care needs)
Lack of information and training
Pathophysiology
Chronic stress
HPA axis activation
cortisol dysregulation
immune suppression, cardiovascular risk
Caregiver burden is an independent risk factor for mortality (63% higher in stressed caregivers - Schulz & Beach 1999)
Anticipatory grief: grieving before death occurs; may be protective or may complicate post-bereavement adjustment
Palliative care emergencies include spinal cord compression, superior vena cava obstruction, hypercalcaemia of malignancy, massive haemorrhage, and seizures, requiring prompt recognition and treatment alongside goals-of-care discussions.
MRCGP AKT · MSRA · PLAB 1 · UKMLA
Key Facts
Spinal cord compression (SCC): back pain + neurological signs; MRI whole spine within 24 hours; dexamethasone 16mg IV immediately; emergency radiotherapy or surgery
Hypercalcaemia of malignancy: confusion, nausea, polyuria, constipation; IV normal saline + zoledronic acid 4mg IV (or denosumab if renal impairment)
Massive haemorrhage: prepare dark towels; midazolam 10mg IM/SC for sedation; hold patient's hand; do not attempt to stop catastrophic haemorrhage
Seizures: midazolam 10mg buccal/IM; consider CSCI midazolam 20-40mg/24h if recurrent; investigate cause (brain mets, metabolic)
All emergencies require simultaneous treatment AND goals of care discussion (is active treatment appropriate or should focus be comfort?)
Neutropenic sepsis: covered in oncology emergencies but palliative care patients may present; decision about antibiotic treatment depends on goals of care
Catastrophic haemorrhage protocol: anticipatory plan for patients at risk (head and neck cancer, large vessel erosion); ensure PRN midazolam available
Overview
Key Facts
Palliative care emergencies require urgent medical management alongside consideration of the patient's overall condition, prognosis, and goals of care. Not all emergencies require active treatment - comfort may be the priority.
Epidemiology
SCC: affects 3-5% of cancer patients; most common with breast, prostate, lung, myeloma
SVC obstruction: 2-4% of cancer patients; most common with lung cancer and lymphoma
Hypercalcaemia: 10-30% of advanced cancer patients (especially squamous cell, breast, myeloma)
Catastrophic haemorrhage: rare but occurs in head and neck cancer, eroded major vessels
Phenytoin/sodium valproate: alternatives for ongoing prophylaxis
Referral Criteria
SCC: emergency oncology and spinal surgery
SVCO: interventional radiology and oncology
Refractory hypercalcaemia: oncology
Complex emergencies: specialist palliative care
Prognosis
SCC: neurological outcome depends on speed of treatment; 50% who are walking at diagnosis remain ambulant; paraplegia at presentation is usually irreversible
SVCO: stenting provides rapid relief (90% response); median survival depends on underlying cancer
Hypercalcaemia: responds to rehydration + bisphosphonate in 80%; recurrence common; poor prognostic sign (median survival 3-4 months)
Massive haemorrhage: usually fatal within minutes; focus is on comfort and dignity
Seizures: most controlled with anticonvulsants; brain metastases have poor prognosis
Other Relevant Information
Palliative Care Emergency Summary
Emergency
Key Investigation
Key Treatment
Spinal cord compression
MRI whole spine
Dexamethasone 16mg + RT/surgery
SVC obstruction
CT thorax
Dexamethasone + stent/RT
Hypercalcaemia
Corrected calcium
IV fluids + zoledronic acid
Massive haemorrhage
Clinical
Dark towels + midazolam
Seizures
CT head
Midazolam 10mg buccal
Catastrophic Haemorrhage Protocol
Element
Identify at-risk patients (head and neck, large vessel proximity)