Back to Oncology

MedPrep · High-Yield Revision Notes

Oncology

Solid tumours, haematological malignancies, chemotherapy regimens, oncological emergencies, and palliative oncology.

30 topics · 10 linked questions

Cancer Biology and Hallmarks of Cancer

Cancer biology encompasses the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying malignant transformation, characterised by the hallmarks of cancer as described by Hanahan and Weinberg.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Hanahan and Weinberg (2000, updated 2011) described the hallmarks of cancer: 10 biological capabilities acquired during tumour development
  • Original 6 hallmarks: sustaining proliferative signalling, evading growth suppressors, resisting cell death, enabling replicative immortality, inducing angiogenesis, activating invasion and metastasis
  • Added in 2011: reprogramming energy metabolism and evading immune destruction
  • Enabling characteristics: genome instability/mutation and tumour-promoting inflammation
  • Oncogenes (gain of function): e.g. RAS (30% of cancers), HER2, MYC, BRAF
  • Tumour suppressor genes (loss of function): e.g. TP53 (most commonly mutated gene in cancer), RB1, APC, BRCA1/2
  • Knudson's two-hit hypothesis: both alleles of a tumour suppressor must be inactivated for loss of function
  • Warburg effect: cancer cells preferentially use glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen (aerobic glycolysis)

Overview

Key Facts

Cancer biology is the study of the molecular and cellular mechanisms that drive malignant transformation. Understanding these mechanisms is fundamental to developing targeted therapies and personalised oncology.

Epidemiology

  • Cancer affects approximately 1 in 2 people in the UK during their lifetime
  • Approximately 375,000 new cancer diagnoses per year in the UK
  • Approximately 167,000 cancer deaths per year
  • Most common cancers (UK): breast, prostate, lung, colorectal

Aetiology

  • Somatic mutations: acquired during lifetime; majority of cancers
  • Germline mutations: inherited predisposition (5-10% of cancers); BRCA1/2, Lynch syndrome, Li-Fraumeni (TP53), retinoblastoma (RB1)
  • Environmental carcinogens: tobacco (strongest modifiable risk factor), UV radiation, ionising radiation, aflatoxins, asbestos
  • Infections: HPV (cervical), HBV/HCV (hepatocellular), H. pylori (gastric), EBV (Burkitt lymphoma, nasopharyngeal)

Pathophysiology

  • Cancer arises from accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in a single cell (monoclonal origin)
Multi-step carcinogenesis: initiation (DNA damage)
promotion (clonal expansion)
progression (invasion, metastasis)
  • Driver mutations: confer growth advantage; passenger mutations: neutral bystanders
  • Tumour heterogeneity: intratumoral and intertumoral genetic diversity drives treatment resistance
  • Cancer stem cells: self-renewing subpopulation responsible for tumour initiation, maintenance, and recurrence

Clinical Presentation

General Cancer Warning Signs

  • Unexplained weight loss (>5% in 6 months)
  • Persistent fatigue
  • Unexplained pain
  • Night sweats
  • New or changing lumps
  • Persistent cough or hoarseness
  • Change in bowel or bladder habits
  • Non-healing wounds
  • Unexplained bleeding

Red Flags

  • Any symptom from NICE NG12 2-week wait criteria
  • Rapidly enlarging mass
  • Bone pain with weight loss
  • Neurological deficit with known malignancy (spinal cord compression)
  • Haemoptysis, haematuria, postmenopausal bleeding

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Benign neoplasmSlow-growing, encapsulated, no invasionImaging, biopsy
InfectionFever, localised inflammation, response to antibioticsCultures, imaging
Autoimmune diseaseMulti-system, characteristic autoantibodiesAutoantibodies, biopsy
Functional disorderNormal investigations, stress-relatedExclusion diagnosis

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Thorough clinical examination
  • Performance status assessment (WHO/ECOG, Karnofsky)

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs, calcium (baseline)
  • Tumour markers: PSA, CA-125, CEA, AFP, βhCG, CA19-9 (for monitoring, not usually diagnosis)
  • LDH (prognostic in some cancers)

Imaging

  • CT, MRI, PET-CT for staging
  • USS for superficial lesions and guided biopsy

Special Tests

  • Tissue biopsy: histological diagnosis (gold standard)
  • Immunohistochemistry: protein expression patterns for classification
  • Molecular profiling: next-generation sequencing (NGS) for driver mutations and targeted therapy selection
  • Liquid biopsy: circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) for monitoring

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT approach to cancer management
  • Cancer nurse specialist support
  • Psychological support and holistic needs assessment
  • Lifestyle advice: smoking cessation, diet, exercise

Pharmacological

  • Chemotherapy: cytotoxic agents targeting rapidly dividing cells
  • Targeted therapy: agents directed at specific molecular targets (e.g. imatinib for BCR-ABL)
  • Immunotherapy: checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4), CAR-T cells
  • Hormonal therapy: anti-oestrogens (tamoxifen), aromatase inhibitors, anti-androgens
  • Supportive care: antiemetics, G-CSF, bisphosphonates

Surgical/Interventional

  • Curative resection where possible
  • Palliative surgery for symptom control
  • Radiotherapy: curative and palliative

Referral Criteria

  • NICE NG12 guides 2-week wait referral criteria for suspected cancer
  • All confirmed cancers discussed at site-specific MDT

Prognosis

  • UK cancer survival has doubled in the last 40 years
  • Overall 10-year survival: approximately 50% for all cancers combined
  • Highly variable by cancer type: testicular (98%), melanoma (90%), pancreatic (7%), lung (10%)
  • Early-stage diagnosis is the single most important prognostic factor
  • Personalised medicine and immunotherapy are improving outcomes for many cancer types

Other Relevant Information

Hallmarks of Cancer (Hanahan & Weinberg)

HallmarkExample Mechanism
Sustaining proliferative signallingRAS mutations, EGFR amplification
Evading growth suppressorsTP53 loss, RB1 loss
Resisting cell deathBCL-2 overexpression
Enabling replicative immortalityTelomerase activation
Inducing angiogenesisVEGF production
Activating invasion and metastasisE-cadherin loss, MMP expression
Reprogramming energy metabolismWarburg effect (aerobic glycolysis)
Evading immune destructionPD-L1 expression
Genome instabilityMMR deficiency, BRCA mutations
Tumour-promoting inflammationNF-κB activation, cytokine production

Key Oncogenes and Tumour Suppressors

GeneTypeCancer Association
TP53TSG>50% of all cancers
KRASOncogenePancreatic, colorectal, lung
HER2OncogeneBreast, gastric
BRCA1/2TSGBreast, ovarian
APCTSGColorectal (FAP)
BRAFOncogeneMelanoma, colorectal
MYCOncogeneBurkitt lymphoma

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Cancer Staging and Grading

Cancer staging (TNM/FIGO) describes the anatomical extent of disease, while grading describes the degree of differentiation, both being essential for treatment planning and prognosis.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • TNM staging is the international standard: T (tumour size/invasion), N (lymph node involvement), M (distant metastases)
  • AJCC/UICC TNM system is used for most solid tumours; FIGO staging for gynaecological cancers
  • Grade 1 (well-differentiated) to Grade 3 (poorly differentiated); higher grade = more aggressive
  • Stage grouping: Stage I (localised) → Stage IV (distant metastasis); used for treatment decisions and prognosis
  • Ann Arbor staging used for lymphomas (Stages I-IV with A/B suffix for symptoms)
  • Dukes classification (historical, colorectal): A (confined to wall), B (through wall), C (lymph nodes), D (distant metastases)
  • Performance status (WHO/ECOG 0-4 or Karnofsky 0-100) is critical for treatment decisions
  • Staging investigations typically include CT chest/abdomen/pelvis ± PET-CT ± MRI depending on cancer type

Overview

Key Facts

Cancer staging and grading provide standardised frameworks for describing the extent and aggressiveness of cancer. They are essential for treatment planning, prognosis, clinical trial enrolment, and communication between healthcare professionals.

Epidemiology

  • Stage at diagnosis is the single most important prognostic factor for most solid tumours
  • In the UK, approximately 45% of cancers are diagnosed at Stage I-II (early) and 40% at Stage III-IV (advanced)
  • Routes to diagnosis affect stage: screening picks up earlier stages than emergency presentations

Aetiology

  • Not applicable (classification system)

Pathophysiology

Staging reflects the biological behaviour of the tumour
local invasion
lymphatic spread
distant metastasis
  • Grading reflects the degree of differentiation: well-differentiated tumours more closely resemble normal tissue and tend to be less aggressive
  • Together, stage and grade predict biological behaviour, response to treatment, and overall prognosis

Clinical Presentation

Clinical Staging

  • Based on physical examination, imaging, and pre-operative investigations
  • May be revised after surgery (pathological staging, pTNM)

Pathological Staging

  • Based on surgical specimens and histopathological examination
  • More accurate than clinical staging
  • Includes assessment of margins, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion

Red Flags Indicating Advanced Stage

  • Multiple organ involvement
  • Weight loss >10%
  • Performance status ECOG ≥3
  • Bone pain (skeletal metastases)
  • Neurological symptoms (brain metastases)
  • Jaundice (liver metastases or biliary obstruction)

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Primary cancerSingle primary with local/regional spreadBiopsy, staging CT
Cancer of unknown primaryMetastatic disease without identifiable primaryCT, PET-CT, immunohistochemistry
Benign conditions mimicking cancerInflammatory lymphadenopathy, benign lesionsBiopsy
Secondary malignancyNew primary cancer vs metastatic diseaseHistology comparison

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Full clinical examination
  • Performance status assessment (ECOG/WHO or Karnofsky)

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs, calcium, LDH, albumin
  • Tumour-specific markers (PSA, CEA, CA-125, AFP, βhCG)

Imaging

  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: standard staging for most solid tumours
  • MRI: superior for local staging (brain, spine, pelvis, liver)
  • PET-CT (18F-FDG): increasingly used for staging, treatment response assessment, recurrence detection
  • Bone scan: for suspected skeletal metastases (breast, prostate, lung)
  • USS: for superficial lymph nodes, liver, guided biopsy

Special Tests

  • Biopsy and histopathology: essential for grading and tumour characterisation
  • Immunohistochemistry: tumour classification and origin
  • Molecular profiling: predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy: minimally invasive lymph node staging (breast, melanoma)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion mandatory for all new cancer diagnoses
  • Treatment decisions based on stage, grade, molecular profile, performance status, and patient preference
  • Clinical nurse specialist support and holistic needs assessment

Pharmacological

  • Treatment stratified by stage:
    • Early stage (I-II): curative surgery ± adjuvant therapy
    • Locally advanced (III): neoadjuvant or concurrent chemoradiotherapy
    • Metastatic (IV): systemic therapy (palliative intent in most solid tumours)
  • Specific regimens are cancer-type dependent

Surgical/Interventional

  • Surgery is the primary curative modality for most early-stage solid tumours
  • Radiotherapy: curative for some localised cancers (cervix, head & neck, prostate)
  • Interventional radiology: ablation, embolisation

Referral Criteria

  • All new cancer diagnoses: MDT discussion
  • Stage-appropriate treatment at specialist centres
  • Clinical trial eligibility assessment

Prognosis

  • Stage is the strongest prognostic factor for most cancers
  • Stage I: 5-year survival typically 80-95% (site-dependent)
  • Stage IV: 5-year survival typically 5-30% (site-dependent)
  • Grade independently predicts outcome within each stage
  • Performance status strongly predicts treatment tolerance and survival
  • Molecular subtypes increasingly influence prognosis (e.g. HER2+ breast cancer has improved outcomes with targeted therapy)

Other Relevant Information

TNM Staging Overview

ComponentDescription
T0No evidence of primary tumour
TisCarcinoma in situ
T1-T4Increasing size and/or local invasion
N0No regional lymph node involvement
N1-N3Increasing lymph node involvement
M0No distant metastasis
M1Distant metastasis present

ECOG Performance Status

GradeDefinition
0Fully active, no restrictions
1Restricted in strenuous activity, ambulatory
2Ambulatory, capable of self-care, up >50% of waking hours
3Limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours
4Completely disabled, cannot carry on self-care

Stage Grouping (General)

StageGeneral DescriptionTypical Treatment Intent
ILocalised, smallCurative surgery
IILocally advancedCurative surgery ± adjuvant
IIIRegional spreadMultimodality (chemoRT or neoadjuvant)
IVDistant metastasesPalliative systemic therapy

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Chemotherapy Principles

Chemotherapy uses cytotoxic drugs to kill rapidly dividing cells, administered in various settings (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, palliative) with specific side effects requiring careful monitoring and supportive care.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Chemotherapy exploits the cell cycle to target rapidly dividing cells; also affects normal rapidly dividing tissues (bone marrow, GI mucosa, hair follicles)
  • Neoadjuvant: pre-surgery to downstage tumour; Adjuvant: post-surgery to eliminate micrometastases; Palliative: to control symptoms and extend survival
  • Alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, cisplatin): cross-link DNA; cell cycle non-specific
  • Antimetabolites (5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, gemcitabine): mimic normal metabolites; S-phase specific
  • Taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel): stabilise microtubules preventing mitosis; M-phase specific
  • Anthracyclines (doxorubicin, epirubicin): intercalate DNA and inhibit topoisomerase II; cumulative cardiotoxicity (max lifetime dose doxorubicin 450mg/m²)
  • Neutropenic sepsis is a life-threatening complication: NICE NG151 mandates empirical IV antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam) within 1 hour of presentation
  • NICE guidelines recommend risk assessment (UKONS) before each cycle; dose modifications based on toxicity grading (CTCAE)

Overview

Key Facts

Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of cancer treatment, using cytotoxic drugs to target rapidly dividing cells. Understanding mechanisms of action, toxicity profiles, and supportive care measures is essential for safe and effective administration.

Epidemiology

  • Approximately 30% of cancer patients receive chemotherapy as part of their treatment
  • Both curative and palliative roles depending on cancer type and stage

Aetiology

  • Not applicable (treatment modality)

Pathophysiology

  • Cytotoxic drugs exploit the cell cycle by targeting DNA synthesis, repair, and cell division
  • Damage to DNA triggers apoptosis in susceptible cells
  • Combination regimens use drugs with different mechanisms to maximise cell kill and minimise resistance (Norton-Simon hypothesis, Goldie-Coldman hypothesis)
  • Log-kill hypothesis: each cycle of chemotherapy kills a constant fraction of tumour cells

Clinical Presentation

Indications for Chemotherapy

  • Neoadjuvant: shrink tumour before surgery (e.g. breast cancer, oesophageal cancer)
  • Adjuvant: reduce recurrence risk after curative surgery (e.g. colorectal, breast)
  • Curative: primary treatment (e.g. leukaemia, lymphoma, testicular cancer)
  • Palliative: improve symptoms and prolong survival (e.g. metastatic disease)

Common Side Effects

  • Bone marrow suppression: neutropenia (day 7-14 nadir), anaemia, thrombocytopenia
  • GI toxicity: nausea/vomiting, mucositis, diarrhoea
  • Alopecia: reversible with most agents
  • Fatigue: most common reported symptom
  • Infertility: depends on agent and cumulative dose

Red Flags

  • Neutropenic sepsis (fever ≥38°C with neutrophils <0.5 × 10⁹/L)
  • Tumour lysis syndrome (TLS)
  • Anaphylaxis during infusion
  • Extravasation of vesicant drugs

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Infection (non-neutropenic)Fever without neutropenia, localising symptomsBlood cultures, CXR
Tumour lysis syndromeHyperuricaemia, hyperkalaemia, hyperphosphataemiaBloods
Drug hypersensitivityRash, anaphylaxis during infusionClinical, tryptase
Disease progressionNew symptoms, rising tumour markersImaging

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Observations (temperature, HR, BP)
  • Performance status assessment
  • Oral examination (mucositis grading)

Bloods

  • Pre-cycle: FBC (ANC >1.5 × 10⁹/L for most regimens), U&Es, LFTs, eGFR
  • During treatment: regular FBC monitoring (nadir typically day 7-14)
  • Tumour markers as appropriate
  • If febrile: blood cultures (peripheral and from central line), lactate, CRP

Imaging

  • Response assessment: CT scan typically after 2-3 cycles
  • PET-CT for interim response in lymphoma

Special Tests

  • Cardiac assessment (echocardiogram/MUGA scan): before anthracyclines
  • Audiometry: before cisplatin
  • Pulmonary function tests: before bleomycin
  • GFR measurement: before platinum-based chemotherapy
  • DPD deficiency testing: before fluoropyrimidines (5-FU, capecitabine) - DPYD genotyping

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Pre-treatment counselling: side effects, fertility preservation options (sperm banking, oocyte cryopreservation)
  • PICC line or port insertion for repeated IV access
  • Scalp cooling to reduce alopecia (where available)
  • Dietary advice and nutritional support

Pharmacological

  • Antiemetics (emetogenicity-dependent per NICE/MASCC guidelines):
    • High emetogenic (cisplatin): ondansetron 8mg + dexamethasone 12mg + aprepitant 125mg/80mg/80mg (days 1-3)
    • Moderate: ondansetron 8mg + dexamethasone 8mg
    • Low: dexamethasone 4mg or metoclopramide 10mg
  • G-CSF (filgrastim 5mcg/kg/day or pegfilgrastim 6mg): primary prophylaxis if febrile neutropenia risk >20%
  • Allopurinol or rasburicase: TLS prophylaxis
  • Dexrazoxane: cardioprotection with anthracyclines (selected patients)
  • Mesna: urothelial protection with cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide
  • Folinic acid (leucovorin) rescue: after high-dose methotrexate

Surgical/Interventional

  • Central venous access device insertion (PICC, Hickman line, portacath)
  • Fertility preservation procedures (pre-chemotherapy)

Referral Criteria

  • All chemotherapy prescribed by oncologists within MDT framework
  • Neutropenic sepsis: immediate assessment in oncology assessment unit or A&E
  • Extravasation: immediate management per local protocol

Prognosis

  • Highly variable depending on cancer type, stage, and treatment intent
  • Curative regimens (e.g. lymphoma, testicular): 80-95% cure rates
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: reduces recurrence by approximately 30%
  • Palliative chemotherapy: extends median survival by weeks to months in most metastatic solid tumours
  • Treatment-related mortality: approximately 1-3% for most standard regimens
  • Late effects: secondary malignancy (leukaemia after alkylating agents), cardiotoxicity, infertility

Other Relevant Information

Common Chemotherapy Drug Classes

ClassExamplesMechanismKey Toxicity
Alkylating agentsCyclophosphamide, cisplatinDNA cross-linkingNephrotoxicity (cisplatin), haemorrhagic cystitis
Antimetabolites5-FU, methotrexate, gemcitabineInterfere with DNA synthesisMucositis, myelosuppression
TaxanesPaclitaxel, docetaxelMicrotubule stabilisationPeripheral neuropathy, neutropenia
AnthracyclinesDoxorubicin, epirubicinDNA intercalation, topoisomerase IICardiotoxicity (cumulative)
Vinca alkaloidsVincristine, vinblastineMicrotubule destabilisationPeripheral neuropathy
PlatinumsCisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatinDNA cross-linkingNephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, neuropathy
Topoisomerase inhibitorsIrinotecan, etoposideInhibit DNA unwindingDiarrhoea (irinotecan), myelosuppression

CTCAE Grading (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events)

GradeSeverity
1Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms
2Moderate; minimal intervention indicated
3Severe; hospitalisation indicated
4Life-threatening; urgent intervention
5Death

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy harnesses the immune system to recognise and destroy cancer cells, with immune checkpoint inhibitors revolutionising treatment for melanoma, lung cancer, and many other malignancies.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block inhibitory pathways that tumours exploit to evade immune destruction
  • Anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab): block PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, restoring T-cell activity
  • Anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab): blocks CTLA-4 on T-cells, enhancing immune activation in lymph nodes
  • Combination ICI (ipilimumab + nivolumab): higher response rates but increased toxicity (e.g. advanced melanoma, renal cell carcinoma)
  • Immune-related adverse events (irAEs): autoimmune-type toxicities affecting any organ; common: colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, endocrinopathies (thyroiditis, hypophysitis), dermatitis
  • irAEs managed with corticosteroids (prednisolone 1-2mg/kg); severe cases may require infliximab or mycophenolate
  • PD-L1 expression and microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) are biomarkers predicting response
  • CAR-T cell therapy: autologous T-cells engineered to target specific tumour antigens (e.g. CD19 for B-cell lymphomas; tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel)

Overview

Key Facts

Immunotherapy has transformed cancer treatment by harnessing the patient's own immune system. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now standard of care for many tumour types. Understanding mechanisms, indications, and management of immune-related adverse events is essential.

Epidemiology

  • Immunotherapy is now used in >50 cancer types
  • Approvals expanding rapidly; ICIs are standard of care in melanoma, NSCLC, renal cell, urothelial, head and neck, Hodgkin lymphoma, and many others
  • Response rates vary: 15-60% depending on tumour type and biomarker status

Aetiology

  • Not applicable (treatment modality)

Pathophysiology

  • Tumours evade immune destruction by upregulating inhibitory checkpoints (PD-L1, CTLA-4)
  • PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: PD-L1 on tumour cells binds PD-1 on T-cells, causing T-cell exhaustion
  • CTLA-4 pathway: CTLA-4 competes with CD28 for B7 binding on APCs, reducing T-cell activation
  • ICIs release the 'brakes' on the immune system, allowing T-cells to attack tumour cells
  • CAR-T cells: T-cells genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptor targeting specific tumour antigen (e.g. CD19); infused back into the patient
  • Cytokine release syndrome (CRS): major toxicity of CAR-T therapy; managed with tocilizumab (anti-IL-6)

Clinical Presentation

Indications

  • Melanoma: pembrolizumab/nivolumab ± ipilimumab (adjuvant and metastatic)
  • NSCLC: pembrolizumab (first-line if PD-L1 ≥50%); combinations with chemotherapy
  • Renal cell carcinoma: nivolumab + ipilimumab (first-line intermediate/poor risk)
  • Urothelial cancer: atezolizumab, pembrolizumab
  • Hodgkin lymphoma: nivolumab, pembrolizumab (relapsed/refractory)
  • MSI-H/dMMR tumours: pembrolizumab (tumour-agnostic indication)

Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs)

  • Dermatitis (most common; 30-40%): rash, pruritus, vitiligo
  • Colitis (15-20%): diarrhoea, abdominal pain, bloody stool
  • Hepatitis (5-10%): elevated transaminases
  • Pneumonitis (3-5%): cough, dyspnoea; potentially fatal
  • Endocrinopathies (10-20%): thyroiditis (hypo/hyperthyroid), hypophysitis, adrenal insufficiency, type 1 diabetes
  • Neurological (rare): myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barré, encephalitis

Red Flags

  • New-onset diarrhoea (>4 stools/day over baseline): colitis
  • Dyspnoea with new infiltrates on CXR: pneumonitis
  • Severe fatigue, hypotension, hyponatraemia: adrenal crisis
  • Visual disturbance, headache: hypophysitis
  • Rapid deterioration with muscle weakness: myasthenia/myositis

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Disease progressionNew symptoms, imaging progressionCT, tumour markers
InfectionFever, localising symptomsBlood cultures, CXR
PseudoprogressionInitial apparent growth then response (immune infiltration)Repeat imaging at 4-8 weeks
Other drug toxicityTemporal relationship with non-ICI drugsDrug history review

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Observations (temperature, HR, BP, SpO2)
  • Stool chart if diarrhoea
  • Glucose monitoring if new diabetes suspected

Bloods

  • Baseline and pre-cycle: FBC, U&Es, LFTs, TFTs, glucose, cortisol
  • If irAE suspected: LFTs (hepatitis), TFTs (thyroiditis), cortisol and ACTH (adrenal/hypophysitis), lipase (pancreatitis), troponin and CK (myocarditis/myositis)
  • Anti-nuclear antibodies if autoimmune cause suspected

Imaging

  • CT chest: pneumonitis assessment
  • MRI brain (pituitary protocol): if hypophysitis suspected
  • CT abdomen: colitis assessment (wall thickening)

Special Tests

  • PD-L1 immunohistochemistry: predictive biomarker (tumour proportion score, TPS)
  • MSI/MMR testing: dMMR/MSI-H predicts response to pembrolizumab
  • Tumour mutational burden (TMB): emerging biomarker
  • Colonoscopy: for severe colitis (biopsy for histological confirmation)
  • Bronchoscopy + BAL: for pneumonitis

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Patient education about irAEs: provide alert card
  • Regular monitoring with blood tests before each cycle
  • Low threshold for investigation of new symptoms
  • Specialist oncology review for any Grade ≥2 irAE

Pharmacological

  • Grade 1 irAE: continue ICI, symptomatic treatment, close monitoring
  • Grade 2 irAE: hold ICI; prednisolone 0.5-1mg/kg/day; taper over 4-6 weeks
  • Grade 3 irAE: hold ICI; prednisolone 1-2mg/kg/day (or IV methylprednisolone 1-2mg/kg); specialist input
  • Grade 4 irAE: permanently discontinue ICI; IV methylprednisolone 1-2mg/kg; consider infliximab 5mg/kg (colitis) or mycophenolate 1g BD (hepatitis)
  • Endocrinopathies: often require permanent hormone replacement (levothyroxine, hydrocortisone) rather than immunosuppression
  • CRS (CAR-T): tocilizumab 8mg/kg IV; dexamethasone if refractory

Surgical/Interventional

  • Rarely required; colectomy for refractory colitis with perforation

Referral Criteria

  • Any suspected irAE: discuss with oncology team
  • Grade ≥3 irAE: inpatient management under oncology
  • Endocrine irAEs: endocrinology input
  • Pneumonitis: respiratory input
  • Neurological irAEs: urgent neurology review

Prognosis

  • ICIs have transformed outcomes in several cancers:
    • Metastatic melanoma: 5-year survival improved from 5% to 40-50% with ICIs
    • Advanced NSCLC (PD-L1 ≥50%): 5-year survival 25-30% with pembrolizumab
  • Durable responses: some patients maintain response for years after stopping treatment
  • irAEs: most are manageable with steroids; rare fatalities (0.3-1.3%), most commonly myocarditis and pneumonitis
  • CAR-T for DLBCL: complete response rate 40-60%; long-term remission in 30-40%

Other Relevant Information

irAE Grading and Management

GradeDefinitionManagement
1MildContinue ICI, monitor
2ModerateHold ICI, oral steroids
3SevereHold ICI, IV steroids, specialist input
4Life-threateningDiscontinue ICI permanently, IV steroids ± infliximab/MMF

Key Checkpoint Inhibitors (UK Approved)

DrugTargetKey Indications
PembrolizumabPD-1Melanoma, NSCLC, endometrial, MSI-H tumours
NivolumabPD-1Melanoma, RCC, NSCLC, Hodgkin lymphoma
IpilimumabCTLA-4Melanoma (combo with nivolumab), RCC
AtezolizumabPD-L1NSCLC, urothelial, breast (TNBC)
DurvalumabPD-L1NSCLC (post-chemoRT), SCLC
AvelumabPD-L1Merkel cell, urothelial

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Radiotherapy Principles

Radiotherapy uses ionising radiation to damage DNA in cancer cells, delivered as external beam or brachytherapy, playing a curative or palliative role in approximately 50% of cancer patients.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Approximately 50% of cancer patients receive radiotherapy at some point; it contributes to 40% of cancer cures
  • Mechanism: ionising radiation causes DNA double-strand breaks; tumour cells have impaired DNA repair compared to normal cells
  • External beam radiotherapy (EBRT): most common delivery method; uses linear accelerator (LINAC) producing megavoltage photons
  • Brachytherapy: radioactive source placed within or adjacent to tumour (intracavitary, interstitial); used in cervical, endometrial, prostate cancers
  • Fractionation: standard 2 Gy per fraction, 5 days/week; allows normal tissue repair between fractions (4 Rs: Repair, Reassortment, Reoxygenation, Repopulation)
  • Hypofractionation: larger doses per fraction, fewer fractions (e.g. breast 40 Gy in 15 fractions per START-B trial; prostate SBRT)
  • Acute side effects (during/shortly after): skin erythema, mucositis, fatigue, nausea; Late effects: fibrosis, secondary malignancy, organ damage
  • IMRT (intensity-modulated), VMAT (volumetric arc), SBRT/SABR (stereotactic body), and proton therapy are advanced techniques improving precision

Overview

Key Facts

Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer treatment, using ionising radiation to cause lethal DNA damage in cancer cells. Understanding the principles of radiobiology, fractionation, and treatment planning is essential for postgraduate medical exams.

Epidemiology

  • Approximately 50% of cancer patients receive radiotherapy
  • Contributes to 40% of all cancer cures (second only to surgery)
  • Used with curative intent in approximately 20% of patients and palliative intent in 30%

Aetiology

  • Not applicable (treatment modality)

Pathophysiology

  • Direct action: ionising radiation directly damages DNA (double-strand breaks are the key lethal lesion)
  • Indirect action: radiation generates free radicals (from water radiolysis) that damage DNA; enhanced by oxygen (oxygen effect)
  • Differential sensitivity: tumour cells have impaired DNA repair mechanisms compared to normal tissue
  • 4 Rs of radiobiology: Repair (sublethal damage repair in normal tissue), Reassortment (redistribution of cells into radiosensitive phases), Reoxygenation (previously hypoxic tumour cells become oxygenated), Repopulation (accelerated repopulation during treatment)
  • Linear-quadratic model: describes relationship between radiation dose and cell kill (α/β ratio); high α/β (e.g. 10 for most tumours) = more sensitive to fractionation; low α/β (e.g. 3 for late-responding tissues) = more sensitive to dose per fraction

Clinical Presentation

Indications for Radiotherapy

  • Curative: as primary treatment (cervical, head & neck, prostate) or adjuvant (breast, rectal, brain)
  • Palliative: bone metastases (pain relief), brain metastases, SVCO, spinal cord compression, haemostasis
  • Emergency: SVCO, spinal cord compression (urgent RT within 24 hours)

Acute Side Effects (during and up to 6 weeks post-RT)

  • Skin: erythema, desquamation, pigmentation
  • Mucositis: oral, oesophageal, rectal (depending on site)
  • Fatigue: most common; affects 80-90% of patients
  • Nausea/vomiting: if abdominal/pelvic RT
  • Bone marrow suppression: if large fields

Late Side Effects (months to years)

  • Fibrosis (lung, bowel, subcutaneous tissue)
  • Stricture (oesophageal, rectal, ureteric)
  • Secondary malignancy (typically 10-20 years later)
  • Lymphoedema
  • Infertility
  • Cardiac toxicity (if heart in field)
  • Radiation myelopathy (spinal cord)

Red Flags

  • Spinal cord compression: urgent RT needed within 24 hours
  • Radiation pneumonitis: cough, dyspnoea 2-6 months post-RT
  • Radiation enteritis: severe diarrhoea, bleeding
  • Osteoradionecrosis of jaw: pain, exposed bone (dental assessment before head & neck RT)

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Disease progressionNew symptoms in/near irradiated fieldImaging, biopsy
Radiation pneumonitisCough, dyspnoea, characteristic CT changesHRCT chest
Radiation enteritisDiarrhoea, bleeding, abdominal painEndoscopy, CT
InfectionFever, localising symptomsCultures, imaging
Secondary malignancyNew mass in/near irradiated field years laterBiopsy

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Clinical assessment of treatment site
  • Skin assessment (CTCAE grading)
  • Swallowing assessment if head & neck RT

Bloods

  • FBC (myelosuppression if large fields)
  • U&Es, LFTs (baseline)
  • TFTs (if neck irradiated - hypothyroidism risk)

Imaging

  • CT simulation: planning scan for treatment field design
  • MRI fusion: improved target delineation (brain, pelvis)
  • PET-CT: for target volume definition and response assessment
  • Follow-up imaging: response assessment per cancer type

Special Tests

  • DVH (dose-volume histogram): evaluates dose distribution to target and organs at risk
  • Pulmonary function tests: before lung RT
  • Audiometry: if cochlea in field
  • Dental assessment: before head & neck RT (prevent osteoradionecrosis)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Patient education about expected side effects and timeline
  • Skin care: gentle washing, aqueous cream, avoid sun exposure
  • Nutritional support: dietitian input for head & neck / GI RT
  • Oral care: fluoride trays, saliva substitutes
  • Psychological support

Pharmacological

  • Skin reactions: emollients (aqueous cream), moderate potency steroid cream (betamethasone 0.1%) if symptomatic
  • Mucositis: benzydamine mouthwash, gelclair, systemic analgesia (opioids if severe)
  • Nausea: ondansetron 8mg, dexamethasone 4mg
  • Radiation pneumonitis: prednisolone 40-60mg tapering over 4-8 weeks
  • Radiation proctitis: sucralfate enemas, topical steroids
  • Amifostine: radioprotectant (limited use; reduces xerostomia in head & neck RT)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Fiducial marker placement for image-guided RT
  • Brachytherapy applicator insertion
  • SpaceOAR hydrogel injection (rectal spacer for prostate RT)

Referral Criteria

  • All radiotherapy prescribed by clinical oncologist within MDT
  • Emergency RT: spinal cord compression, SVCO (immediate referral)
  • Late radiation toxicity: specialist management

Prognosis

  • Curative RT: 5-year local control rates depend on cancer type (e.g. cervical 80-90%, prostate 85-95%, early laryngeal 90%)
  • Palliative RT for bone metastases: pain response in 60-80% (8 Gy single fraction as effective as 20 Gy in 5 per NCRI Bone Pain Trial)
  • Late toxicity risk: generally <5-10% for serious complications with modern techniques
  • Secondary malignancy risk: approximately 1-2% at 10-20 years
  • IMRT and proton therapy reduce late toxicity compared to conventional techniques

Other Relevant Information

Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques

TechniqueDescriptionIndication
IMRTModulated beam intensity across fieldHead & neck, prostate
VMATArc-based delivery; faster IMRTMost sites
SBRT/SABRAblative doses in 1-5 fractionsLung, liver, spine metastases
Proton therapyBragg peak reduces exit dosePaediatric, skull base, spinal
BrachytherapyInternal radioactive sourceCervical, endometrial, prostate

Landmark Radiotherapy Trials

TrialFinding
START-A/BHypofractionation (40 Gy/15# or 26 Gy/5#) non-inferior in breast cancer
FAST-ForwardUltra-hypofractionation (26 Gy/5#) for breast cancer
CHHiPHypofractionation (60 Gy/20#) non-inferior in prostate cancer
NCRI Bone PainSingle fraction 8 Gy as effective as multi-fraction for bone mets

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Targeted Therapy

Targeted therapy uses agents directed at specific molecular alterations driving cancer growth, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and PARP inhibitors, enabling personalised oncology.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Targeted therapy differs from chemotherapy by acting on specific molecular targets rather than all dividing cells
  • Imatinib (Gleevec) was the first major targeted agent; inhibits BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in CML (transformed survival from 30% to >90% at 5 years)
  • Trastuzumab (Herceptin): anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody for HER2+ breast cancer (reduces recurrence by 50%); risk of cardiotoxicity (monitor LVEF)
  • BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib) + MEK inhibitors (trametinib): for BRAF V600E mutant melanoma (60-70% response rate)
  • EGFR TKIs (osimertinib, erlotinib, gefitinib): first-line for EGFR-mutant NSCLC; osimertinib preferred (FLAURA trial)
  • ALK inhibitors (crizotinib, alectinib): for ALK-rearranged NSCLC; alectinib preferred (ALEX trial)
  • PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib): exploit synthetic lethality in BRCA-mutant and HRD-positive cancers (ovarian, breast, prostate, pancreatic)
  • CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib): combined with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer (PALOMA, MONARCH trials)

Overview

Key Facts

Targeted therapy represents a paradigm shift in oncology, enabling treatment directed at specific molecular abnormalities driving individual cancers. This approach underlies precision/personalised medicine.

Epidemiology

  • Targeted agents now form part of standard treatment for the majority of common cancers
  • Molecular profiling is increasingly performed at diagnosis to guide therapy selection
  • Next-generation sequencing panels identify actionable mutations in 30-50% of advanced cancers

Aetiology

  • Not applicable (treatment modality)

Pathophysiology

  • Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): small molecules that inhibit intracellular kinase domains (competitive or non-competitive ATP binding site inhibition)
  • Monoclonal antibodies: bind extracellular targets (receptors, ligands); mechanisms include direct signalling blockade, ADCC (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity), complement activation
  • PARP inhibitors: block poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, preventing single-strand break repair; in BRCA-deficient cells (impaired HRR), this leads to synthetic lethality
  • CDK inhibitors: block cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6, preventing cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase
  • Resistance mechanisms: secondary mutations (T790M in EGFR), bypass pathway activation, target amplification

Clinical Presentation

Key Indications

  • CML: imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib (BCR-ABL TKIs)
  • HER2+ breast cancer: trastuzumab, pertuzumab, T-DXd (trastuzumab deruxtecan)
  • EGFR-mutant NSCLC: osimertinib
  • ALK-rearranged NSCLC: alectinib, lorlatinib
  • BRAF-mutant melanoma: dabrafenib + trametinib
  • BRCA-mutant cancers: olaparib (ovarian, breast, prostate, pancreatic)
  • HR+/HER2- breast cancer: CDK4/6 inhibitors + endocrine therapy
  • RCC: sunitinib, pazopanib, cabozantinib (VEGFR TKIs)
  • GIST: imatinib (KIT/PDGFRA mutations)

Common Side Effects by Drug Class

  • TKIs: diarrhoea, rash (acneiform with EGFR inhibitors), fatigue, hypertension (VEGFR inhibitors)
  • Anti-HER2: cardiotoxicity (reduced LVEF), infusion reactions
  • PARP inhibitors: myelosuppression (anaemia, thrombocytopenia), nausea, fatigue
  • CDK4/6 inhibitors: neutropenia, diarrhoea (abemaciclib), QT prolongation (ribociclib)
  • BRAF/MEK inhibitors: pyrexia, rash, photosensitivity, cutaneous SCC (BRAF alone)

Red Flags

  • Cardiac symptoms with trastuzumab (dyspnoea, oedema): check LVEF
  • Severe diarrhoea with TKIs (dehydration risk)
  • Interstitial lung disease with EGFR TKIs (rare but fatal)
  • Hepatotoxicity with any targeted agent (monitor LFTs)
  • Secondary cutaneous malignancy with BRAF inhibitors (SCC/keratoacanthoma)

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Drug toxicity vs disease progressionSymptom timing, imagingRepeat scans, drug level
Cardiotoxicity vs cardiac diseaseDyspnoea, oedema on targeted therapyEchocardiogram, BNP
Drug-induced pneumonitisCough, dyspnoea on TKIsHRCT, drug history
Secondary malignancyNew lesion in treated patientBiopsy

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Observations, clinical assessment
  • ECG (QT interval for ribociclib, sunitinib)

Bloods

  • FBC (myelosuppression with PARP inhibitors, CDK inhibitors)
  • LFTs (hepatotoxicity)
  • TFTs (sunitinib causes hypothyroidism)
  • BNP/NT-proBNP if cardiac symptoms

Imaging

  • Echocardiogram: baseline and regular monitoring with trastuzumab (every 3 months)
  • CT response assessment: typically every 2-3 months

Special Tests

  • Molecular profiling (NGS panel): identify targetable mutations before treatment
  • FISH/IHC: HER2 status in breast/gastric cancer
  • PCR: BCR-ABL transcript monitoring in CML
  • Liquid biopsy (ctDNA): monitor resistance mutations (e.g. EGFR T790M)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Pre-treatment molecular profiling to confirm target
  • Patient education about expected side effects
  • Cardiac monitoring plan for cardiotoxic agents
  • Fertility counselling where appropriate

Pharmacological

  • Drug-specific management of side effects:
    • EGFR rash: prophylactic doxycycline 100mg OD, topical steroids
    • Trastuzumab cardiotoxicity: hold if LVEF drops >10 percentage points; consider ACE inhibitor/beta-blocker
    • VEGFR TKI hypertension: amlodipine 5-10mg or ramipril 2.5-10mg
    • PARP inhibitor anaemia: dose reduction, transfusion support
    • Diarrhoea: loperamide 4mg stat then 2mg after each loose stool (max 16mg/day)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Excision of BRAF inhibitor-related cutaneous SCCs
  • Interventional procedures for toxicity management (stenting, drainage)

Referral Criteria

  • All targeted therapy prescribed by oncologists within MDT
  • Molecular tumour board for complex cases
  • Cardio-oncology referral for cardiac toxicity
  • Clinical trial consideration for patients with actionable mutations

Prognosis

  • CML with imatinib: 5-year survival >90% (previously 30%); transformed to chronic manageable disease
  • HER2+ breast cancer: trastuzumab reduces mortality by 30-35%
  • EGFR-mutant NSCLC: median OS with osimertinib approximately 38 months (FLAURA trial)
  • BRAF-mutant melanoma: median OS with combined BRAF/MEK inhibition approximately 25-33 months
  • BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer with olaparib: 70% reduction in risk of progression (SOLO-1)
  • Resistance inevitably develops in most metastatic settings; duration of response varies

Other Relevant Information

Key Targeted Therapy Agents and Indications

AgentTargetCancerLandmark Trial
ImatinibBCR-ABLCML, GISTIRIS
TrastuzumabHER2Breast, gastricHERA
OsimertinibEGFRNSCLCFLAURA
AlectinibALKNSCLCALEX
Dabrafenib + trametinibBRAF + MEKMelanomaCOMBI-d
OlaparibPARPOvarian, breast, prostateSOLO-1
PalbociclibCDK4/6HR+ breastPALOMA-2
BevacizumabVEGFCRC, ovarian, RCCAVAiL

Resistance Mechanisms

MechanismExample
Secondary mutationEGFR T790M (resistance to first-gen TKIs)
Bypass pathwayMET amplification in EGFR-mutant NSCLC
Target amplificationBCR-ABL amplification in CML
Histological transformationNSCLC to SCLC under EGFR TKI pressure

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Oncological Emergencies

Oncological emergencies are life-threatening complications of cancer or its treatment requiring immediate recognition and management, including neutropenic sepsis, spinal cord compression, SVCO, and tumour lysis syndrome.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Neutropenic sepsis: fever ≥38°C with neutrophils <0.5 × 10⁹/L; treat with IV piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g within 1 hour (NICE NG151)
  • Spinal cord compression (MSCC): back pain with neurological signs; dexamethasone 16mg IV stat + urgent MRI whole spine + radiotherapy/surgery within 24 hours
  • Superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO): facial/arm swelling, dyspnoea, distended neck veins; dexamethasone 16mg IV + urgent CT + stenting/RT
  • Hypercalcaemia of malignancy: confusion, constipation, polyuria, dehydration; IV 0.9% saline 3-4L/24h + zoledronic acid 4mg IV over 15 minutes
  • Tumour lysis syndrome: hyperkalaemia, hyperuricaemia, hyperphosphataemia, hypocalcaemia; prevent with allopurinol or rasburicase; aggressive hydration
  • Brain metastases with raised ICP: headache, vomiting, papilloedema; dexamethasone 16mg IV + urgent imaging
  • Massive haemorrhage from tumour erosion: apply pressure, group and crossmatch, alert surgical/IR team; may be terminal event
  • Early recognition and protocolised management of oncological emergencies significantly improves outcomes

Overview

Key Facts

Oncological emergencies encompass a range of life-threatening conditions arising from the cancer itself or its treatment. Rapid recognition and protocolised management are essential to prevent death and permanent disability.

Epidemiology

  • Neutropenic sepsis complicates approximately 15-25% of chemotherapy cycles (varies by regimen)
  • MSCC affects 5-10% of cancer patients
  • SVCO occurs in 2-4% of lung cancer patients
  • Hypercalcaemia of malignancy affects 10-30% of cancer patients during their illness
  • TLS most common with haematological malignancies (Burkitt lymphoma, ALL)

Aetiology

  • Neutropenic sepsis: chemotherapy-induced bone marrow suppression
  • MSCC: vertebral metastases with epidural compression (lung, breast, prostate most common)
  • SVCO: mediastinal tumour compression/invasion (lung cancer 70%, lymphoma 15%)
  • Hypercalcaemia: PTHrP secretion (humoral), osteolytic metastases, calcitriol production
  • TLS: rapid tumour cell lysis releasing intracellular contents

Pathophysiology

  • Neutropenic sepsis: impaired innate immunity allows overwhelming bacterial infection
MSCC
tumour compresses spinal cord
oedema
ischaemia
irreversible neurological damage if untreated
  • SVCO: obstruction of SVC → venous congestion in head, neck, arms, upper thorax
  • Hypercalcaemia: PTHrP activates osteoclasts; excess calcium → renal impairment, cardiac arrhythmias, neurological dysfunction
  • TLS: massive release of potassium, phosphate, uric acid, nucleic acids → renal failure, cardiac arrhythmias

Clinical Presentation

Neutropenic Sepsis

  • Fever ≥38°C (or ≥37.5°C sustained for >1 hour) in patient receiving chemotherapy
  • May lack typical infection signs due to neutropenia
  • Hypotension, tachycardia, rigors

Spinal Cord Compression

  • Back pain (90%, often precedes neurology by weeks)
  • Limb weakness (progressive)
  • Sensory level
  • Bladder/bowel dysfunction (late sign; poor prognostic indicator)

SVCO

  • Facial and arm swelling
  • Distended neck and chest wall veins
  • Dyspnoea, stridor
  • Headache worse on bending forward

Hypercalcaemia

  • 'Stones, bones, groans, moans': renal stones, bone pain, abdominal pain, confusion
  • Polyuria, polydipsia, dehydration
  • Constipation, nausea
  • Cardiac: shortened QT, arrhythmias

Red Flags

  • Any temperature ≥38°C within 6 weeks of chemotherapy: assume neutropenic sepsis until proven otherwise
  • New back pain in cancer patient: assume MSCC until excluded
  • Rapid deterioration in conscious level: brain metastases, hypercalcaemia, or hyponatraemia

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Non-neutropenic infectionFever without neutropeniaFBC, cultures
Degenerative spinal diseaseChronic pain, no red flagsMRI
Cardiac tamponadeDyspnoea, muffled heart sounds, raised JVPEchocardiogram
Primary hyperparathyroidismChronic mild hypercalcaemia, no cancer historyPTH, calcium
Acute kidney injuryOliguria, rising creatinine, various causesU&Es, USS renal

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • ABCDE assessment
  • Observations: HR, BP, temperature, SpO2, RR
  • Blood glucose
  • ECG (hyperkalaemia, hypercalcaemia)
  • Neurological examination (MSCC)

Bloods

  • FBC (neutrophil count)
  • U&Es (potassium, calcium, phosphate, urate, creatinine)
  • LFTs, CRP, lactate
  • Blood cultures (peripheral and from central line if present)
  • Coagulation screen
  • Blood gas

Imaging

  • MSCC: MRI whole spine within 24 hours (NICE NG149)
  • SVCO: CT chest with contrast (CT venogram)
  • Brain metastases: CT head ± MRI brain
  • CXR: baseline for sepsis assessment

Special Tests

  • Urine culture, sputum culture (sepsis source)
  • Adjusted calcium calculation: Corrected Ca = measured Ca + 0.02 × (40 - albumin)
  • PTHrP: if humoral hypercalcaemia suspected

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Sepsis 6 bundle implementation
  • Spinal precautions (log-roll) if MSCC suspected
  • IV fluid resuscitation

Pharmacological

  • Neutropenic sepsis: IV piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g TDS (or local protocol) within 1 hour of presentation (NICE NG151); add vancomycin if line infection suspected
  • MSCC: dexamethasone 16mg IV stat then 16mg OD; PPI cover; specialist opinion within 24 hours
  • SVCO: dexamethasone 16mg IV stat; anticoagulation if thrombosis; urgent oncology referral
  • Hypercalcaemia: IV 0.9% saline 3-4L/24h rehydration → zoledronic acid 4mg IV over 15 minutes (onset 2-4 days; duration 3-4 weeks); denosumab 120mg SC if refractory
  • TLS: aggressive IV hydration (3L/m²/day); rasburicase 0.2mg/kg IV (converts uric acid to allantoin; avoid in G6PD deficiency); allopurinol 300mg OD (prophylaxis); correct hyperkalaemia (calcium gluconate, insulin-dextrose, salbutamol nebuliser)
  • Brain metastases: dexamethasone 16mg IV → 4mg QDS tapering; anticonvulsants if seizures (levetiracetam 250-500mg BD)

Surgical/Interventional

  • MSCC: surgical decompression (if operable, single level, good performance status) ± RT; or RT alone
  • SVCO: SVC stenting (interventional radiology) for rapid symptom relief
  • Cardiac tamponade: pericardiocentesis (USS-guided)
  • Obstructive uropathy: nephrostomy or ureteric stent

Referral Criteria

  • All oncological emergencies: immediate oncology/acute medicine assessment
  • MSCC: MSCC coordinator (every cancer network has one)
  • Neutropenic sepsis: oncology assessment unit or A&E
  • TLS: haematology/oncology + HDU/ITU if severe

Prognosis

  • Neutropenic sepsis: mortality 5-10% with prompt treatment; up to 50% if delayed
  • MSCC: ambulatory status at treatment predicts outcome; >80% remain ambulatory if mobile at diagnosis; <10% regain ambulation if paraplegic
  • SVCO: depends on underlying cause; stenting provides rapid relief in >90%
  • Hypercalcaemia: responds to treatment in >90%; median survival after first episode approximately 3-4 months (reflects advanced disease)
  • TLS: mortality 5-15% with treatment; prevention is key

Other Relevant Information

Oncological Emergency Management Summary

EmergencyKey ActionTimeframe
Neutropenic sepsisIV antibioticsWithin 1 hour
MSCCDexamethasone 16mg + MRIWithin 24 hours
SVCODexamethasone + CT + stent/RTSame day
HypercalcaemiaIV saline + bisphosphonateSame day
TLSHydration + rasburicaseImmediately
Brain metastases + raised ICPDexamethasone + CTSame day
Cardiac tamponadePericardiocentesisImmediately

Cairo-Bishop TLS Classification

FeatureLaboratory TLSClinical TLS
Uric acid>476 μmol/L or 25% increaseLab TLS +
Potassium>6.0 mmol/L or 25% increaseCardiac arrhythmia
Phosphate>1.45 mmol/L or 25% increaseRenal failure (Cr >1.5× ULN)
Calcium<1.75 mmol/L or 25% decreaseSeizures or death

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Neutropenic Sepsis

Neutropenic sepsis is a medical emergency defined as fever ≥38°C with neutrophils <0.5 × 10⁹/L, requiring empirical IV antibiotics within 1 hour per NICE NG151.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Definition: temperature ≥38°C (or other signs of sepsis) with neutrophils <0.5 × 10⁹/L (or expected to fall below this)
  • NICE NG151: empirical IV antibiotics within 1 hour of presentation (door-to-needle target)
  • First-line: piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g IV TDS (or local protocol, e.g. meropenem if penicillin allergy)
  • Mortality: 5-10% with prompt treatment; up to 50% if delayed >6 hours
  • Most common organisms: Gram-negative (E. coli, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella) and Gram-positive (coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus, streptococci)
  • Risk assessment: MASCC score ≥21 identifies low-risk patients (may be suitable for early discharge/oral antibiotics)
  • G-CSF prophylaxis (filgrastim, pegfilgrastim) recommended if febrile neutropenia risk >20% with planned chemotherapy regimen
  • Investigate for source but do not delay antibiotics for investigations

Overview

Key Facts

Neutropenic sepsis is the most common life-threatening complication of cancer chemotherapy. It requires immediate empirical antibiotic treatment, as the immunocompromised state allows rapid progression to septic shock and death.

Epidemiology

  • Complicates 15-25% of chemotherapy cycles (varies by regimen and patient factors)
  • Higher risk with haematological malignancies than solid tumours
  • Neutrophil nadir typically occurs 7-14 days after chemotherapy
  • Annual incidence in UK cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: approximately 20,000 episodes

Aetiology

Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression
neutropenia
impaired innate immunity
  • Sources of infection: GI tract (translocation of gut flora), skin (central venous catheter), respiratory tract, urinary tract
  • Often no source identified (30-50% of episodes)
  • Risk factors: previous neutropenic sepsis, poor performance status, advanced disease, mucositis, central venous catheter, comorbidities (diabetes, COPD, renal impairment)

Pathophysiology

  • Neutrophils are the first line of defence against bacterial and fungal infections
  • With counts <0.5 × 10⁹/L, risk of serious infection increases exponentially
  • <0.1 × 10⁹/L: highest risk; unable to mount inflammatory response (classic signs of infection may be absent)
  • Rapid bacterial proliferation can lead to septicaemia, multi-organ dysfunction, and death within hours

Clinical Presentation

Typical Presentation

  • Fever ≥38°C (single reading) or ≥37.5°C sustained for >1 hour
  • Patient receiving chemotherapy within the last 6 weeks
  • May have rigors, sweats, tachycardia
  • Signs of sepsis: hypotension, confusion, tachypnoea, oliguria

Atypical Presentation

  • Hypothermia (<36°C) may indicate severe sepsis
  • Absence of typical inflammatory signs (no erythema, no pus formation) due to neutropenia
  • Non-specific symptoms: fatigue, malaise, myalgia

Red Flags

  • Systolic BP <90 mmHg
  • Temperature >39°C or <36°C
  • Heart rate >130/min
  • Respiratory rate >25/min
  • SpO2 <91%
  • Altered mental status
  • Lactate >2 mmol/L
  • New onset of organ dysfunction

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Non-neutropenic feverFever with adequate neutrophilsFBC
Drug feverTemporal relationship with drug, no sourceDrug history, exclusion
Tumour feverFever related to cancer (lymphoma, RCC)Response to naproxen
Transfusion reactionFever during/after blood productClinical, haemolysis screen
DVT/PELeg swelling, dyspnoeaCTPA, duplex USS

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • ABCDE assessment
  • Full observations including NEWS2 score
  • Examine all potential sites: oral cavity, central line exit site, lungs, abdomen, perianal area, skin
  • Do NOT perform digital rectal examination (risk of bacteraemia through damaged mucosa)

Bloods

  • Blood cultures: at least 2 sets (peripheral + each lumen of central line); BEFORE antibiotics if possible but do NOT delay antibiotics
  • FBC (confirm neutropenia)
  • U&Es, creatinine (renal function for dose adjustment)
  • LFTs
  • CRP, lactate
  • Coagulation screen (DIC screen if unwell)
  • Blood gas

Imaging

  • CXR: baseline, even if no respiratory symptoms
  • CT if source unclear and patient not improving
  • HRCT chest if invasive fungal infection suspected

Special Tests

  • MSU, stool cultures (if diarrhoea), sputum culture, wound swabs
  • CMV PCR, galactomannan, β-D-glucan if prolonged neutropenia (>7 days) and not responding to antibiotics
  • Central line tip culture if line removed

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Immediate assessment using Sepsis 6 bundle
  • IV access (large bore)
  • Fluid resuscitation with IV crystalloid
  • Oxygen to maintain SpO2 ≥94%
  • Strict hand hygiene and reverse barrier nursing
  • Consider HDU/ITU if haemodynamically unstable

Pharmacological

  • Empirical antibiotics within 1 hour (NICE NG151):
    • First-line: piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5g IV TDS (most common UK protocol)
    • Penicillin allergy: meropenem 1g IV TDS
    • Add vancomycin 15-20mg/kg IV BD if: suspected line infection, skin/soft tissue infection, MRSA colonisation, haemodynamic instability
    • Add gentamicin 5-7mg/kg IV if: septic shock (local protocol)
  • Escalation: if no improvement at 48 hours, consider broadening spectrum (add antifungal: caspofungin 70mg IV loading then 50mg OD, or liposomal amphotericin B if neutropenia >7 days)
  • G-CSF: therapeutic use in established neutropenic sepsis (controversial; consider if prolonged neutropenia expected)
  • Step down: to oral antibiotics (co-amoxiclav 625mg TDS + ciprofloxacin 500mg BD) if MASCC ≥21, afebrile >48 hours, and improving

Surgical/Interventional

  • Central line removal: if tunnel infection, exit site infection not responding, or persistent bacteraemia
  • Drainage of any collections

Referral Criteria

  • All suspected neutropenic sepsis: immediate acute oncology or A&E assessment
  • Escalation to ITU if: refractory hypotension, multi-organ failure, respiratory failure
  • Discussion with microbiology for resistant organisms or failure to respond

Prognosis

  • With prompt treatment: mortality 5-10%
  • If antibiotics delayed >6 hours: mortality rises to 30-50%
  • MASCC score ≥21: low risk (predicted mortality <5%); suitable for early discharge/oral therapy
  • MASCC score <21: high risk (mortality 10-36%); requires inpatient IV antibiotics
  • Most episodes resolve within 5-7 days
  • Prolonged neutropenia (>7 days): increased risk of invasive fungal infection (aspergillosis, candidiasis)

Other Relevant Information

MASCC Risk Index

FeatureScore
Burden of illness: no or mild symptoms5
Burden of illness: moderate symptoms3
No hypotension (SBP >90)5
No COPD4
Solid tumour or no previous fungal infection4
No dehydration3
Outpatient at onset of fever3
Age <60 years2
Maximum score26
Low risk: ≥21

Neutropenic Sepsis Antibiotic Escalation

TimepointAction
0 hoursEmpirical piperacillin-tazobactam (or meropenem)
24-48 hoursReview cultures; add vancomycin if indicated
48-72 hoursIf no improvement: widen antibiotics, consider imaging
>96 hours with persistent feverAdd empirical antifungal (caspofungin or liposomal amphotericin B)

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Tumour Lysis Syndrome

Tumour lysis syndrome is a potentially fatal metabolic emergency caused by rapid destruction of tumour cells, releasing intracellular contents and leading to hyperkalaemia, hyperuricaemia, hyperphosphataemia, and hypocalcaemia.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • TLS results from rapid tumour cell lysis releasing potassium, phosphate, uric acid, and nucleic acids into the bloodstream
  • Most commonly associated with haematological malignancies: Burkitt lymphoma, ALL, high-grade NHL (high tumour burden + rapid turnover)
  • Cairo-Bishop classification: laboratory TLS (≥2 metabolic abnormalities) vs clinical TLS (lab TLS + organ dysfunction)
  • Prevention is key: aggressive IV hydration (3L/m²/day) + allopurinol 300mg OD (prophylaxis) or rasburicase 0.2mg/kg IV (high-risk patients)
  • Rasburicase converts uric acid to allantoin (highly soluble); rapid onset; contraindicated in G6PD deficiency (causes haemolysis)
  • Hyperkalaemia is the most immediately life-threatening complication (cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac arrest)
  • Avoid calcium supplementation for asymptomatic hypocalcaemia (risk of calcium phosphate precipitation in kidneys)
  • Monitor U&Es, calcium, phosphate, urate, LDH every 6-8 hours during treatment initiation for high-risk patients

Overview

Key Facts

Tumour lysis syndrome is an oncological emergency resulting from the rapid release of intracellular contents following tumour cell destruction. Prevention, early detection, and aggressive management are essential to avoid life-threatening complications.

Epidemiology

  • Incidence: 5-20% in high-risk haematological malignancies
  • Rare in solid tumours (<1%) but reported in bulky/rapidly responsive disease (SCLC, germ cell tumours)
  • Usually occurs within 12-72 hours of initiating treatment
  • Can occasionally occur spontaneously in rapidly proliferating tumours

Aetiology

  • High-risk: Burkitt lymphoma, ALL, high-grade NHL, CLL with bulky disease/high WCC
  • Moderate-risk: AML, intermediate-grade NHL, CML in blast crisis
  • Low-risk: most solid tumours, indolent lymphomas
  • Risk factors: high tumour burden, high proliferative rate, high LDH, renal impairment, dehydration

Pathophysiology

  • Rapid cell lysis releases intracellular potassium, phosphate, and nucleic acids
  • Nucleic acid metabolism produces uric acid (via xanthine oxidase)
Uric acid precipitates in renal tubules
acute uric acid nephropathy
AKI
Hyperphosphataemia binds calcium
calcium phosphate deposition in kidneys and tissues
hypocalcaemia
Hyperkalaemia
cardiac arrhythmias
cardiac arrest
  • Hypocalcaemia → tetany, seizures, cardiac arrhythmias

Clinical Presentation

Metabolic Derangements

  • Hyperkalaemia: muscle weakness, ECG changes (peaked T waves, widened QRS), cardiac arrhythmias
  • Hyperuricaemia: flank pain, oliguria, haematuria (uric acid nephropathy)
  • Hyperphosphataemia: often asymptomatic; contributes to renal failure
  • Hypocalcaemia: muscle cramps, tetany (Chvostek/Trousseau sign), seizures, prolonged QT

Acute Kidney Injury

  • Oliguria or anuria
  • Rising creatinine
  • Fluid overload

Red Flags

  • Potassium >6.0 mmol/L with ECG changes
  • Symptomatic hypocalcaemia (seizures, tetany)
  • Anuria or rapidly rising creatinine
  • Cardiac arrhythmias

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Pre-renal AKI (dehydration)Clinical dehydration, responsive to fluidsU&Es, fluid challenge
Obstructive uropathyHydronephrosis, palpable bladderRenal USS
RhabdomyolysisMuscle pain, raised CK, myoglobinuriaCK, urine myoglobin
Drug-induced AKITemporal relationship with nephrotoxic drugDrug history
Primary hyperuricaemia (gout)Joint inflammation, lower urate levelsUrate, joint aspiration

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • ECG (hyperkalaemia changes: peaked T waves, prolonged PR, widened QRS, sine wave)
  • Fluid balance chart (strict input/output)
  • Blood pressure, observations
  • Urinalysis

Bloods

  • U&Es: potassium, creatinine (monitor every 6-8 hours in high-risk)
  • Calcium and phosphate: monitor every 6-8 hours
  • Uric acid: monitor every 6-8 hours
  • LDH: marker of cell turnover
  • Blood gas: acidosis (lactic acidosis from tissue ischaemia)
  • FBC (WCC, platelets)

Imaging

  • Renal USS: exclude obstruction if AKI
  • CXR: fluid overload assessment

Special Tests

  • Urine uric acid/creatinine ratio: >1.0 suggests uric acid nephropathy
  • G6PD assay: BEFORE rasburicase administration (contraindicated in G6PD deficiency)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Aggressive IV hydration: 3L/m²/day (0.9% saline); aim urine output >2 mL/kg/hour
  • Cardiac monitoring (telemetry)
  • Strict fluid balance
  • Avoid potassium in IV fluids
  • Consider ICU admission for severe TLS
  • Renal replacement therapy (haemodialysis/haemofiltration) if: refractory hyperkalaemia, volume overload, severe AKI

Pharmacological

  • Prevention (high risk): rasburicase 0.2mg/kg IV single dose (can repeat); aggressive hydration
  • Prevention (moderate risk): allopurinol 300mg PO OD (start 24-48h before treatment); hydration
  • Hyperkalaemia management:
    • Calcium gluconate 10% 10mL IV over 10 minutes (cardiac protection)
    • Insulin 10 units + 50mL 50% glucose IV (shift potassium intracellularly)
    • Salbutamol 10-20mg nebulised
    • Calcium resonium 15-30g PO or PR (slow onset)
  • Hyperphosphataemia: phosphate binders (aluminium hydroxide 500mg TDS, sevelamer)
  • Hypocalcaemia: only treat if symptomatic (seizures, tetany); IV calcium gluconate 10% 10-20mL over 10 minutes; avoid calcium if hyperphosphataemia present (precipitation risk)
  • Hyperuricaemia: rasburicase 0.2mg/kg IV if not already given; allopurinol for mild cases
  • Alkalinisation of urine is NO longer routinely recommended (may worsen calcium phosphate precipitation)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Haemodialysis/haemofiltration: for refractory hyperkalaemia (>6.5 despite medical treatment), severe AKI (oliguria/anuria), volume overload, severe metabolic acidosis
  • Nephrostomy if obstructive component

Referral Criteria

  • All high-risk patients: haematology/oncology and renal team awareness before starting treatment
  • Established TLS: renal team review
  • ICU if multi-organ dysfunction

Prognosis

  • With prevention and prompt treatment: mortality <5%
  • Without treatment: mortality up to 50-80% (particularly with renal failure and hyperkalaemia)
  • AKI requiring dialysis: approximately 5-10% of TLS cases
  • Most metabolic derangements resolve within 5-7 days with appropriate treatment
  • Long-term renal impairment is uncommon if managed promptly

Other Relevant Information

Cairo-Bishop TLS Classification

CategoryCriteria
Laboratory TLS≥2 of: uric acid >476 μmol/L (or 25% ↑), K+ >6.0 (or 25% ↑), PO₄ >1.45 (or 25% ↑), Ca²⁺ <1.75 (or 25% ↓) within 3 days before or 7 days after treatment
Clinical TLSLab TLS + ≥1 of: Cr >1.5× ULN, cardiac arrhythmia, seizures, death

TLS Risk Stratification

RiskExamplesProphylaxis
HighBurkitt lymphoma, ALL (WCC >100), bulky NHLRasburicase + aggressive hydration
ModerateAML, intermediate NHL, CLL (high WCC)Allopurinol + hydration
LowMost solid tumours, indolent lymphomasHydration; consider allopurinol

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Spinal Cord Compression

Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is an oncological emergency requiring immediate dexamethasone and urgent MRI, with definitive treatment by radiotherapy or surgery within 24 hours to preserve neurological function.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • MSCC affects 5-10% of cancer patients; most common primary sites: lung, breast, prostate (account for >50%)
  • Back pain is the earliest and most common symptom (present in 90%), often preceding neurological deficit by weeks to months
  • NICE NG149: immediate dexamethasone 16mg IV/PO + urgent MRI whole spine within 24 hours of clinical suspicion
  • Ambulatory status at treatment is the strongest predictor of outcome: >80% who are walking at treatment remain ambulatory
  • Thoracic spine is the most commonly affected level (60-70%), followed by lumbosacral (20-30%) and cervical (10%)
  • Radiotherapy is the most common treatment (20-30 Gy in 5-10 fractions); surgery for selected patients (single level, good prognosis, spinal instability)
  • Patchell trial: direct decompressive surgery + RT superior to RT alone for maintaining ambulation in selected patients
  • Cauda equina syndrome: lower motor neuron signs, urinary retention, saddle anaesthesia; requires urgent decompression

Overview

Key Facts

Metastatic spinal cord compression is an oncological emergency that requires immediate recognition and treatment to prevent irreversible neurological damage. Delay in diagnosis and treatment is the most important modifiable factor.

Epidemiology

  • Affects 5-10% of cancer patients
  • Accounts for approximately 4,000 cases per year in England and Wales
  • Most common primary cancers: lung (25%), breast (20%), prostate (15%), myeloma (10%), lymphoma (5%), renal (5%)
  • Thoracic spine: 60-70%; lumbosacral: 20-30%; cervical: 10%

Aetiology

  • Vertebral metastases with posterior expansion into the epidural space (85%)
  • Direct epidural extension without bony involvement (10%)
  • Paravertebral tumour extending through neural foramina (5%)
  • Pathological vertebral collapse causing cord compression

Pathophysiology

  • Tumour in epidural space compresses the spinal cord
Compression causes venous congestion
vasogenic oedema
spinal cord ischaemia
  • If untreated: irreversible infarction and permanent neurological damage
  • Speed of onset influences prognosis: gradual onset (better) vs rapid (worse)
  • Dexamethasone reduces vasogenic oedema, providing temporary neuroprotection

Clinical Presentation

Early Symptoms

  • Back pain (90%): localised, progressive, worse on coughing/straining/lying flat
  • Pain may precede neurological symptoms by weeks to months
  • Radicular pain (nerve root distribution)
  • Band-like pain around trunk

Progressive Neurological Deficit

  • Motor weakness (60-85%): upper motor neuron pattern below level of compression
  • Sensory loss (40-90%): sensory level; may start distally and ascend
  • Bladder/bowel dysfunction (40-60%): late sign; poor prognostic indicator; urinary retention, overflow incontinence
  • Autonomic dysfunction: postural hypotension

Red Flags

  • New back pain in a known cancer patient (assume MSCC until excluded)
  • Progressive limb weakness
  • Sensory level on examination
  • Urinary retention or new-onset incontinence
  • Bilateral radiculopathy
  • Saddle anaesthesia (cauda equina)

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Degenerative spinal diseaseChronic history, no red flags, no cancer historyMRI
Epidural abscessFever, localised tenderness, risk factors (IVDU, immunosuppression)MRI, blood cultures
Transverse myelitisRapid onset, often post-viral, younger patientsMRI, CSF analysis
Vertebral collapse (osteoporotic)Acute pain post-trauma, no neurological deficitMRI, DEXA
Leptomeningeal metastasesMultifocal neurological signs, cranial nerve palsiesMRI with gadolinium, CSF cytology

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Full neurological examination (motor, sensory level, reflexes, tone, plantar response)
  • Bladder assessment (post-void residual; catheterise if retention)
  • Straight leg raising, anal tone
  • Spinal tenderness to percussion

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs, bone profile (calcium)
  • Myeloma screen: protein electrophoresis, immunoglobulins, Bence-Jones protein
  • PSA (if prostate cancer suspected)
  • CRP, ESR (infection vs malignancy)

Imaging

  • MRI whole spine (with gadolinium): gold standard; must image entire spine (10-38% have multiple levels of compression)
  • Requested urgently: within 24 hours if suspected on clinical grounds (NICE NG149)
  • Plain X-rays: may show vertebral collapse but low sensitivity (<60%); do NOT rely on negative X-rays
  • CT spine: if MRI contraindicated (pacemaker)

Special Tests

  • CT-guided biopsy: if no known primary and tissue diagnosis needed
  • Bone scan: assess extent of skeletal metastases

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Spinal precautions: log-roll, flat bed rest if neurological deficit
  • Nurse on pressure-relieving mattress
  • VTE prophylaxis (LMWH; high DVT risk due to immobility)
  • Urgent contact MSCC coordinator (each cancer network has one)

Pharmacological

  • Dexamethasone 16mg IV/PO stat, then 16mg OD (reduce and taper after definitive treatment over 5-7 days)
  • PPI cover (omeprazole 20mg OD)
  • Blood glucose monitoring (steroid-induced hyperglycaemia)
  • Analgesia: paracetamol ± opioids (morphine titrated); avoid NSAIDs if renal impairment
  • Laxatives: senna 15mg ON, movicol 1 sachet OD (prevent constipation)
  • Catheterisation if urinary retention

Surgical/Interventional

  • Radiotherapy: most common definitive treatment; 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions; start within 24 hours
  • Surgery (direct decompressive surgery + post-op RT): for selected patients meeting criteria:
    • Single or oligometastatic level of compression
    • Good performance status (ECOG 0-2)
    • Expected survival >3 months
    • Spinal instability (SINS score ≥7)
    • Progressive neurological deficit during RT
  • Patchell trial evidence: surgery + RT maintained ambulation in 84% vs 57% with RT alone
  • Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty: for pain from vertebral collapse without cord compression

Referral Criteria

  • Any suspected MSCC: contact MSCC coordinator immediately (NICE NG149)
  • Urgent MRI within 24 hours
  • Oncology and spinal surgery joint review
  • Rehabilitation input: physiotherapy, occupational therapy early

Prognosis

  • Ambulatory at treatment: >80% remain ambulatory after treatment
  • Paraparetic at treatment: 30-40% regain ambulation
  • Paraplegic >24-48 hours: <5-10% regain ambulation (often irreversible)
  • Median survival after MSCC: approximately 3-6 months (varies by primary cancer and overall disease burden)
  • Prostate and breast cancer: better survival (median 9-12 months)
  • Lung cancer: worse survival (median 3-4 months)
  • Bladder dysfunction at presentation: poor prognostic indicator for functional recovery

Other Relevant Information

MSCC Management Pathway (NICE NG149)

StepActionTimeframe
1Clinical suspicionImmediate
2Dexamethasone 16mg IV/POImmediate
3Contact MSCC coordinatorWithin 1 hour
4MRI whole spineWithin 24 hours
5MDT decision (RT vs surgery)Within 24 hours of MRI
6Definitive treatmentWithin 24 hours of decision

Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS)

ComponentScoring
LocationJunctional (3), mobile (2), semi-rigid (1), rigid (0)
PainMechanical (3), non-mechanical (1), none (0)
Lesion typeLytic (2), mixed (1), blastic (0)
AlignmentSubluxation/translation (4), kyphosis/scoliosis (2), normal (0)
Vertebral body collapse>50% (3), <50% (2), none (1)
Posterolateral involvementBilateral (3), unilateral (1), none (0)
Total: 0-6 stable; 7-12 potentially unstable; 13-18 unstable

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Superior Vena Cava Obstruction

Superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO) is caused by external compression or invasion of the SVC, most commonly by lung cancer or lymphoma, presenting with facial swelling and dyspnoea requiring urgent management.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Lung cancer (particularly small cell) causes 70% of SVCO; lymphoma causes 15%; non-malignant causes (thrombosis, goitre) account for 15%
  • Classic presentation: facial and arm swelling, distended neck veins, dyspnoea, headache worse on bending forward
  • Pemberton's sign: facial plethora and JVP distension on raising both arms above the head
  • CT venogram is the investigation of choice for diagnosis and treatment planning
  • Not usually a true emergency unless airway compromise or cerebral oedema present
  • SVC stenting (interventional radiology): provides rapid symptom relief (within hours); >90% success rate
  • Dexamethasone 16mg IV: particularly effective if lymphoma (steroid-sensitive) or cerebral oedema
  • Definitive management depends on underlying cause: chemotherapy (SCLC, lymphoma), radiotherapy (NSCLC), or anticoagulation (thrombotic)

Overview

Key Facts

SVCO is the obstruction of blood flow through the superior vena cava, causing venous congestion in the head, neck, upper limbs, and upper thorax. It is most commonly caused by malignancy but has an important differential of thrombotic and non-malignant causes.

Epidemiology

  • Approximately 3-4% of patients with lung cancer develop SVCO
  • Incidence of non-malignant SVCO increasing due to more central venous catheter and pacemaker use
  • Male predominance (reflects lung cancer demographics)

Aetiology

  • Malignant (85%):
    • Lung cancer: 70% (SCLC most common, followed by NSCLC)
    • Lymphoma: 15% (particularly NHL, mediastinal)
    • Other: thymoma, germ cell tumour, metastatic disease
  • Non-malignant (15%):
    • Central venous catheter-related thrombosis
    • Pacemaker leads
    • Fibrosing mediastinitis
    • Retrosternal goitre
    • Aortic aneurysm

Pathophysiology

  • External compression by mediastinal mass or invasion of SVC wall
  • Intraluminal thrombosis (may be superimposed on compression)
  • SVC is thin-walled, low-pressure vessel surrounded by rigid structures (sternum, trachea, bronchi, aorta, lymph nodes)
  • Obstruction causes venous hypertension in the head, neck, and upper extremities
  • Collateral venous circulation develops over days-weeks (azygos, internal mammary, subcutaneous)
  • Cerebral oedema (rare): raised intracranial pressure in severe acute obstruction

Clinical Presentation

Typical Presentation

  • Facial swelling and plethora (worse in morning, improves with upright posture)
  • Periorbital oedema
  • Upper limb swelling (bilateral)
  • Distended neck veins (non-pulsatile)
  • Visible chest wall collateral veins
  • Dyspnoea
  • Headache (worse on bending forward, lying flat, or straining)

Severe Symptoms

  • Stridor (tracheal compression)
  • Hoarseness (recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement)
  • Dysphagia (oesophageal compression)
  • Confusion, visual disturbance (cerebral oedema)

Red Flags

  • Stridor or airway compromise
  • Altered consciousness (cerebral oedema)
  • Papilloedema
  • Rapid onset (more likely thrombosis or aggressive tumour)
  • Known central venous catheter (thrombosis)

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Cardiac tamponadeRaised JVP, muffled heart sounds, pulsus paradoxusEchocardiogram
Heart failureBilateral oedema, orthopnoea, elevated BNPEcho, BNP, CXR
AngioedemaAcute facial/lip swelling, urticariaClinical, tryptase
Central venous thrombosisUnilateral arm swelling, catheter historyDuplex USS, CT venogram
Retrosternal goitreTracheal deviation, thyroid swellingTFTs, CT neck/chest

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Observations (HR, BP, SpO2, RR)
  • Examine for collateral veins, JVP, facial swelling
  • Pemberton's sign
  • Pulse oximetry

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs, calcium, LDH
  • Tumour markers (AFP, βhCG if germ cell tumour suspected)
  • Coagulation screen (thrombosis assessment)
  • Blood gas if respiratory symptoms

Imaging

  • CT chest with IV contrast (CT venogram): investigation of choice; shows site and extent of obstruction, identifies underlying cause, guides stent placement
  • CXR: mediastinal widening, right paratracheal mass (abnormal in 80%)
  • CT head: if cerebral oedema suspected

Special Tests

  • Tissue diagnosis: essential before treatment if no prior histology
    • CT-guided biopsy of mediastinal mass
    • Bronchoscopy with biopsy
    • Lymph node biopsy (cervical/supraclavicular)
    • Sputum cytology
  • Venography: rarely needed; CT venogram usually sufficient

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Elevate head of bed (30-45°)
  • Avoid IV access in upper limbs if possible (poor venous return)
  • Avoid constricting clothing

Pharmacological

  • Dexamethasone 16mg IV stat then 8mg BD: reduces peritumoral oedema; particularly effective in lymphoma/thymoma
  • PPI cover (omeprazole 20mg OD)
  • Anticoagulation: if thrombotic component identified; LMWH initially
  • Definitive treatment based on histology:
    • SCLC: chemotherapy (cisplatin/carboplatin + etoposide); rapid response expected
    • Lymphoma: chemotherapy ± steroids (R-CHOP for DLBCL)
    • NSCLC: radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy

Surgical/Interventional

  • SVC stenting: provides rapid symptom relief (within 24-48 hours in >90%)
    • Indicated for: severe symptoms, poor response to medical treatment, bridge to definitive therapy
    • Performed by interventional radiology under fluoroscopic guidance
  • Radiotherapy: palliative (8-12 Gy in 1-2 fractions for rapid relief, or 20-30 Gy in 5-10 fractions)

Referral Criteria

  • All suspected SVCO: urgent oncology referral
  • Airway compromise: immediate anaesthetic/ENT assessment
  • Stenting: interventional radiology referral
  • Unknown histology: urgent tissue diagnosis required

Prognosis

  • Depends on underlying cause and treatment response
  • SCLC with SVCO: median survival approximately 6-12 months (chemosensitive)
  • NSCLC with SVCO: median survival approximately 3-6 months
  • Lymphoma with SVCO: good prognosis if chemosensitive (>50% 5-year survival for some subtypes)
  • SVC stenting: symptom relief in >90% within 48-72 hours; re-occlusion rate 10-15%
  • Non-malignant SVCO: good prognosis with anticoagulation and/or stenting

Other Relevant Information

SVCO Management Algorithm

StepAction
1Clinical assessment + elevate head of bed
2CT chest with contrast (CT venogram)
3Dexamethasone 16mg IV if symptomatic
4Tissue diagnosis (if not already known)
5SVC stenting if severe symptoms or slow to respond
6Definitive treatment based on histology (chemo/RT)

Causes of SVCO by Frequency

CauseFrequency
NSCLC50%
SCLC20%
Lymphoma15%
Other malignancy5%
Thrombosis (catheter/pacemaker)5-10%
Benign causes (goitre, mediastinal fibrosis)<5%

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Hypercalcaemia of Malignancy

Hypercalcaemia of malignancy is the most common metabolic emergency in oncology, affecting 10-30% of cancer patients, caused by PTHrP secretion or osteolytic metastases, and treated with rehydration and bisphosphonates.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Most common paraneoplastic metabolic emergency; affects 10-30% of cancer patients at some point
  • Three mechanisms: humoral (PTHrP) (80%, squamous cell cancers), osteolytic (bone metastases, breast, myeloma), 1,25(OH)₂D (lymphoma)
  • Symptoms: 'stones, bones, groans, moans' - renal stones, bone pain, abdominal pain/constipation, confusion/depression
  • Corrected calcium = measured Ca²⁺ + 0.02 × (40 - albumin); mild: 2.6-3.0, moderate: 3.0-3.5, severe: >3.5 mmol/L
  • First-line treatment: aggressive IV 0.9% saline rehydration (3-4L/24h) + zoledronic acid 4mg IV over 15 minutes
  • Denosumab 120mg SC: for bisphosphonate-refractory hypercalcaemia; also used in renal impairment (does not require renal dose adjustment)
  • Loop diuretics (furosemide): only use AFTER rehydration and only if fluid overload; no longer recommended routinely
  • Median survival after first episode of hypercalcaemia of malignancy: approximately 3-4 months (reflects advanced disease)

Overview

Key Facts

Hypercalcaemia is the most common metabolic emergency in oncology and is often a sign of advanced disease. Prompt recognition and treatment are essential to prevent life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias, renal failure, and coma.

Epidemiology

  • Affects 10-30% of cancer patients during their illness
  • Most common with: squamous cell carcinomas (lung, head & neck), breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, myeloma
  • Often indicates advanced disease with poor prognosis

Aetiology

  • Humoral hypercalcaemia (80%): PTHrP (parathyroid hormone-related peptide) secretion by tumour
    • Most common: squamous cell lung cancer, renal cell, breast, bladder, ovarian
  • Osteolytic metastases (20%): local osteoclast activation by cytokines (RANKL, IL-6)
    • Breast cancer, myeloma
  • Calcitriol-mediated (<1%): ectopic 1,25(OH)₂D production
    • Lymphoma (particularly Hodgkin)
  • Ectopic PTH production: extremely rare

Pathophysiology

  • PTHrP mimics PTH at the PTH receptor: increases osteoclastic bone resorption, increases renal calcium reabsorption, increases phosphate excretion
  • Osteolytic metastases: tumour cells in bone produce cytokines that activate osteoclasts (vicious cycle of bone destruction)
Hypercalcaemia impairs renal concentrating ability
polyuria
dehydration
worsened hypercalcaemia (vicious cycle)
  • Calcium affects cardiac conduction (shortened QT), neurological function (confusion), and GI motility (constipation)

Clinical Presentation

Mild Hypercalcaemia (2.6-3.0 mmol/L)

  • Often asymptomatic
  • Mild fatigue, constipation
  • Polyuria, polydipsia

Moderate Hypercalcaemia (3.0-3.5 mmol/L)

  • Nausea, vomiting, anorexia
  • Constipation, abdominal pain
  • Confusion, drowsiness
  • Dehydration
  • Muscle weakness

Severe Hypercalcaemia (>3.5 mmol/L)

  • Obtundation, coma
  • Cardiac arrhythmias (shortened QT, bradycardia, heart block)
  • Renal failure
  • Pancreatitis
  • Cardiac arrest

Red Flags

  • Corrected calcium >3.5 mmol/L
  • Altered conscious level
  • ECG changes (shortened QT, wide QRS, arrhythmias)
  • Renal failure (oliguria)
  • Severe dehydration

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Primary hyperparathyroidismChronic mild hypercalcaemia, raised PTHPTH, calcium, phosphate
Vitamin D intoxicationSupplement history, raised 25(OH)D25-hydroxyvitamin D
SarcoidosisBilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, raised ACECXR, ACE level, biopsy
Thiazide diureticsDrug history, mild hypercalcaemiaDrug review
Milk-alkali syndromeExcessive calcium/antacid intakeHistory, U&Es
ThyrotoxicosisWeight loss, tremor, tachycardiaTFTs

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • ECG: shortened QT interval, wide QRS, arrhythmias
  • Fluid balance chart
  • Observations including GCS

Bloods

  • Corrected calcium (adjusted for albumin) or ionised calcium
  • Phosphate: low in PTHrP-mediated (PTH-like effect), variable in osteolytic
  • PTH: suppressed in malignancy (distinguishes from primary hyperparathyroidism where PTH is raised/inappropriately normal)
  • PTHrP: elevated in humoral hypercalcaemia
  • U&Es (renal function; dehydration)
  • Albumin (for calcium correction)
  • ALP (bone metastases; often raised)
  • Vitamin D (25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)₂D)
  • Myeloma screen: protein electrophoresis, Bence-Jones protein, immunoglobulins

Imaging

  • CXR (primary lung cancer, lymphadenopathy)
  • Bone scan or skeletal survey (myeloma; osteolytic metastases)
  • CT if staging/primary unknown

Special Tests

  • Urine calcium:creatinine ratio (to exclude familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Aggressive IV rehydration: 0.9% saline 3-4L over first 24 hours (most important initial step)
  • Mobilise if possible (immobility worsens hypercalcaemia)
  • Stop offending drugs (thiazides, calcium supplements, vitamin D supplements)
  • Strict fluid balance and urine output monitoring
  • Cardiac monitoring if calcium >3.5 mmol/L

Pharmacological

  • Zoledronic acid 4mg IV over 15 minutes (onset 2-4 days; peak effect 7 days; duration 3-4 weeks)
    • Caution: dose adjust for eGFR 30-60; avoid if eGFR <30
  • Pamidronate 60-90mg IV over 2-4 hours: alternative bisphosphonate
  • Denosumab 120mg SC: for bisphosphonate-refractory cases or renal impairment; onset 4-10 days; monitor for hypocalcaemia
  • Calcitonin 4-8 units/kg SC/IM 12-hourly: rapid onset (hours) but tachyphylaxis within 48 hours; useful as bridge
  • Prednisolone 40-60mg OD: for lymphoma/myeloma-related hypercalcaemia (vitamin D-mediated or steroid-responsive tumours)
  • Loop diuretics (furosemide 20-40mg IV): ONLY after adequate rehydration and if fluid overload; not routine
  • Definitive: treat underlying malignancy (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Haemodialysis: for life-threatening hypercalcaemia refractory to medical treatment (Ca >4.5 mmol/L or with renal failure)

Referral Criteria

  • Moderate-severe hypercalcaemia: acute medical/oncology admission
  • Corrected calcium >3.5 mmol/L: consider HDU/ITU monitoring
  • Refractory hypercalcaemia: discuss with endocrinology and oncology
  • If underlying malignancy unknown: urgent investigation for primary

Prognosis

  • Median survival after first episode: approximately 3-4 months (indicates advanced disease)
  • Response to bisphosphonates: normalisation of calcium in 60-90% within 7 days
  • Recurrence is common: repeat bisphosphonate/denosumab as needed
  • Patients with hypercalcaemia responding to cancer treatment have better prognosis
  • Myeloma patients may have better outcomes as the hypercalcaemia is more treatment-responsive

Other Relevant Information

Severity Classification

SeverityCorrected CalciumSymptomsManagement
Mild2.6-3.0 mmol/LOften asymptomaticOral rehydration, consider bisphosphonate
Moderate3.0-3.5 mmol/LSymptomaticIV fluids + IV bisphosphonate
Severe>3.5 mmol/LSevere/life-threateningAggressive IV fluids + IV bisphosphonate + cardiac monitoring

Mechanism of Hypercalcaemia by Cancer Type

CancerMechanismFrequency
Squamous cell lungPTHrPVery common
Breast (metastatic)Osteolytic + PTHrPCommon
MyelomaOsteolytic (RANKL, MIP-1α)30%
Renal cellPTHrPCommon
Lymphoma1,25(OH)₂DUncommon
Head & neck SCCPTHrPCommon

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the UK, with non-small cell (85%) and small cell (15%) subtypes, increasingly treated with molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy alongside surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the UK with approximately 48,500 new cases and 35,000 deaths per year
  • Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, large cell); small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15%
  • Smoking is the primary risk factor (85-90% of cases); lifetime risk in smokers is 15-30% (vs 1-2% in non-smokers)
  • NICE NG12: urgent 2-week wait CXR for haemoptysis, persistent cough/chest pain/SOB, or unexplained weight loss with chest symptoms
  • Molecular testing mandatory for non-squamous NSCLC: EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, PD-L1, KRAS G12C
  • Early-stage NSCLC: lobectomy ± adjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin-based); SABR for medically inoperable
  • Advanced NSCLC: pembrolizumab monotherapy (PD-L1 ≥50%) or pembrolizumab + chemotherapy; targeted therapy if actionable mutation
  • SCLC: limited stage = concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin + etoposide + RT); extensive stage = chemotherapy + durvalumab (CASPIAN trial)

Overview

Key Facts

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide and in the UK. Advances in molecular profiling, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have significantly improved outcomes for selected patients.

Epidemiology

  • UK incidence: approximately 48,500 new cases per year (3rd most common cancer)
  • Mortality: approximately 35,000 deaths per year (leading cause of cancer death)
  • Peak incidence: 70-74 years
  • Male:female ratio approaching 1:1 (increasing in women)
  • 5-year survival: approximately 15-16% overall; 55-60% for Stage I
  • NHS Targeted Lung Health Check programme being rolled out for early detection

Aetiology

  • Smoking (85-90%): dose-response relationship; risk proportional to pack-years; risk declines after cessation but never returns to baseline
  • Passive smoking: 20-30% increased risk
  • Occupational exposure: asbestos (synergistic with smoking), radon, arsenic, chromium, nickel
  • Air pollution: estimated to contribute to 1-2% of lung cancers
  • Genetic: family history increases risk 1.5-2×; EGFR mutations more common in non-smokers/East Asian populations
  • Pre-existing lung disease: COPD, pulmonary fibrosis

Pathophysiology

  • Adenocarcinoma (40%): peripheral location; most common subtype; common in non-smokers; glandular differentiation; EGFR, ALK, KRAS mutations
  • Squamous cell carcinoma (25-30%): central location, cavitating; strongly associated with smoking; may produce PTHrP (hypercalcaemia)
  • Large cell carcinoma (10%): poorly differentiated; often peripheral
  • Small cell lung cancer (15%): central, rapidly growing, early metastasis; neuroendocrine origin; strongly associated with smoking; paraneoplastic syndromes common (SIADH, Lambert-Eaton, Cushing)

Clinical Presentation

Local Symptoms

  • Persistent cough (most common presenting symptom)
  • Haemoptysis
  • Dyspnoea
  • Chest pain (pleuritic or dull ache)
  • Recurrent pneumonia (post-obstructive)

Local Invasion

  • Hoarseness (recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy)
  • Dysphagia (oesophageal compression)
  • SVCO (facial swelling, distended veins)
  • Pancoast tumour: shoulder/arm pain, Horner syndrome (miosis, ptosis, anhidrosis), T1 weakness
  • Phrenic nerve palsy (raised hemidiaphragm)

Paraneoplastic Syndromes

  • SIADH (hyponatraemia) - SCLC
  • Ectopic ACTH (Cushing) - SCLC
  • Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome - SCLC
  • Hypercalcaemia (PTHrP) - squamous cell
  • Hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy (HPOA) - clubbing, periostitis

Red Flags

  • Haemoptysis at any age
  • Persistent cough >3 weeks with risk factors
  • Unexplained weight loss with chest symptoms
  • New hoarseness with smoking history
  • Recurrent pneumonia in same location

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
TBChronic cough, haemoptysis, night sweats, travel/contact historySputum AFB, CXR, Mantoux
COPD exacerbationKnown COPD, productive cough, wheezeCXR, spirometry
PneumoniaAcute onset, fever, productive coughCXR, cultures
Pulmonary embolismAcute dyspnoea, pleuritic pain, risk factorsCTPA, D-dimer
SarcoidosisBilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, younger ageCXR, biopsy, ACE level
MesotheliomaAsbestos exposure, pleural thickening/effusionCT, thoracoscopy, biopsy

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • CXR: first-line investigation (lesion visible in ~75%); hilar mass, peripheral nodule, pleural effusion, collapse, mediastinal widening
  • Sputum cytology: low sensitivity (~30%) but specific if positive
  • Pulse oximetry

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es (Na⁺ for SIADH), LFTs, calcium, LDH, albumin
  • Tumour markers: not routinely used for diagnosis

Imaging

  • CT chest/abdomen/adrenals with contrast: staging; characterise primary lesion and assess lymph nodes, liver, adrenals
  • PET-CT: staging and assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes; guides biopsy site
  • MRI brain: if SCLC or NSCLC Stage IB+ (brain metastasis screening)
  • Bone scan: if bone pain or raised ALP

Special Tests

  • Tissue biopsy for histological diagnosis:
    • CT-guided percutaneous biopsy (peripheral lesions)
    • Bronchoscopy ± EBUS (endobronchial USS-guided biopsy) for central lesions and mediastinal lymph nodes
    • Thoracoscopy (VATS) for pleural disease
  • Molecular profiling (NSCLC, non-squamous): EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangement, ROS1 rearrangement, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, PD-L1 expression (TPS), NTRK fusions
  • Pulmonary function tests: pre-operative assessment (FEV1, TLCO); predict postoperative lung function

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion (thoracic surgery, medical oncology, clinical oncology, radiology, pathology, respiratory medicine, CNS)
  • Smoking cessation
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation (pre-operative)
  • Psychological support

Pharmacological

  • Early-stage NSCLC (Stage I-II):
    • Surgery (lobectomy) + adjuvant chemotherapy if Stage IB-IIIA (cisplatin-based, e.g. cisplatin + vinorelbine × 4 cycles)
    • Adjuvant osimertinib for resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADAURA trial)
    • Adjuvant atezolizumab for resected PD-L1+ NSCLC (IMpower010)
  • Locally advanced NSCLC (Stage III):
    • Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin + etoposide or cisplatin + vinorelbine + 60-66 Gy RT) → durvalumab maintenance (PACIFIC trial)
  • Advanced NSCLC (Stage IV):
    • PD-L1 ≥50%, no actionable mutation: pembrolizumab monotherapy (KEYNOTE-024)
    • PD-L1 <50%, no mutation: pembrolizumab + carboplatin + pemetrexed (KEYNOTE-189)
    • EGFR mutation: osimertinib (FLAURA trial)
    • ALK rearrangement: alectinib (ALEX trial)
    • BRAF V600E: dabrafenib + trametinib
    • KRAS G12C: sotorasib (CodeBreaK 100)
  • SCLC:
    • Limited stage: cisplatin 80mg/m² + etoposide 100mg/m² × 4 cycles + concurrent thoracic RT (45 Gy); prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) if response
    • Extensive stage: carboplatin + etoposide + durvalumab × 4 cycles → durvalumab maintenance (CASPIAN trial); PCI if response

Surgical/Interventional

  • Lobectomy (preferred) or pneumonectomy: curative for early-stage NSCLC
  • VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery): minimally invasive; preferred approach
  • SABR/SBRT: for medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC (e.g. 54 Gy in 3 fractions)
  • Endobronchial interventions: stenting, debulking, laser for airway obstruction
  • Pleural procedures: talc pleurodesis for malignant effusion, IPC insertion

Referral Criteria

  • Suspected lung cancer: urgent 2-week wait referral per NICE NG12
  • All confirmed: MDT discussion before any treatment
  • Molecular testing results: to determine targeted therapy eligibility
  • Palliative care: early involvement recommended (improves quality of life and survival)

Prognosis

  • Overall 5-year survival: 15-16% (all stages combined)
  • Stage IA: 80-90% 5-year survival
  • Stage IB: 68%
  • Stage II: 50-60%
  • Stage IIIA: 25-35%
  • Stage IIIB-C: 10-15%
  • Stage IV: 5-10% (improving with immunotherapy and targeted therapy)
  • SCLC limited stage: median survival 15-20 months; 5-year survival 10-15%
  • SCLC extensive stage: median survival 10-12 months; rare long-term survivors

Other Relevant Information

Lung Cancer TNM Staging (8th Edition Summary)

StageDescription5-Year Survival
IA1-3T1 (≤3cm), N0, M077-92%
IBT2a (3-4cm), N0, M068%
IIAT2b (4-5cm), N0, M060%
IIBT3 or T1-2/N1, M053%
IIIAT3-4/N1 or T1-2/N2, M036%
IIIBT3-4/N2 or N3, M026%
IIICT3-4/N3, M013%
IVAM1a-b10%
IVBM1c<5%

Key Landmark Trials

TrialFinding
KEYNOTE-024Pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% NSCLC: doubled OS
FLAURAOsimertinib in EGFR+ NSCLC: OS 38.6 vs 31.8 months
PACIFICDurvalumab after chemoRT in Stage III: OS 47.5 vs 29.1 months
CASPIANDurvalumab + chemo in ES-SCLC: improved OS
ADAURAAdjuvant osimertinib in resected EGFR+ NSCLC: 88% DFS at 24 months

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK with approximately 56,000 new cases per year, managed with a multimodal approach including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and increasingly guided by molecular subtype.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Most common cancer in the UK: approximately 56,000 new cases and 11,500 deaths per year; 1 in 7 women affected in their lifetime
  • NHS Breast Screening Programme: mammography every 3 years for women aged 50-70 (being extended to 47-73)
  • Molecular subtypes: Luminal A (ER+/HER2-, low Ki67), Luminal B (ER+/HER2- or HER2+, high Ki67), HER2-enriched, Triple-negative (TNBC)
  • ER-positive (75%): treated with endocrine therapy (tamoxifen for premenopausal, aromatase inhibitors for postmenopausal)
  • HER2-positive (15-20%): treated with trastuzumab + pertuzumab + chemotherapy (CLEOPATRA trial)
  • Triple-negative (15%): chemotherapy-based; pembrolizumab added for PD-L1+ (KEYNOTE-522); PARP inhibitors for BRCA-mutated (OlympiAD)
  • BRCA1/2 testing offered to all patients diagnosed <50, TNBC, bilateral, male, family history (NICE CG164)
  • 5-year survival: 85-90% overall; Stage I: >95%; Stage IV: 25%

Overview

Key Facts

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK and a leading cause of cancer mortality in women. Treatment is increasingly personalised based on molecular subtype, stage, and genomic profiling.

Epidemiology

  • UK incidence: approximately 56,000 new cases per year (most common cancer overall)
  • Mortality: approximately 11,500 deaths per year
  • Lifetime risk: 1 in 7 women; 1 in 870 men
  • Peak incidence: 60-64 years
  • 5-year survival: approximately 85-90% (improvement due to screening and better treatments)

Aetiology

  • Hormonal factors: early menarche, late menopause, nulliparity, late first pregnancy (>30), HRT (combined > oestrogen-only), OCP (small increased risk while taking)
  • Genetic: BRCA1 (60-80% lifetime risk, typically TNBC), BRCA2 (40-60%, typically ER+), TP53 (Li-Fraumeni), PALB2, CHEK2, ATM
  • Lifestyle: obesity (postmenopausal), alcohol (dose-dependent, 7% increase per unit/day), physical inactivity
  • Previous: previous breast cancer, atypical ductal hyperplasia, LCIS, chest wall irradiation
  • Protective: breastfeeding, multiparity, physical activity, late menarche

Pathophysiology

  • Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): pre-invasive; proliferation within ducts; 30-50% progress to invasive cancer over 10-20 years
  • Invasive ductal carcinoma (NST): 75-80% of invasive cancers
  • Invasive lobular carcinoma: 10-15%; diffuse infiltration pattern; may be bilateral
  • Special types: mucinous, tubular, medullary, papillary (generally better prognosis)
Spread: local invasion
axillary lymph nodes
systemic (bone, liver, lung, brain)

Clinical Presentation

Typical Presentation

  • Painless breast lump (most common)
  • Detected on screening mammography (20-30% of diagnoses)
  • Breast skin changes: peau d'orange, dimpling, tethering
  • Nipple changes: inversion, discharge (bloody), Paget's disease (eczematous change over nipple/areola)
  • Axillary lump (lymphadenopathy)

Advanced Disease

  • Bone pain (most common site of metastasis)
  • Dyspnoea (pleural effusion, lung metastases)
  • Jaundice, abdominal pain (liver metastases)
  • Headache, neurological symptoms (brain metastases)

Red Flags

  • Hard, irregular, fixed breast lump
  • Bloody nipple discharge (unilateral)
  • Skin tethering or peau d'orange
  • Axillary lymphadenopathy
  • Inflammatory breast cancer (rapidly enlarging, erythematous, warm breast)
  • Male breast lump

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
FibroadenomaMobile, smooth, well-defined, young womenUSS ± core biopsy
Breast cystSmooth, fluctuant, may be tenderUSS ± aspiration
Fat necrosisHistory of trauma, irregular lumpMammogram, core biopsy
Breast abscessTender, warm, erythematous, fluctuantUSS, aspiration, cultures
Phyllodes tumourRapidly growing, smooth, largeCore biopsy
Inflammatory breast cancerDiffuse erythema, peau d'orange, no discrete massSkin punch biopsy, imaging

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Triple assessment (NICE NG101):
    1. Clinical examination
    2. Imaging (mammography ± USS)
    3. Core biopsy (14G needle)
  • Examine both breasts, axillae, supraclavicular fossae

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs, calcium, ALP (baseline; staging if advanced)
  • Tumour markers: CA 15-3 (monitoring, not diagnosis)

Imaging

  • Mammography: first-line for women ≥40; screening detects 6-8 cancers per 1,000 women screened
  • Breast USS: first-line for women <40 (dense breast tissue); USS-guided core biopsy
  • MRI breast: for lobular carcinoma, BRCA carriers, implants, neoadjuvant response assessment
  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis + bone scan or PET-CT: for staging in advanced/symptomatic disease

Special Tests

  • Core biopsy (14G): histological diagnosis, ER/PR status, HER2 status (IHC/FISH), Ki67
  • Oncotype DX / EndoPredict / Prosigna: genomic assays for ER+/HER2-/node-negative to guide adjuvant chemotherapy benefit
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy: staging of axilla (avoids full clearance if negative)
  • BRCA testing: all <50, TNBC, bilateral, male, or family history meeting criteria

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion
  • Psychological support and breast care nurse specialist
  • Fertility preservation counselling (before chemotherapy)
  • Genetic counselling for BRCA carriers

Pharmacological

  • Endocrine therapy (ER+):
    • Premenopausal: tamoxifen 20mg OD for 5-10 years (± GnRH agonist)
    • Postmenopausal: aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole 1mg, letrozole 2.5mg, or exemestane 25mg) for 5-10 years
    • CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) added for metastatic HR+/HER2-
  • Anti-HER2 therapy (HER2+):
    • Adjuvant: trastuzumab 6mg/kg IV 3-weekly for 1 year + chemotherapy (docetaxel + carboplatin)
    • Neoadjuvant: trastuzumab + pertuzumab + chemotherapy (NeoSphere, PEONY trials)
    • Metastatic: trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) (DESTINY-Breast03)
  • Chemotherapy:
    • Neoadjuvant or adjuvant: FEC-D (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide → docetaxel) or dose-dense AC-T
    • Guided by genomic assays in ER+/HER2-/node-negative (TAILORx, RxPONDER trials)
  • TNBC:
    • Neoadjuvant: pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-522)
    • BRCA-mutated: olaparib (OlympiAD) or talazoparib
    • Metastatic: sacituzumab govitecan (ASCENT trial)
  • Bisphosphonates: zoledronic acid adjuvant in postmenopausal (AZURE, ABCSG-12) - reduces bone recurrence

Surgical/Interventional

  • Breast-conserving surgery (wide local excision) + adjuvant radiotherapy: preferred for early-stage (equivalent survival to mastectomy)
  • Mastectomy ± immediate reconstruction: for multicentric disease, large tumour:breast ratio, patient preference
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB): staging; if positive → axillary clearance or axillary radiotherapy
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: to downstage tumour enabling BCS
  • Risk-reducing mastectomy: for BRCA carriers (reduces risk by 90%)
  • Adjuvant radiotherapy: whole breast after BCS; chest wall after mastectomy if high risk; boost to tumour bed

Referral Criteria

  • Breast lump in woman ≥30: urgent 2-week wait referral (NICE NG12)
  • Breast lump in woman <30 with concerning features: urgent referral
  • Skin changes, nipple changes: urgent referral
  • Family history meeting criteria: genetics referral (NICE CG164)

Prognosis

  • Overall 5-year survival: 85-90%
  • Stage I: >95% 5-year survival
  • Stage II: 80-90%
  • Stage III: 50-70%
  • Stage IV: 25% (improving with modern therapies)
  • ER+ tumours: better short-term prognosis but can recur late (up to 20 years)
  • HER2+ with trastuzumab: significantly improved (50% reduction in recurrence)
  • TNBC: worst short-term prognosis; lower rate of late recurrence
  • Oncotype DX low recurrence score: excellent prognosis with endocrine therapy alone (no chemotherapy benefit)

Other Relevant Information

Molecular Subtypes and Treatment

SubtypeERHER2Ki67TreatmentPrognosis
Luminal A+-LowEndocrine ± chemoExcellent
Luminal B+±HighEndocrine + chemo ± anti-HER2Intermediate
HER2-enriched-+HighAnti-HER2 + chemoIntermediate (improved with therapy)
Triple-negative--HighChemotherapy ± immunotherapyPoor

Key Breast Cancer Trials

TrialFinding
HERAAdjuvant trastuzumab for 1 year in HER2+: 50% recurrence reduction
TAILORxOncotype DX RS 11-25: no chemo benefit in most
KEYNOTE-522Pembrolizumab + neoadjuvant chemo in TNBC: improved pCR
DESTINY-Breast03T-DXd superior to T-DM1 in HER2+ metastatic
OlympiADOlaparib in BRCA+ metastatic: improved PFS

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the UK with approximately 42,900 new cases per year, increasingly detected by the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme and treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Fourth most common cancer in the UK with approximately 42,900 new cases and 16,500 deaths per year
  • NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: FIT (faecal immunochemical test) every 2 years for ages 60-74 (being extended to 50+)
Adenoma-carcinoma sequence
normal epithelium
adenomatous polyp
carcinoma over 10-15 years (APC
KRAS
TP53 mutations)
  • Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): autosomal dominant; MMR gene mutations; 80% lifetime CRC risk; screening colonoscopy from age 25
  • NICE NG12: 2-week wait for: unexplained rectal bleeding/iron deficiency anaemia >40, change in bowel habit >60, abdominal/rectal mass
  • Surgery is mainstay for early-stage: right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, anterior resection, APR (abdominoperineal resection)
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy: FOLFOX (5-FU + leucovorin + oxaliplatin) or capecitabine ± oxaliplatin for Stage III (reduces recurrence by 30%)
  • Metastatic CRC: FOLFOX/FOLFIRI ± bevacizumab or cetuximab (if RAS wild-type left-sided); pembrolizumab for MSI-H/dMMR (KEYNOTE-177)

Overview

Key Facts

Colorectal cancer is common and highly preventable through screening. The adenoma-carcinoma sequence provides a window for early detection and polypectomy. Treatment is multimodal, with surgery for early disease and systemic therapy for advanced disease.

Epidemiology

  • UK incidence: approximately 42,900 new cases per year (4th most common cancer)
  • Mortality: approximately 16,500 deaths per year (2nd most common cause of cancer death)
  • Peak incidence: 70-79 years
  • Male:female ratio approximately 1.2:1
  • 5-year survival: approximately 60% overall; >90% for Stage I
  • Incidence declining in screening-age population due to polypectomy at screening

Aetiology

  • Sporadic (75-80%): accumulation of somatic mutations; risk factors include age, red/processed meat, obesity, alcohol, smoking, physical inactivity
  • Hereditary:
    • Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): 3-5% of CRC; autosomal dominant; MMR mutations (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2); 80% lifetime CRC risk
    • FAP (familial adenomatous polyposis): <1%; APC gene mutation; >100 polyps by age 20; near 100% CRC risk without prophylactic colectomy
    • MUTYH-associated polyposis: autosomal recessive; attenuated polyposis
  • Inflammatory bowel disease: UC (8-10× risk after 20 years of pancolitis); Crohn's colitis

Pathophysiology

Adenoma-carcinoma sequence (Vogelstein model)
sequential mutations (APC
KRAS
TP53) over 10-15 years
  • Microsatellite instability (MSI) pathway: defective MMR → accumulation of mutations at microsatellite repeats; sporadic (MLH1 promoter methylation) or hereditary (Lynch syndrome)
Serrated pathway
BRAF mutation
sessile serrated lesions
CRC (right-sided)
Spread: direct invasion
lymphatic
haematogenous (liver most common, then lung)
peritoneal

Clinical Presentation

Right-Sided Colon Cancer

  • Iron deficiency anaemia (insidious blood loss)
  • Vague abdominal pain
  • Palpable right iliac fossa mass
  • Weight loss
  • Often presents late (large bowel calibre allows growth without obstruction)

Left-Sided Colon Cancer

  • Change in bowel habit (increasing constipation or alternating)
  • Rectal bleeding (mixed with stool)
  • Colicky abdominal pain
  • Tenesmus
  • May present as large bowel obstruction

Rectal Cancer

  • Fresh rectal bleeding
  • Mucus per rectum
  • Tenesmus
  • Sense of incomplete evacuation
  • Palpable on digital rectal examination

Red Flags

  • Unexplained iron deficiency anaemia (any age)
  • Rectal bleeding with change in bowel habit
  • Abdominal mass
  • Large bowel obstruction
  • New-onset symptoms >50 years with weight loss

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Diverticular diseaseLIF pain, fever, tendernessCT abdomen
IBD (UC/Crohn's)Chronic bloody diarrhoea, younger ageColonoscopy, biopsy
HaemorrhoidsBright red rectal bleeding, no weight lossProctoscopy
IBSAltered bowel habit, bloating, no red flagsClinical (Rome IV criteria)
Coeliac diseaseIron deficiency, diarrhoea, malabsorptiontTG antibodies, biopsy

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Digital rectal examination (essential; palpable low rectal tumours)
  • Abdominal examination (mass, hepatomegaly)
  • FIT (faecal immunochemical test): quantitative; >10 mcg Hb/g faeces is positive

Bloods

  • FBC (iron deficiency anaemia)
  • U&Es, LFTs (liver metastases)
  • CEA: baseline (not diagnostic; prognostic and monitoring)
  • Iron studies (ferritin, transferrin saturation)

Imaging

  • Colonoscopy: gold standard for diagnosis; allows biopsy and polypectomy
  • CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): alternative if colonoscopy incomplete or patient unfit
  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: staging
  • MRI pelvis: local staging for rectal cancer (T and N staging, CRM involvement)
  • PET-CT: if potentially resectable metastatic disease

Special Tests

  • Histopathology: adenocarcinoma subtype, grade, lymphovascular invasion
  • MMR immunohistochemistry / MSI testing: all CRC (Lynch screening and treatment implications)
  • RAS (KRAS/NRAS) and BRAF mutation testing: for metastatic disease (guides targeted therapy)
  • Staging laparoscopy: if peritoneal disease suspected

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol
  • Stoma care specialist nurse if stoma formed
  • Psychological support

Pharmacological

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy (Stage III, selected Stage II with high-risk features):
    • FOLFOX (5-FU + leucovorin + oxaliplatin) × 6 months (MOSAIC trial) or 3 months (IDEA trial for low-risk Stage III)
    • Capecitabine monotherapy (alternative for Stage III; X-ACT trial)
  • Neoadjuvant (rectal cancer):
    • Long-course chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine + 45-50.4 Gy RT over 5 weeks) then surgery at 6-8 weeks
    • Short-course RT (25 Gy in 5 fractions) then surgery at 1 week or delayed
    • Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT): chemotherapy + RT before surgery (RAPIDO, PRODIGE 23 trials)
  • Metastatic CRC:
    • RAS wild-type, left-sided: FOLFOX/FOLFIRI + cetuximab (anti-EGFR)
    • RAS wild-type, right-sided: FOLFOX/FOLFIRI + bevacizumab (anti-VEGF)
    • RAS mutant: FOLFOX/FOLFIRI + bevacizumab
    • MSI-H/dMMR: pembrolizumab first-line (KEYNOTE-177)
    • BRAF V600E: encorafenib + cetuximab (BEACON trial)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Right hemicolectomy: caecal and ascending colon tumours
  • Left hemicolectomy: descending colon tumours
  • Sigmoid colectomy: sigmoid tumours
  • Anterior resection: upper/mid rectal tumours
  • Abdominoperineal resection (APR): low rectal tumours (permanent colostomy)
  • TME (total mesorectal excision): standard for rectal cancer surgery
  • Liver resection: potentially curative for isolated liver metastases (20-40% 5-year survival)
  • Lung metastasectomy: selected cases
  • Emergency surgery: obstruction (stenting as bridge to surgery or Hartmann's procedure), perforation

Referral Criteria

  • NICE NG12 2-week wait criteria
  • Positive FIT: urgent colonoscopy
  • All confirmed CRC: MDT discussion
  • Family history meeting criteria: genetics referral and surveillance colonoscopy

Prognosis

  • Overall 5-year survival: 60%
  • Stage I (Dukes A): >90%
  • Stage II (Dukes B): 80%
  • Stage III (Dukes C): 65% (with adjuvant chemotherapy)
  • Stage IV (Dukes D): 10-15% (higher with resectable metastatic disease: 30-40%)
  • MSI-H tumours: better prognosis at Stage II; respond well to immunotherapy at Stage IV
  • CEA surveillance: rising CEA after treatment indicates recurrence
  • Follow-up: CT surveillance, CEA monitoring, colonoscopy at 1 and 3 years post-surgery

Other Relevant Information

Dukes vs TNM Staging

DukesTNMDescription5-Year Survival
AT1-2, N0, M0Confined to bowel wall>90%
BT3-4, N0, M0Through bowel wall80%
CAny T, N1-2, M0Lymph node involvement65%
DAny T, Any N, M1Distant metastases10-15%

NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

FeatureDetail
TestFIT (faecal immunochemical test)
Age range60-74 (extending to 50+)
FrequencyEvery 2 years
Positive threshold≥10 mcg Hb/g faeces
Follow-upColonoscopy within 2 weeks

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the UK, with a wide spectrum from indolent to aggressive disease, managed with active surveillance, surgery, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and novel agents.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Most common cancer in men in the UK: approximately 52,300 new cases and 12,000 deaths per year
  • PSA (prostate-specific antigen): not a perfect screening test; raised in BPH, prostatitis, UTI, ejaculation; PSA >4 ng/mL warrants further investigation (age-adjusted thresholds exist)
  • MRI prostate (mpMRI) is now first-line investigation before biopsy (NICE NG131; PROMIS trial); PI-RADS scoring (1-5)
  • Gleason grading: sum of two most prevalent patterns (each 1-5); grouped into Grade Groups 1-5 (ISUP)
  • Active surveillance for low-risk localised disease (Gleason 3+3, PSA <10, ≤T2a): ProtecT trial showed no difference in 15-year cancer-specific mortality vs radical treatment
  • Radical prostatectomy or radical radiotherapy ± ADT for intermediate/high-risk localised disease
  • Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): GnRH agonists (goserelin 3.6mg/10.8mg SC) or antagonists (degarelix); backbone of advanced disease treatment
  • Novel agents for advanced disease: abiraterone (CYP17 inhibitor), enzalutamide (AR inhibitor), docetaxel, PARP inhibitors (olaparib for BRCA-mutated), lutetium-177 PSMA (TheraP/VISION trials)

Overview

Key Facts

Prostate cancer has a wide spectrum of biological behaviour, from indolent disease requiring only monitoring to aggressive metastatic disease. Understanding risk stratification and appropriate treatment selection is crucial.

Epidemiology

  • UK incidence: approximately 52,300 new cases per year (most common cancer in men)
  • Mortality: approximately 12,000 deaths per year (2nd most common cause of cancer death in men)
  • Peak incidence: 75-79 years
  • Lifetime risk: 1 in 8 men
  • 5-year survival: approximately 87% overall; >95% for localised disease

Aetiology

  • Age: strongest risk factor; rare before 50; median age at diagnosis 72
  • Ethnicity: Black men have 2× higher risk; earlier onset
  • Family history: first-degree relative with prostate cancer doubles risk; BRCA2 carriers 3-5× risk
  • Genetic: BRCA2, HOXB13, Lynch syndrome
  • Protective: 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride) reduce incidence by 25% but may select for higher-grade tumours

Pathophysiology

  • Adenocarcinoma (>95%): arises from prostatic epithelial cells, typically in the peripheral zone
Androgen-dependent growth (testosterone
DHT via 5-alpha reductase
AR activation)
  • Multifocal in approximately 85% of cases
Spread: local invasion (seminal vesicles, bladder)
lymphatic (pelvic/para-aortic)
haematogenous (bone: sclerotic metastases; liver, lung)
  • Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): disease progresses despite castrate testosterone levels; may still be AR-driven

Clinical Presentation

Early Disease (Often Asymptomatic)

  • Detected on PSA testing or incidental finding
  • May have LUTS (frequency, hesitancy, nocturia) but these more commonly due to BPH
  • Hard, irregular nodule on DRE

Locally Advanced Disease

  • Haematuria, haematospermia
  • Obstructive symptoms: acute urinary retention
  • Perineal pain
  • Erectile dysfunction
  • Lower limb oedema (lymphatic/venous obstruction)

Metastatic Disease

  • Bone pain (axial skeleton; sclerotic metastases)
  • Pathological fractures
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Weight loss, fatigue, anorexia
  • Anaemia

Red Flags

  • Hard irregular prostate on DRE
  • Rapidly rising PSA (PSA velocity >0.75 ng/mL/year)
  • New bone pain with raised PSA
  • Lower limb weakness in man with prostate cancer (MSCC)
  • PSA >100 ng/mL (almost always metastatic)

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
BPHSmooth enlarged prostate, LUTS, normal/mildly raised PSADRE, PSA, USS
ProstatitisTender prostate, dysuria, fever, raised PSAMSU, PSA (wait to recheck)
UTIDysuria, frequency, positive urineMSU
Bladder cancerPainless haematuria, frequencyCystoscopy, CT urogram
Chronic pelvic pain syndromePerineal pain, no infectionExclusion diagnosis

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Digital rectal examination (DRE): assess prostate size, shape, consistency, nodules
  • Urinalysis (exclude UTI)

Bloods

  • PSA: age-adjusted reference ranges (50-59: <3, 60-69: <4, >70: <5 ng/mL); also check if symptoms or abnormal DRE
  • FBC (anaemia in advanced disease)
  • U&Es, ALP (bone metastases), LDH

Imaging

  • mpMRI prostate: first-line before biopsy (NICE NG131); PI-RADS 1-2 (negative) avoids biopsy; PI-RADS 3-5 → targeted biopsy
  • TRUS biopsy or MRI-targeted transperineal biopsy: histological diagnosis; at least 12 cores
  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis and bone scan: staging for intermediate/high-risk disease
  • PSMA PET-CT: superior staging for high-risk disease; detects small volume metastases

Special Tests

  • Gleason grading: pathologist grades tumour architecture (Grade Groups 1-5)
  • Genomic tests: Oncotype DX GPS, Prolaris (risk stratification for active surveillance candidates)
  • BRCA2/ATM testing: for metastatic disease (PARP inhibitor eligibility)
  • Bone density (DEXA): before long-term ADT

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Active surveillance: for low-risk disease (Grade Group 1, PSA <10, ≤T2a); regular PSA, mpMRI, and re-biopsy; ProtecT trial supports safety
  • Watchful waiting: for men with limited life expectancy; treat symptoms only

Pharmacological

  • Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT):
    • GnRH agonists: goserelin 3.6mg SC monthly or 10.8mg 3-monthly; triptorelin, leuprorelin
    • GnRH antagonist: degarelix 240mg SC loading → 80mg monthly (no testosterone flare)
    • Anti-androgens: bicalutamide 50mg OD (combined androgen blockade) or 150mg monotherapy
  • Radical RT ± ADT: EBRT (78 Gy in 39 fractions or hypofractionated) ± 6 months ADT (intermediate-risk) or 2-3 years ADT (high-risk; STAMPEDE trial)
  • Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC):
    • ADT + docetaxel (STAMPEDE/CHAARTED) or
    • ADT + abiraterone 1000mg OD + prednisolone 5mg OD (STAMPEDE/LATITUDE) or
    • ADT + enzalutamide 160mg OD (ENZAMET) or
    • ADT + apalutamide (TITAN)
  • Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC):
    • Abiraterone + prednisolone (COU-AA-301/302)
    • Enzalutamide (PREVAIL/AFFIRM)
    • Docetaxel 75mg/m² 3-weekly
    • Cabazitaxel (post-docetaxel; TROPIC trial)
    • Olaparib (BRCA1/2 or ATM mutated; PROfound trial)
    • Lutetium-177 PSMA (PSMA-expressing; VISION trial)
    • Radium-223 (bone-only metastases; ALSYMPCA trial)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Radical prostatectomy (open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted): for localised disease; cure rate >90% for organ-confined disease
  • Brachytherapy (low-dose rate or high-dose rate): alternative for low/intermediate risk
  • Pelvic lymph node dissection: at time of radical prostatectomy for intermediate/high-risk
  • TURP: for obstructive symptoms (palliative)
  • Orchidectomy (bilateral): surgical castration; rapid, permanent; rarely performed now

Referral Criteria

  • Abnormal DRE or raised PSA: urgent 2-week wait urology referral
  • Confirmed prostate cancer: MDT discussion
  • BRCA carrier or strong family history: genetics referral and early PSA screening (from age 40)
  • Advanced disease: oncology referral

Prognosis

  • Overall 5-year survival: 87% (one of the highest of any cancer)
  • Localised disease: >95% 10-year survival with active surveillance, surgery, or RT (ProtecT trial)
  • Locally advanced: 80-85% with multimodal treatment
  • Metastatic hormone-sensitive: median survival 4-6 years with intensified treatment (ADT + docetaxel or abiraterone)
  • Castration-resistant metastatic: median survival 2-3 years with modern sequential therapies
  • Bone metastases: managed but significantly impacts QoL (pain, fractures, MSCC)

Other Relevant Information

Risk Stratification (NICE NG131)

Risk GroupCriteriaManagement
LowGrade Group 1, PSA <10, ≤T2aActive surveillance
IntermediateGrade Group 2-3, PSA 10-20, T2b-cRadical treatment (surgery or RT)
HighGrade Group 4-5, PSA >20, ≥T3Radical RT + long-term ADT (2-3 years)

Key Prostate Cancer Trials

TrialFinding
ProtecTActive surveillance vs surgery vs RT: no difference in 15-year cancer-specific mortality for localised
STAMPEDEADT + abiraterone/docetaxel improved OS in mHSPC
LATITUDEAbiraterone + ADT in high-risk mHSPC: OS benefit
PREVAILEnzalutamide in pre-chemo CRPC: improved OS
PROfoundOlaparib in HRR-mutated CRPC: improved PFS
VISIONLutetium-177 PSMA in CRPC: improved OS

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological malignancy, predominantly high-grade serous carcinoma, treated with debulking surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, with PARP inhibitors for BRCA-mutated disease.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Most lethal gynaecological cancer in the UK; 75% diagnosed at Stage III-IV due to non-specific symptoms
  • High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common subtype (70%); arises from fallopian tube fimbria
  • NICE NG12: suspect ovarian cancer with persistent bloating, early satiety, pelvic pain, urinary frequency (≥12 times/month, new onset)
CA-125 ≥35 IU/mL + pelvic USS
RMI calculation
if >250 refer to specialist centre
  • Treatment: primary debulking surgery (aim for zero residual disease) + carboplatin AUC5 + paclitaxel 175mg/m² every 3 weeks × 6 cycles
  • BRCA1/2 mutations: 10-15% of cases; offer olaparib maintenance (SOLO-1: 70% reduction in progression risk)
  • Bevacizumab: anti-VEGF; added to chemotherapy and as maintenance in high-risk (ICON7 trial)
  • 5-year survival: 45% overall; Stage I: 90%; Stage III: 25-30%

Overview

Key Facts

This entry covers ovarian cancer from the oncology perspective, focusing on systemic treatment principles. Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy, largely because it presents at advanced stage. BRCA testing and PARP inhibitors have significantly altered the treatment landscape.

Epidemiology

  • UK incidence: approximately 7,500 new cases per year
  • Mortality: approximately 4,100 deaths per year
  • Peak incidence: 60-64 years
  • Lifetime risk: 1.8% overall; 40-60% with BRCA1; 10-30% with BRCA2

Aetiology

  • As per gynaecological ovarian cancer entry: sporadic (85-90%), hereditary (10-15%)
  • BRCA1, BRCA2, Lynch syndrome
  • Protective: COC use, multiparity, breastfeeding, tubal ligation

Pathophysiology

  • HGSC arises from serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) in the fallopian tube fimbriae
  • Universal TP53 mutations; 50% have homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)
  • Transcoelomic spread: peritoneal deposits, omental cake
  • BRCA-deficient tumours: impaired DNA repair → sensitivity to platinum and PARP inhibitors (synthetic lethality)

Clinical Presentation

Symptoms

  • Persistent bloating, early satiety, pelvic/abdominal pain, urinary urgency/frequency
  • Ascites, palpable mass, pleural effusion
  • Weight loss, fatigue
  • Change in bowel habit

Red Flags

  • Persistent symptoms ≥12 times/month, new onset, in women ≥50
  • Ascites with pelvic mass
  • CA-125 ≥35 IU/mL
  • Family history of BRCA-associated cancers

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Benign ovarian cystPremenopausal, simple cyst, normal CA-125USS, RMI
Colorectal cancerAltered bowel habit, rectal bleedingColonoscopy
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (other primary)Ascites, GI symptomsCT, cytology
Gastric cancerDyspepsia, weight lossOGD

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Abdominal examination: ascites, palpable mass
  • Pelvic examination

Bloods

  • CA-125, HE4, FBC, U&Es, LFTs, albumin
  • CEA, CA19-9 (if GI primary suspected)
  • AFP, βhCG, LDH (young women: germ cell tumours)

Imaging

  • Pelvic USS, CT CAP, PET-CT for staging
  • MRI for indeterminate lesions

Special Tests

  • RMI calculation
  • Tissue biopsy (CT-guided or ascitic cytology)
  • BRCA1/2 and HRD testing on tumour
  • MMR/MSI testing

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion at specialist gynaecological oncology centre
  • Genetic counselling for BRCA carriers and families
  • Nutritional and psychological support

Pharmacological

  • First-line: carboplatin AUC5 + paclitaxel 175mg/m² q3w × 6 cycles
  • Bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3w: added for Stage IIIB-IV; continued as maintenance
  • PARP inhibitor maintenance:
    • Olaparib 300mg BD: for BRCA-mutated (SOLO-1: 70% risk reduction)
    • Niraparib 200-300mg OD: for all comers after platinum response (PRIMA)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
3 cycles
interval debulking surgery
3 further cycles (CHORUS trial: non-inferior)
  • Platinum-sensitive relapse (>6 months): rechallenge with platinum doublet ± bevacizumab; PARP maintenance
  • Platinum-resistant relapse (<6 months): pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, weekly paclitaxel, topotecan, gemcitabine

Surgical/Interventional

  • Primary debulking surgery: total hysterectomy + BSO + omentectomy + appendicectomy + peritoneal biopsies + lymphadenectomy; aim complete cytoreduction
  • Interval debulking: after NACT if primary surgery not feasible
  • Fertility-sparing surgery: unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for Stage IA, Grade 1 in young women
  • Risk-reducing BSO: for BRCA1 (by age 35-40) and BRCA2 (by age 40-45)

Referral Criteria

  • RMI >250: urgent specialist referral
  • Confirmed ovarian cancer: specialist gynaecological oncology centre
  • All patients: BRCA testing
  • BRCA carriers: genetics referral for family cascade testing

Prognosis

  • Overall 5-year survival: 45%
  • Stage I: 90%; Stage II: 60-70%; Stage III: 25-30%; Stage IV: 10-15%
  • Complete cytoreduction: strongest surgical prognostic factor
  • BRCA-mutated: paradoxically better prognosis (platinum and PARP sensitivity)
  • PARP inhibitor era: significantly prolonged PFS and emerging OS benefits
  • Most patients with advanced disease relapse within 18-24 months
  • CA-125 monitoring: rising levels may indicate relapse (but early treatment of asymptomatic relapse does not improve OS per MRC OV05/EORTC 55955)

Other Relevant Information

Key Ovarian Cancer Trials

TrialFinding
ICON7Bevacizumab improved PFS in high-risk subgroup
SOLO-1Olaparib maintenance in BRCA+: 70% risk reduction
PRIMANiraparib maintenance all-comers: improved PFS
CHORUSNACT non-inferior to primary debulking
PAOLA-1Olaparib + bevacizumab maintenance: PFS benefit in HRD+
KEYNOTE-826Pembrolizumab for cervical (not ovarian, but similar ICI trials emerging)

FIGO Staging Summary

StageDescription5-Year Survival
IConfined to ovaries90%
IIPelvic extension60-70%
IIIPeritoneal deposits and/or lymph nodes25-30%
IVDistant metastases (liver parenchyma, extra-abdominal)10-15%

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer is an HPV-driven malignancy managed with surgery for early-stage and concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease, with immunotherapy emerging for recurrent/metastatic cases.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • HPV 16 and 18 cause 70% of cervical cancers; 99.7% of cervical cancers are HPV-related
  • UK incidence: approximately 3,200 new cases and 850 deaths per year
  • FIGO staging (2018 revision): includes imaging and pathology findings; now incorporates lymph node status (Stage IIIC)
  • Early-stage (IA-IB1): radical hysterectomy (Wertheim) ± pelvic lymphadenectomy; or radical trachelectomy (fertility-sparing)
  • Locally advanced (IB2-IVA): concurrent chemoradiotherapy: cisplatin 40mg/m² weekly × 5-6 + EBRT 45-50 Gy + brachytherapy
  • LACC trial: open surgery non-inferior to laparoscopic; laparoscopic associated with worse outcomes (changed practice)
  • Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy ± bevacizumab for persistent/recurrent/metastatic (KEYNOTE-826)
  • HPV vaccination (Gardasil 9) expected to reduce cervical cancer by 90% in vaccinated populations

Overview

Key Facts

This entry covers cervical cancer from the oncology treatment perspective. Cervical cancer is highly preventable through vaccination and screening. Treatment is stage-dependent, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy being standard for locally advanced disease.

Epidemiology

  • UK incidence: approximately 3,200 cases per year
  • Mortality: approximately 850 deaths per year
  • Peak incidence: 30-34 years
  • Declining incidence due to screening and expected to decline further with HPV vaccination

Aetiology

  • Persistent high-risk HPV infection (types 16, 18 most important)
  • Risk factors: early sexual debut, multiple partners, immunosuppression, smoking, long-term COC

Pathophysiology

  • Squamous cell carcinoma (70-80%): arises from transformation zone
  • Adenocarcinoma (20-25%): arises from endocervical glandular cells
  • HPV E6/E7 oncoproteins inactivate p53/Rb
CIN progression over 10-20 years: CIN1
CIN3
invasive cancer
Spread: direct invasion (parametria, vagina, bladder, rectum)
lymphatic (pelvic, para-aortic)
haematogenous (lung, liver, bone)

Clinical Presentation

Early Disease

  • Postcoital bleeding, intermenstrual bleeding
  • Vaginal discharge (blood-stained/watery)
  • Often asymptomatic (detected on screening)

Advanced Disease

  • Pelvic pain, leg oedema, renal failure (ureteric obstruction)
  • Haematuria, rectal bleeding (local invasion)
  • Fistulae (vesicovaginal, rectovaginal) in very advanced/recurrent disease

Red Flags

  • Visible cervical lesion on speculum
  • Postcoital bleeding in any age group
  • Unexplained renal failure in a woman

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Cervical ectropionSmooth red area, postcoital bleedingSpeculum
Cervical polypVisible polyp, contact bleedingPolypectomy
Endometrial cancerPMB, no visible cervical lesionTVS, biopsy
Vaginal cancerVaginal lesionBiopsy

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Speculum and bimanual/rectal examination

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es (renal function), LFTs
  • SCC antigen (squamous marker)

Imaging

  • MRI pelvis: local staging
  • CT CAP: distant staging
  • PET-CT: increasingly used for staging and response assessment

Special Tests

  • Cervical biopsy: histological confirmation
  • EUA: clinical staging
  • Cystoscopy/sigmoidoscopy if bladder/rectal involvement suspected

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion
  • Fertility counselling for young women
  • Psychological support

Pharmacological

  • Early-stage (IA-IB1): surgery ± adjuvant RT if high-risk features (positive margins, LVI, deep invasion)
  • Locally advanced (IB2-IVA): concurrent chemoradiotherapy:
    • Cisplatin 40mg/m² IV weekly × 5-6 cycles
    • EBRT 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions
    • Intracavitary brachytherapy (total equivalent dose >80 Gy to point A)
    • Treatment completed within 56 days (prolongation worsens outcomes)
  • Metastatic/recurrent:
    • Pembrolizumab + cisplatin/carboplatin + paclitaxel ± bevacizumab (KEYNOTE-826)
    • Tisotumab vedotin (antibody-drug conjugate targeting tissue factor; innovaTV 204)
  • Adjuvant RT ± concurrent cisplatin: after radical hysterectomy with high-risk features (Sedlis criteria, Peters criteria)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Cone biopsy / simple hysterectomy: Stage IA1 without LVI
  • Radical hysterectomy (Wertheim) + pelvic lymphadenectomy: Stage IA2-IB1 (open approach preferred after LACC trial)
  • Radical trachelectomy: fertility-sparing for Stage IA2-IB1 (tumour <2cm)
  • Pelvic exenteration: central recurrence after RT (anterior, posterior, or total)
  • Sentinel lymph node mapping: emerging for early-stage

Referral Criteria

  • Visible cervical lesion: urgent 2-week wait
  • Confirmed cervical cancer: specialist gynaecological oncology centre
  • All women: HPV vaccination recommended for prevention

Prognosis

  • Overall 5-year survival: 60-65%
  • Stage IA: 95%
  • Stage IB: 80-85%
  • Stage II: 60-70%
  • Stage III: 30-40%
  • Stage IV: 15-20%
  • Concurrent chemoradiotherapy reduces risk of death by 30-40% compared to RT alone
  • HPV vaccination expected to make cervical cancer a rare disease in coming decades

Other Relevant Information

Treatment by FIGO Stage

StagePrimary Treatment
IA1 (no LVI)Cone biopsy or simple hysterectomy
IA2-IB1Radical hysterectomy + LND or radical RT
IB2-IIAConcurrent chemoRT or radical surgery (selected)
IIB-IVAConcurrent chemoRT (cisplatin + EBRT + brachytherapy)
IVBSystemic therapy (pembrolizumab + chemo ± bevacizumab)

Key Trials

TrialFinding
GOG 120Cisplatin-based chemoRT superior to RT alone
LACCOpen surgery superior to laparoscopic in early cervical cancer
KEYNOTE-826Pembrolizumab + chemo improved OS in recurrent/metastatic

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Testicular Cancer

Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy in young men aged 15-35, with cure rates exceeding 95% due to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, even in metastatic disease.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Most common solid cancer in men aged 15-35 years; approximately 2,400 new cases per year in the UK
  • Two main types: seminoma (40-45%, peak age 35-40) and non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) (55-60%, peak age 25-30)
  • Cure rate >95% overall; even metastatic disease is highly curable with cisplatin-based chemotherapy
  • Risk factors: cryptorchidism (undescended testis, 4-8× risk), previous testicular cancer, family history, Klinefelter syndrome
  • Tumour markers: AFP (raised in NSGCT, never in pure seminoma), βhCG (raised in both), LDH (prognostic, reflects tumour burden)
  • Standard first-line chemotherapy: BEP (bleomycin + etoposide + cisplatin) × 3-4 cycles
  • Radical inguinal orchidectomy: diagnostic and therapeutic; NEVER perform trans-scrotal biopsy (risk of seeding)
  • IGCCCG classification: good, intermediate, poor prognosis groups based on markers and metastatic sites

Overview

Key Facts

Testicular cancer is one of the great success stories of modern oncology, with cure rates exceeding 95% even in metastatic disease. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy and multidisciplinary management are key to these outcomes.

Epidemiology

  • UK incidence: approximately 2,400 new cases per year
  • Peak incidence: 25-35 years
  • Incidence has been rising over the past 50 years (reason unclear)
  • Caucasian men have highest incidence worldwide
  • Mortality: approximately 60 deaths per year in the UK (reflects high cure rate)

Aetiology

  • Cryptorchidism: strongest risk factor (4-8× risk; not eliminated by orchidopexy but allows better surveillance)
  • Previous testicular cancer: 2-5% risk of contralateral tumour
  • Family history: first-degree relative 4-8× risk
  • Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY): increased risk of mediastinal germ cell tumours
  • Testicular microlithiasis: controversial risk factor; surveillance if symptomatic
  • Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS): precursor lesion; 50% progress to invasive cancer within 5 years

Pathophysiology

  • Seminoma: uniform cells resembling primordial germ cells; radiosensitive; slower growth; good prognosis
  • Non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT): includes embryonal carcinoma (aggressive), yolk sac tumour (AFP production), choriocarcinoma (βhCG, haematogenous spread), teratoma (mature/immature)
  • Mixed germ cell tumours: contain both seminomatous and non-seminomatous elements; treated as NSGCT
  • Spread: lymphatic to retroperitoneal lymph nodes (para-aortic) → haematogenous to lungs, liver, brain, bone
  • Excellent chemosensitivity due to high mitotic rate and intact apoptotic pathways

Clinical Presentation

Typical Presentation

  • Painless testicular swelling or lump (most common)
  • Sensation of heaviness in scrotum
  • Dull ache in testis, groin, or lower abdomen
  • Detected incidentally after trauma

Advanced Disease

  • Back pain (retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy)
  • Dyspnoea, cough (pulmonary metastases)
  • Gynaecomastia (βhCG-producing tumours)
  • Neck mass (supraclavicular lymphadenopathy)

Red Flags

  • Any new testicular lump in a young man
  • Rapidly enlarging testis
  • Gynaecomastia in young man
  • Unexplained back pain in young man with testicular abnormality
  • Elevated AFP or βhCG

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Epididymo-orchitisAcute onset, tender, fever, dysuriaUrine MC&S, USS
HydroceleTransilluminant, non-tenderUSS
Varicocele'Bag of worms', left-sided, worse standingUSS
Testicular torsionAcute severe pain, absent cremasteric reflex, nauseaUrgent surgical exploration
Inguinal herniaReducible swelling, cough impulseClinical, USS

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Testicular examination (size, consistency, tenderness, transillumination)
  • Abdominal examination (retroperitoneal mass)
  • Supraclavicular lymph nodes

Bloods

  • Tumour markers (pre-orchidectomy):
    • AFP: raised in yolk sac tumour and embryonal carcinoma; NEVER raised in pure seminoma
    • βhCG: raised in choriocarcinoma and 10-20% of seminomas
    • LDH: non-specific; reflects tumour burden
  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs
  • Semen analysis and sperm banking: BEFORE orchidectomy/chemotherapy

Imaging

  • Scrotal USS: first-line; hypoechoic intratesticular mass is cancer until proven otherwise
  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: staging (retroperitoneal lymph nodes, pulmonary metastases)
  • MRI brain: if choriocarcinoma (high risk of brain metastases) or neurological symptoms

Special Tests

  • Serial tumour markers: post-orchidectomy; half-lives: AFP 5-7 days, βhCG 24-36 hours
  • Histopathology after orchidectomy: definitive diagnosis, subtype classification
  • PET-CT: role in post-chemotherapy assessment of residual seminoma masses (>3cm)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Sperm banking BEFORE orchidectomy (30-50% of men have impaired spermatogenesis at diagnosis)
  • Testicular prosthesis option
  • Psychological support
  • Long-term follow-up (late effects of treatment)

Pharmacological

  • Stage I seminoma (post-orchidectomy options):
    • Active surveillance (98-99% cure; relapse 15-20%, salvaged with treatment)
    • Single-dose carboplatin AUC7 (reduces relapse to 5%)
    • Adjuvant radiotherapy to para-aortic nodes (20 Gy; reduces relapse to <5%)
  • Stage I NSGCT (post-orchidectomy options):
    • Active surveillance (70-80% cure without further treatment; 30% relapse)
    • Adjuvant BEP × 1 cycle (reduces relapse to <3%)
  • Metastatic seminoma and NSGCT:
    • BEP: bleomycin 30,000 IU days 1, 8, 15 + etoposide 100mg/m² days 1-5 + cisplatin 20mg/m² days 1-5; q21 days
    • Good prognosis: 3 cycles BEP (or 4 × EP if bleomycin contraindicated)
    • Intermediate/poor prognosis: 4 cycles BEP
    • Bleomycin pulmonary toxicity: monitor PFTs; stop if TLCO falls >25%
  • Post-chemotherapy residual mass:
    • NSGCT: retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) if residual mass >1cm
    • Seminoma: PET-CT at 6 weeks; surgery only if PET-avid and >3cm
  • Salvage chemotherapy: TIP (paclitaxel + ifosfamide + cisplatin) or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue

Surgical/Interventional

  • Radical inguinal orchidectomy: diagnostic and therapeutic; approach through inguinal incision (NOT trans-scrotal)
  • RPLND: post-chemotherapy for residual NSGCT masses; nerve-sparing technique to preserve ejaculation
  • Metastasectomy: resection of residual pulmonary or other metastases

Referral Criteria

  • Any testicular lump in a young man: urgent USS within 2 weeks
  • Confirmed testicular cancer: urgent referral to specialist supra-network centre
  • All patients: sperm banking before any treatment
  • Follow-up: long-term surveillance for relapse and late effects

Prognosis

  • Overall cure rate: >95%
  • Stage I: 99% cure rate with surveillance and salvage treatment
  • Good prognosis metastatic (IGCCCG): 92% 5-year survival
  • Intermediate prognosis: 80% 5-year survival
  • Poor prognosis: 48% 5-year survival
  • Long-term effects of treatment: cardiovascular disease (2× risk), secondary malignancy, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity (cisplatin), pulmonary toxicity (bleomycin), infertility, metabolic syndrome
  • Late relapse (>2 years): occurs in 2-3%; often chemo-resistant; surgery is primary treatment

Other Relevant Information

IGCCCG Prognostic Classification

GroupCriteria5-Year Survival
Good (56%)NSGCT: testis/retroperitoneal primary, no non-pulmonary visceral mets, markers low; Seminoma: any primary, no non-pulmonary visceral mets, normal AFP92%
Intermediate (28%)NSGCT: testis/retroperitoneal primary, no non-pulmonary visceral mets, intermediate markers; Seminoma: non-pulmonary visceral mets80%
Poor (16%)NSGCT: mediastinal primary or non-pulmonary visceral mets or high markers; Seminoma: N/A (no poor prognosis group)48%

Tumour Marker Interpretation

MarkerHalf-lifeRaised inNot raised in
AFP5-7 daysYolk sac, embryonalPure seminoma
βhCG24-36 hoursChoriocarcinoma, some seminomasMost NSGCT
LDHN/AReflects tumour bulkNon-specific

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma is the most common primary renal malignancy, classically presenting with haematuria, loin pain, and a palpable mass, though increasingly detected incidentally on imaging.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 85% of primary renal cancers; approximately 13,300 new cases/year in the UK
  • Clear cell RCC is the most common subtype (75-80%); associated with VHL gene loss on chromosome 3p
  • Classic triad of haematuria, loin pain, palpable mass present in only 10-15% (late presentation); >50% now detected incidentally
  • NICE NG12: 2-week wait referral for adults aged ≥45 with unexplained visible haematuria
  • Nephrectomy (radical or partial) is the mainstay of treatment for localised disease
  • Metastatic RCC: combination immunotherapy (nivolumab + ipilimumab - CheckMate-214) or TKI + immunotherapy (pembrolizumab + axitinib - KEYNOTE-426) first-line
  • RCC is resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy
  • Paraneoplastic syndromes in 20-30%: polycythaemia (EPO), hypercalcaemia (PTHrP), hypertension (renin), Stauffer syndrome (hepatic dysfunction)

Overview

Key Facts

RCC is notable for its resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy has significantly improved outcomes in advanced disease.

Epidemiology

  • Approximately 13,300 new cases/year in the UK
  • Male:female ratio 2:1
  • Peak incidence age 60-70 years
  • Incidence rising (partly due to increased incidental detection)

Aetiology

  • Smoking: strongest modifiable risk factor (2× risk)
  • Obesity: 2× risk (especially in women)
  • Hypertension: independent risk factor
  • Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome: autosomal dominant; bilateral/multifocal clear cell RCC
  • Acquired cystic kidney disease: in dialysis patients (50× risk)
  • Family history: 2-4× risk with first-degree relative

Pathophysiology

Clear cell RCC (75-80%)
VHL gene inactivation
HIF accumulation
upregulation of VEGF and PDGF
angiogenesis
  • Papillary RCC (10-15%): types 1 and 2; MET pathway activation
  • Chromophobe RCC (5%): better prognosis
  • RCC characteristically extends into the renal vein and IVC (tumour thrombus)
  • Metastatic spread: lung (75%), bone, liver, brain, contralateral kidney

Clinical Presentation

Classic Triad (only 10-15%)

  • Haematuria (visible or non-visible)
  • Loin/flank pain
  • Palpable abdominal/loin mass

Other Features

  • Incidental finding on imaging (>50% of cases)
  • Unexplained weight loss
  • Fever of unknown origin
  • Varicocele (left-sided, does not disappear on lying down - left renal vein obstruction)
  • Paraneoplastic syndromes (20-30%)

Paraneoplastic Syndromes

  • Polycythaemia (EPO secretion)
  • Hypercalcaemia (PTHrP)
  • Hypertension (renin secretion)
  • Stauffer syndrome (non-metastatic hepatic dysfunction; raised ALP, deranged LFTs)

Red Flags

  • Visible haematuria in adults ≥45 (2-week wait referral)
  • Non-visible haematuria with raised PSA or symptoms
  • Palpable renal mass
  • Left varicocele that does not decompress on lying flat

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Transitional cell carcinoma (urothelial)Painless haematuria, filling defect in collecting systemCT urogram, cytology
Renal cyst (simple)Asymptomatic, thin-walled, no enhancementUSS, Bosniak classification
AngiomyolipomaFat-containing renal mass, associated with tuberous sclerosisCT (fat density)
Renal abscessFever, loin pain, raised CRPCT, blood cultures
OncocytomaBenign tumour, central scar on imagingCT/MRI (often indistinguishable pre-op)
Lymphoma (renal involvement)Multiple renal masses, lymphadenopathyCT, biopsy

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Urinalysis (haematuria)
  • Blood pressure
  • Abdominal examination

Bloods

  • FBC (polycythaemia or anaemia), U&Es, LFTs, calcium, ALP, LDH
  • ESR/CRP (may be raised as paraneoplastic)

Imaging

  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis with contrast: investigation of choice for diagnosis and staging
    • Renal mass with contrast enhancement is RCC until proven otherwise
  • CT renal angiography: pre-operative vascular mapping for partial nephrectomy
  • MRI: IVC tumour thrombus assessment, indeterminate lesions
  • Bone scan/PET-CT: if bone metastases or advanced disease suspected

Special Tests

  • Renal biopsy: not routinely required for solid enhancing masses (risk of seeding); used for small masses (<4cm) if active surveillance considered, or metastatic disease for histological confirmation
  • Bosniak classification: for cystic renal lesions (I-IV; III-IV warrant surgery)
  • Genetic testing if VHL or hereditary syndrome suspected

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Active surveillance: for small renal masses (<4cm) in elderly/frail patients
  • MDT discussion mandatory

Pharmacological

  • Metastatic RCC - first-line:
    • Favourable/intermediate risk: nivolumab + ipilimumab (CheckMate-214) or pembrolizumab + axitinib (KEYNOTE-426)
    • Poor risk: nivolumab + ipilimumab
    • Alternative: cabozantinib monotherapy
  • Second-line: nivolumab monotherapy (CheckMate-025), cabozantinib, lenvatinib + everolimus
  • Adjuvant: pembrolizumab for high-risk RCC post-nephrectomy (KEYNOTE-564)
  • Cytokine therapy (historical): IL-2, interferon-alpha (largely replaced)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Partial nephrectomy: standard for T1a (<4cm) and selected T1b (4-7cm); nephron-sparing
  • Radical nephrectomy: for larger/more advanced tumours (T2+, tumour thrombus)
  • IVC thrombectomy: for tumour thrombus extending into IVC (may require cardiopulmonary bypass if atrial extension)
  • Metastasectomy: selected patients with limited metastatic disease (oligometastatic)
  • Ablation (cryotherapy/radiofrequency): small tumours in non-surgical candidates
  • Cytoreductive nephrectomy: in metastatic RCC, role now more selective (CARMENA trial)

Referral Criteria

  • Visible haematuria in ≥45: 2-week wait urology referral
  • Suspicious renal mass on imaging: urgent urology referral
  • All confirmed RCC: renal cancer MDT

Prognosis

  • Stage I (T1): 5-year survival >90% (with surgery)
  • Stage II (T2): 5-year survival 75-85%
  • Stage III (T3/N1): 5-year survival 50-60%
  • Stage IV (metastatic): 5-year survival 10-20% (improving with immunotherapy)
    • IMDC favourable risk: median OS >4 years
    • IMDC poor risk: median OS 12-18 months
  • Median survival with untreated metastatic RCC: 6-12 months
  • Spontaneous regression of metastases after nephrectomy: rare but documented (<1%)
  • Late recurrence can occur >10 years after initial treatment

Other Relevant Information

IMDC (Heng) Prognostic Criteria for Metastatic RCC

Risk FactorDefinition
Time from diagnosis to treatment<1 year
Karnofsky PS<80%
HaemoglobinBelow lower limit of normal
Corrected calciumAbove upper limit of normal
NeutrophilsAbove upper limit of normal
PlateletsAbove upper limit of normal
0 factorsFavourable (median OS >40 months)
1-2 factorsIntermediate (median OS ~27 months)
3-6 factorsPoor (median OS ~9 months)

Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses

CategoryFeaturesMalignancy RiskManagement
ISimple cyst, thin wall, no enhancement0%No follow-up
IIFew thin septations, fine calcification, <3cm0%No follow-up
IIFMore septations, minimal thickening5%Follow-up imaging
IIIThick septations, nodular calcification50%Surgery
IVEnhancing soft tissue component>80%Surgery

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer is the most common urinary tract malignancy, typically presenting with painless visible haematuria, with transitional cell carcinoma (urothelial) accounting for over 90% of cases.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Bladder cancer affects approximately 10,300 people per year in the UK; fourth most common cancer in men
  • Transitional cell carcinoma (urothelial) accounts for >90%; squamous cell (5%) and adenocarcinoma (<5%)
  • Painless visible haematuria is the hallmark presentation; any adult with this symptom needs urgent investigation
  • Smoking is the most important risk factor (responsible for 50% of bladder cancers)
  • Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): 75% at diagnosis; managed with TURBT ± intravesical BCG or mitomycin C
  • Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): standard treatment is neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemo + radical cystectomy or radical radiotherapy
  • Checkpoint inhibitors (atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, avelumab) approved for advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma
  • Occupational exposure: aromatic amines (2-naphthylamine, benzidine) - rubber, dye, and chemical industries

Overview

Key Facts

Bladder cancer has a high recurrence rate for superficial disease and requires lifelong cystoscopic surveillance. Muscle-invasive disease has a significantly worse prognosis.

Epidemiology

  • Approximately 10,300 new cases/year in the UK
  • Male:female ratio 3:1
  • Median age at diagnosis: 73 years
  • ~5,500 deaths/year

Aetiology

  • Smoking: most important risk factor (50% of cases); 3× increased risk
  • Occupational exposure: aromatic amines (rubber, dye, chemical industries) - latency 15-40 years
  • Schistosomiasis (S. haematobium): squamous cell carcinoma in endemic areas (Egypt, Middle East)
  • Pelvic radiotherapy: previous RT increases risk
  • Cyclophosphamide: haemorrhagic cystitis → increased risk
  • Chronic catheterisation/irritation: squamous cell carcinoma

Pathophysiology

  • NMIBC (75%): confined to mucosa (Ta, CIS) or lamina propria (T1); high recurrence rate (50-70%)
  • MIBC (25%): invades muscularis propria (T2) or beyond; higher metastatic potential
  • Carcinoma in situ (CIS): flat, high-grade; high progression risk to muscle-invasive disease
  • FGFR3 mutations: common in low-grade NMIBC (targeted by erdafitinib)
  • P53 mutations: common in high-grade and muscle-invasive disease

Clinical Presentation

Typical Presentation

  • Painless visible (macroscopic) haematuria: most common (80-90%)
  • Non-visible (microscopic) haematuria
  • Lower urinary tract symptoms (frequency, urgency - especially with CIS)
  • Recurrent UTIs

Advanced Disease

  • Pelvic pain
  • Flank pain (ureteric obstruction)
  • Lower limb oedema (lymphatic/venous obstruction)
  • Bone pain (metastases)
  • Weight loss, fatigue

Red Flags

  • Visible haematuria in any adult ≥45 (2-week wait referral)
  • Non-visible haematuria with raised PSA, UTI symptoms, or recurrent UTIs ≥60
  • Palpable suprapubic mass
  • Hydronephrosis on imaging

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
UTIDysuria, frequency, positive MSUMSU culture
Renal cell carcinomaRenal mass, loin painCT urogram
Renal/ureteric stonesColicky pain, haematuriaCT KUB
BPHLUTS, smooth enlarged prostatePSA, DRE, USS
GlomerulonephritisProteinuria, dysmorphic RBCs, HTNUrine ACR, renal biopsy
Prostate cancerRaised PSA, hard prostate on DREPSA, mpMRI

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Urinalysis (haematuria)
  • DRE (exclude prostate pathology)
  • Abdominal examination

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs
  • PSA (if indicated)

Imaging

  • CT urogram: investigation of choice for visible haematuria (detects upper tract tumours)
  • USS kidneys and bladder: alternative initial imaging
  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: staging for MIBC
  • MRI pelvis: local staging (T stage assessment)

Special Tests

  • Flexible cystoscopy: gold standard for diagnosis; outpatient under local anaesthetic
  • TURBT (transurethral resection of bladder tumour): diagnostic (provides tissue) and therapeutic for NMIBC
    • Must include detrusor muscle in specimen to assess muscle invasion
  • Urine cytology: useful for high-grade and CIS (low sensitivity for low-grade)
  • Re-TURBT: at 6 weeks for high-grade T1 or if detrusor muscle absent from initial specimen

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Smoking cessation (reduces recurrence risk)
  • Cystoscopic surveillance post-TURBT
  • MDT discussion for all MIBC

Pharmacological

  • NMIBC - low/intermediate risk: single dose intravesical mitomycin C 40mg at TURBT
  • NMIBC - high risk (T1 high-grade, CIS): intravesical BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin) induction (6 weekly instillations) + maintenance (3 weekly at 3, 6, 12 months)
  • MIBC - neoadjuvant chemotherapy: gemcitabine + cisplatin × 3-4 cycles before radical cystectomy (improves 5-year survival by 5-8%)
  • Metastatic/advanced: gemcitabine + cisplatin first-line; pembrolizumab or atezolizumab for PD-L1+ cisplatin-ineligible patients; avelumab maintenance after chemo (JAVELIN Bladder 100)
  • FGFR-altered: erdafitinib (targeted therapy)
  • Enfortumab vedotin (antibody-drug conjugate): for post-ICI/post-chemo advanced urothelial carcinoma

Surgical/Interventional

  • TURBT: first-line for NMIBC (diagnostic and therapeutic)
  • Radical cystectomy + urinary diversion: standard for MIBC (T2+)
    • Ileal conduit (Bricker) or neobladder reconstruction
    • Includes pelvic lymphadenectomy
  • Radical radiotherapy (55Gy/20 fractions): bladder-preserving alternative for MIBC with concurrent chemo (mitomycin C + 5-FU, or gemcitabine)
  • Palliative radiotherapy: for haemorrhage, pain
  • Nephrostomy: for obstructive uropathy

Referral Criteria

  • Visible haematuria ≥45: 2-week wait urology referral
  • Non-visible haematuria ≥60 with dysuria or raised WCC: 2-week wait
  • All MIBC: MDT discussion

Prognosis

  • NMIBC (Ta low-grade): 5-year survival >90%; recurrence rate 50-70% (requires surveillance)
  • T1 high-grade: 5-year survival 70-80%; progression to MIBC in 30-50% if inadequately treated
  • CIS: high progression risk (50-70% without BCG); BCG response rate 70-80%
  • MIBC (T2-T3): 5-year survival 40-60% with radical treatment
  • Metastatic: median survival 12-15 months with chemotherapy; improving with immunotherapy
  • Overall 5-year survival: approximately 50%
  • Lifelong cystoscopic surveillance is required for NMIBC (check cystoscopy at 3 months, then scheduled intervals)

Other Relevant Information

Bladder Cancer Staging (TNM)

StageDescription
TaNon-invasive papillary (confined to urothelium)
Tis (CIS)Flat carcinoma in situ (high-grade)
T1Invades lamina propria
T2Invades muscularis propria (muscle-invasive)
T3Invades perivesical tissue
T4Invades adjacent organs (prostate, uterus, pelvic wall)

Risk Stratification for NMIBC

RiskFeaturesManagement
LowSingle, Ta, low-grade, <3cmTURBT + single mitomycin C
IntermediateMultiple, recurrent, Ta/T1, low-gradeTURBT + intravesical chemo or BCG
HighT1, high-grade, CIS, multiple/recurrentTURBT + BCG induction + maintenance
Very highBCG-refractory or T1 high-grade recurrenceConsider radical cystectomy

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Melanoma

Melanoma is the most serious form of skin cancer, arising from melanocytes, with incidence rising rapidly in the UK and treatment transformed by immunotherapy and BRAF-targeted therapy.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the UK (~16,700 new cases/year); incidence has more than doubled in 30 years
  • Breslow thickness is the most important prognostic factor for localised melanoma (measured in mm from granular layer to deepest invasive cell)
  • ABCDE criteria: Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Colour variation, Diameter >6mm, Evolution/change
  • NICE NG12: 2-week wait referral for pigmented lesion with ABCDE features or dermoscopic concern
  • Wide local excision (WLE) with margins guided by Breslow thickness: in situ (5mm), ≤1mm (1cm), 1-2mm (1-2cm), >2mm (2cm)
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB): offered for melanoma ≥0.8mm Breslow thickness (staging, not therapeutic)
  • BRAF V600E mutation present in ~50% of melanomas; treated with dabrafenib + trametinib
  • Immunotherapy (nivolumab + ipilimumab): 5-year OS ~50% in metastatic melanoma (CheckMate-067); has transformed prognosis

Overview

Key Facts

Melanoma treatment has been revolutionised by immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Early detection remains critical for cure.

Epidemiology

  • Fifth most common cancer in the UK (~16,700 new cases/year)
  • ~2,300 deaths/year
  • Incidence rising rapidly (UV exposure, sun-seeking behaviour)
  • More common in fair-skinned populations
  • Median age: 65 years; can affect younger adults

Aetiology

  • UV radiation: most important environmental risk factor (intermittent intense exposure > chronic)
  • Sunburn history: particularly childhood sunburns
  • Fair skin, red/blonde hair, blue eyes (Fitzpatrick skin types I-II)
  • Multiple naevi (>50 common naevi or >5 atypical naevi)
  • Family history: 2× risk with first-degree relative
  • Genetic: CDKN2A mutations (familial melanoma); BRAF, NRAS somatic mutations
  • Previous melanoma: 3-5% risk of second primary
  • Immunosuppression: transplant recipients have 3-5× risk

Pathophysiology

  • Arises from malignant transformation of melanocytes (neural crest-derived)
  • BRAF V600E mutation: constitutive activation of MAPK pathway (50% of cutaneous melanomas)
  • NRAS mutations: 15-20%
  • C-KIT mutations: mucosal and acral melanomas
  • Subtypes: superficial spreading (70%), nodular (15-20%), lentigo maligna (5-10%), acral lentiginous (5%)
  • Spread: lymphatic (regional nodes), haematogenous (lung, brain, liver, bone, skin)

Clinical Presentation

ABCDE Criteria

  • Asymmetry of shape
  • Border irregularity
  • Colour variation (multiple shades of brown, black, red, white, blue)
  • Diameter >6mm
  • Evolution (change in size, shape, colour, or new symptoms)

Subtypes

  • Superficial spreading: most common; irregular border, colour variation, radial growth phase
  • Nodular: rapidly growing dome-shaped/polypoid nodule; often amelanotic; worst prognosis (no radial growth phase)
  • Lentigo maligna: on sun-damaged skin (face) in elderly; slow-growing
  • Acral lentiginous: palms, soles, subungual; most common in dark-skinned individuals

Red Flags

  • Rapidly changing pigmented lesion
  • New pigmented lesion in an adult
  • Amelanotic (non-pigmented) nodule that is growing
  • Subungual pigmentation (Hutchinson's sign - periungual pigmentation suggests melanoma)
  • Satellite lesions or in-transit metastases

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Dysplastic/atypical naevusIrregular but stable, family historyDermoscopy, biopsy if concern
Seborrhoeic keratosisStuck-on appearance, warty surfaceClinical, dermoscopy
Basal cell carcinoma (pigmented)Pearly edge, telangiectasiaDermoscopy, biopsy
HaemangiomaCompressible, red-purpleDermoscopy
Subungual haematomaHistory of trauma, grows out with nailDermoscopy
Pyogenic granulomaRapidly growing, bleeds easilyBiopsy

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Dermoscopy: essential for assessment of pigmented lesions (improves diagnostic accuracy by 30%)
  • Full skin examination (check all sites including scalp, soles, nails, mucous membranes)
  • Lymph node palpation (regional drainage basins)

Bloods

  • LDH: elevated in metastatic melanoma (prognostic marker)
  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs (baseline)
  • S100B protein: monitoring marker in advanced disease

Imaging

  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: staging for ≥stage IIB or symptomatic
  • MRI brain: if neurological symptoms or stage III/IV
  • PET-CT: for staging equivocal findings, recurrence detection
  • USS of regional lymph nodes: if suspicious on examination

Special Tests

  • Excision biopsy (full thickness, 2mm clinical margin): standard diagnostic procedure
    • Never shave biopsy or incisional biopsy of suspected melanoma (need full Breslow measurement)
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB): offered for Breslow ≥0.8mm or <0.8mm with ulceration/high mitotic rate
    • Staging procedure; prognostic value (positive SLNB → stage III)
  • BRAF mutation testing: all stage III/IV melanomas (guides targeted therapy)
  • Gene expression profiling: emerging prognostic tools (DecisionDx-Melanoma)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Sun protection advice (sunscreen SPF 30+, protective clothing, avoid sunburn)
  • Regular skin self-examination education
  • Surveillance: clinical examination ± imaging per risk stratification

Pharmacological

  • Adjuvant (stage III):
    • Nivolumab (CheckMate-238) or pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-054) for 1 year
    • Dabrafenib + trametinib for BRAF-mutated (COMBI-AD)
  • Metastatic (stage IV):
    • BRAF-mutated: dabrafenib 150mg BD + trametinib 2mg OD (COMBI-d/v trials)
    • BRAF wild-type or any: nivolumab 3mg/kg + ipilimumab 1mg/kg × 4 then nivolumab maintenance (CheckMate-067)
    • Alternative: pembrolizumab monotherapy
  • Response rates: combination immunotherapy 50-60% ORR; BRAF-targeted 65-70% ORR but shorter duration

Surgical/Interventional

  • Wide local excision (WLE): definitive primary treatment
    • In situ: 5mm margin
    • Breslow ≤1mm: 1cm margin
    • Breslow 1-2mm: 1-2cm margin
    • Breslow >2mm: 2cm margin
  • SLNB: staging for ≥0.8mm Breslow
  • Completion lymph node dissection (CLND): no longer routine for positive SLNB (DeCOG-SLT, MSLT-II trials)
  • Metastasectomy: for oligometastatic disease (especially pulmonary, can be curative)
  • Isolated limb perfusion: for in-transit metastases

Referral Criteria

  • Suspected melanoma: 2-week wait referral to dermatology/skin cancer clinic
  • All confirmed melanomas: skin cancer MDT
  • Stage III/IV: medical oncology referral
  • Family history/high risk: specialist dermatology surveillance

Prognosis

  • Stage IA (≤0.8mm, no ulceration): 5-year survival >99%
  • Stage IB (≤1mm with ulceration or 1-2mm without): 5-year survival >95%
  • Stage II (>1mm with high-risk features): 5-year survival 70-90% (depending on thickness)
  • Stage III (nodal involvement): 5-year survival 40-78% (depending on tumour burden)
  • Stage IV (metastatic): 5-year survival ~50% with combination immunotherapy (from <10% pre-immunotherapy era)
  • Overall 5-year survival: approximately 90% (reflecting majority early-stage diagnosis)
  • Prognosis for metastatic disease has been transformed by immunotherapy

Other Relevant Information

Breslow Thickness and Excision Margins

Breslow ThicknessExcision MarginT Stage
In situ5mmTis
≤1.0mm1cmT1
1.01-2.0mm1-2cmT2
2.01-4.0mm2cmT3
>4.0mm2cmT4

Key Trials in Melanoma

TrialFinding
CheckMate-067Nivolumab + ipilimumab: 5-year OS 52% in metastatic
CheckMate-238Adjuvant nivolumab superior to ipilimumab in stage III
KEYNOTE-054Adjuvant pembrolizumab improves RFS in stage III
COMBI-dDabrafenib + trametinib in BRAF V600: ORR 67%, 5-year OS 34%
MSLT-IINo survival benefit from CLND after positive SLNB

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck cancers encompass squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx, with smoking, alcohol, and HPV being the major risk factors.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) accounts for approximately 12,400 new cases/year in the UK
  • HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-16) has a significantly better prognosis than HPV-negative disease (5-year survival 80% vs 40%)
  • Major risk factors: smoking + alcohol (synergistic effect - 30× combined risk); HPV-16 (oropharyngeal)
  • NICE NG12: 2-week wait referral for unexplained neck lump, persistent hoarseness >3 weeks, oral ulcer >3 weeks
  • Early-stage: surgery or radical radiotherapy (equivalent outcomes for many sites)
  • Locally advanced: concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin 100mg/m² 3-weekly × 3 cycles + 70Gy RT over 7 weeks)
  • Cetuximab (anti-EGFR): used with RT when cisplatin contraindicated (Bonner trial)
  • Pembrolizumab first-line for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC (KEYNOTE-048 trial)

Overview

Key Facts

Head and neck cancer requires multidisciplinary management involving surgeons, oncologists, speech therapists, dietitians, and specialist nurses.

Epidemiology

  • Approximately 12,400 new cases/year in the UK
  • Male:female ratio 2:1 (narrowing)
  • HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer incidence is rising rapidly in younger patients
  • Tobacco and alcohol-related cancers declining

Aetiology

  • Smoking: most important risk factor; dose-response relationship
  • Alcohol: independent risk factor; synergistic with smoking
  • HPV-16: responsible for 70-80% of oropharyngeal cancers in the UK (tonsil, base of tongue)
  • Betel nut chewing: oral cavity cancer (South Asian populations)
  • Poor oral hygiene: oral cavity cancer
  • EBV: nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Pathophysiology

  • 90% are squamous cell carcinoma

  • HPV-positive: p16 overexpression (surrogate marker); better prognosis, younger patients, often non-smokers
  • HPV-negative: TP53 mutations, associated with smoking/alcohol; worse prognosis
  • Spread: local invasion, lymphatic (cervical nodes - 40% have nodal disease at presentation), distant metastases rare at diagnosis (lung, bone, liver)

Clinical Presentation

By Site

  • Oral cavity: non-healing ulcer (>3 weeks), white/red patch (leukoplakia/erythroplakia), loose teeth, difficulty chewing
  • Oropharynx: sore throat, dysphagia, referred otalgia, neck lump (cystic - HPV+)
  • Larynx: hoarseness (>3 weeks), stridor, dysphagia
  • Hypopharynx: dysphagia, referred otalgia, weight loss, neck lump
  • Nasopharynx: unilateral nasal obstruction, epistaxis, serous otitis media, cranial nerve palsies

Red Flags (NICE NG12)

  • Unexplained neck lump persisting >3 weeks
  • Hoarseness >3 weeks
  • Oral ulcer not healing >3 weeks
  • Persistent sore throat >3 weeks (especially with otalgia)
  • Unexplained dysphagia
  • Unilateral serous otitis media in an adult

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Reactive lymphadenopathyTender, mobile, associated infectionObservation, FNA if persists
Pharyngitis/tonsillitisAcute sore throat, fever, bilateralClinical, throat swab
Benign salivary gland tumourSlow-growing, firm, parotid/submandibularUSS, FNA
Thyroid noduleMidline/lateral neck swelling, moves on swallowingUSS, TFTs, FNA
Aphthous ulcersRecurrent, small, painful, self-limitingClinical
Dental abscessLocalised swelling, dental painOPG, dental assessment

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Full ENT examination including flexible nasendoscopy
  • Oral examination (inspection, palpation of tongue and floor of mouth)
  • Neck palpation (cervical lymph nodes)

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs, TFTs (baseline before treatment)
  • EBV serology (if nasopharyngeal carcinoma suspected)

Imaging

  • CT neck with contrast: initial staging (tumour extent, nodal disease)
  • MRI: superior soft tissue detail (oral cavity, oropharynx, parapharyngeal space)
  • PET-CT: staging for advanced disease; detection of unknown primary; post-treatment response assessment
  • CT chest: exclude lung metastases or synchronous primary
  • OPG (orthopantomogram): dental assessment before radiotherapy

Special Tests

  • Biopsy: incisional biopsy, punch biopsy, or EUA with biopsy under GA
  • Fine needle aspiration (FNA): for neck lumps (cytology)
  • p16 IHC: surrogate marker for HPV in oropharyngeal carcinoma
  • HPV DNA testing: confirmatory if p16 positive
  • Panendoscopy (EUA): assessment of tumour extent, biopsy, exclude synchronous primary
  • Speech and swallowing assessment: baseline before treatment

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion mandatory (surgeon, oncologist, SALT, dietitian, CNS, dental)
  • Smoking and alcohol cessation
  • Nutritional optimisation (PEG/RIG feeding may be needed during treatment)
  • Dental assessment and extractions before radiotherapy (to prevent osteoradionecrosis)
  • Speech and language therapy
  • Psychological support

Pharmacological

  • Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (locally advanced): cisplatin 100mg/m² on days 1, 22, 43 with 70Gy RT over 7 weeks
    • Alternative: weekly cisplatin 40mg/m²
    • If cisplatin contraindicated: cetuximab 400mg/m² loading then 250mg/m² weekly with RT (Bonner trial)
  • Recurrent/metastatic: pembrolizumab + platinum + 5-FU (KEYNOTE-048) or cetuximab + platinum + 5-FU (EXTREME trial)
  • Induction chemotherapy (TPF: docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU): in selected cases to reduce tumour volume before definitive treatment

Surgical/Interventional

  • Primary surgery: for oral cavity cancers (preferred over RT for most oral cavity subsites) and selected early-stage laryngeal/oropharyngeal cancers
  • Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM): minimally invasive for oropharyngeal and laryngeal tumours
  • Neck dissection: selective or radical for nodal disease (with primary surgery or after chemoRT if residual disease)
  • Reconstruction: free tissue transfer (radial forearm flap, fibula, ALT flap) for defect reconstruction
  • Total laryngectomy: for advanced laryngeal cancer or recurrence after RT; permanent tracheostomy

Referral Criteria

  • Suspected head and neck cancer: 2-week wait referral (NICE NG12)
  • All confirmed cancers: head and neck cancer MDT
  • Unknown primary with neck lump: urgent ENT/MDT assessment

Prognosis

  • Early-stage (I-II): 5-year survival 70-90% (site-dependent)
  • Locally advanced (III-IVA): 5-year survival 40-60% with chemoRT
  • Metastatic/recurrent: median survival 10-15 months (improving with immunotherapy)
  • HPV-positive oropharyngeal: 5-year survival ~80% (significantly better than HPV-negative ~40%)
  • Laryngeal cancer (early): 5-year survival >90% with voice preservation
  • Overall 5-year survival: approximately 60%
  • Late effects of treatment: xerostomia, dysphagia, osteoradionecrosis, hypothyroidism, carotid stenosis, second primary cancers

Other Relevant Information

HPV-Positive vs HPV-Negative Oropharyngeal Cancer

FeatureHPV-PositiveHPV-Negative
AgeYounger (40-60)Older (60+)
Risk factorsSexual behaviourSmoking + alcohol
SiteTonsil, base of tongueVariable
Nodal diseaseOften cystic, largeSmaller, solid
p16 IHCPositiveNegative
PrognosisExcellent (5-yr OS ~80%)Poor (5-yr OS ~40%)
De-escalation trialsActive researchNot applicable

Key Trials

TrialFinding
KEYNOTE-048Pembrolizumab first-line for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC
BonnerCetuximab + RT improves OS in locally advanced (cisplatin-unsuitable)
EXTREMECetuximab + chemo in recurrent/metastatic
De-ESCALaTE/RTOG 1016Cetuximab inferior to cisplatin with RT in HPV+ oropharyngeal

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Oesophageal Cancer

Oesophageal cancer includes squamous cell carcinoma (upper/mid) and adenocarcinoma (lower/GOJ), with Barrett's oesophagus being the key precursor for adenocarcinoma and dysphagia the hallmark symptom.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Oesophageal cancer accounts for approximately 9,300 new cases/year in the UK; sixth most common cause of cancer death
  • Two main types: squamous cell carcinoma (upper/mid oesophagus; smoking + alcohol) and adenocarcinoma (lower oesophagus/GOJ; Barrett's oesophagus, obesity, GORD)
  • Barrett's oesophagus: intestinal metaplasia of the distal oesophagus; 0.5% per year risk of progression to adenocarcinoma
  • Dysphagia (progressive, initially solids then liquids) is the hallmark symptom
  • NICE NG12: 2-week wait OGD for dysphagia at any age; age ≥55 with weight loss + upper abdominal pain/reflux/dyspepsia
  • Staging: EUS (T stage) + PET-CT + CT (TNM staging)
  • Operable disease: neoadjuvant chemo (FLOT regimen - FLOT4 trial) or chemoRT (CROSS regimen) + Ivor Lewis or McKeown oesophagectomy
  • 5-year survival: overall approximately 15-20% (most present late)

Overview

Key Facts

Oesophageal cancer has a poor prognosis overall due to late presentation, but outcomes for operable disease have improved with modern neoadjuvant regimens.

Epidemiology

  • ~9,300 new cases/year in the UK; ~7,900 deaths/year
  • Male:female ratio 3:1 (adenocarcinoma); SCC more equal
  • Adenocarcinoma incidence rising rapidly (now >50% of oesophageal cancers in the UK)
  • Squamous cell carcinoma incidence declining (linked to reduced smoking)

Aetiology

  • Adenocarcinoma: Barrett's oesophagus (10× risk), GORD, obesity, smoking
  • SCC: smoking, alcohol (synergistic), hot drinks, caustic injury, Plummer-Vinson syndrome, achalasia, tylosis

Pathophysiology

Barrett's → dysplasia → adenocarcinoma
GORD causes chronic oesophagitis
columnar metaplasia (Barrett's)
low-grade dysplasia
high-grade dysplasia
invasive adenocarcinoma
SCC
squamous epithelium
dysplasia
carcinoma in situ
invasive carcinoma
  • Oesophagus lacks serosa → early transmural spread and lymph node involvement
  • Lymphatic drainage is longitudinal → skip metastases common

Clinical Presentation

Typical Symptoms

  • Progressive dysphagia: initially solids, then liquids (by the time dysphagia occurs, >50% of lumen is occluded)
  • Weight loss (often >10%)
  • Odynophagia (painful swallowing)
  • Regurgitation
  • Chest pain or epigastric pain
  • Iron deficiency anaemia

Advanced Disease

  • Hoarseness (recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement)
  • Persistent cough or aspiration pneumonia (tracheo-oesophageal fistula)
  • Hepatomegaly (liver metastases)
  • Supraclavicular lymphadenopathy (Virchow's node - left)

Red Flags

  • Progressive dysphagia (any age - urgent OGD)
  • Unintentional weight loss >3kg
  • Iron deficiency anaemia without obvious cause
  • Dysphagia + weight loss + age ≥55
  • New dyspepsia in patients ≥55 with alarm symptoms

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
GORD/oesophagitisHeartburn, acid regurgitationOGD, PPI trial
AchalasiaDysphagia to solids and liquids equally, bird-beak on bariumManometry, barium swallow
Oesophageal stricture (benign)History of GORD, caustic, post-radiationOGD with biopsy
Pharyngeal pouchRegurgitation of undigested food, halitosisBarium swallow
Extrinsic compressionLung cancer, mediastinal lymphadenopathyCT, OGD
Eosinophilic oesophagitisYounger patient, food bolus obstruction, atopyOGD with biopsies

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • BMI, nutritional assessment
  • Abdominal examination (hepatomegaly, ascites)
  • Cervical lymph node palpation (Virchow's)

Bloods

  • FBC (anaemia), U&Es, LFTs, albumin (nutritional status)
  • CEA (monitoring, not diagnostic)

Imaging

  • OGD with biopsy: gold standard diagnostic investigation
  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: TNM staging
  • EUS (endoscopic ultrasound): T and N staging (depth of invasion)
  • PET-CT: detects distant metastases, guides treatment decisions
  • Staging laparoscopy: for GOJ tumours (peritoneal disease)

Special Tests

  • Histopathology: SCC vs adenocarcinoma, differentiation grade
  • HER2 testing: for GOJ adenocarcinoma (trastuzumab if HER2+, ToGA trial)
  • PD-L1 CPS: guides immunotherapy use
  • Nutritional assessment and dietitian review
  • Swallowing assessment

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion mandatory (upper GI surgeon, oncologist, CNS, dietitian, SALT)
  • Nutritional optimisation (supplementary feeds, consider feeding jejunostomy)
  • Smoking and alcohol cessation
  • Psychological support

Pharmacological

  • Operable adenocarcinoma: perioperative FLOT (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) × 4 pre-op + 4 post-op (FLOT4 trial)
  • Operable SCC: neoadjuvant CROSS regimen (carboplatin + paclitaxel + 41.4Gy RT) then surgery (CROSS trial)
  • Inoperable locally advanced: definitive chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin + 5-FU + 50Gy)
  • Metastatic adenocarcinoma: platinum + fluoropyrimidine ± trastuzumab if HER2+ (ToGA); nivolumab + chemo if PD-L1 CPS ≥5 (CheckMate-649)
  • Metastatic SCC: platinum + 5-FU + pembrolizumab if PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (KEYNOTE-590)
  • Adjuvant: nivolumab after neoadjuvant chemoRT if residual disease (CheckMate-577)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: right thoracotomy + laparotomy (mid/lower oesophagus)
  • McKeown (3-stage) oesophagectomy: includes cervical anastomosis (upper oesophagus)
  • Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: laparoscopic/thoracoscopic (reducing morbidity)
  • Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): for T1a (intramucosal) adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's
  • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA): for Barrett's with dysplasia (after EMR of visible lesions)
  • Palliative stenting: for dysphagia in inoperable disease (self-expanding metal stent)
  • Palliative RT: for dysphagia, bleeding

Referral Criteria

  • Dysphagia at any age: urgent 2-week wait OGD
  • Age ≥55 with unexplained weight loss and upper GI symptoms: 2-week wait
  • All confirmed oesophageal cancers: upper GI cancer MDT

Prognosis

  • Stage I: 5-year survival 60-80%
  • Stage II-III (operable): 5-year survival 35-45% with neoadjuvant + surgery
  • Stage IV (metastatic): median survival 8-12 months
  • Overall 5-year survival: approximately 15-20%
  • FLOT4 (adenocarcinoma): median OS 50 months with perioperative FLOT
  • CROSS (SCC): 5-year OS 47% with neoadjuvant chemoRT + surgery
  • Barrett's surveillance: early detection of dysplasia/cancer improves outcomes
  • Operative mortality for oesophagectomy: 2-5% in high-volume centres

Other Relevant Information

Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance (BSG 2014)

FindingSurveillance Interval
Barrett's, no dysplasia3-5 years
Low-grade dysplasia6 months (confirm, then endoscopic therapy or 6-monthly)
High-grade dysplasiaEndoscopic therapy (EMR/RFA)
Intramucosal cancer (T1a)EMR ± RFA

Key Trials in Oesophageal Cancer

TrialFinding
FLOT4Perioperative FLOT superior to ECF/ECX for GOJ/gastric adenocarcinoma
CROSSNeoadjuvant chemoRT + surgery improves survival for oesophageal cancer
ToGATrastuzumab + chemo for HER2+ GOJ/gastric cancer
CheckMate-577Adjuvant nivolumab after neoadjuvant chemoRT doubles DFS
CheckMate-649Nivolumab + chemo first-line for advanced gastric/GOJ (CPS ≥5)
KEYNOTE-590Pembrolizumab + chemo for advanced oesophageal SCC/adeno

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with Helicobacter pylori being the most important risk factor, and perioperative chemotherapy improving outcomes for resectable disease.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Gastric cancer accounts for approximately 6,600 new cases/year in the UK; incidence declining but remains significant
  • H. pylori infection is the most important risk factor (WHO Group 1 carcinogen); causes 65-80% of non-cardia gastric cancers
  • Intestinal type (Lauren classification): associated with H. pylori, intestinal metaplasia, better prognosis; diffuse type: younger patients, signet ring cells, worse prognosis
  • Linitis plastica: diffuse infiltration of stomach wall causing a rigid "leather bottle" stomach
  • NICE NG12: 2-week wait OGD for dysphagia, age ≥55 with weight loss + upper GI symptoms
  • Perioperative chemotherapy: FLOT regimen (FLOT4 trial) is standard for resectable disease (4 cycles pre-op + 4 post-op)
  • Trastuzumab: added to chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric/GOJ cancer (ToGA trial)
  • 5-year survival: overall approximately 20%; stage I >70% but most present late

Overview

Key Facts

Gastric cancer has high mortality due to late presentation. H. pylori eradication is a key preventive strategy.

Epidemiology

  • ~6,600 new cases/year in the UK; ~4,300 deaths/year
  • Male:female ratio 2:1
  • Incidence declining in the West (falling H. pylori prevalence); very common in East Asia
  • Median age: 70 years

Aetiology

H. pylori
chronic infection
chronic gastritis
atrophic gastritis
intestinal metaplasia
dysplasia
carcinoma
  • Diet: smoked/salted foods, low fruit/vegetable intake
  • Smoking: 1.5-2× risk
  • Family history: 2-3× risk; hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (CDH1 mutation - prophylactic gastrectomy)
  • Pernicious anaemia: atrophic gastritis → 2-3× risk
  • Previous gastric surgery: bile reflux → increased risk after 15-20 years

Pathophysiology

Intestinal type
well-formed glandular structures; Correa cascade (H. pylori
chronic gastritis
atrophic gastritis
intestinal metaplasia
dysplasia
carcinoma)
  • Diffuse type: poorly cohesive cells, signet ring morphology; CDH1 (E-cadherin) loss; infiltrative growth (linitis plastica)
  • Spread: direct invasion (peritoneum), lymphatic (perigastric nodes), haematogenous (liver, lung), transcoelomic (peritoneal - Krukenberg tumours in ovaries, Sister Joseph's nodule at umbilicus)

Clinical Presentation

Early Disease

  • Often asymptomatic or vague dyspepsia
  • Epigastric discomfort
  • Early satiety, loss of appetite

Advanced Disease

  • Progressive dysphagia (GOJ tumours)
  • Weight loss (significant)
  • Nausea and vomiting (if outlet obstruction)
  • GI bleeding (haematemesis, melaena, iron deficiency anaemia)
  • Palpable epigastric mass

Metastatic Signs

  • Virchow's node (left supraclavicular - Troisier's sign)
  • Sister Mary Joseph's nodule (periumbilical metastasis)
  • Krukenberg tumour (ovarian metastases - bilateral)
  • Blumer's shelf (palpable mass on rectal examination - pouch of Douglas deposits)
  • Ascites (peritoneal carcinomatosis)

Red Flags

  • Dysphagia (any age)
  • Age ≥55 with weight loss and upper GI symptoms
  • Iron deficiency anaemia in male or post-menopausal female
  • Palpable epigastric mass
  • Virchow's node

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Peptic ulcer diseaseEpigastric pain, related to meals, H. pyloriOGD, CLO test
GORDHeartburn, acid regurgitationOGD, PPI trial
Gastric lymphoma (MALT)Similar presentation, associated with H. pyloriOGD with biopsy
Pancreatic cancerPainless jaundice, weight loss, epigastric painCT, CA 19-9
Functional dyspepsiaRecurrent symptoms, normal OGDClinical criteria

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Abdominal examination
  • Lymph node palpation (supraclavicular, periumbilical)
  • DRE (Blumer's shelf)

Bloods

  • FBC (anaemia), U&Es, LFTs, albumin
  • CEA, CA 19-9 (monitoring, not diagnostic)

Imaging

  • OGD with biopsy: gold standard (multiple biopsies from mass and surrounding mucosa)
  • CT chest/abdomen/pelvis: TNM staging
  • EUS: T and N staging
  • PET-CT: detects occult metastases
  • Staging laparoscopy + peritoneal washings: mandatory for potentially operable gastric cancer (detects peritoneal disease missed on CT in 20-30%)

Special Tests

  • HER2 testing: all advanced gastric/GOJ adenocarcinomas
  • PD-L1 CPS: guides immunotherapy eligibility
  • MSI/dMMR testing: immunotherapy eligibility
  • H. pylori testing and eradication

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion
  • Nutritional support (dietitian, supplementary feeds)
  • H. pylori eradication if positive
  • Psychological support

Pharmacological

  • Resectable disease: perioperative FLOT × 4 pre-op + 4 post-op (FLOT4 trial; superior to ECF/ECX)
  • Metastatic - first-line: platinum + fluoropyrimidine (cisplatin or oxaliplatin + 5-FU or capecitabine)
    • HER2+: add trastuzumab (ToGA trial)
    • PD-L1 CPS ≥5: add nivolumab (CheckMate-649)
  • Second-line: ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR2) + paclitaxel (RAINBOW trial)
  • MSI-high metastatic: pembrolizumab
  • MALT lymphoma (H. pylori-associated): H. pylori eradication can cure early-stage disease

Surgical/Interventional

  • Subtotal gastrectomy: distal tumours (2/3 resection with D2 lymphadenectomy)
  • Total gastrectomy: proximal/diffuse tumours (with Roux-en-Y reconstruction)
  • D2 lymphadenectomy: standard in specialist centres (removes perigastric + coeliac axis nodes)
  • Endoscopic resection (EMR/ESD): for T1a, well-differentiated, <2cm, no ulceration
  • Palliative stenting: GOJ obstruction
  • Palliative gastrectomy/bypass: in selected patients with bleeding or obstruction

Referral Criteria

  • Suspected gastric cancer: 2-week wait referral for OGD
  • All confirmed cancers: upper GI cancer MDT
  • Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (CDH1): genetics referral (consider prophylactic gastrectomy)

Prognosis

  • Stage I: 5-year survival >70%
  • Stage II: 5-year survival 45-55%
  • Stage III: 5-year survival 20-35%
  • Stage IV (metastatic): median survival 10-14 months with chemotherapy
  • Overall 5-year survival: approximately 20% (most present late)
  • FLOT4: median OS 50 months with perioperative FLOT (vs 35 months with ECF/ECX)
  • HER2+ with trastuzumab: median OS 13.8 months (vs 11.1 without)
  • Japan/South Korea: much higher survival due to screening programmes (>60% 5-year survival)
  • MALT lymphoma (H. pylori+): >90% cure with eradication therapy for localised disease

Other Relevant Information

Lauren Classification

TypeFeaturesH. pyloriPrognosis
IntestinalWell-formed glands, older patientsStrong associationBetter
DiffuseSignet ring cells, linitis plastica, youngerWeaker associationWorse
MixedFeatures of bothVariableIntermediate

Key Trials in Gastric Cancer

TrialFinding
FLOT4Perioperative FLOT improves survival vs ECF/ECX
ToGATrastuzumab + chemo for HER2+ gastric/GOJ
CheckMate-649Nivolumab + chemo improves OS in PD-L1 CPS ≥5
RAINBOWRamucirumab + paclitaxel second-line
MAGICPerioperative ECF/ECX established neoadjuvant approach (now superseded by FLOT)

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of all common cancers, with only 10-20% of patients having resectable disease at diagnosis and overall 5-year survival approximately 7%.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for >85% of pancreatic cancers; approximately 10,500 new cases/year in the UK
  • Fifth most common cause of cancer death in the UK (~9,800 deaths/year); worst 5-year survival of any common cancer (~7%)
  • Painless obstructive jaundice is the classic presentation of head of pancreas tumours (60-70%)
  • Courvoisier's law: palpable, non-tender gallbladder with jaundice = malignant obstruction until proven otherwise
  • CA 19-9: most useful tumour marker for monitoring response (not screening); elevated in 80% of PDAC
  • Whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy): standard surgery for resectable head of pancreas tumours; only 10-20% are resectable at diagnosis
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy: modified FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine + capecitabine (ESPAC-4 trial)
  • New-onset diabetes in adults >50 may be an early sign of pancreatic cancer

Overview

Key Facts

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies with few effective treatments. Research into early detection and novel therapies is a priority.

Epidemiology

  • ~10,500 new cases/year in the UK
  • ~9,800 deaths/year (almost equal incidence and mortality - reflects poor prognosis)
  • Median age: 72 years
  • Incidence increasing slightly
  • 5-year survival: approximately 7%

Aetiology

  • Smoking: most important modifiable risk factor (2× risk; 25% of cases)
  • Chronic pancreatitis: 10-15× risk
  • Diabetes mellitus: 2× risk (and new-onset diabetes can be an early sign)
  • Obesity: 1.5× risk
  • Family history: 5-10% have hereditary predisposition (BRCA2, PALB2, CDKN2A, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers)
  • Alcohol: indirect risk via chronic pancreatitis

Pathophysiology

  • KRAS mutation: present in >90% (constitutive activation of RAS-MAPK pathway)
  • TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4 loss: common tumour suppressor mutations
  • Dense desmoplastic stroma: creates hypoxic, immunosuppressive microenvironment (contributes to treatment resistance)
  • 60-70% arise in the head of the pancreas
  • Early perineural invasion and lymphatic spread
  • Metastases: liver (most common), peritoneum, lung

Clinical Presentation

Head of Pancreas (60-70%)

  • Painless obstructive jaundice: progressive, dark urine, pale stools, pruritus
  • Courvoisier's sign (palpable, non-tender gallbladder)
  • Weight loss
  • New-onset diabetes (may precede cancer diagnosis by 1-2 years)

Body/Tail of Pancreas (30-40%)

  • Epigastric pain radiating to the back (often worse at night, relieved by leaning forward)
  • Weight loss
  • Often presents later (no jaundice)

Advanced Disease

  • Ascites (peritoneal carcinomatosis)
  • Hepatomegaly (liver metastases)
  • Gastric outlet obstruction (nausea, vomiting)
  • Trousseau's syndrome (migratory thrombophlebitis)
  • Depression (may precede diagnosis)

Red Flags

  • Painless jaundice in adults >40
  • New-onset diabetes >50 with weight loss
  • Epigastric pain radiating to back with weight loss
  • Unexplained acute pancreatitis >60
  • Courvoisier's sign

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
CholedocholithiasisColicky pain, fluctuating jaundice, fever (Charcot's triad)USS, MRCP, LFTs
CholangiocarcinomaObstructive jaundice, weight lossCT, MRCP, brush cytology
Ampullary carcinomaSilver stool (melaena + pale), relapsing jaundiceOGD, biopsy
Chronic pancreatitisChronic pain, steatorrhoea, calcificationsCT, faecal elastase
Autoimmune pancreatitisDiffuse pancreatic enlargement, elevated IgG4IgG4, CT, responds to steroids

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Abdominal examination (jaundice, palpable gallbladder, hepatomegaly, ascites)
  • Urine dipstick (bilirubin)

Bloods

  • LFTs (obstructive pattern: raised ALP, GGT, bilirubin)
  • CA 19-9: elevated in 80% (also raised in obstructive jaundice without cancer; not suitable for screening)
  • FBC, U&Es, coagulation (vitamin K deficiency from obstructive jaundice)
  • HbA1c (new-onset diabetes)

Imaging

  • CT pancreas protocol (triple-phase contrast-enhanced CT): investigation of choice for diagnosis and resectability assessment
  • MRCP: biliary anatomy, alternative if CT indeterminate
  • EUS with FNA: tissue diagnosis; best for small lesions and locoregional staging
  • PET-CT: detect occult metastases in potentially resectable disease
  • Staging laparoscopy: mandatory before resection (peritoneal disease missed by CT in 10-20%)

Special Tests

  • EUS-guided FNA/biopsy: tissue confirmation (especially before neoadjuvant chemo or if unresectable)
  • ERCP with stenting: for biliary decompression pre-operatively (only if delayed surgery or cholangitis)
  • Germline testing: all patients with pancreatic cancer (BRCA2, PALB2, Lynch - guides PARP inhibitor use)
  • Faecal elastase if exocrine insufficiency suspected

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion mandatory
  • Nutritional support (PERT - pancreatic enzyme replacement: Creon)
  • Psychological support
  • Specialist palliative care involvement early

Pharmacological

  • Resectable: adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) × 12 cycles (PRODIGE-24 trial) or gemcitabine + capecitabine (ESPAC-4)
  • Borderline resectable: neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel then surgery
  • Locally advanced unresectable: mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (MPACT trial)
  • Metastatic (good PS): mFOLFIRINOX (PRODIGE-4/ACCORD 11) or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel
  • Metastatic (poor PS): gemcitabine monotherapy
  • BRCA-mutated: olaparib maintenance after platinum-based chemo (POLO trial)
  • PERT (Creon): pancreatic enzyme replacement for exocrine insufficiency (50,000 units lipase with main meals)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure): for resectable head of pancreas tumours; includes distal gastrectomy, duodenum, head of pancreas, CBD, gallbladder
  • Distal pancreatectomy + splenectomy: for body/tail tumours
  • Biliary stenting (ERCP or PTC): palliative for jaundice in unresectable disease
  • Gastrojejunostomy: bypass for gastric outlet obstruction
  • Coeliac plexus block: for pain management in advanced disease

Referral Criteria

  • Suspected pancreatic cancer: urgent CT and 2-week wait HPB referral
  • All confirmed cancers: HPB cancer MDT
  • BRCA/Lynch carriers: genetics referral
  • Palliative care: early referral recommended (NICE)

Prognosis

  • Resectable with adjuvant chemo: median survival 28-54 months (mFOLFIRINOX adjuvant: median OS 54 months - PRODIGE-24)
  • Locally advanced: median survival 12-18 months
  • Metastatic (mFOLFIRINOX): median survival 11 months
  • Metastatic (gemcitabine alone): median survival 6-7 months
  • Overall 5-year survival: approximately 7%
  • Only 10-20% are resectable at diagnosis
  • 5-year survival after Whipple + adjuvant chemo: 20-30%
  • Operative mortality for Whipple: 2-5% in high-volume centres

Other Relevant Information

Resectability Criteria

CategoryDefinitionTreatment
ResectableNo arterial contact, <180° venous contactUpfront surgery + adjuvant chemo
Borderline resectableArterial contact <180° or venous involvement with reconstruction possibleNeoadjuvant chemo then surgery
Locally advanced>180° arterial contact, unreconstructable venousChemo ± chemoRT
MetastaticDistant metastasesPalliative chemo

Key Trials

TrialFinding
PRODIGE-24Adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX: median OS 54 months (vs 35 gemcitabine)
ESPAC-4Gemcitabine + capecitabine adjuvant: median OS 28 months
MPACTGemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel for metastatic
PRODIGE-4mFOLFIRINOX for metastatic: median OS 11 months (vs 6.8 gem)
POLOOlaparib maintenance in BRCA-mutated metastatic

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary liver cancer, arising almost exclusively in the context of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, with surveillance AFP and USS being key for early detection.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • HCC accounts for >80% of primary liver cancers; approximately 6,000 new cases/year in the UK
  • Cirrhosis is present in 80-90% of HCC cases; any cause of cirrhosis increases risk
  • Most common causes in UK: alcohol-related liver disease, NAFLD/MASLD (rising rapidly), hepatitis C, hepatitis B
  • Surveillance: 6-monthly USS + AFP for all patients with cirrhosis (NICE, EASL, AASLD guidelines)
  • AFP >400 ng/mL with typical imaging features is virtually diagnostic; imaging diagnosis often sufficient without biopsy
  • BCLC staging system guides treatment: 0-A (curative: resection, transplant, ablation), B (TACE), C (systemic therapy), D (palliative)
  • Atezolizumab + bevacizumab is first-line systemic therapy for advanced HCC (IMbrave150 trial; superior to sorafenib)
  • Sorafenib (TKI): previous standard first-line; now second-line or alternative

Overview

Key Facts

HCC is increasing in incidence globally and in the UK, driven by NAFLD/MASLD and residual HCV burden. Surveillance in cirrhotic patients enables early detection and curative treatment.

Epidemiology

  • ~6,000 new cases/year in the UK; incidence rising
  • Male:female ratio 3:1
  • Fifth most common cancer worldwide; third most common cause of cancer death
  • 5-year survival: approximately 15% overall (stage-dependent)

Aetiology

  • Cirrhosis (any cause): 80-90% of HCC arises in cirrhotic livers
  • Alcohol-related liver disease: most common cause of cirrhosis in UK
  • NAFLD/MASLD: fastest rising cause (can cause HCC without cirrhosis in 10-20%)
  • Hepatitis B: major cause globally; can cause HCC without cirrhosis
  • Hepatitis C: major cause in UK/US; risk reduced but not eliminated with SVR
  • Haemochromatosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, autoimmune hepatitis, PBC
  • Aflatoxin B1 exposure: Aspergillus contamination of grains/nuts (sub-Saharan Africa, Asia)

Pathophysiology

Chronic liver injury
inflammation
regeneration
fibrosis
cirrhosis
dysplastic nodules
HCC
  • Key molecular pathways: Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, RAS/MAPK, VEGF
  • HBV: direct oncogenic effect (HBx protein disrupts p53); can cause HCC without cirrhosis
  • HCC is highly vascular (arterial supply) - basis for imaging diagnosis and TACE treatment
  • AFP produced by HCC cells (not all tumours produce AFP)

Clinical Presentation

Early HCC (screen-detected)

  • Often asymptomatic
  • Detected on surveillance USS/AFP

Symptomatic HCC

  • Right upper quadrant pain
  • Weight loss
  • Hepatomegaly (may be palpable mass)
  • Worsening of previously stable liver disease (decompensation)
  • Ascites
  • Jaundice (if advanced/decompensated)

Complications

  • Hepatic decompensation (new ascites, variceal bleeding, encephalopathy)
  • Rupture with intraperitoneal haemorrhage (rare, surgical emergency)
  • Budd-Chiari syndrome (hepatic vein invasion)
  • Portal vein thrombosis (tumour thrombus)

Red Flags

  • New decompensation in a previously stable cirrhotic patient
  • Rapidly rising AFP
  • New hepatomegaly or liver mass on examination
  • Budd-Chiari features (ascites, hepatomegaly, RUQ pain)
  • Paraneoplastic: hypoglycaemia, erythrocytosis, hypercalcaemia

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Liver metastasesMultiple lesions, known primary cancerCT, liver biopsy
CholangiocarcinomaObstructive jaundice, intrahepatic massCT, MRCP, CA 19-9, biopsy
Focal nodular hyperplasiaYoung women, central scar, no cirrhosisMRI (Primovist)
Hepatic adenomaYoung women, OCP use, risk of haemorrhageMRI
HaemangiomaCommon, incidental, typical enhancement patternUSS, MRI
Regenerative/dysplastic noduleIn cirrhosis, no typical arterial enhancementMRI (Primovist)

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Abdominal examination (hepatomegaly, ascites, splenomegaly)
  • Signs of chronic liver disease (spider naevi, palmar erythema, gynaecomastia)

Bloods

  • AFP: screening and monitoring marker; >400 ng/mL highly suggestive
  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs, coagulation (INR)
  • Hepatitis serology: HBsAg, anti-HCV, HBV DNA, HCV RNA
  • Child-Pugh score and MELD score (assess liver function/transplant eligibility)

Imaging

  • Surveillance: 6-monthly USS ± AFP
  • Diagnostic: CT or MRI with contrast (arterial phase hyperenhancement + portal venous/delayed phase washout = diagnostic of HCC in cirrhotic liver - LI-RADS classification)
    • MRI with Primovist (hepatocyte-specific contrast): superior for small lesions and differentiation from dysplastic nodules
  • CT chest: staging (lung metastases)
  • Bone scan: if suspected bone metastases

Special Tests

  • Biopsy: NOT routinely required if typical imaging features in cirrhotic liver (risk of seeding 2-5%)
    • Required if: atypical imaging, non-cirrhotic liver, or diagnosis uncertain
  • Child-Pugh score: guides treatment eligibility
  • BCLC staging: integrates tumour stage, liver function, and performance status

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • MDT discussion mandatory (hepatologist, HPB surgeon, radiologist, oncologist, transplant team)
  • Alcohol cessation
  • Antiviral therapy for HBV/HCV (reduces recurrence risk)
  • Nutritional support

Pharmacological

  • Advanced HCC (BCLC C) - first-line: atezolizumab 1,200mg + bevacizumab 15mg/kg IV every 3 weeks (IMbrave150 trial)
    • Contraindication to bevacizumab: durvalumab + tremelimumab (HIMALAYA trial)
  • Second-line: sorafenib 400mg BD or lenvatinib 8-12mg OD
  • Third-line: regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab (if AFP ≥400)

Surgical/Interventional

  • BCLC 0-A (very early/early):
    • Surgical resection: for single HCC in non-cirrhotic liver or compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A)
    • Liver transplantation: within Milan criteria (single ≤5cm or up to 3 lesions each ≤3cm, no vascular invasion, no extrahepatic disease); curative for both cancer and cirrhosis
    • Ablation (RFA, microwave): for tumours <3cm, especially if not surgical candidates
  • BCLC B (intermediate):
    • Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE): delivers chemotherapy directly + embolic agent into tumour arterial supply
  • BCLC D (end-stage): best supportive care/palliative

Referral Criteria

  • All HCC: hepato-pancreato-biliary/liver cancer MDT
  • Within Milan criteria: transplant assessment
  • Cirrhosis surveillance: 6-monthly in hepatology/gastroenterology clinic

Prognosis

  • BCLC 0 (very early): 5-year survival >70% with resection or ablation
  • BCLC A (early): 5-year survival 50-70% (transplant achieves best outcomes)
  • BCLC B (intermediate): median survival 20-26 months with TACE
  • BCLC C (advanced): median survival 12-19 months with atezolizumab + bevacizumab
  • BCLC D (end-stage): median survival 3 months
  • Overall 5-year survival: approximately 15%
  • Liver transplant within Milan criteria: 5-year survival >70%; recurrence rate <15%
  • Post-resection recurrence: 50-70% at 5 years (new tumours and intrahepatic metastases)

Other Relevant Information

BCLC Staging and Treatment

StageCriteriaTreatmentMedian Survival
0 (Very early)Single <2cm, PS 0, Child-Pugh AResection/ablation>5 years
A (Early)Single or up to 3 (each ≤3cm), PS 0, CP A-BResection/transplant/ablation3-5 years
B (Intermediate)Multinodular, PS 0, CP A-BTACE~2 years
C (Advanced)Vascular invasion/extrahepatic, PS 1-2Systemic therapy~1-1.5 years
D (End-stage)CP C, PS 3-4Best supportive care~3 months

Milan Criteria for Liver Transplantation

CriterionRequirement
Single tumour≤5cm
Multiple tumoursUp to 3 lesions, each ≤3cm
No vascular invasion
No extrahepatic disease

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Cancer Pain Management

Cancer pain affects approximately 70-80% of patients with advanced disease, requiring a systematic approach using the WHO analgesic ladder, with strong opioids being the mainstay for moderate-severe pain.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Cancer pain affects approximately 70-80% of patients with advanced disease
WHO analgesic ladder
Step 1 (non-opioid: paracetamol/NSAIDs)
Step 2 (weak opioid: codeine)
Step 3 (strong opioid: morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl)
  • Oral morphine is the first-line strong opioid: start 5-10mg IR morphine every 4 hours (or 20-30mg MR BD in opioid-naive patients)
  • Breakthrough dose: 1/6th of the total 24-hour morphine dose, given as immediate-release preparation PRN
  • Opioid side effects: constipation (prescribe laxatives prophylactically), nausea (usually transient; metoclopramide/haloperidol), drowsiness, respiratory depression (rare with appropriate dosing)
  • Neuropathic pain: add amitriptyline 10-75mg ON or gabapentin 300-1,800mg daily (or pregabalin 75-300mg BD)
  • Bone pain: NSAIDs + strong opioid + palliative RT (8Gy single fraction); consider bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid 4mg monthly) or denosumab
  • NICE NG193: strong opioids should be titrated to effect with regular assessment; opioid rotation if side effects intolerable

Overview

Key Facts

Effective cancer pain management requires regular assessment, appropriate prescribing, and addressing the physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions of pain (total pain concept - Cicely Saunders).

Epidemiology

  • Pain affects 50% of patients at diagnosis and 70-80% with advanced disease
  • Approximately 30% of cancer patients have pain that is difficult to control
  • Undertreatment of cancer pain remains a significant problem

Aetiology

  • Cancer-related (60-70%): tumour invasion of bone, nerve, viscera, soft tissue
  • Treatment-related (20%): post-surgical, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, radiation fibrosis
  • Concurrent non-cancer pain (10-20%): musculoskeletal, neuropathic

Pathophysiology

  • Nociceptive pain: somatic (well-localised, aching) or visceral (poorly localised, cramping, referred)
  • Neuropathic pain: nerve compression or invasion; burning, shooting, tingling
Bone pain
tumour stimulates osteoclasts
bone destruction
nociceptor activation; prostaglandin-mediated
  • Central sensitisation: chronic pain leads to neuroplastic changes in the spinal cord and brain

Clinical Presentation

Pain Assessment

  • Location, character, severity (0-10 numerical rating scale)
  • Temporal pattern (constant, intermittent, breakthrough)
  • Aggravating and relieving factors
  • Impact on function and quality of life
  • Current analgesic use and effectiveness
  • Side effects of current treatment

Pain Types

  • Somatic: well-localised, aching, worsened by movement (bone metastases)
  • Visceral: diffuse, cramping, poorly localised (liver capsule stretch, bowel obstruction)
  • Neuropathic: burning, shooting, electric shock-like (nerve compression, chemotherapy-induced)
  • Breakthrough pain: transient flares of pain on background of controlled baseline pain

Red Flags

  • New back pain with neurological signs (spinal cord compression)
  • Severe uncontrolled pain despite escalating opioids (consider nerve block, radiotherapy)
  • Signs of opioid toxicity: myoclonus, confusion, hallucinations, pinpoint pupils
  • Bone pain with risk of pathological fracture
  • Pain crisis (severe uncontrolled pain requiring emergency management)

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Tumour progressionWorsening pain at known disease sitesRestaging imaging
Pathological fractureSudden onset bone pain, loss of functionX-ray, CT/MRI
Spinal cord compressionBack pain, weakness, sensory levelMRI whole spine
Opioid-induced hyperalgesiaParadoxical increased pain with opioid escalationClinical assessment
Neuropathic pain componentBurning, shooting, allodyniaClinical, nerve conduction if needed
Non-cancer painCoexisting musculoskeletal, headacheClinical assessment

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Pain assessment tool (numerical rating scale, Brief Pain Inventory)
  • Neurological examination if neuropathic pain suspected
  • Examination of pain site

Bloods

  • U&Es (renal function for drug dosing and opioid metabolite accumulation)
  • LFTs (hepatic metabolism of opioids)
  • Calcium (hypercalcaemia as cause of pain)

Imaging

  • Targeted imaging of pain site (X-ray, CT, MRI)
  • Bone scan or PET-CT for bone metastases
  • MRI spine if cord compression suspected

Special Tests

  • Quantitative sensory testing (research setting)
  • Nerve conduction studies (chemotherapy-induced neuropathy)
  • Psychological assessment (pain catastrophising, depression)

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Patient education about pain management
  • Psychological support (CBT, relaxation techniques, mindfulness)
  • Physiotherapy and occupational therapy
  • TENS (adjunct for localised pain)
  • Complementary therapies (massage, acupuncture - limited evidence)

Pharmacological

  • Step 1 (mild pain): paracetamol 1g QDS ± NSAID (ibuprofen 400mg TDS or naproxen 250-500mg BD)
  • Step 2 (moderate pain): codeine 30-60mg QDS or tramadol 50-100mg QDS (consider going directly to Step 3)
  • Step 3 (severe pain):
    • Oral morphine: start 5-10mg IR (Oramorph) 4-hourly; titrate by 30-50% every 24-48 hours
    • Once stable: convert to modified-release (MST Continus) BD with IR morphine for breakthrough (1/6th of 24h dose)
    • Oxycodone: alternative if morphine poorly tolerated (start 5mg IR 4-6 hourly or 10mg MR BD)
    • Fentanyl patch: 12-25mcg/h every 72 hours (for stable pain in patients unable to take oral medication)
    • Buprenorphine patch: 5-70mcg/h every 7 days
  • Adjuvant analgesics:
    • Neuropathic: amitriptyline 10-75mg ON, gabapentin 300-1,800mg daily (titrated), pregabalin 75-300mg BD
    • Bone pain: NSAID + dexamethasone 4-8mg daily; bisphosphonates (zoledronic acid 4mg IV monthly)
    • Visceral colic: hyoscine butylbromide 20mg QDS
    • Muscle spasm: baclofen 5-20mg TDS, diazepam 2-5mg TDS
  • Always co-prescribe laxatives with opioids: senna 15mg ON + docusate 100mg BD or macrogol
  • Antiemetics with opioid initiation: metoclopramide 10mg TDS or haloperidol 1.5mg ON (usually transient)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Palliative radiotherapy: bone metastases (8Gy single fraction - 60-80% pain response)
  • Nerve blocks: coeliac plexus block (pancreatic cancer), paravertebral block
  • Intrathecal drug delivery: for refractory pain (intrathecal morphine, bupivacaine, ziconotide)
  • Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty: painful vertebral fractures
  • Surgical stabilisation: prophylactic fixation for impending fractures

Referral Criteria

  • Pain not controlled with standard analgesics: palliative care/pain specialist referral
  • Neuropathic pain not responding to first-line agents: specialist input
  • Consideration of interventional procedures: pain team referral
  • Psychological distress associated with pain: psychology/psychiatry referral

Prognosis

  • Adequate pain control achievable in >80% of cancer patients with WHO ladder approach
  • 10-20% have refractory pain requiring specialist intervention
  • Palliative RT for bone pain: response in 60-80%, complete response in 30%
  • Neuropathic pain: often more difficult to treat; combination therapy usually needed
  • Pain management significantly impacts quality of life, function, and survival

Other Relevant Information

WHO Analgesic Ladder

StepPain SeverityAgents
1MildParacetamol ± NSAID
2ModerateWeak opioid (codeine/tramadol) ± Step 1
3SevereStrong opioid (morphine/oxycodone/fentanyl) ± Step 1 ± adjuvants

Opioid Equianalgesic Doses (Approximate)

OpioidOral Dose Equivalent to 10mg Oral Morphine
Codeine60-100mg
Tramadol100mg
Oxycodone5mg (oral)
Hydromorphone2mg (oral)
Fentanyl patch12mcg/h (for 60mg/24h oral morphine)
Buprenorphine patch10mcg/h (for ~24mg/24h oral morphine)

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Palliative Chemotherapy

Palliative chemotherapy aims to improve quality of life, control symptoms, and extend survival in patients with incurable cancer, requiring careful balance of benefit against treatment toxicity.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Palliative chemotherapy aims to improve quality of life and extend survival; it is not curative
  • Patient performance status (ECOG 0-2) is the most important factor determining suitability for palliative chemo
  • Median survival benefit varies widely: weeks to months depending on cancer type and regimen
  • Quality of life assessment should be integral to treatment decisions; validated tools include EORTC QLQ-C30
  • Treatment breaks/holidays are appropriate and increasingly recognised as valuable for patients
  • Shared decision-making is essential: patients must understand treatment intent, expected benefits, and side effects
  • NICE recommends against chemotherapy in patients with ECOG PS ≥3 (limited benefit, high toxicity risk)
  • Advance care planning should be discussed alongside palliative chemotherapy decisions

Overview

Key Facts

Palliative chemotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer care but requires careful patient selection and honest communication about goals and limitations.

Epidemiology

  • Approximately 50% of chemotherapy given in the UK is with palliative intent
  • Treatment-related mortality from palliative chemo: approximately 2-3%
  • SACT 30-day mortality is a national quality indicator (target <8%)

Aetiology

Palliative chemotherapy is indicated for incurable/metastatic cancers where treatment may improve symptoms and extend life.

Pathophysiology

  • Same mechanisms as curative chemotherapy (DNA damage, cell cycle disruption)
  • Lower dose intensities and less aggressive regimens may be used to balance efficacy and toxicity
  • Treatment breaks allow recovery and maintain quality of life
  • Immunotherapy and targeted therapies increasingly used in the palliative setting with potentially fewer side effects than cytotoxic chemotherapy

Clinical Presentation

Indications for Palliative Chemotherapy

  • Symptom control (e.g. pain from tumour, dyspnoea, bleeding)
  • Disease control (slow progression, prevent complications)
  • Survival extension
  • Patient preference (desire to "do something")

Assessment Before Treatment

  • Performance status (ECOG 0-2 generally required)
  • Organ function (renal, hepatic, cardiac, bone marrow)
  • Nutritional status
  • Patient understanding and expectations
  • Goals of care discussion

Red Flags Indicating Treatment May Not Be Appropriate

  • ECOG PS ≥3
  • Severe organ dysfunction
  • Recent acute illness or infection
  • Patient ambivalence or lack of understanding about palliative intent
  • Rapidly deteriorating condition
  • Less than 3 months predicted survival (for most regimens)

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
Treatment toxicitySide effects mimicking disease progressionClinical assessment, bloods
Disease progressionRising markers, new symptoms, imaging progressionRestaging CT/PET
Concurrent illnessInfection, PE, cardiac eventAppropriate investigations
Depression/fatigueMay mimic poor performance statusPsychological assessment

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Performance status assessment (ECOG/Karnofsky)
  • Weight, BMI, nutritional assessment
  • Quality of life assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Bloods

  • FBC, U&Es, LFTs (organ function; assess before each cycle)
  • GFR (for dose calculations, especially platinum agents)
  • Tumour markers (monitoring response)
  • Albumin (nutritional/prognostic marker)

Imaging

  • Restaging CT typically every 3-4 cycles (RECIST criteria)
  • Response: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD)

Special Tests

  • Quality of life questionnaires
  • Holistic needs assessment
  • DPYD testing before fluoropyrimidines
  • Echocardiography if using cardiotoxic agents

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Shared decision-making: ensure patient understands palliative intent
  • Goals of care discussions (what matters most to the patient)
  • Advance care planning: discuss alongside treatment decisions
  • Treatment breaks: acceptable and may improve quality of life without worsening outcomes
  • Nutritional support
  • Psychological support
  • Palliative care involvement (not just at end of life)

Pharmacological

  • Regimen selection based on: cancer type, molecular profile, performance status, comorbidities, patient preference
  • Common palliative regimens: single-agent or reduced-intensity combinations
  • Supportive care: antiemetics, G-CSF if indicated, growth factors
  • Dose modifications based on toxicity
  • Treatment duration: typically continued until progression or intolerable toxicity

Surgical/Interventional

  • Not specifically related to palliative chemotherapy
  • Palliative procedures may be used alongside (stenting, drainage, RT)

Referral Criteria

  • All patients receiving palliative chemotherapy: regular oncology review
  • Deteriorating performance status: reassess treatment appropriateness
  • Palliative care referral: concurrent with palliative chemotherapy (early referral improves outcomes - Temel 2010 NEJM)
  • Treatment toxicity: acute oncology assessment

Prognosis

  • Varies enormously by cancer type and regimen:
    • Metastatic CRC (FOLFOX + biological): median OS 25-30 months
    • Metastatic NSCLC (immunotherapy): median OS 15-25 months
    • Metastatic pancreatic (mFOLFIRINOX): median OS 11 months
  • Benefit must be weighed against toxicity for each individual
  • SACT 30-day mortality: approximately 3-8% depending on regimen
  • Concurrent palliative care improves quality of life and may extend survival (Temel et al. 2010)
  • Many patients overestimate the survival benefit of palliative chemotherapy

Other Relevant Information

ECOG Performance Status and Treatment Suitability

ECOGDescriptionPalliative Chemo Suitability
0Fully activeYes
1Restricted strenuous activityYes
2Ambulatory, self-caring, up >50%Consider (reduced intensity)
3Limited self-care, >50% in bed/chairGenerally not appropriate
4Completely disabledNot appropriate

SACT 30-Day Mortality (NHS England Quality Indicator)

MetricTarget
30-day mortality after curative chemo<1%
30-day mortality after palliative chemo<8%
Chemotherapy in last 30 days of lifeMinimise (quality indicator)

NICE Guidelines / CKS

Cancer Screening Programmes

The NHS operates three national cancer screening programmes (breast, cervical, and bowel), with the aim of detecting cancer or pre-cancerous changes early to reduce mortality.

MRCP Part 1 · MRCP Part 2 · PLAB 1 · UKMLA · MRCGP AKT · MSRA

Key Facts

  • Three NHS cancer screening programmes: breast (mammography), cervical (HPV testing), bowel (FIT)
  • Breast screening: mammography every 3 years for women aged 50-70 (extending to 47-73); reduces mortality by 20%
  • Cervical screening: HPV primary testing for women aged 25-64 (every 3 years for 25-49; every 5 years for 50-64)
  • Bowel cancer screening: FIT (faecal immunochemical test) every 2 years for adults aged 50-74 (previously 60-74; expanding)
  • Lung cancer screening: targeted LDCT screening for high-risk individuals aged 55-74 (NHS Lung Health Check programme rolling out)
  • Wilson and Jungner criteria: define the principles for a good screening programme (important, treatable, detectable pre-clinical phase, acceptable test, cost-effective)
  • Lead time bias, length time bias, and overdiagnosis are important concepts in understanding screening limitations
  • Informed choice: patients must understand benefits, risks (false positives, overdiagnosis, anxiety), and limitations of screening

Overview

Key Facts

Screening aims to detect cancer or pre-cancer at an early stage when treatment is more effective. Screening programmes must demonstrate net benefit at a population level.

Epidemiology

  • Breast screening prevents approximately 1,300 deaths per year in England
  • Cervical screening prevents approximately 5,000 cancers and 5,000 deaths per year
  • Bowel cancer screening reduces CRC mortality by approximately 15-20%
  • Overall screening uptake in England: breast ~71%, cervical ~72%, bowel ~65%

Aetiology

Screening programmes target cancers with:

  • High incidence and mortality
  • Recognisable pre-clinical phase
  • Effective treatment for early-stage disease
  • An acceptable and feasible test

Pathophysiology

  • Breast: mammography detects small cancers and DCIS before clinical presentation
  • Cervical: HPV testing detects persistent HPV infection; cytology triage identifies CIN
  • Bowel: FIT detects haemoglobin in stool from polyps or cancers
  • Lung: low-dose CT detects early-stage lung cancer in high-risk smokers/ex-smokers

Clinical Presentation

Screening Pathways

Breast
invitation letter
mammography at screening unit
results within 2 weeks
recall for further assessment if abnormal (5% recall rate)
Cervical
invitation letter
sample by practice nurse/GP
HPV test
cytology triage if HPV+
colposcopy if abnormal
Bowel
FIT kit posted home
collect stool sample
return by post
results within 2 weeks
colonoscopy if positive (≥10mcg Hb/g faeces)

Abnormal Results Management

  • Each programme has defined pathways for investigation and treatment
  • Patient support and counselling are integral

Red Flags

  • Symptoms between screening rounds must be investigated promptly ("interval cancers")
  • A normal screening result does not exclude cancer
  • Patients with symptoms should not wait for scheduled screening

Differential Diagnosis

DiagnosisKey FeaturesInvestigation
True positive screenConfirmed cancer or pre-cancerDiagnostic investigation
False positive screenAbnormal screening test, no cancer foundFurther investigation (e.g. biopsy)
Interval cancerCancer presenting between screensInvestigate as symptomatic
OverdiagnosisCancer detected that would never have caused symptomsImpossible to determine individually

Diagnosis / Investigation

Bedside

  • Screening test as per programme (mammogram, cervical sample, FIT)

Bloods

  • Not part of current UK screening programmes
  • PSA screening: not recommended as a population programme (debate ongoing)

Imaging

  • Mammography: 2-view (CC + MLO) digital mammography
  • LDCT: for lung cancer screening (high-risk populations)

Special Tests

  • FIT: quantitative measurement of haemoglobin in faeces; threshold ≥10mcg Hb/g for colonoscopy referral
  • HPV testing: detects high-risk HPV DNA from cervical sample
  • Colonoscopy: diagnostic investigation after positive FIT
  • Colposcopy: diagnostic investigation after abnormal cervical screening

Management

Non-pharmacological

  • Public health campaigns to improve uptake
  • Address barriers: language, accessibility, anxiety, cultural factors
  • Informed consent: ensure understanding of benefits and harms
  • Quality assurance programmes for each screening service

Pharmacological

  • Not directly part of screening
  • HPV vaccination: primary prevention complements cervical screening
  • Chemoprevention: aspirin for CRC prevention (not yet part of screening programme)

Surgical/Interventional

  • Treatment of screen-detected abnormalities as per cancer-specific guidelines
  • Polypectomy at colonoscopy for bowel adenomas
  • LLETZ for high-grade CIN
  • Surgery/chemotherapy for screen-detected cancers

Referral Criteria

  • Abnormal screening results: defined referral pathways within each programme
  • Symptomatic patients: do not delay for screening; investigate via 2-week wait pathway
  • High-risk individuals: may qualify for enhanced/earlier screening (e.g. breast MRI for BRCA carriers)

Prognosis

  • Breast screening: reduces breast cancer mortality by ~20% in screened population
  • Cervical screening: prevents ~70% of cervical cancer deaths
  • Bowel screening: reduces CRC mortality by ~15-20%
  • Lung cancer screening (NELSON trial): 24% reduction in lung cancer mortality with LDCT
  • Overdiagnosis rates: breast screening ~11-19%; cervical CIN1 ~60% regress; bowel polyps - not all progress
  • Screen-detected cancers generally have better stage distribution and outcomes than symptomatic cancers

Other Relevant Information

NHS Cancer Screening Programmes Summary

ProgrammeTestAge RangeFrequencyUptake
BreastMammography50-70 (extending 47-73)3 years~71%
CervicalHPV primary test25-643 years (25-49); 5 years (50-64)~72%
BowelFIT50-74 (expanding)2 years~65%
Lung (rolling out)LDCT55-74 (high-risk)Annual (pilot)N/A

Wilson and Jungner Screening Criteria

Criterion
Important health problem
Accepted treatment for recognised disease
Facilities for diagnosis and treatment available
Recognisable latent or early symptomatic stage
Suitable test or examination
Test acceptable to the population
Natural history understood
Agreed policy on whom to treat
Cost-effective
Screening is a continuous process

NICE Guidelines / CKS